ORBITALS Phase A Extended Interim Meeting U of A Phase A2 Work Update ORBITALS Science Team, University of Alberta CSA HQ, St. Hubert, 2010/03/17.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GN/MAE155B1 Orbital Mechanics Overview 2 MAE 155B G. Nacouzi.
Advertisements

U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Direct measurements of chorus wave effects on electrons in the.
Electron Acceleration in the Van Allen Radiation Belts by Fast Magnetosonic Waves Richard B. Horne 1 R. M. Thorne 2, S. A. Glauert 1, N. P. Meredith 1.
1 FIREBIRD Science Overview Marcello Ruffolo Nathan Hyatt Jordan Maxwell 2 August 2013FIREBIRD Science.
Forecasting the high-energy electron flux throughout the radiation belts Sarah Glauert British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK SPACECAST stakeholders meeting,
EFW Operational Modes RBSP SWG San Antonio September 2014.
U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Pitch angle evolution of energetic electrons at geosynchronous.
The Importance of Wave Acceleration and Loss for Dynamic Radiation Belt Models Richard B. Horne M. M. Lam, N. P. Meredith and S. A. Glauert, British Antarctic.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Further development of modeling of spatial distribution of energetic electron fluxes near Europa M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I.
The second exam is this Thursday. It will cover everything we have covered from since the first exam (until the end of class today). There will be a review.
A student satellite initiative Indian Institute of Technology Madras.
Radiation Belt variations during current solar maximum
Earth’s Radiation Belt Xi Shao Department of Astronomy, University Of Maryland, College Park, MD
Polar – THEMIS Collaboration Opportunities Spacecraft Locations post launch Magnetopause campaign? Conjugate studies with THEMIS Ground Stations C. T.
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
UCLA-LANL Reanalysis Project Yuri Shprits 1 Collaborators: Binbin Ni 1, Dmitri Kondrashov 1, Yue Chen 2, Josef Koller 2,
Direction - Conférence 1. Latest developments in MEO radiation belt Models D.Lazaro, A.Sicard-Piet, S.Bourdarie ONERA/DESP, Toulouse, France Session 2:
RBSP-ECT Suite Status: Instrument Status and Instrument Operations Flexibility Harlan E. Spence on behalf of RBSP-ECT Team University of New Hampshire.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
RESONANCE Project for Studies of Wave-Particle Interactions in the Inner Magnetosphere Anatoly Petrukovich and Resonance team RESONANCEРЕЗОНАНС R.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Current status of A. Matsuoka, Y. Miyoshi, I. Shinohara, T. Takashima, K. Asamura, and ERG project team ERG project ERG project Van Allen Probes SWG 2014/09.
1 Introduction The TOP-modelPotential applicationsConclusion The Transient Observations-based Particle Model and its potential application in radiation.
Understanding and Mitigating Radiation Belt Hazards for Space Exploration Geoffrey Reeves Space Science and Applications, ISR-1, Los Alamos National Laboratory,
Radiation environment estimates for Europa lander mission M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I. S. Veselovsky 1,2, A. A. Sukhanov 2 1.
RBSP SWG Meeting 1 3/5/2009 BARREL Update (Balloon Array for RBSP Relativistic Electron Losses) R. M. Millan and the BARREL Team.
Living With a Star Radiation Belt Storm Probes and Associated Geospace Missions D. G. Sibeck Project Scientist NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
1 Space Environment Measurements by JAXA Satellites and ISS Takahiro OBARA Space Environment Group Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)
PAPER I. ENA DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS. The Imager for Magnetopause-to- Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) missionis the first NASA Mid-size Explorer (MIDEX)
Initial Measurements of O-ion and He-ion Decay Rates Observed from the Van Allen Probes RBSPICE Instrument Andrew Gerrard, Louis Lanzerotti et al. Center.
Large electric fields near the nightside plasmapause observed by the Polar spacecraft K.-H. Kim 1, F. Mozer 2, and D.-H. Lee 1 1 Department of Astronomy.
Space Environment SSE-120 Please type in your questions and raise your hand so we can answer it during class.
Drift Resonant Interactions of Radiation Belt Electrons with ULF waves. L. G. Ozeke, I. R. Mann, A. Degeling, V. Amalraj, and I. J. Rae University of Alberta.
Data Assimilation With VERB Code
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
SKOBELTSYN INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS, LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY, RUSSIA Radiation Conditions of a Mission to Jupiter ʼ s Moon Ganymede M. V.
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
1 Space technology course : Space Radiation Environment and its Effects on Spacecraft Components and Systems Space radiation environment Space Radiation.
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
The Geoeffectiveness of Solar Cycle 23 as inferred from a Physics-Based Storm Model LWS Grant NAG Principal Investigator: Vania K. Jordanova Institute.
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
Van Allen Probes Extended Mission Science Themes (1 of 3) 1.Spatial and temporal structures of injections and other transient phenomena and their effects.
Van Allen Probes Extended Mission Science Theme (See next 3 slides for full articulations) 1.Structure of injections and shock-driven fronts. –Discussion.
SHINE 2004 Session 41 New Radiation Belts and Other Effects of Cycle 23 SEP Events J. E. Mazur, J. B. Blake, P. L. Slocum The Aerospace Corporation M.
HISAKI mission – ひさき – Chihiro Tao 1,2, Nicolas Andre 1, Hisaki/EXCEED team 1. IRAP, Univ. de Toulouse/UPS-OMP/CNRS 2. now at NICT
Richard Thorne / UCLA Physical Processes Responsible for Relativistic Electron Variability in the Outer Radiation Zone over the Solar Cycle 1 Outline 2.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
On-Line Visualization Ring Current / Radiation Belt.
Modelling Electron Radiation Belt Variations During Geomagnetic Storms with the new BAS Global Radiation Belt Model Richard B. Horne Sarah A. Glauert Nigel.
AE Review Orbital Mechanics.
Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.
Spacecast Richard B Horne, S. A. Glauert, N. P. Meredith, D. Boscher, V. Maget, A. Sicard, D. Heynderickx and D. Pitchford Forecasting the High Energy.
Agency xxx, version xx, Date xx 2016 [update in the slide master] Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Add CGMS agency logo here (in.
Gyeongbok Jo 1, Jongdae Sohn 2, KyeongWook Min 2, Yu Yi 1, Suk-bin Kang 2 1 Chungnam National University 2 Korea Advanced Institute of Science.
GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES
Van Allen Probes data dives deep into Near-Earth space, revealing safer areas with less radiation Claudepierre, S. G., et al.(2017), The hidden dynamics.
Radiation Belt Storm Probes (Van Allen Probes) Launched 30 August 2012
The most challenging consequences of Earth’s space environment occur in the inner radiation belt So far you have been hearing about sensational new results.
Forecasting the Perfect Storm
Mission overview: two spacecraft that target key radiation belt regions with variable spacing
THEMIS and Space Weather
Vladimir Mikhailov (MEPhI) on behalf PAMELA collaboration
N. P. Meredith1, R. B. Horne1, I. Sandberg2,3,
Extreme Events In The Earth’s Electron Radiation Belts
Orbital Mechanics Basic Orbits Include:
Here are regions where different kinds of waves are thought to persist
NICT report on intercalibration of high-energy electron sensors onboard Himawari Presented to CGMS-45 Space Weather Task Team Meeting, agenda item SWTT/5.
ICRC2003 OG Calculation of Cosmic-Ray Proton and Anti-proton Spatial Distribution in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki, Ayako Kuwahara, Nozomi, Sawada Faculty.
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Presentation transcript:

ORBITALS Phase A Extended Interim Meeting U of A Phase A2 Work Update ORBITALS Science Team, University of Alberta CSA HQ, St. Hubert, 2010/03/17

WP Launch and Orbit Work by Louis Ozeke New 8 hour period orbit with magnetic conjunctions to multiple ground segments Review science return from orbit options for tomorrows launch/orbit discussion ORBITALS Mission Orbit Analysis and Science Impact (D , D ) P1, 2010/02/28

Science Objectives Primary Science Objective: 1. Understand the dynamical variation of outer radiation belt electron flux, including determining the dominant acceleration and loss processes Secondary Science Objectives : 2. Understand the dynamical behaviour of inner zone and slot region radiation belt particle fluxes. 3. Understand the structure of global inner magnetospheric electric and magnetic fields. 4. Understand the core ion composition of the outer plasmasphere, plasmapause and plasmatrough regions and its dynamics during storms.

Outer, Inner and Slot Regions Outer Belt 3 Re – 6 Re Inner Belt 1 Re – 2 Re Slot Region 2 Re – 3 Re All distances are geocentric in the equatorial plane

Orbit Parameters for Candidate Options Orbit Parameter Raised Perigee Orbit 375 km Perigee Orbit 750 km Perigee Orbit 250 km Perigee Orbit Epoch1/1/ :00 Apogee Altitude (km)33743 (L=6.3)32835 (L=6.1)32435 (L=6.1)35950 (L=6.6) Perigee Altitude (km)6627 (L=2.04)375 (L=1.06)750 (L=1.12)250 (L=1.04) Semi-Major Axis (km) Eccentricity Inclination (°)7777 Argument of Perigee (°)0000 RAAN (°)270 True Anomaly (°)0000 Period (hrs) (2 orbits/day) 9.63 (5 orbits/2 days) 9.62 (5 orbits/2 days) (7 orbits/3 days)

Daily Averaged Worst Case Electron and Proton Integral Flux ( AE-8/AP-8 and CRRES ELE/PRO models) For protons > 50 MeV the flux is more than an order of magnitude greater along the low perigee orbits. The risk of SEU maybe greater at lower perigee. For electrons the flux is the same for raised & lower perigee orbit options at these energies. Deep dielectric charging risk may not depend on the orbit choice.

ULTIMA Magnetometers (as of 2006)

New 8 hrs period orbit option A new orbit option with 3 orbits/day has been examined. This orbit option has magnetic conjunctions with different magnetometer arrays at each apogee pass. To obtain the 8 hr period the apogee has had to be reduced to ~5.24 Re (radial geocentric distance) for a perigee of 750 km.

7.96 hr period (3orbit/day) Apogee km (4.24 Re) Perigee 750 km Incl 7 degs Dipole tilts of 10 degs & 15 degs give max L-shells of 5.7 & 6.1 RAAN=240 degs Argument of perigee=0 True anomaly=0 Magnetic Footprints along the 3 petal orbit (plot shows 20 orbits)

Primary Science Goal Measurement Need to measure PSD peak radial location L*=5.6 (6.3 Re in the equatorial plane for -100nT Dst). To measure particles at L=6.3 the inclination needs to be at least ~10 degs assuming dipole tilt of 15 degs ~15 degs assuming a dipole tilt of 10 degs Results taken from “ The energization of relativistic electrons in the outer Van Allen radiation belt” Yue Chen, Geoffrey D. Reeves & Reiner H. W. Friedel, Nature, 2007

Raised Perigee Orbit (12 hr orbit) - Once per day apogee conjunctions with Churchill and Alberta line magnetometers - Over an order of magnitude lower flux of > 5-10 MeV protons, reduced risk of SEU -Over 2 orders of magnitude lower flux of > 20 MeV protons, reduced risk of SEU - Inner zone region is missed below altitudes of 1 Re Lower Perigee Orbit (750 km no main & 375 km with main) - Once per 2 days apogee conjunctions with Churchill & Alberta line magnetometers - Good coverage of the inner zone at perigee - Increased risk of SEU due to higher flux of > ~10 MeV protons Lower Apogee Orbit (8 hr orbit) - 3 times per day conjunctions with Church/Alberta, Japanese and European lines - Good coverage of the inner zone at perigee - Reduced coverage of outer zone; poorer conjunctions with GEO satellites. -Increased risk of SEU due to higher flux of > ~10 MeV protons also higher TID - Inclination increase needed

Raised perigee Apogee conjunctions -Alberta line -Churchill line Perigee conjunctions -Europe -Japan-poor -Antarctica

375 km perigee maintenance Apogee conjunctions -Alberta line -Churchill line -Alaska station -Antarctic-poor Perigee conjunctions -Europe -Japan

750 km perigee Apogee conjunctions -Alberta line-poor -Churchill line -Alaska station -Europe-poor -Antarctic-poor Perigee conjunctions -Europe -Japan

SEU rates detected on 64 Mbit DRAM (COTS) on-board MDS-1 JAXA Sample time hrs. Er1 & Er2 are two memory slices. Taken from IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, VOL. 53, NO. 4, AUGUST 2006

Particle flux measurements TID is slightly greater than the other orbit options due to greater time spent in the middle of the outer radiation belt at apogee. However TID over 2 years is < 50 krads behind 8 mm of Al so that 100 krad parts may still be used assuming an RDM of 2. Worst case electron and proton flux is the same as the other orbit options. 750 km perigee means measurements of the inner belt are possible.

Radiation Dose over 2 years Al, m m New orbit Apogee 4.24Re Perigee 750 km Raised perigee375 km perigee750 km perigee250 km perigee CRRES ELE/ PRO max dose AE-8/AP-8 max dose CRRES ELE/ PRO max dose AE-8/AP-8 max dose CRRES ELE/ PRO max dose AE-8/AP-8 max dose CRRES ELE/ PRO max dose AE-8/AP-8 max dose CRRES ELE/ PRO max dose AE-8/AP-8 max dose E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E+03

250 km perigee. Apogee drifts through all local times in less than 6 months.

What apogee can reach L=5.6* L*=5.6 is approximately equal to a dipole L-shell of L=6.3 for a Dst of -100nT To reach L=6.3 with the 8 hr period orbit the inclination of the spacecraft needs at least 13 degs assuming a dipole tilt of 11 degs. If the dipole tilt is 15 degs (true in the southern hemisphere) then the inclination needs to be at least 10 degs.

Dependence on apogee and perigee of the 8hr period orbit. Dropping the perigee down to 375 km means that the apogee can be extended slightly to km and the 8hrs period is maintained. The TID and worst case particle flux are not affected. Orbit maintenance is needed at 375 km.

Data still available from the Japanese meridian stations u.ac.jp/denji/obs/cpmn/statio n/map/russia.gif

L-shell Coverage ER ORBITALS Orbit Analysis DRAFT May (3) Orbit OptionsLow Earth Orbit Spatial Coverage h < 0.5R e (% of Time) Inner Zone Spatial Coverage 0.5R e < h < 1.5R e (% of Time) Slot Region Spatial Coverage 1.5R e < h < 3.0R e (% of Time) Outer Zone Spatial Coverage 3.0R e < h < 6.0R e (% of Time) Raised Perigee Orbit km Perigee Orbit with Orbit Maint km Perigee Orbit without Orbit Maint km Perigee Orbit km Perigee Orbit

Meridian Location Good Conjunction (ΔLong. < 15°) Very Good Conjunction (ΔLong. < 10°) Excellent Conjunction (ΔLong. < 5°) Churchill (94°W) Alberta Line (110°W) Europe (20°E)000 Japan (138°E)000 Churchill (94°W) Alberta Line (110°W) Europe (20°E) Japan (138°E)000 Churchill (94°W) Alberta Line (110°W) Europe (20°E) Japan (138°E) Churchill (94°W) Alberta Line (110°W) Europe (20°E) Japan (138°E)000 Churchill (94°W) Alberta Line (110°W) Europe (20°E) Japan (138°E) km Perigee 750 km Perigee 375 km Perigee No main Raised Perigee 375 km Perigee main ER ORBITALS Orbit Analysis DRAFT May Raised perigee typically >30% more conjunctions with the Churchill and Alberta line than lower perigee orbits.

375 km perigee No maintenance 5 orbits/2 days Apogee conjunctions -Alberta line -Churchill line -Alaska station -Europe -Antarctic Perigee conjunctions -Europe -Japan