Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative Intellectual Property
Advertisements

Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects STCU/NATO Workshop From Science to Business Kiev, Ukraine October 11, 2006 Judson R. Hightower.
Intellectual Property HEY Trusts New IP Policy and Role of Medipex Will it enable me to turn this…. into.
Exercise Science The Legal & Professional Responsibilities of Personal Trainers.
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Invention Disclosures Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual.
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Intellectual Property Considerations in Joint Development Agreements Presented by H. Eric Fisher, Ph.D. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC Continuing.
Fosterswift.com PROTECTING AGAINST THE UNKNOWN : How to Successfully Review IT Contracts to Increase Your Rights and Avoid Potential Liability Samuel Frederick.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OGADA T. and MBAYAKI A. CAMPUS BASED RESEARCH WORKSHOPS TOWN CAMPUS 3 May 2006.
What is Commercialization of IP Josiah Hernandez.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
Eric J. Pritchard One Liberty Place, 46 th Floor 1650 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (215)
A Basic Primer on Intellectual Property Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Industry Relations Associate Vice Chancellor.
Tips for Managing Intellectual Property Camille L. Urban BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone: Facsimile:
2011 Industry Sponsored Research Workshop INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Michael Jaremchuk Associate Director CVIP Phone: FAX:
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
+ Faculty Orientation UAMS BioVentures September 23, 2015 Christopher A. Fasel Associate Director of Licensing Patent Attorney UAMS BioVentures.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 3rd October 2013 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2013.
Reasonable is in Eye of the Beholder Vendor, Customer, & Litigator Perspectives on Software License Provisions Aaron Brodsky Greg Leibold Peter Gergely.
Jay A. Lefton Senior Partner Common Mistakes That Cause Turmoil in Licensing, Financing and M&A Transactions Common.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
AOF Entrepreneurship Unit 3, Lesson 10 Intellectual Property Protections Copyright © 2009–2012 National Academy Foundation. All rights reserved.
PTGC Part Time General Counsel Prepared for:. The Concept Having a high caliber, senior level “legal insider” on location part-time, compared to the outside.
Intellectual Property Dr Laura Rush Business Development Manager Research Enterprise Services copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
General Guidelines for Institutional IP Policies: What Should be There Franco G. Teves, Ph.D., Dipl. PAM Director of Research MSU-IIT.
1 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel March 2012 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel Patenting Biotech: Strategies and Tips.
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
1 The Political, Legal, and Regulatory Environments of Global Marketing Global Marketing Chapter 5.
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
UNECE April 2009 Commercialization of IPR A Business Perspective Jason Bucha, Compliance Counsel April 2, 2009.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
1 28 June 2006 © ip21 Limited 2006 Intellectual Property Issues for the Consultant Matthew Dixon, Chartered Patent Attorney, ip21 Limited
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Protecting your Managed Services Practice: Are you at Risk?
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
1 Intellectual Property Rights David Worrall – Legal Department.
Technology Transfer Office
So you’ve invented something?
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
Universities and the Commercial World
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Protecting and exploiting research results at Newcastle University Geraint Lewis – Business Development Manager, Research and Enterprise Services
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
Causes of disputes Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Collaboration - WIPO Ian Harvey Chairman, Intellectual Property Institute.
U.S. Army Technology Transfer Mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007

University Innovations  generating new knowledge written works, science  knowledge = intellectual property

University Innovations = IP  written works = copyright manuscripts, technical drawings, computer code  science = patents, trade secret circuits, software, mechanical devices, drugs, diagnostics

Intellectual Property  copyright is automatic  trade secret protection lasts as long as the secret  patents – have to register (expensive) most university inventions go into public domain – no IP

Inventions Policy  encourage capture of small portion of university IP for commercialization  public benefit  set out support structure to help scientists commercialize with university (mandatory or optional)

Rulebook  who is covered - all staff, students?  require disclosure of IP to institution  assert ownership of institution; option for return of rights to inventor  process for commercialization - licensee or spin-of company  distribution of revenue - fair sharing encourages commercialization

If No Inventions Policy…  "Common law" provides general principles employees own their inventions unless hired to invent independent contractors – own their inventions  Best to have policy and require new workers to agree to policy at time of hiring

Scope of Policy is Variable  all inventions made in the course of employment  broader add-on: all inventions made using institution resources

Policy Does Not Cover All Research  contracts with research sponsors may alter inventions policy  consulting work for third parties often excluded  inventors and institutions can make own agreement

Success Story  Amorfix (Toronto)  diagnostics for prion diseases (mad cow, CJD), Alzheimer’s, ALS  technology developed at university, hospital  Amorfix has partnerships with industry (Biogen), universities, hospital

Mosaic of IP – Cooperative Relationship  hybrid – multiple institutions and inventors  UofT – institution owns, but inventor can compel reassignment  UHN – institution owns

Ownership  UofT inventors take reassignment of ownership and transfer ownership to Amorfix  UHN retains ownership of its UHN inventor rights – license to Amorfix

Ingredients for Success Under Inventions Policy  early identification of IP at UofT, UHN  no public disclosure before patenting  assess inventorship and patentability  file patent application  coordinate timing of publications to follow patent application filing  assign/license ownership promptly  research grants, industrial partners

Ingredients for Success Under Inventions Policy  good relationship - ongoing communication with licensor (UHN) to show that Amorfix is in compliance with license terms and making progress in commercialization  new inventions, improvements made outside Amorfix are disclosed to institutions and then Amorfix

Hot Spots to Beware  inventor commercializes and does not disclose to institution  commercialize without proper determination of inventorship  commercialize without filing quality patent application  commercialize without permissions and freedom to operate analysis

Hot Spots  expenses – government fees, attorney fees, consultants  third party liability  inventor does not follow through on research contract obligations  dispute resolution/termination

Hot Spots – Future Research and Collaboration  inventor, licensee or spin off company shelving technology or not paying money  third party getting overly-broad IP rights under research agreement  overbearing confidentiality and non-use clauses  clear obligations for when licensors/spin-off companies have to pay royalty  clear rights to terminate upon default or missed milestones

Applying Legal Aspects of Inventions Policy More Effectively  educate researchers on policy, rights  identify and protect IP properly  move commercialization, IP and agreements along efficiently and boldly  terminate - don’t throw good money after bad  can't be proactive if have too many projects

Applying Legal Aspects of Inventions Policy More Effectively  Keep moving up the learning curve on IP and legal aspects – call in support when necessary  Hope for the best, but also think about and prepare for the worst when making agreements to commercialize