SSIP Process A Suggested Pathway, Timeline and Gantt Chart WRRC Regional Forum Eugene October 31 and November 1, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Advertisements

Theme by Richard Strauss…from 2001 A Space Odyssey, 1968: Also Sprach Zarathrustra State Systemic Improvement Plan : Challenge and Opportunity for the.
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
SPP/APR/SSIP/SiMR Welcome to More Acronyms. Who is here? Introductions – who are you HERE? Your name cards are color coded by which group you represent.
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
SSIP Overview: State Experiences with Stakeholder Engagement
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 3 (State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report – State Systemic Improvement Plan)
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report SPP/APR State Systemic Improvement Plan SSIP / Indicator 17.
Targets & Improvement Activities State Improvement Planning Carol Massanari, MPRRC Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010.
Part B Indicators 1 & 2 Graduation and Dropout Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San Francisco, California.
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Ready for Phase II? Developing an Effective Systemic Improvement Plan Anne Lucas, ECTA/WRRC Grace Kelley, SERRC Taletha Derrington, DaSy Christina Kasprzak,
Ready for Phase II? Developing an Effective Systemic Improvement Plan Anne Lucas, ECTA/WRRC Grace Kelley, SERRC Taletha Derrington, DaSy Christina Kasprzak,
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
State Systemic Improvement Plan March 18,  All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best supports States in.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Anne Lucas, WRRC/ECTA Ron Dughman, MPRRC Janey Henkel, MPRRC 2013 WRRC Leadership Forum October.
Engagement as Strategy: Leading by Convening in the SSIP Part 2 8 th Annual Capacity Building Institute May, 2014 Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Mariola.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Presentation to SAC June 3, 2015 Ruth Littlefield.
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
SSIP Implementation Support Visit Idaho State Department of Education September 23-24, 2014.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
RPTAC Region 4 Conference: Results-Driven Accountability Gregg Corr, Ed.D. Director Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning Office of Special.
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 5. Agenda for Today Stakeholder involvement Review Draft SSIP –Baseline Data / Target setting –Introduction –Data.
All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Evaluation-Zen: The Pathway to Results The Story of North Carolina.
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
Georgia Parent Mentor Kickoff: Inform, Imagine, Inspire with Results-Driven Accountability Ruth Ryder DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Dan Schreier, Gregg Corr, Jill Harris, Ken Kienas, Kate Moran,
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
Applying Collective Impact to a Healthy Start CAN/CI Initiative Peer Learning Network Call #7 Action Planning & Continuous Communication December 2015.
Arizona State Systemic Improvement Plan Update State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report  All indicators are still significant and will be.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
1 First Nations Economic Development Readiness Questionnaire Presented By: Ontario First Nations Economic Developers Association and Ministry Of Economic.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
KCMP Quarter 3 Indicators 1, 2, 4, and 20 November - January.
Aligning Efforts to Improve Capacity
Rorie Fitzpatrick & Dona Meinders, WestEd
Excellent Educators for All Initiative
Region 1 PTAC Regional Conference
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
KCTCS Strategic Planning: Brief Overview
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Target Setting for Child Outcomes
Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities
Using the Child and Family Outcomes Analysis Tools
Presentation transcript:

SSIP Process A Suggested Pathway, Timeline and Gantt Chart WRRC Regional Forum Eugene October 31 and November 1, 2013

A Suggested Pathway Contributing Factor(s) for which state will focus improvement strategies Contributing Factor(s) for which state will focus improvement strategies Data analysis across several indicators of performance (results) for children with disabilities (SPP/APR and other indicators) Data analysis across several indicators of performance (results) for children with disabilities (SPP/APR and other indicators) Root Cause, Drill Down Analysis Root Cause, Drill Down Analysis Evidence-based solutions and Possible Strategies (Best Practices) that fit the focus for improvement Evidence-based solutions and Possible Strategies (Best Practices) that fit the focus for improvement Supports for Implementing Best Practices Supports for Implementing Best Practices Annual Evaluation of Progress, Adjustments Infrastructure Development to Support Improvement (Capacity Building) Infrastructure Development to Support Improvement (Capacity Building) Theory of Action Prioritization Process Identify Area that Needs Improvement (e.g. reading proficiency) Identify Area that Needs Improvement (e.g. reading proficiency) Local Implementation Infrastructure Analysis Systemic barriers and leverage points Systemic barriers and leverage points Evaluation Plan 2

Start SPP/APR and Phase I of SSIP Activities Root Cause Analysis FALL 2013 SPRING 2014 SUMMER 2014 FALL 2014 Conduct infrastructure analysis Identify focus for improvement Draft SSIP Establish baselines and targets for all indicators Determine contributing factors of problems in areas for improvement Identify and analyze key data, from APR and other sources, disaggregate data February 2015 Submit APR Plan: consider the management of the SSIP process including the activities related to the design and implementation of the SSIP Engage stakeholders in determining areas for improvement and focus for improvement Inform stakeholders re. changes to SPP/APR & SSIP* Refine data analysis – addressing issues of data quality Work with LEAs/LAs and other stakeholders to identify and select evidenced based practices Review Theory of Action with stakeholders Data Related Activities SSIP Specific Activities State Processes * Please refer to OSEP Memorandum regarding requirements for stakeholder input. Draft Theory of Action Identify areas for improvement

Phase I ● at-a-glance Phase II ● at-a-glance Phase III ● at-a-glance FALL 2013 SPRING 2014 SUMMER 2014 FALL 2014 Data Analysis Focus for Improvement Infrastructure Analysis Theory of Action FALL 2014 SPRING 2015 SUMMER 2015 FALL 2015 FALL 2015 SPRING 2016 SUMMER 2016 FALL 2016 Evaluation Plan Infrastructure Development Support LEA/LA Implementation February 2016 Submit APR February 2017 Submit APR February 2015 Submit APR Support LEA/LA Implementation Results of Ongoing Evaluation Revise SPP

A Possible Gantt Chart for the FFY2013 SPP/APR and Phase I of SSIP DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSeptOctNovDecJan SSIP - Infrastructure Analysis SSIP - Broad Data Analysis SSIP - Identify Areas for Improvement SSIP - Data Analysis – Root Cause Analysis SSIP - Identify Focus for Improvement SSIP - Identify Evidenced-Based Practices SSIP - Evaluate and Select Evidence-based Practices SSIP - Draft Theory of Action SSIP - Draft SSIP SSIP - Review SSIP before submission SPPAPR - Collect Indicator Data SPPAPR - Analyze Data SPPAPR - Draft SPP/APR Template (Indicators) SPPAPR - Draft Improvement Plan SPPAPR - Draft SPP/APR with Improvement Plan SPPAPR - Review SPP/APR before submission