Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” 18-20 November 2008 Session 8 Standard Cost Model and RIAs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting up the RIA System in Turkey Better Regulation Group İstanbul, OECD November 20, 2007.
Advertisements

Slovenian experience MEASURES TO STRENGHTEN THE CIVIL DIALOGUE AND PARTNERSHIP Irma Mežnarič Brussels - 10 October 2006.
Administrative burden in Impact Assessments for Commission proposals November 2012 – February 2013 Dr. Marianne Klingbeil Deputy Secretary General European.
Ministry of communications and Information Technology A project approved by the council of Arab Ministers of Communications in the framework of the Arab.
PRIME MINISTRY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE TurkStat NATIONAL ACCOUNTS IN TURKEY 1 TurkStat.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
Measuring Respondent Burden to Statistical Surveys
Substantive Compliance Costs The term “regulatory costs” as used by the OECD embraces all of the costs attributable to the adoption of a regulatory requirement,
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Better regulation in Denmark Presentation by Flemming N. Olsen Senior Advisor, Division for Better Regulation Ministry of Finance, Denmark Conference on.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
Smart Regulation Responding to the needs of SMEs Commission Communication COM(2013) final of
Estimating the Market for Internet Service Provider-Based Cyber Security Solutions Brent Rowe – RTI International Doug Reeves – NC State University Dallas.
/SCM-Network, Ljubljana Gerald Reindl SCM: Test Case for Outcome- Oriented Impact Assessment.
Institutional Development for Improved Water Quality | November 2010 Operation and Maintenance for Safe Drinking Water – Institutional development to achieve.
1 OECD Berlin, 11 June 2012 Regulatory costs in France The search for a comprehensive definition Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert,
Measuring Respondent Burden at the UK Office for National Statistics Denise Williams, Sarah Green & Jacqui Jones.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs FDEA State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO The Regulatory Checkup Estimating the cost of regulation and identifying.
Meeting of the High Level Group on Administrative Burdens Dr. Johannes Ludewig Chairman of the Nationaler Normenkontrollrat Brussels, 23 July 2013.
“Analytical Tools and Data Collection” Workshop April 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Introduction: Course Objectives and RIA Context in Turkey.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
Preparing Supervisory Authority and Pension Industry for Risk-based Supervision Charles Machira, Manager, Supervision Retirement Benefits Authority, Kenya.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 Session 5 Defining the Problem and.
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public Governance.
Reducing Respondent Burden The Australian Bureau of Statistics Experience Integrated Economic Statistics / Joint FSO-UNSD work session, 6-8 June 2007,
Legal and institutional foundation of economic statistics Overview of international experience Regional Workshop for African Countries on Compilation of.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Strategy for Better Regulation in Romania Expert - Florin.
“Analytical Tools and Data Collection” April 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Session 1 Introduction to Role of Impacts Assessment in RIAs.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries Capacity building for decision makers for small businesses regulation Monika P ř ibylová.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES REVIEW CONTENT, METHODOLOGY AND INSTRUMENTS Presented by: Nguyen Viet Anh, Member of the Prime Minister’s Special Task Force.
WSSB Capacity Enhancement Workshops 1 Session 2: Legal & Institutional Background for Management of Small-Town Water Systems.
Productivity Commission Capacity Building On Regulatory Review Impact Analysis Module ‘ Compliance costs: Business Cost Calculator’ March 2011 Rod.
CEDR TD Management PG2 Planning the Road Network Performance Indicators for the TERN: Implementation Options.
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in OECD countries: a policy tool to manage the flow of regulation Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on “Drafting Legislation.
PRIME MINISTRY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Foreign Relations Department Projects Group TurkStat Meeting of the Policy Group on Statistical.
(Regulatory) Impact Assessment Introduction Zsombor Kovacsy, Ministry of Justice Hungary Regional Strategic Workshop on Impact Assessment Riga, Latvia.
APPROACHES TO REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM Regulatory Impact Assessments: Case study from Uganda.
Better Regulation Executive Making regulation work for everyone Karen Hill Better Regulation Executive 01 March 2007 From Enforcement to Compliance: Delivering.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Seminar on Administrative Simplification Seminar on Administrative.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TEMPLATE Svilena Simeonova, Director of Internal Control Directorate, Ministry of Finance, Bulgaria.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Oversight Bodies for Regulatory Quality in OECD Countries Regional Capacity Building Seminar on “Drafting Legislation and Oversight Bodies for Regulatory.
STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS PRESENTATION TO PASC XXX 26 April 2007.
Lect. 10 Administrative Burdens and RIA. Overview Methodology currently used by many Member States and the European Commission to deal with the problem.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 3 – Freedom to provide services Bilateral.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
Supporting community action on AIDS in developing countries ‘Evaluating HIV and AIDS-related advocacy’ Skills Building Session International.
RIA in ERRADA  2 workshops (in collaboration with SIGMA) to raise awareness about RIA concepts and tools (Mar 10, Jul 10).  1 workshop (in collaboration.
Regulatory Impact Assessment in Poland
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory reform in the Czech Republic
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy
Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Azerbaijan
Session 2: Institutional arrangements for energy statistics
Measuring the “red tape” on citizens
Reducing Administrative Burdens -Initiatives-
Slovenia Matija Kodra Consultant Ministry of Public Administration.
Germany Thomas Nehring Better regulation unit Federal Chancellery.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 Session 4 Organizing RIA in the.
Administrative Burden Citizens - Project experiences SIRA Consulting -
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy
Towards a Better Regulatory Environment in Serbia
Better regulation working group
Project Coordination Committee (PCC) Meeting Piraeus, 2 November 2017
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
System of Tax Subsidies and Related Case Studies
National level Objective:
Presentation transcript:

Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 Session 8 Standard Cost Model and RIAs

Policy and Administrative Costs The cost of regulation is two-fold: policy costs and administrative burdens. What is the difference? Policy costs are those related to complying with the objective of the regulation. Administrative costs are those associated with requirements to collect, keep or provide information in relation to regulation.

Example You are required to pay tax on earned income. The policy objective of the law is that you will pay a certain amount of money to the Government as taxes depending on the level of your earnings. This is the policy cost. Paying taxes requires keeping records, filling out forms, submitting information etc. These are the administrative costs of regulation.

Why Is The Difference Important? Being able to identify policy costs and admin costs means you can assess the full costs of legislation. So you can see exactly where the greatest costs come from. Administrative costs can be reduced without affecting the policy objective of the legislation. Administrative costs are important in considering the best way to implement legislation and achieve compliance. The admin costs of different options for responding to a problem influence which will deliver the greatest benefits.

What is the Standard Cost Model? A simple, pragmatic framework for measuring the administrative costs of regulation. It works by identifying the information requirements of a regulation and measuring the costs of each requirement. It is indicative and not statistically representative. It is a means to an end – the aim is to find ways to achieve simplification and reduce costs, not get a perfect set of data. Can be used for individual areas of regulation or to establish a baseline of costs.

Links to RIAs RIAs are used to measure the policy costs of new legislation or changes to existing legislation. The SCM can be used to: − measure the admin costs of existing legislation and identify areas for simplification − estimate the admin costs of new legislation or proposed changes to legislation. To consider the full effects of regulation, the two can be combined – SCM particularly useful in looking at options for implementing regulation.

SCM in Turkey SCM project in Turkey co-ordinated by the Prime Ministry Administrative Improvement Directorate. Two pilots are being conducted. SCM network of ministry representatives – if you don’t know who your ministry’s representative is, the Administrative Improvement Directorate can help. A more detailed workshop on the SCM methodology can be offered if it would be helpful.