Predicting toxicity for patients with advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate : an EORTC/ISG/AGITG randomized trial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.
Advertisements

Pre-operative Imatinib for metastatic, recurrent and locally advanced GISTs E. Efthimiou, S Mudan E. Efthimiou, S Mudan On behalf of the Sarcoma Group.
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Highlights of the Day II: SARCOMA “The not so Old and the New” Presented By Dennis Priebat at 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting.
Evaluation of Femur Fracture Risk in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Thigh Treated with Intensity- Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Michael R. Folkert, MD.
A pooled analysis of the final results of the two randomized phase II studies comparing Gemcitabine (G) vs Gemcitabine + Docetaxel (G+D) in patients (pts)
IMPACT OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN UTERINE SARCOMA (UTS): REVIEW OF 12 CLINICAL TRIALS FROM EORTC INVOLVING ADVANCED UTS COMPARED TO OTHER SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA (STS)
LMS-02 A phase II single-arm multicenter study of Trabectedin in combination with Doxorubicin as first-line treatment of metastatic and/or locally advanced.
1 Results of the Phase 3, placebo-controlled trial (SUCCEED) evaluating the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus as maintenance therapy in advanced sarcoma patients.
Abstract Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy First, Followed by Chemoradiation and Then Surgery, in the Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer A. Cercek, K.
CO-I KNTM/K i CzS M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute of Oncology Medical University of Warsaw; Warsaw, POLAND Medical University of Gdansk;
Surgical resection of metastatic GIST on imatinib delays recurrence and death: results of a cross- match comparison in the EORTC Intergroup study.
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
EORTC – ISG - AGITG Prognostic factors for initial and late resistance to Imatinib in patients with advanced GIST Martine Van Glabbeke, Jaap Verweij, Paolo.
Results of a Randomized Study of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) versus Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post- Polycythemia.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Vascular issues associated with bevacizumab Stuart M. Lichtman, MD, FACP 65+ Clinical Geriatric Program Associate Attending Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Kwo PY. NEJM 2014;371: CORAL-I  Design OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Open label Phase II years Chronic HCV infection, genotype 1 Liver transplantation.
Efficacy, Hematologic Effects and Dose of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients with Low Platelet Starting Counts ( x 10 9 /L): A Comparison to Patients.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
1 1 Using Marginal Structural Model to Estimate and Adjust for Causal Effect of Post- discontinuation Chemotherapy on Survival in Cancer Trials Y. Wang,
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Outcome of chemotherapy in synovial sarcoma (sys) patients (pts): review of 15 clinical trials from EORTCc involving advanced sys compared to other Soft.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
EARLY PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS AN ANALYSIS FROM A PHASE III RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL (EORTC 62961/ESHO) OF NEOADJUVANT.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
Tumor clock protein PER2 as a determinant of survival in patients (pts) receiving oxaliplatin-5-FU- leucovorin as 1st line chemotherapy for metastatic.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Raafat R. Abdel-Malek, MD, FRCR Ass. Prof Clinical Oncology Cairo University, Egypt Efficacy & Toxicity of Sunitinib in mRCC patients in Egypt.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Tolerability of fluoropyrimidines differs by region Daniel G. Haller on behalf of: Cassidy J, Clarke S, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E Hoff P, Rothenberg M,
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
ANCO 2006 ASH UPDATE MDS Joseph M. Tuscano, M.D. UC Davis Cancer Center.
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
1 LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Sequist LV et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27): Treatment-naïve Advanced NSCLC.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Joensuu H et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract LBA1.
Rossi A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8008.
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Fernando De Vita Oncologia Medica Seconda Università di Napoli
Clinical Considerations in Evidence-based Management of GIST
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Clinical Considerations in Evidence-based Management of GIST
Presentation transcript:

Predicting toxicity for patients with advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate : an EORTC/ISG/AGITG randomized trial M. Van Glabbeke, J. Verweij, P.G. Casali, J. Simes, A. Le Cesne, P. Reichardt, R. Issels, J.R. Judson, A.T. van Oosterom, J.-Y. Blay EORTC STBSG

Material Randomized phase III study comparing daily doses of imatinib (400 mg od vs 400 mg bid) for the treatment of patients with advanced GIST 946 patients randomized 942 patients started therapy 310 patients still under therapy Follow-up Median: 42 months (3.5 years) At 1, 2, 3 and 4 years: 99%, 90%, 81% and 4%

Methods Prognostic factors analyses End-points (binary) : occurrence of Grade 3-4 anemia, neutropenia Grade 2-4 edema, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, skin rash Investigated co-factors Imatinib dose Age, sex, PS, baseline laboratory parameters Time since GIST diagnosis, site of origin, lesion size Prior therapies Logistic univariate / multivariate regression models Univariate model: select variables if P < 0.05 Multivariate model: keep variable if P < 0.01

Cumulative incidence of toxicities (non hemato.grade 2+, hemato. grade 3+) Edema - Skin rash - Fatigue - Nausea - Diarrhea Anemia - Neutropenia 400 mg o.d.400 mg b.i.d.

Multivariate models : non hematological grade 2+ toxicities EdemaFatigueRashNauseaDiarrh. Dose Age Sex (F) Perform.status Identified GI origin++ Tumor size--- Prior chemo : P < 0.01, --- : P < 0.001, +++ : P < 0.001, ++++ : P <

Multivariate models : hematological grade 3+ toxicities AnemiaNeutropenia Dose++++ Initial hemoglobin level Initial neutrophils count : P < 0.01, ---- : P < , ++++ : P <

Interactive risk calculator / tools / imatinibtoxicity Interactive version Downloads (Excel) - For PC - For PDA

Interactive risk calculator for predicting imatinib toxicities in GIST patients

Validation Validation data set EORTC phase I-II trial of imatinib 91 patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma Daily doses: 400 mg, 600 mg, 800 mg, 1000 mg Patients classified in “risk group” according to probability of each toxicity estimated with the model 40% or 20% Comparison with the observed proportion of events Within the expected range for 10/13 risk groups (> 10 pts) Overlap with the 95% confidence interval in all groups Underestimation of edema & nausea (low risk groups) Underestimation in male patients ?

Conclusion (I) All toxicities are highly dose dependent, except neutropenia Anemia and neutropenia only depend on baseline hematological factors Risk of non hematological toxicity increase with age, poor PS and in female Confirmation of other series Other factors Prior chemotherapy (fatigue) Small lesions (rash) Identified GI origin (diarrhea)

Conclusions (II) Interactive risk calculator to estimate the risk of toxicity for individual patients May be used in the clinic Available on the internet (Excel spreadsheet) May be used to customized treatment ? Validation Based on a limited data set Underestimate of edema and nausea in male patients ? Should be validated on larger data series