RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Psychological biases In Negotiation. Anchoring and adjustment In the face of uncertainty, people fix on the first piece of information and subconsciously.
Advertisements

The Behavioral Side of Pricing MKT 750 Dr. West. Agenda Issues associated with product pricing Defining terms Capturing value Behavioral pricing Discuss.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons
Choice under Uncertainty. Introduction Many choices made by consumers take place under conditions of uncertainty Therefore involves an element of risk.
Chapter 12 Uncertainty Consider two lotteries L 1 : 500,000 (1) L 1 ’: 2,500,000 (0.1), 500,000 (0.89), 0 (0.01) Which one would you choose? Another two.
The imperfect brain: Rationality and the limits of knowledge Quentin Huys Wellcome Trust Neuroimaging Centre Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit Medical.
An Exploration of Decision Processes in an Evolutionary Perspective: the Case of the Framing Effect.
Samantha Nicholas & Khrys Nugent Hanover College
1 Intuitive Irrationality: Reasons for Unreason. 2 Epistemology Branch of philosophy focused on how people acquire knowledge about the world Descriptive.
Thinking: Concept Formation Concept formation: identifying commonalities across stimuli that unite them into a common category Rule learning: identifying.
1 MKT201 – Buyer Behavior Chapter 9&11 Supplementary Examples.
The Disordered Brain what happens when decision making goes wrong? Neil Harrison University of Sussex Formerly: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience & Wellcome.
Survey.
Elements of Decision Problems
CHAPTER 14 Utility Axioms Paradoxes & Implications.
Three-way choice Option Price Option Value Real Options Calls & Puts Endogenous/Exogenous Option Price Option Value Real Options Calls & Puts Endogenous/Exogenous.
Prospect Theory, Framing and Behavioral Traps Yuval Shahar M.D., Ph.D. Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems.
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.
Reviewing Prospect Theory According to RCT options should be evaluated in terms of utilities and probabilities. Prospect Theory generalizes about the quantities.
Running Experiments with Amazon Mechanical-Turk Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler, Jesse Chandler Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 5, August 2010.
Mathematical Expectation. A friend offers you the chance to play the following game: You bet $2 and roll a die. If you roll a 6 you win $5 plus your bet.
BEE3049 Behaviour, Decisions and Markets Miguel A. Fonseca.
Behavioral Economics Chapter 30. What Is Behavioral Economics? The study of choices actually made by economic decision makers in an effort to assess the.
Or Why We’re Not Really As Rational As We’d Like to Believe.
Decision-making II choosing between gambles neural basis of decision-making.
Lecture 4 PPE 110. In most situations when people make choices, the outcomes are random. For example, if you buy a stock, it may go up or down. If you.
Do we always make the best possible decisions?
Decision. Decision Summary Descriptive, normative, prescriptive Expected Utility: normative theory of decision Psychology of decision Prospect theory:
The Psychology of Security ….a work in progress Bruce Schneier DIMACS Workshop on Information Security Economics Rutgers University 18 January 2007.
I’m not overweight It just needs redistribution Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
BU1004 Week 3 expected values and decision trees.
Decision. Decision Summary Search for alternatives Descriptive, normative, prescriptive Expected Utility: normative theory of decision Psychology of decision.
Decision-making I choosing between gambles neural basis of decision-making.
Choice. There’s never just one reinforcer Hmm…what to do?
Today’s Topic Do you believe in free will? Why or why not?
Review of Related Literature Different decision-making: – Budget decisions of managers – Irrationality of continuing the risk of losing a prospect – Decision-making.
Consumer Judgment and Decision Making Professor Charles Hofacker Spring 2005.
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Thinking and Decision Making
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects
Framing Effects From Chapter 34 ‘Frame and Reality’ of Thinking Fast and Slow, by D. Kahneman.
Prospect Theory. 23A i 23B, reference point 23A) Your country is plagued with an outbreak of an exotic Asian disease, which may kill 600 people. You.
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, 1979.
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects.
Human Cognitive Processes: psyc 345 Ch. 13 Reasoning and Decision Making Takashi Yamauchi © Takashi Yamauchi (Dept. of Psychology, Texas A&M University)
Reframe the problem or the solution
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
Psychology 485 March 23,  Intro & Definitions Why learn about probabilities and risk?  What is learned? Expected Utility Prospect Theory Scalar.
PSY 323 – Cognition Chapter 13: Judgment, Decisions & Reasoning.
Amity School Of Business Operations Research OPERATIONS RESEARCH.
Chapter Seventeen Uncertainty. © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Topics  Degree of Risk.  Decision Making Under Uncertainty.
Introduction to Prospect Theory Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making Instructor: John Miyamoto 11/17/2015: Lecture 08-2 Note: This Powerpoint presentation.
Chapter 8 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 DECISION MAKING Suppose your patient (from the Brazilian rainforest) has tested positive for a rare but serious disease. Treatment exists but is risky.
Expected Value, Expected Utility & the Allais and Ellsberg Paradoxes
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
1 BAMS 517 – 2011 Decision Analysis -IV Utility Failures and Prospect Theory Martin L. Puterman UBC Sauder School of Business Winter Term
QUESTION to answer You are worried about a possible disease form central or SE ASIA affecting 600 people Decide between to government programs.
Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Preferences Part I Feb 16 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Psych 335 Decision Making. Issues How do we decide between a number of alternatives? Big issues Day-to-day issues Eliminating all aspects Decision trees.
OPERATIONS RESEARCH.
Preference Assessment 1 Measuring Utilities Directly
Behavioral Economics A branch of economics that studies the psychology of decision-making to explain consumer behavior.
Effects of Foreign Language on Decision Making
DIS 280 Social Science Research Methodology: Problem Framing
Choices, Values and Frames
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Presentation transcript:

RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and 15th 2002

January 14th 9 am to 2 pm Uncertainty and Perception Risk implies an Uncertainty An uncertain outcome implies a risk Public Perception is all important in influencing decisions. A Decision Maker ignores it at his peril

Risk Changes with Time So does Uncertainty

Two main types of Uncertainty Systematic Uncertainty or Uncertainty of fact. (Does it, or will it, ever happen to anyone ?) Stochastic (will it happen to me?) Society is primarily concerned with only the first Individuals also are concerned about the second

Kahneman got the 2002 Nobel prize in Economics. Why?

Kahneman and Tversky Problem 1 [N = 152]: Imagine that the U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. Assume that the exact scientific estimate of the consequences of the programs are as follows: If Program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved. If Program B is adopted, there is 1/3 probability that 600 people will be saved, and 2/3 probability that no people will be saved. Which of the two programs would you favor?

Problem 2 [N = 155] If Program C is adopted 400 people will die. If Program D is adopted there is 1/3 probability that nobody will die, and 2/3 probability that 600 people will die. Which of the two programs would you favor?

Problem 3 [N = 150] Imagine that you face the following pair of concurrent decisions. First examine both decisions, then indicate the options you prefer. Decision (i) Choose between: A.a sure gain of $240 B.25% chance to gain $1000, and 75% chance to gain nothing Decision (ii) Choose between: C.a sure loss of $750 D.75% chance to lose $1000, and 25% chance to lose nothing

Problem 4 [N = 86] Choose between: A & D.25% chance to win $240, and 75% chance to lose $760 B & C.25% chance to win $250, and 75% chance to lose $750

Problem 5 [N = 77] Which of the following options do you prefer? A.a sure win of $30 B.80% chance to win $45

Problem 6 [N = 85] Consider the following two-stage game. In the first stage, there is a 75% chance to end the game without winning anything, and a 25% chance to move into the second stage. If you reach the second stage you have a choice between: C.a sure win of $30 D.80% chance to win $45 Your choice must be made before the game starts, i.e. before the outcome of the first stage is known. Please indicate the option you prefer.

Problem 7 [N = 81] Which of the following options do you prefer? E.25% chance to win $30 F.20% chance to win $45

Problem 8 [N = 183] Imagine that you have decided to see a play where admission is $10 per ticket. As you enter the theater you discover that you have lost a $10 bill. Would you still pay $10 for a ticket for the play? Yes No

Problem 9 [N = 200] Imagine that you have decided to see a play and paid the admission price of $10 per ticket. As you enter the theater you discover that you have lost the ticket. The seat was not marked and the ticket cannot be recovered. Would you pay $10 for another ticket? Yes No

Problem 10 Imagine that you are about to purchase a jacket for ($125) [$15], and a calculator for ($15) [$125]. The calculator salesman informs you that the calculator you wish to buy is on sale for ($10) [$120] at the other branch of the store located 20 minutes drive away. Would you make the trip to the other store?

Attributes of a Risk that influence perception PRIMARY Representativeness Anchoring Availability Voluntariness Trust SECONDARY Availability of Alternatives Necessity Immediacy Dread Rare yet Catastrophic Knowledge about Risk Familiarity Distribution of Risk Potential for misuse or Abuse

Risk Comparisons

We chlorinate drinking water for sanitation. Chlorine + organic matter produces chloroform - a carcinogen in animals The risk is more than one in a million Should we continue?

Public misconceptions Environmentally caused means caused by industry When 5 people on a street get cancer, it is not due to chance Radiation at any level is uniquely dangerous

Example of: Global Warming Lecture 2 at Kuwait University January 15th 2002

How do we encourage people to use less carbon? Carbon charge or tax?