HOT Lanes on I-77 Widen I-77 Goes To Raleigh Apr 3, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
Advertisements

Overview of a Timely Publication. Transportations importance has been recognized since colonial times National defense Economic vitality Quality of life.
Local Government Services and revenue.
The Fuel Tax: An Unsustainable Transportation Revenue Source
TRE ANNUAL MEETING Grant Levi, NDDOT Director November 26,
HOT Lanes on I-77 An imminent calamity Jan 14, 2013.
HOT Lanes on I-77 How did we get here and what do we do? October 30, 2014.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Corridor #5 Update United States Senate Briefing September 26, 2007.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Highways: free or toll?. In the past, roads were considered a public good Now it is possible to make people pay: should roads be produced by the private.
Toll Collection. One of the early widespread adopters of ITS Some of the most obvious benefits from ITS adoption.
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation Research Board Executive Committee June 17, 2005 TOLL: The Four.
COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Meeting Rick Clarke, Assistant GM – Capital Programs June 20, 2012.
Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
General Purpose Lanes on I-77 The Plan… February, 2015.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Update Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning September 19, 2012.
Construction Conference Construction Conference NDDOT’s: NDDOT’s: Future Federal Funding Future Federal Funding State Legislative & Budget issues.
Dallas/Fort Worth Toll Plan Randy Jennings Founder, Stop121Tolls.Com
Convergence of Transportation Policy and RFID Enabler of Future Transportation Policy Chris Body Mark IV Vice President, Business Development.
HOT Lanes on I-77 What we don’t know… Sept 9, 2014.
Is Transportation Sustainable?. Objectives By the end of this unit, students will be able to: 1.Examine and prioritize transportation project impacts.
Overview of PPI’s in Georgia April 26, 2006 Earl Mahfuz, Treasurer.
Keeping Texas in Business. Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State In part, our.
National Survey of Likely Voters April AHUA National Survey of Likely Voters - April Methodology Universe: Likely Voters Sample Size: 1,000.
Interstate Tolling: Why and How by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation
HOT Lanes on I-77 What do we do now? July 24, 2014.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB)
GAMPO Workshop: SR 821 Multi-year Construction Agreements Brandon Beach Representing Congressional District 6 State Transportation Board June 25, 2010.
Presented by: Peter Loughlin September 23, THE PAST YEAR September 30, 2009 Program Expired Short Term Extensions – GF Transfers $8b in 08, $7b.
HOT Lane Discussion Sept 4, CA 91 (LA Area) I-15 (San Diego) Some HOT Lane Examples.
North Carolina Transportation Issues David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. Emeritus Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte Remarks at the Shaftesbury.
HOT Lanes on I-77 Widen I-77 March 3, The Purpose of P3 Legislation Source: I-77 Mobility Partners Brief in Favor of Motion to Strike and In Opposition.
Congestion Congestion Congestion Congestion Congestion Congestion Interstates Years----$12 Billion Local Roads.
Local Government Section 2 Services & Revenue. Local Government What services does local government provide Utilities – services needed by the public,
Kyle Schneweis. How much revenue would you like to generate for your transportation program? The “Basic” version keeps it simple…
Growth Management Legislative Discussion April 3, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion April 3, 2012.
General Election 2010 What the Parties Say – Local Government.
HOT Lanes on I-77 More Questions Than Answers Feb 22, 2013.
Local Government Services and Revenue Chapter 12 Section 2.
Class Presentation Sources of State Revenue. Georgia Performance Standard SS8E4  The student will identify revenue sources for and services provided.
AMPO October 22, South Florida Region.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Budget Workshop Capital Improvement Plan Presentation on Public Private Partnership and Strategy for Municipal Complex, HWY 50, and Coast to Coast Trail.
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 31) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
Technical Issues Design Status Due Diligence Materials Tony DeVito, Project Director Jan. 28, 2016 I-70 East Project.
2005 TWG Legislative Recommendations. Fix It First ? WSDOT recommends first priority be Alaskan Way Viaduct, SR-520 with new state revenue Does the TWG.
Effectiveness of Funding Mechanisms and
Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study
I-77 High-Occupancy Toll Lanes
• Congestion • Congestion • Congestion
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Mobility Fund High Impact/Low Cost Projects: Cape Fear RPO
HOT Lanes on I-77 Today vs 2010 May 6, 2013.
Issaquah-Fall City Road
Undoing the “done deal”
Strategic Highway Investment Formula for Tomorrow
TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy
Presentation transcript:

HOT Lanes on I-77 Widen I-77 Goes To Raleigh Apr 3, 2013

What is a HOT lane?  Vehicles w/three or more occupants use lane for free  All others pay toll electronically  “Congestion pricing”  Designed, built, operated, financed for profit by a private company (P3)  50 year contract  Trucks prohibited

The Problem Congested stretch of four lane road from exit 23 to exit 36

A GP Lane Estimate Source: “I-77 HOT Discussion with Cornelius Town Board”, from Bill Coxe to Andrew Grant, Oct. 10, 2012 A ballpark cost for two GP lanes from exit 23 to exit 36: $80- $130M

The Current HOT Lane Proposal Source: “I-77 HOT Lanes Project Overview NCSITE Lunch N’ Learn”, August 21, 2012; “I-77 Widening Update”, MUMPO (Bill Coxe), Sept 19, 2012; “Billions invested in Roads”, Charlotte Observer, Jan 14, Miles of HOT Lanes Cost: $550 Million

GP vs HOT HOTGP 27.5 Miles $550M 13 Miles $ M (est)

Why the difference? Source: RFP Majority of travel time savings Majority of Cost

HOT Lanes and Congestion  HOT lanes rely on congestion  “Congestion Pricing” means more congestion = more toll revenue

HOT Lane Revenues Source: “Managed Lanes: More than a Revenue Tool”, Parsons Brinkerhoff, 2013

Some other factoids  Automated Vehicle Occupancy Verification… …doesn’t exist  MAP 21 Legislation… Grants categorical exclusion to every capacity addition within the existing ROW… Puts GP lanes on same legal footing as toll lanes

Toll Lanes on I-77: 1.Cost much more than GP lanes 2.Ensure congestion instead of relieving it 3.Limits our ability to make future I-77 improvements 4.Locks us into an agreement with a private company for 50 years 5.Will negatively impact our economy

So what did Raleigh have to say about all this?

Speaker Thom Tillis on Tolling I-77 "I think the takeaway is that… the choice is (a high-occupancy toll lane) project... or no improvements to I-77 for 15 or 20 years." Source: “Tillis: Toll Lanes or Wait 20 Years for I-77 Widening”, LKN Citizen, March 27, 2013

What else are y’all worried about? We’re going to have to look at alternative revenue sources… We can’t actually discredit the effort to use toll roads by going out and starting to backtoll existing roads. Speaker Thom Tillis on Tolling I-95 … because if it happens to I-95… We’re not going to toll I-95. …why wouldn’t it work for 77? …sales taxes subject to a vote of the people… …We understand how this affects your industry… …Retail industry, everybody else… …We’ve got to do it in a smart, responsible way.

If tolls won’t work on I-95, why will they work on I-77?

According to Speaker Tillis…  Fiscal Realities State doesn’t have the money Fuel tax receipts are declining  Political Realities Federal Local State

The State Has No Money

NC’s First Toll Road… In twenty years the TriEx is projected to carry half the traffic I-77 does today. Source: Toll Road News, Dec 29, 2012

Gas Tax Receipts

Cost Breakdown I-77 Toll Lanes -$M Source: “Billions invested in Roads”, Charlotte Observer, Jan 14, 2013

Toll Lanes vs GP Lanes So there is enough public money. But can we use it for GP lanes? GP lanes: $80- $130M $170M Public Funds:

According to Speaker Tillis…  Fiscal Realities State doesn’t have the money Fuel tax receipts are declining  Political Realities Federal Local State

HOT Lane Funding- Federal Source: NCDOT What do the Feds Say?

From the NCDOT  Q: “Does Federal funding (NHPP) receive a higher priority due to HOT lanes?”  A: ”We are going to get the same amount… from the feds funding regardless of what projects we build. The feds play no part in the selection process for projects that use NHPP funding.” Source: NCDOT So the Feds are a non-issue…

According to Speaker Tillis…  Fiscal Realities State doesn’t have the money Fuel tax receipts are declining  Political Realities Federal Local State

The Buck Stops Where?  Davidson Mayor John Woods: “We are under the direction of the state. The town of Davidson doesn't manage I-77, nor does the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County or Iredell County.” -Huntersville Herald, Jan 31, 2013  Speaker Thom Tillis: The state doesn't decide where to spend money in the regions. Rather those decisions rest in the hands of (MUMPO). - Lake Norman Citizen, Mar 27, 2013

MUMPO Priority #93 Source: 2035 LRTP

Speaker Tillis on MUMPO  “Unless the local entity prioritizing roads changes that (prioritization), the only way you could potentially move up is to move other things down.“ - Mar 27, 2013 (emphasis added) Well Guess What…

MUMPO Criteria Are A’ Changin’! Source: Potential LRTP Roadway Project Priortization Process, RS&H, Feb 2, /3 of possible points 1/3 of possible points

MUMPO Tier 1 Highly NegativeHighly Positive Impact on I-77 GP Lanes Priority Source: Potential LRTP Roadway Project Priortization Process, RS&H, Feb 2, 2013; MUMPO LRTP Roadway Ranking Methodology, approved 11/14/07

MUMPO Tier 2 Highly Negative Highly Positive Impact on I-77 GP Lanes Priority Source: Ibid. I-77 General Purpose Lanes Poised to Be Much Higher Priority

A Question  IF… …the 50 year P3 contract is supposed to be signed by Dec 2013 BUT… …the new MUMPO ranking won’t be completed until May 2014, THEN… Shouldn’t we wait four months for the new MUMPO rankings before signing a 50 year contract? Toll Lanes WILL be an Election Issue in November…

According to Speaker Tillis…  Fiscal Realities State doesn’t have the money Fuel tax receipts are declining  Political Realities Federal Local State

NCDOT on Toll Lanes “My perspective on why express (toll) lanes should be how we add future capacity to all our interstates is founded on… the reality of declining revenue….” - James Trogdon, COO NCDOT (emphasis added)

Mobility Fund Criteria Weighting  Mobility Cost-Benefit measured by the estimated travel time savings the project will provide divided by the cost to the Mobility Fund.  Multimodal/Intermodal measured by whether the project provides an improvement to more than one mode of transportation 80% 20% Weighting HOT Lanes are worth an extra The State of North Carolina WANTS to Build Toll Lanes Source: Connect NCDOT

Mobility Funding Source: “Mobility Fund Project Scoring,” NCDOT, 2012

Speaker Tillis on Tolls "That option (to use mobility fund transfer money on I-77) is not on the table," Tillis said. "If Wilmington, for example, says, 'We are ready for a managed lane project, let's take the mobility fund money and transfer it for that use if (the Lake Norman area) isn't ready to do that," the money will go there.

Where’s Wilmington?

State Priority- As Is What if MUMPO Supported GP Lanes? Source: Prioritization Scores for Roads, NCDOT Priority

State Priority w/MUMPO Priority With Local Support, I77 Moves to the Top of the List… Priority

State Priority Based on Merit Competing on Merit, There’s a Clear Winner… Priority

Speaker Tillis on Tolls  Toll lanes or no lanes for 20 years  No Mobility Funds  No Support from MPO

I-77 Is Just the Beginning Source: Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study, Presentation to NCTA, Mar 3, 2011

NCDOT Sources of Funding

Toll Roads are a Poor Way to Pay for Construction  Operating Costs & Profit  Pennies on the dollar goes toward construction  Only those willing/able to pay extra will have access to good infrastructure and yet… …NCDOT is looking at $40B+ in toll revenues from Source: NCDOT 2040 Plan

Summarizing  All the necessary elements are coming together to build GP lanes… Funding ($170M) Local priority (MUMPO) Enabling environmental legislation (MAP 21)  …except the State of North Carolina wants to build toll roads So why does Thom Tillis want to build toll lanes?

What Can I Do?  Call/ Thom Tillis:  Follow us wideni77.org and FB  Sign the petition  Take a petition  Vote!

Appendix

Access Point (1 req’d) Access Point (1 req’d) Westmoreland & Hambright Bridges (to be replaced) Access Points