Observational and theoretical investigations of turbulent structures generated by low-Intensity prescribed fires in forested environments X. Bian, W. Heilman,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
Advertisements

NATO ASI Conference, Kyiv Pollutant Dispersion Investigation of buoyancy effects on distribution of mean concentration field in the turbulent circulation.
Section 2: The Planetary Boundary Layer
Shallow Flows Symposium, TU Delft, Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Transport of Active and Passive Scalars above Urban Heat Island in Stably.
ANALYSIS OF TRACER DATA FROM URBAN DISPERSION EXPERIMENTS Akula Venkatram and Vlad Isakov  Motivation for Field Experiments  Field Studies Conducted.
PBL simulated from different PBL Schemes in WRF during DICE
Session 2, Unit 3 Atmospheric Thermodynamics
Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations SCOTT A. BRAUN AND WEI-KUO TAO PRESENTATION.
THE PARAMETERIZATION OF STABLE BOUNDARY LAYERS BASED ON CASES-99 Zbigniew Sorbjan Marquette University, Milwaukee Zbigniew Sorbjan Marquette University,
Reading: Text, (p40-42, p49-60) Foken 2006 Key questions:
Skyler Goldman, Meteorology, DMES RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ROUGHNESS LENGTH, STATIC STABILITY, AND DRAG COEFFICIENT IN A DUNE ENVIRONMENT.
Direct numerical simulation study of a turbulent stably stratified air flow above the wavy water surface. O. A. Druzhinin, Y. I. Troitskaya Institute of.
Will Pendergrass NOAA/ARL/ATDD OAR Senior Research Council Meeting Oak Ridge, TN August 18-19, 2010 Boundary–Layer Dispersion Urban Meteorology 5/20/2015Air.
The impact of mesoscale PBL parameterizations on the evolution of mixed-layer processes important for fire weather Joseph J. Charney USDA Forest Service,
Surface Exchange Processes SOEE3410 : Lecture 3 Ian Brooks.
Atmospheric Analysis Lecture 3.
0.1m 10 m 1 km Roughness Layer Surface Layer Planetary Boundary Layer Troposphere Stratosphere height The Atmospheric (or Planetary) Boundary Layer is.
Comparison of Eddy Covariance Results By Wendy Couch, Rob Aves and Larissa Reames.
Craig Clements San José State University Shaorn Zhong Michigan State University Xindi Bian and Warren Heilman Northern Research Station, USDA Scott Goodrick.
Ambient temperature inside an automobile subject to external conditions. MeEn 340 By Eric McKane and Benton Russell.
Training course: boundary layer II Similarity theory: Outline Goals, Buckingham Pi Theorem and examples Surface layer (Monin Obukhov) similarity Asymptotic.
GFS Deep and Shallow Cumulus Convection Schemes
Review of the Boundary Layer
Calculation of wildfire Plume Rise Bo Yan School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
Wind Driven Circulation I: Planetary boundary Layer near the sea surface.
Assessment of the vertical exchange of heat, moisture, and momentum above a wildland fire using observations and mesoscale simulations Joseph J. Charney.
Evaporation Slides prepared by Daene C. McKinney and Venkatesh Merwade
Chris Birchfield Atmospheric Sciences, Spanish minor.
CHAPTER 5 Concentration Models: Diffusion Model.
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Evaporation What is evaporation? How is evaporation measured? How is evaporation estimated? Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 3.5 and 3.6 With assistance.
Xin Xi. 1946: Obukhov Length, as a universal length scale for exchange processes in surface layer. 1954: Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory, as a starting.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Determining and Distributing Real-Time Strategic-Scale Fire Danger Assessments Chris Woodall and Greg Liknes USDA North Central Research Station, Forest.
Momentum Equations in a Fluid (PD) Pressure difference (Co) Coriolis Force (Fr) Friction Total Force acting on a body = mass times its acceleration (W)
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun.
The diagnosis of mixed-layer depth above an eastern U.S. wildfire using a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model Joseph J. Charney USDA Forest Service,
Modeling the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (2). Review of last lecture Reynolds averaging: Separation of mean and turbulent components u = U + u’, = 0 Intensity.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Observational and theoretical investigations of turbulent structures generated by low-Intensity prescribed fires in forested environments X. Bian, W. Heilman,
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Fire Plume Rise WRAP (FEJF) Method vs. SMOKE.
Far Shore Wind Climate Modelling Background Far shore wind conditions are expected to be favorable for wind energy power production due to increased mean.
Evaluating forecasts of the evolution of the cloudy boundary layer using radar and lidar observations Andrew Barrett, Robin Hogan and Ewan O’Connor Submitted.
Climate, Fire, and Carbon Cycle Sciences Research Work Unit NRS-06 Silas Little Experimental Forest New Jersey Rich Birdsey (project leader, Newtown Square,
CITES 2005, Novosibirsk Modeling and Simulation of Global Structure of Urban Boundary Layer Kurbatskiy A. F. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.
Transport and dispersion of air pollution
Turbulence Spectra and Cospectra Measured during Fire Front Passage Daisuke Seto, Craig B. Clements, and Fred Snively Department of Meteorology and Climate.
NATO ASI Conference, Kyiv MODELING AND SIMULATION OF TURBULENT PENETRATIVE CONVECTION AND POLLUTANT DISPERSION ABOVE THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND IN STABLY.
Consequence Analysis 2.2.
Meteorology for modeling AP Marti Blad PhD PE. Meteorology Study of Earth’s atmosphere Weather science Climatology and study of weather patterns Study.
Processes in the Planetary Boundary Layer
Evaporation What is evaporation? How is evaporation measured? How is evaporation estimated? Reading for today: Applied Hydrology Sections 3.5 and 3.6 Reading.
Jonathan Pleim NOAA/ARL* RTP, NC A NEW COMBINED LOCAL AND NON-LOCAL PBL MODEL FOR METEOROLOGY AND AIR QUALITY MODELING * In Partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Fire Whirl Formation During a Valley Wind Reversal Daisuke Seto, Craig B. Clements, and Scott Strenfel Department of Meteorology San José State University.
Large Eddy Simulations of Entrainment and Inversion Structure Alison Fowler (MRes Physics of Earth and Atmosphere) Supervisor: Ian Brooks Entrainment Zone.
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Meteorological Variables 1. Local right-hand Cartesian coordinate 2. Polar coordinate x y U V W O O East North Up Dynamic variable: Wind.
Modeling of heat and mass transfer during gas adsorption by aerosol particles in air pollution plumes T. Elperin1, A. Fominykh1, I. Katra2, and B. Krasovitov1.
Similarity theory 1. Buckingham Pi Theorem and examples
Turbulence closure problem
“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT
Analysis of Parameterization in Single-Column Model
INFLUX: Comparisons of modeled and observed surface energy dynamics over varying urban landscapes in Indianapolis, IN Daniel P. Sarmiento, Kenneth Davis,
E. Dellwik, A. Papettaa, J. Arnqvist, M. Nielsena and T. J. Larsena
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Session 6: Atmospheric Boundary Layer
Assessment of the Surface Mixed Layer Using Glider and Buoy Data
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
Wind Velocity One of the effects of wind speed is to dilute continuously released pollutants at the point of emission. Whether a source is at the surface.
Jielun Sun NCAR Earth System Laboratory
Presentation transcript:

Observational and theoretical investigations of turbulent structures generated by low-Intensity prescribed fires in forested environments X. Bian, W. Heilman, J. Charney, J. Hom, K. Clark, N. Skowronski, M. Gallagher, and M. Patterson S. Zhong, M. Kiefer, and N. Duan USDA Forest Service, East Lansing, MI Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI Results and Conclusion These tests demonstrate quicker upward transport of ground-level heat and momentum fluxes by the FIPFs as compared to the eddy diffusion scheme currently used … This is the model used in the comparisons described in Based on field experiment data The analyses of turbulence data collected before, at, and post fire front indicate that The LIPF can generate turbulence that is much greater than turbulence in the ambient atmosphere. The production of turbulence at the surface near the fire front was associated with increased variance in the 3D winds, specially in vertical direction, while buoyancy was strongest at higher levels within the fire plume. Turbulence at 10-m level nearly doubled that at 3-m level, indicating that the assumption of ‘constant flux layer’ near the surface is no longer valid in the LIPF environment. The residual term is generally small in the ambient environment, but quite large at the fire front and somewhat large immediate before and after the fire front, indicating that other factors in addition to shear and buoyancy are important to local turbulence behavior. Further analyses are needed to identify these specific factors. Introduction Low-intensity prescribed fires (LIPF) can be a viable tool for managing forest ecosystems. However, LIPF may significantly modify the atmospheric environment by inducing strong fire-atmosphere interactions. These interactions can lead to intense turbulence production in and around the fire front, which may affect the dispersion of smoke. As part of a broad Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP) project to develop modeling tools for predicting smoke dispersion from LIPFs, the USDA Forest Service - Northern Research Station conducted two LIPFs in 2011 and 2012 on forested plots in the New Jersey Pine Barrens to collect meteorological and air-quality data that can be used for model validation. The data have been used to investigate, among other things, the modification of LIPF on turbulence mixing processes and provide further insight into the complex physical processes that govern turbulent energy production and turbulent diffusion of momentum and heat in the vicinity of LIPFs within forest vegetation layers. In this paper, we describe a turbulence parameterization (flux-profile relationship) developed using the 10 Hz measurements of temperatures and wind speeds using fine- wire thermocouples and sonic anemometers at multiple levels on a 20 me tower during the LIPFs. This parameterization takes into account of modification of LIPF on the mean and turbulent flows in the surface boundary layer. Theoretical Model A Non-local Turbulent Closure Model (NTCM) for vertical turbulent mixing in Fire Induced Convective Boundary Layers (FICBL) has been developed for applications of fine-scale atmospheric models to LIPF environments. The NTCM is based on the concept that vertical mixing/transport within the FICBL is inherently asymmetrical and that turbulent flux consists of a local and a non-local component. The non-local upward/downward mixing and transport by buoyant fire-smoke plumes originating in the surface layer is simulated by mixing from the lowest model layer directly to all other layers (Fig 1) in the FICBL. Following Holtslag and Moeng (1991), the vertical turbulent flux of a scalar quantity C can be written as: where is eddy transport coefficient, is the local vertical gradient for the mean quantity C, and represents the non-local transport. The eddy transport coefficient can be expressed as where z is height above surface and h is boundary layer height. In the surface boundary layer, z is about 10% of h, and thus, resulting in a simplified formula for eddy transport coefficient u * is friction velocity that is related to turbulent momentum fluxes by is a non-dimension function of atmospheric stability, which is calculated following Louis (1979) The Monin-Obukov length L is defined as In this study, we focus on turbulent heat flux, Figure 1. Temperature at 10 and 3 meter levels and heat fluxes (top); the ratio of non-local vs local component in turbulent heat flux before, during and after the fire front passing the tower location (bottom). Data and Method Using high frequency (10Hz) data from the fine-wire thermocouples and sonic anemometers on the 20 m tower in the burn plot during the LIPF in the New Jersey Pine Barrens in March 2011 and 2012, we estimated the ratio of local vs non-local contribution to the total measured sensible heat flux before, during, and after the fire fronts pass the tower location. Specifically, the measured turbulent heat flux, which is the total heat flux, can be decomposed into where the local contribution can be calculated using Acknowledgments. Funding for this research was provided by the U.S. National Fire Plan, the U.S. Joint Fire Science Program (Project # ), and the USDA Forest Service (Research Joint Venture Agreement # 09-JV ). Blackadar (1978, 4th Symp. on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffusion and Air Quality, pp. 443–447, Reno, Am. Meteorol. Soc.) Following Holtslag and Moeng (1991 J.A.S: Eddy Diffusivity and Countergradient Transport in Convective Atmospheric Boundary) Fig. 1. Illustration of local vs non-local contribution to measured turbulent fluxes The mean vertical gradient can be calculated using the measured potential temperature at two layers, and eddy transport coefficient for heat can be calculated using measured momentum and heat fluxes. The ratio of local to non-local components can thus be estimated as Results