Free Personal Care Issues from the Survey John Jackson Co-Chair Resources Network.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South East Personalisation IT Workshop 11 th June 2010 Working in partnership with Improvement and Efficiency South East.
Advertisements

Safeguarding Adults A study of the effectiveness of arrangements to safeguard adults from abuse. Sue Toole and Louise Lawton.
RCU, Buckingham House, Glovers Court, Preston, PR1 3LS Tel | Fax | RCU Ref Smarter Fees Policies March 2008 Towards Smarter.
From Grant Funding to Individual Budgets: The Impact On Day Services Denyse Whillier CEO Age Concern Ealing.
Self-Directed Support Giving People Control of Their Lives.
Edinburgh Shadow Strategic Planning Group Wednesday 18 March 2015.
1 Carers and The Care Act Cross-cutting theme rather than stand-alone chapter Parity of esteem between carers and those they care for – Assessment:
National Children’s and Adult Services Conference What Next for Personalisation? David Pearson President of the Association of Directors of Adult Social.
The Future of Social Care Rebecca Matthews, Policy Manager - North of England, Social Care & Partnerships 25 April2013 DH – Leading the nation’s health.
Self Directed Support What does it mean The Theory and the Practice Speaker: Ian Hood.
Adult Social Care and the Spending Review John Jackson Co-Chair Resources Network 1.
Financial Issues facing Adult Social Care…some of them John Jackson Co-Chair Resources Network 1.
Parvaneh Rabiee, Kate Baxter, Gillian Parker and Sylvia Bernard RNIB Research Day 2014: Rehabilitation and social care RNIB, 105 Judd Street, London 20.
The Care Act 2014 Healthwatch & Disability Sheffield Information Event 30 September 2014.
RCVS Network Meeting - Health & Social Care 3 rd June 2014 Richmond Council Update Cathy Kerr, Director Adult & Community Services.
Care Act 2014 Social Care & Funding Reform Understanding the Costs The Lincolnshire Model By Glen Garrod Director of Adult Social Services Lincolnshire.
PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST WORKSHOP FRIDAY 7 MARCH 08. Key documents Vision, specific expectations, proposed support mechanisms and resources set out in two.
Jane Jobarteh Midlands and East May 2013 The Future of Social Care Patients First and Foremost.
Joint Working in a Cold Climate NHS Confed Conference 7th July 2011 Peter Hay ADASS President.
Charging and financial assessment Care Act Outline of content  Introduction Introduction  Conducting the financial assessment Conducting the financial.
EASPD CONFERENCE 2006 FINANCING STRATEGIES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON EQUITY, CHOICE, EFFECTIVENESS AND SUSTAINABILITY RAPHAEL WITTENBERG 8 JUNE 2006, GRAZ.
Long-Term Care in a Global Context. Demographics Population aging globally Increased numbers of older adults (esp. oldest- old) means increased need for.
The Care Act ,500 older people 3,420 people with a physical disability 3,030 people with a learning disability 5,300 people with mental health.
Care Bill Implementation Discussion Andrew Osborn Head of Service, Adult Care Commissioning (Personalisation and Carers)
The Torbay Model – meeting people’s needs and expectations Dr Carol Tozer People Commissioner.
1 Consultation on Funding Reform Reforming care and support: funding adult social care Joseph Levitt.
Partnership Board Progress Reports 2010/11 Alison Copeland Gyles Glover Supported by the Department of Health.
Solace Summit 2014 The integration challenge: health and social care David Pearson President of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS)
Putting People First – SW region update Feb 2010.
National Dignity Council Conference Creating a system that delivers dignity David Pearson President of the Association of the Directors of Adult Social.
Adult Social Care and the Spending Review John Jackson Co-Chair Resources Network.
Day Services: the changing context and challenges Paul Kelly LB Camden Monday 11 July 2011.
Homecare and personalisation. Context Personalisation is central to the social care policy of successive governments and is at the core of the Care Act.
Implications of the Green Paper Jeni Bremner Programme Director.
Financial Update Directors Seminar 28 th February 2011 John Jackson Co-Chair Resources Network.
Helping to make care better Cynthia Bower, CEO National Care Association Conference 11 November 2009.
Care Act Presented by Simon Cheverst of RadcliffesLeBrasseur May 2015.
ASSH Overview and Scrutiny Panel 30 th July 2008 Transforming Social Care – The Change Agenda.
Evaluation of the Individual Budget Pilot Projects Karen Jones, Ann Netten, José-Luis Fernández, Martin Knapp, David Challis, Caroline Glendinning, Sally.
Care Act Norfolk Older Peoples Strategic Partnership Board 18 June 2014 Janice Dane, Assistant Director Prevention and Transformation.
LGA Community Well-being Board John Dixon Executive Director Adults and Children, West Sussex President Association of Directors of Adults Social Services.
Adult Social Care and Young Carers Richard Jones Executive Director of Adult and Community Services Lancashire.
Reablement Seminar New Connaught Rooms London 24 January 2008.
Support to live at Home Providers event 29 th August 2014.
Ellen Atkinson 28th June 2011 Working together to reduce barriers to employment.
Special Educational Needs Reforms What is happening in Wandsworth.
No man’s land or promised land? The lure of local public service delivery contracts for social enterprise Alex Murdock London South Bank University London.
Putting People First – where to next? Mona Sehgal – National Adviser Adult Social Care 7 April 2008.
The Care Act Implications for Bolton 7 th April 2015 Rachel Tanner - Assistant Director Children’s & Adult Services.
Anthea Sully Director of the Learning Disability Coalition.
Single Assessment Process and Self Assessment Seamus Breen Change Agent December 2004.
Individual Housing and Support Pathway Plan for people with a learning disability in Westminster November
2011/12 FINANCIAL OUTLOOK April 2011 John Holme, Principal Finance Manager ACS.
National Children and Adult Services Conference A Guide to Getting Ready for Implementation of the Care Act 2015/16 David Pearson President of the Association.
‘PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST’ Colin Pitman January 2009.
Free Personal Care at Home The Story So Far. Key stages Summary of the proposals ADASS’s view – the positives ADASS’s view – the problems What happened.
‘PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST’ Alan Dean February Putting People First  Putting People First’: A shared vision and commitment to the transformation of.
Provider Forum 5 th July – Supported Lodgings & Floating Support Value for Money –“the relationship between economy, efficiency and effectiveness” –“a.
Birmingham City Council’s Approach to Care ACT Financial Modelling.
Local care markets Unintended consequences of the Care Act and risk mitigation.
The implications of Individual Budgets for Extra Care Housing London & SE Housing LIN 11th June 2008 Angela Nicholls, CSIP Consultant
The Transformation of Social Care Janet Walden 13th November 2008.
The Government’s Assistive Technology & Telecare Initiative Denise Gillie Department of Health.
 Original impact of funding and social care reform – ran into £ billions  Preliminary results suggest impact will be much more than this – and.
Informal Carers. What is an Informal Carer? “An informal carer is someone who looks after a relative, partner, neighbour or friend who needs support for.
Informal Carers Sue Ernstzen
The impact of budget cuts on social care services for older people
Personal Budgets “Lessons Learned”
April 2018.
ADASS Resource Reduction Board
Presentation transcript:

Free Personal Care Issues from the Survey John Jackson Co-Chair Resources Network

Headlines from the survey Costs will be significantly more than the Government has assumed Minimum cost of the order of £1 billion Financial risks exclusively borne by local government …thus costs will double for us (may be more) Impact looks likely to vary significantly across the country Publishing our figures has informed the public debate and led to an informed discussion with DH

Financial Implications – 4 areas the loss of income from those currently paying for their care; the costs of providing care to those who are currently arranging their own care, or paying for residential care or who are doing without care because they do not want to pay for that care; the costs of offering re-ablement to all those with the highest levels of need; the costs of assessing new people who come forward or reviewing the circumstances of all those receiving care who currently self fund.

Income Results from the survey are the least reliable part of the survey. We used a figure of £209m Subsequent discussions with DH: alternative way of calculating possible cost using PSSEX1 Our calculations are that the loss of income is a minimum of £154m (probably more)

Number of service users Used the figures in the Impact Assessment Discussions with DH: numbers of older people are well founded Number of younger adults are unknown It appears that they are assuming 100,000 people already known to us (with 10,000 making a contribution) Possibly 10,000 coming forward who are not known to us. Do we have any better idea?

Costs of care Key area of disagreement with DH They are assuming that care for those with the highest needs can be done in 8 hours (not 6.54) Survey median hours: 14 OP; 20 Younger Adults We used lower quartile 11 and 14 hours = costs of £160/£204 week Most authorities do not appear to have included double handed care in their calculations RAS figure is higher - £209/week We intend to stick with our figures which are a minimum

Revised Minimum Costs £m Income154 Costs of care older people447 Costs of care younger adults106 Re-ablement130 Administration27 Total864

ADASS position We have always used the lower figure where there is a choice Actual costs very likely to be higher – possibly much higher Our stance: “mimimum costs of free personal care are of the order of £1 billion and possibly more than this" Risk is with us. £1 billion means that we pay £580m compared with to £250m – more than twice as much

Other issues: funding Only minority of respondents had included in budget at time of response Efficiency savings assumption is a breach of new burdens protocol It looks likely that the financial implications will vary enormously from area to area (even ignoring costs) Can the grant systems cope?

Other issues: eligibility Many people will not benefit It is free personal care not free social care Boundaries between personal and non-personal care Mental health problems Not simple or transparent (key principles in Green Paper) Incentive to use residential care

Other issues: re-ablement We will welcome this Age Concern, etc are concerned about possible compulsion Need for more work on this with them

Other issues: behaviour Currently focus on responsibility. Carers feel responsible for looking after their relatives Free care may mean a move to rights which may affect carer behaviour and lead to less personal care input from them “Cost” of carer input is huge in financial terms (tens of £ billions)

Other issues: timescales Government plan: 1 st October Tool only available in June Staff training and systems work Huge number of assessments Backlogs inevitable; service user/carer dissatisfaction LGA pushing for 1 st April 2011

An alternative approach Fixed sum per week for all those eligible Could be £100/week on top of attendance allowance (£70/£47 per week) Limited financial risk to either the Government or local authorities Consistent with the partnership model from the Green Paper Political acceptability?

ADASS Business Unit Local Government House Smith Square London SW1P 3HZ Tel: Fax: WEB: