EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Advertisements

Modeling the New 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Alan Dresser Research Scientist I October 14, 2011.
Examples of 1-Hour NO 2 and SO 2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP June 14, 2011.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
AERMOD Modeling System Photo: Ralph Turcotte presentation by: Larry L. Simmons May 23, 2006.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter Overview
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Planning for the 2008/2010 Ozone Air Quality Standards WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Portland, Oregon ~ September 29, 2010 Corky Martinkovic, Planning Supervisor.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
North Dakota’s Approach to a Periodic Review to Determine the Status of Consumption of PSD Class I Sulfur Dioxide Increments WESTAR Fall Technical Conference,
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
SIP Steering Committee Meeting March 29,  In October 2011, EPA issued draft SIP and modeling guidance related to the 1-hour SO2 standard issued.
Air Quality Regulations – What’s New? (for Ethanol Plants) Shelley Schneider Air Quality Division Administrator.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
New Source Review (NSR) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD): Refinement of Increment Modeling Procedures Proposal Jessica Montañez.
Development of 24-Hour 2006 PM 2.5 Designations Guidance NTAA National Tribal Air Quality Forum Barbara Driscoll EPA, OAQPS April 17, 2007.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
GIS Applications for Air Quality Management Robert Wu 吳震球 South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCAEPAApril 26, 2008.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
A&WMA Southern Section Annual Meeting Biloxi, MS September 12, 2012 Carla Brown, P.E. MS Dept. of Environmental Quality
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
1 Status of SO 2 Implementation and Modeling Issues Michael Ling Associate Director, Air Quality Policy Division U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
EPA’s New National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Sunil Kumar MWAQC July 28,
Compliance Challenges in Meeting 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) and Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) NAAQS Sube Vel, GHD Co-speaker: James VanAssche, GHD.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Source: Javier Fochesatto Regulatory Context for Modeling Robert Elleman EPA Region 10.
Introduction to Modeling – Part I Sarah Kelly ITEP Sarah Kelly ITEP.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
Ozone NAAQS Implementation WESTAR Fall Meeting September 29, 2010 Scott Mathias, Associate Director Air Quality Policy Division.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Jerry Beasley, Ph.D., P.E. Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality MMA Environmental & Safety Conference and Expo October 16, 2015.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Air Modeling Updates 2015 Region 4 Grants/Planning Meeting May 19-21, 2015 Atlanta, Georgia 1.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Daily Screening for Wildfire Impacts on Ozone using a Photochemical Model A Proposal to the Texas Near-Nonattainment Areas Greg Yarwood
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Implementing 8-Hour Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze Standards
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models (GAQM)
Status of Exceptional Events Implementation Guidance
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Presentation transcript:

EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011

Schedule June 2, 2010 – SO 2 NAAQS Promulgated March 25, 2011 – Area Designations Guidance Released (updated Apr 11, 2011) October 2, 2011 – Modeling Guidance Released – 30 Day Comment Period Comment Period extended – closed Dec 2, 2011

SO 2 Implementation Guidance Draft guidance released via Notice of Availability in Federal Register Oct. 3, –30 day public comment period (extended to 60 days) –Appendix A: Modeling guidance for attainment demonstration Nonattainment areas –Area where monitoring data or an appropriate modeling analysis indicates a violation Unclassifiable areas –Area has no monitored violations and lacks an appropriate modeling analysis or other appropriate information sufficient to support an alternate designation –Appendix C: Non-modeling technical guidance for attainment demonstration

Subjects Discussed Model Selection Determining Modeling Domain Sources to Model Emissions and Source Characterization Meteorology Background Concentrations Calculating SO 2 Design Values

Model Selection For SIP modeling, AERMOD should be used unless an alternative model can be justified (Section 3.2 of the Guideline on Air Quality Models, Appendix W) AERMOD is EPA’s preferred near-field dispersion model (promulgated in 2005)

Determining Modeling Domain Gather state-wide information about SO 2 sources: –Emissions, locations, building information –Reasonable to focus on actual emissions and most significant sources of SO 2 (e.g., > 100 tons/year) Note that refined dispersion modeling will be based on allowable or permitted emissions. Sources may have actual emissions much lower than allowable limits so it may be prudent to map sources less than 100 tons (e.g., > 50 tpy actual emissions) Also, bear in mind that smaller sources with short stacks or sources located in complex terrain may cause or contribute to a NAAQS violation –States should use best professional judgment or act in consultation with Regional Office modeler to determine emissions threshold for mapping

Determining Geographic Areas for SIP Demo Map sources and SO 2 monitor locations to identify any geographic clusters as potential areas to model –Nonattaining monitors or large sources can be center of potential modeling domain for each area

Sources to Model Once the areas to model have been identified, the next step is to define the domain size and identify sources that are to be explicitly modeled –Some sources may be represented by background monitors –Some sources may screen out via AERSCREEN –Modeling domain may not always extend out 50 km

Emissions and Source Characterization Maximum allowable emissions or federally enforceable limits should be basis of emissions used in modeling –Follow Section 8.1 of Appendix W –Federal Rules expected to be in place by attainment date can be factored in emissions –Use of allowables or permits consistent with current SO 2 guidance (1994) Source characterization –Source release parameters should reflect modeled emissions levels –If modeling controlled emissions for attainment demonstration, release parameters should reflect source “with controls in place” –Accurate locations Sources and Buildings (if needed for downwash) –Urban vs. rural classification

Meteorology 5-years of representative National Weather Service (NWS) data or at least one year of site-specific data (Appendix W) –3-year standard does not pre-empt use of 5 years of NWS data –Calculate design values for modeling period, not 3-year averages Example: Modeling , do not need to calculate 3-year averages for , , and –Recommend use of AERMINUTE hourly averaged winds to supplement standard NWS observations to reduce calms and missing data that will be important for modeling of an hourly standard

Background Concentrations August 23, 2010 memo “Applicability of Appendix W Modeling Guidance for the 1-hour SO 2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard –Recommend first tier use of maximum 1-hour monitored concentration –Simple and straightforward but may be overly conservative March 1, 2011 memo “Additional Clarification Regarding Application of Appendix W Modeling Guidance for the 1-hour NO 2 NAAQS” (applicable to SO 2 ) –Recommend new first tier of monitored design values added to modeled design values –Specifically, use temporally varying concentrations based on 99 th percentile monitored concentrations by hour of day and season added to modeled design values.

Calculating SO 2 Design Values At each receptor: 1. For each modeled day, determine maximum 1-hour total (from all modeled sources + background) concentration Results in 365 concentrations per year (366 for leap year) 2. For each modeled year, determine 4 th highest of the 365 (366) hourly concentrations If modeling 5 years of data, results in 5 concentrations 3. If modeling 5 years, average concentrations from step 2 to calculate design value 4. Among all receptors, determine if any design values exceed NAAQS

Summary AERMOD should be used for SIP modeling Sources should be modeled with maximum allowable 1-hour or short-term emission rates in the SIP modeling based on continuous operations at the source It is reasonable to initially focus on larger emitters, i.e. 100 tons or more per year –Smaller sources, especially those with short stacks and/or located in complex terrain can possibly cause or contribute to NAAQS violations Modeling should be done with 5 years of representative NWS meteorological data or at least one year of site specific meteorology

Summary, Continued Background concentrations can be included as: –“First tier” approach based on monitored design values added to modeled design values; or –Temporally varying based on the 99 th percentile monitored concentrations by hour of day and season added to modeled design values States should work with EPA Regional Modeler to develop a modeling protocol At any time during the SIP process when there are questions regarding modeling or implementation modeling guidance, the appropriate EPA Regional Modeling Contact should be consulted.

Relevant Guidance Guideline on Air Quality Models (Appendix W) Memoranda –Applicability of Appendix W Modeling Guidance for the 1-hour SO 2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard, August 23, 2010 –Additional Clarification Regarding Application of Appendix W Modeling Guidance for the 1-hour NO 2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard, March 1, 2011 –Area designations for the 2010 Revised Primary Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards, March 24, AERMOD Implementation Guide AERMOD, AERMET, AERMAP, AERMINUTE, AERSCREEN, and AERSURFACE User’s Guides

Questions