Tropical Domain Results Downscaling Ability of the NCEP Regional Spectral Model v.97: The Big Brother Experiment Conclusions: Motivation: The Big Brother.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Where and when should one hope to find added value from dynamical downscaling of GCM data? René Laprise Director, Centre ESCER (Étude et Simulation du.
Advertisements

Association of U.S. tornado counts with the large-scale environment on monthly time-scales Michael K. Tippett 1, Adam H. Sobel 2,3 and Suzana J. Camargo.
An intraseasonal moisture nudging experiment in a tropical channel version of the WRF model: The model biases and the moisture nudging scale dependencies.
INPE Activities on Seasonal Climate Predictions Paulo Nobre INPE-CCST-CPTEC WGSIP-12, Miami, January 2009.
Dynamical Downscaling of surface wind circulations in the Northeast of the Iberian Peninsula Pedro A. Jiménez (UCM-CIEMAT) J. Fidel González-Rouco (UCM)
Earth Science & Climate Change
A Cloud Resolving Model with an Adaptive Vertical Grid Roger Marchand and Thomas Ackerman - University of Washington, Joint Institute for the Study of.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management Akm Saiful Islam Lecture-4: Module- 3 Regional Climate.
Assessment of Future Change in Temperature and Precipitation over Pakistan (Simulated by PRECIS RCM for A2 Scenario) Siraj Ul Islam, Nadia Rehman.
Adjustment to tropospheric warming over ocean and land surfaces Adam Sobel, John Chiang, Deborah Herceg, Liqiang Sun, Michela Biasutti + many discussions.
The Effects of Grid Nudging on Polar WRF Forecasts in Antarctica Daniel F. Steinhoff 1 and David H. Bromwich 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research.
Simulations of Floods and Droughts in the Western U.S. Under Climate Change L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory US CLIVAR/NCAR ASP Researcher.
Documenting Results of Dynamical Downscaling of Climate Forecasts over the Equatorial East Africa Using Regional Spectral Model Drs. Matayo Indeje, L.
SLEPS First Results from SLEPS A. Walser, M. Arpagaus, C. Appenzeller, J. Quiby MeteoSwiss.
© Crown copyright Met Office Climate Projections for West Africa Andrew Hartley, Met Office: PARCC national workshop on climate information and species.
The Eta Regional Climate Model: Model Development and Its Sensitivity in NAMAP Experiments to Gulf of California Sea Surface Temperature Treatment Rongqian.
RCM sensitivity to domain size in summer and winter With the collaboration of: Jean-Philippe Morin (simulations) and Mathieu Moretti (diagnostics) By Martin.
Workshop on Theory and Use of Regional Climate Models, ICTP, Trieste, 26 May - 6 June ARIAL PROGRAMME ON REGIONAL CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CHANGE.
Development of a downscaling prediction system Liqiang Sun International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI)
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
Dynamical Downscaling: Assessment of model system dependent retained and added variability for two different regional climate models Christopher L. Castro.
Eötvös Loránd University Department of Meteorology Budapest, Hungary Judit Bartholy Introduction to panel discussion 1: Climate change projections in Europe.
Mathematics and Computer Science & Environmental Research Divisions ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY Regional Climate Simulation Analysis & Vizualization John.
What is a Climate Model?.
"Retrospective simulation and analysis of changing SE Asian high-resolution typhoon wind and wave statistics" Hans von Storch Institute for Coastal Research.
Climate Downscaling Using Regional Climate Models Liqiang Sun.
Preliminary Results of Global Climate Simulations With a High- Resolution Atmospheric Model P. B. Duffy, B. Govindasamy, J. Milovich, K. Taylor, S. Thompson,
2012 NARCCAP Meeting, NCAR, Boulder Ana Nunes 1 and John Roads 2* 1 IGEO, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2 ECPC,SIO, UCSD, California, USA (*) Deceased (*)
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
MJO simulations under a dry environment Marcela Ulate M Advisor: Chidong Zhang (… in a Nudging World)
“A view of the 2 nd and 3 rd August COPE cases using storm-permitting ensemble MOGREPS-UK” S. Dey Supervisors: R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini COPE.
Assimilating chemical compound with a regional chemical model Chu-Chun Chang 1, Shu-Chih Yang 1, Mao-Chang Liang 2, ShuWei Hsu 1, Yu-Heng Tseng 3 and Ji-Sung.
Impact of global warming on tropical cyclone structure change with a 20-km-mesh high-resolution global model Hiroyuki Murakami (AESTO/MRI, Japan) Akio.
Simulating Rainfall Extremes in South America: Sensitivity to remote and local forcing Anji Seth and Maisa Rojas International Research Institute for Climate.
THE FORMATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF SPACE AND KNOWLEDGE IN ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS The Formation and Transformation of Space and Knowledge in Ancient Civilizations.
RegCM3_25RegCM3_10 Driving FieldECHAM5Nested from 25km Number of grid points192 x x 144 Number of vertical levels18 Integration timeJan 1,
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
Page 1 Strategies for describing change in storminess – using proxies and dynamical downscaling. Hans von Storch Institute for Coastal Research, GKSS Research.
Incorporation of Stable Water Isotopes in GSM and Spectrum-Nudged 28-year Simulation Kei YOSHIMURA 1,2 1: Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University.
Marine Stratus and Its Relationship to Regional and Large-Scale Circulations: An Examination with the NCEP CFS Simulations P. Xie 1), W. Wang 1), W. Higgins.
Analysis of Streamflow Characteristics over Northeastern Canada in a Changing Climate O. Huziy, L. Sushama, M.N. Khaliq, R. Laprise, B. Lehner, R. Roy.
COST 723 WORKSHOP – SOFIA, BULGARIA MAY 2006 USE OF RADIOSONDE DATA FOR VALIDATION OF REGIONAL CLIMATE MODELLING SIMULATIONS OVER CYPRUS Panos Hadjinicolaou.
NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center & *Environmental Modeling Center Camp Springs, MD Impact of High-Frequency Variability of Soil Moisture on Seasonal.
IPILPS Workshop ANSTO April 2005 IPILPS Forcing & REMOiso Performance by Dr Matt Fischer and Kristof Sturm.
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
© Crown copyright Met Office Downscaling ability of the HadRM3P model over North America Wilfran Moufouma-Okia and Richard Jones.
On Climate Predictability of the Summer Monsoon Rainfall Bin Wang Department of Meteorology and IPRC University of Hawaii Acknowledging contribution from.
Analysis of Typhoon Tropical Cyclogenesis in an Atmospheric General Circulation Model Suzana J. Camargo and Adam H. Sobel.
Arctic climate simulations by coupled models - an overview - Annette Rinke and Klaus Dethloff Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Dynamics of the African Heat Low on climate scale R. Roehrig, F. Chauvin, J.-P. Lafore Météo-France, CNRM-GAME ENSEMBLES RT3 Working Meeting 10 February.
Overview of Downscaling
Daniel Kirk-Davidoff (University of Maryland) Amy Solomon (NOAA PSD)
Michael K. Tippett1,2, Adam H. Sobel3,4 and Suzana J. Camargo4
The Experimental Climate Prediction Center Regional Spectral Model (ECPC-RSM) Contribution to the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program.
GIJS DE BOER(1), GREGORY J. TRIPOLI(1), EDWIN W. ELORANTA(2)
What is a Climate Model?.
Multimodel Ensemble Reconstruction of Drought over the Continental U.S
On HRM3 (a.k.a. HadRM3P, a.k.a. PRECIS) North American simulations
Leo Separovic, Ramón de Elía, René Laprise and Adelina Alexandru
Application of the ensemble technique to CRCM simulations
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Predictability of Indian monsoon rainfall variability
University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System
What is a Climate Model?.
A CASE STUDY OF GRAVITY WAVE GENERATION BY HECTOR CONVECTION
Multimodel Ensemble Reconstruction of Drought over the Continental U.S
Presentation transcript:

Tropical Domain Results Downscaling Ability of the NCEP Regional Spectral Model v.97: The Big Brother Experiment Conclusions: Motivation: The Big Brother Experiment methodology allows us to assess the errors in regional climate simulations which are solely due to the nesting strategy. Deborah Herceg * Adam Sobel *†‡ Liqiang Sun ‡ Stephen Zebiak ‡ *Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics Columbia University New York, NY †Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Columbia University New York, NY ‡International Research Institute For Climate Prediction Columbia University Palisades, NY Setup of the Big Brother Experiment: Our Experiment : Domains STEPS: 1.We first perform a large-domain high resolution regional model simulation, the “Big Brother”. 2.This reference simulation is then degraded by filtering out short-scales which would be unresolved in the GCM 3.This filtered reference is then used to drive the same regional climate model, integrated at the same resolution as the Big Brother, but over a smaller domain embedded in the large domain, called the Little Brother 4.We then compare the climate statistics of the Little Brother with those of the Big Brother on the Little Brother Domain 5.Since the same model is used for both the Big Brother and Little Brother experiments, the climate of the two should in principle be identical. Any difference in the solutions can only be attributed to the nesting strategy, and not to model error. TROPICAL DOMAIN:MIDLATITUDE DOMAIN: Midlatitude Domain Results Experimental Details: NOAA 29 th Annual Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop; October 18-22, 2004, Madison, Wisconsin Table Legend: The Big Brother Experiment (BBE) Large Limited Area High Resolution Model Regional Climate Validation Filter Small Scales Small Limited-area High Resolution model Small regional High Resolution Simulation Corresponding Data Set Model IC and LBC IC LBC IC = Initial Condition LBC = Lateral Boundary Condition LEGEND : Global Low-Resolution Data Set Large regional High Resolution Reference Simulation BIG BROTHER LITTLE BROTHER BIG BROTHER The Model: NCEP Regional Spectral Model, v. 97 – Juang et al.,  ECHAM4.5 data, archived every 6 hours was used to drive the Big Brother simulation.  The Big Brother simulation data was archived every 6 hours for the nesting of the Little Brother simulation, as well.  All experiments were executed for a month.  All of the statistical computations were performed excluding the first day in order to reject any short time-scale spin-up phenomenon. A ten grid point lateral boundary zone was also excluded.  To mimic the resolution of the operational GCM (ECHAM at T-42 resolution), a cutoff wavelength of ~900 km was used in the filtering of the Big Brother output before using it to drive the Little Brother. This experiment was first performed by Denis et al. (2001), using a grid point model for a midlatitude winter simulation. Our study extends theirs by using both a tropical and a midlatitude domain case, and using a different (in this case, spectral) model.  One month simulation completed for April, 1994  Both domains centered at 37.5°W and 5°S  Horizontal resolution of 60 km  Big Brother domain at 181 x 182 grid points  Little Brother domain at 91 x 92 grid points  18 vertical layers  One month simulation completed for February, 2001  Both domains centered at 70°W and 47°N  Horizontal resolution of 50 km  Big Brother domain at 151 x 142 grid points  Little Brother domain at 81 x 77 grid points  18 vertical layers BIG BROTHER LITTLE BROTHER PRECIPITATION SEA+LANDSEALAND Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Var. Ratio Trans. Var. Ratio Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Total LW SW SPECIFIC HUMIDITY (850 MBAR) SEA+LANDSEALAND Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Var. Ratio Trans. Var. Ratio Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Total LW SW PRECIPITATION SEA+LANDSEALAND Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Var. Ratio Trans. Var. Ratio Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Total LW SW SPECIFIC HUMIDITY (850 MBAR) SEA+LANDSEALAND Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Var. Ratio Trans. Var. Ratio Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Total LW SW  Total Field (TOTAL) is separated into a small-scale component (SW), and large-scale component (LW); defined as the wave numbers above and below the cutoff wave number.  Stationary Correlation (Stat. Corr.) = spatial correlation of time- mean fields.  Stationary Variance Ratio (Stat. Var. Ratio)=ratio of variances of time-mean fields.  Transient Correlation (Trans. Corr.), Transient Variance Ratio (Trans. Var. Ratio) = spatial correlation, variance ratio of transient fields (total-stationary).  Statistics provided for sea and land separately, as well as total.  In most fields, good agreement between Big and Little Brothers was obtained, for both small and large scales, after a brief initial spin-up period.  Precipitation was the exception. For our tropical domain experiment, the small-scale features of the precipitation field in the Big Brother were not reproduced by the Little Brother. The spatial and temporal variations of the large-scale component of the precipitation were well reproduced.  The reason for the poor reproduction of the small- scale component of the precipitation is that this component is inherently unpredictable, at least in this model, rather than because of any inherent flaw in the nesting strategy. This was shown by an ensemble of identically forced Little Brother simulations which were initialized at different times differing by 6-24 hours, in which the correlations of the small-scale precipitation between these different simulations was nearly as low as that between the Big and Little Brothers. Related to this, the agreement between Big and Little Brothers is fairly insensitive to the choice of the cutoff wave number used for the filtering.  Good reproduction of the small-scale precipitation was obtained for a wintertime midlatitude simulation. Thus, the relatively poor reproduction of this field for the tropical case appears to be due to specifically tropical (convective) precipitation processes. “Ensemble” Simulations Results ZONAL WIND (850 MBAR) SEA+LANDSEALAND Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Var. Ratio Trans. Var. Ratio Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Total LW SW ZONAL WIND (850 MBAR) SEA+LANDSEALAND Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Var. Ratio Trans. Var. Ratio Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Stat. Corr. Trans. Corr. Total LW SW Stat. Corr. Stat. Var. Ratio Trans. Corr. Trans. Var. Ratio T=06 HR Total LW SW T=12 HR Total LW SW T=18 HR Total LW SW T=24 HR Total LW SW PRECIPITATION FIELD ENSEMBLES  The table on the left shows the “ensemble” results comparing the identically forced Little Brother simulations, but initialized at different times differing by 6-24 hours; the correlations of the small-scale precipitation between these different simulations was almost as low as that between the Big and Little Brother “ensemble” simulations (not shown here).