Cloud fraction in SCMs: Representation of clouds constitutes a major source of uncertainty in climate models and thus future climate change projections.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Advertisements

R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
Studying the Arctic Stratiform Clouds Using Four Different Microphysics Schemes Ping Du, Prof. Eric Girard.
Process-oriented MJO Simulation Diagnostic: Moisture Sensitivity of Simulated Convection Daehyun Kim 1, Prince Xavier 2, Eric Maloney 3, Matthew Wheeler.
Microphysics and the simulation of MCSs in the TWP. Progress in the representation of Mesoscale Convective Systems (MCS) within cloud-resolving models.
To perform statistical analyses of observations from dropsondes, microphysical imaging probes, and coordinated NOAA P-3 and NASA ER-2 Doppler radars To.
Drought simulation over west US. --- Final Report Haifeng QIan Wen Mi.
Microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds Evaluation of the representation of clouds in models J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP Assessment.
Evaluation of ECHAM5 General Circulation Model using ISCCP simulator Swati Gehlot & Johannes Quaas Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Hamburg, Germany.
Preliminary Experiments with a Dynamics-Based PDF Parameterization for Boundary Layers and Associated Clouds in GCMs Leo Donner, Huan Guo, and Chris Golaz.
Brief review of my previous work in Beijing Xiaofeng Wang Directed by : Guoguang Zheng Huiwen Xue 1.
Applications to Global Climate Modeling Tom Ackerman Lecture II.7b.
Cloud-scale modelling at Manchester during VOCALS P. Connolly, G. Vaughan, J. Crosier etc.
ARM Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. 2 Improve the performance of general circulation models (GCMs) used for climate research and prediction.
The aim of FASTER (FAst-physics System TEstbed and Research) is to evaluate and improve the parameterizations of fast physics (involving clouds, precipitation,
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
Climate model grid meshes are too coarse to explicitly simulate storm system winds and therefore must rely on simplified models referred to as parameterizations.
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002 Large-Eddy Simulation Andreas Chlond Department Climate Processes.
Calibration Guidelines 1. Start simple, add complexity carefully 2. Use a broad range of information 3. Be well-posed & be comprehensive 4. Include diverse.
The representation of stratocumulus with eddy diffusivity closure models Stephan de Roode KNMI.
CAUSES (Clouds Above the United States and Errors at the Surface) "A new project with an observationally-based focus, which evaluates the role of clouds,
Improving Black Carbon (BC) Aging in GEOS-Chem Based on Aerosol Microphysics: Constraints from HIPPO Observations Cenlin He Advisers: Qinbin Li, Kuo-Nan.
A dual mass flux framework for boundary layer convection Explicit representation of cloud base coupling mechanisms Roel Neggers, Martin Köhler, Anton Beljaars.
Evaluation of CMIP5 Simulated Clouds and TOA Radiation Budgets in the SMLs Using NASA Satellite Observations Erica K. Dolinar Xiquan Dong and Baike Xi.
In this study, HWRF model simulations for two events were evaluated by analyzing the mean sea level pressure, precipitation, wind fields and hydrometeors.
Validation and Sensitivities of Dynamic Precipitation Simulation for Winter Events over the Folsom Lake Watershed: 1964–99 Jianzhong Wang and Konstantine.
 Comparison of predicted radar reflectivity (Z) with observations, such as e.g. from the W-band ARM Cloud Radar (WACR), is an essential part of verifying.
4. Large-Scale Forcing Datasets Large-scale forcings are obtained: From the ARM variational analysis (ARM VA) for a standard domain (300 km, 25 mb) & reduced.
Clouds in the Southern midlatitude oceans Catherine Naud and Yonghua Chen (Columbia Univ) Anthony Del Genio (NASA-GISS)
JCSDA Summer Colloquium Erica Dolinar 4 August 2015.
Soil moisture generation at ECMWF Gisela Seuffert and Pedro Viterbo European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ELDAS Interim Data Co-ordination.
Monthly Precipitation Rate in July 2006 TRMM MMF DIFF RH84 New Scheme 3.3 Evaluate MMF Results with TRMM Data Zonal Mean Hydrometeor Profile TRMM TMI CONTROL.
Forecast simulations of Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus with CAM3 and CAM3-UW. Cécile Hannay (1), Jeffrey Kiehl (1), Dave Williamson (1), Jerry Olson (1),
CCSM Atmospheric Model Working Group Summary J. J. Hack, D. A Randall AMWG Co-Chairs CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001 CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001.
Entrainment Rate in Shallow Cumuli : Probabilistic Distribution and Dependence on Dry Air Sources: The rate of cloud engulfing dry air (entrainment rate)
Evaluation of sulfate simulations using CMAQ version 4.6: The role of cloud Chao Luo 1, Yuhang Wang 1, Stephen Mueller 2, and Eladio Knipping 3 1 Georgia.
Yuying Zhang, Jim Boyle, and Steve Klein Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jay Mace University.
Observed & Simulated Profiles of Cloud Occurrence by Atmospheric State A Comparison of Observed Profiles of Cloud Occurrence with Multiscale Modeling Framework.
Improved understanding of global tropospheric ozone integrating recent model developments Lu Hu With Daniel Jacob, Xiong Liu, Patrick.
Representation of Subgrid Cloud-Radiation Interaction and its Impact on Global Climate Simulations Xinzhong Liang (Illinois State Water Survey, UIUC )
LMDZ Single Column Model + what is it ? + why is it interesting ? + List of 1D cases + how to install and run it ? M-P Lefebvre and LMDZ team.
Continuous treatment of convection: from dry thermals to deep precipitating convection J.F. Guérémy CNRM/GMGEC.
The nature of rain events in summer vs. winter at the SGP ARM Facility MPO 581 Class Project Emily Riley, Siwon Song, & Brian Mapes.
EUCLIPSE Toulouse meeting April 2012 Roel Neggers Process-level evaluation at selected grid-points: Constraining a system of interacting parameterizations.
Initial Results from the Diurnal Land/Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (DICE) Weizhong Zheng, Michael Ek, Ruiyu Sun, Jongil Han, Jiarui Dong and Helin Wei.
Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment, Part II: Multi-layered cloud GCSS.
Yuqing Wang Department of Meteorology, University of Hawaii The 65 th IHC, February 28-March 3, 2011.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
Multiscale Variations of Decade-long Cloud Fractions from Six Different Platforms over the SGP: For decades, researchers have intensively studied observationally.
Incrementing moisture fields with satellite observations
Update on progress with the implementation of a new two-moment microphysics scheme: Model description and single-column tests Hugh Morrison, Andrew Gettelman,
Strong Impacts of Vertical Velocity on Cloud Microphysics and Implications for Aerosol Indirect Effects: Despite widely recognized importance, aerosol.
Evaluation of Cloud-Radiation Interaction in the Canadian GEM Model Using ARM Observations Danahé Paquin-Ricard 1 Colin Jones 1, Paul Vaillancourt 2 1.
Evaluation of cloudy convective boundary layer forecast by ARPEGE and IFS Comparisons with observations from Cabauw, Chilbolton, and Palaiseau  Comparisons.
Update on progress with the implementation of a statistical cloud scheme: Prediction of cloud fraction using a PDF- based or “statistical” approach Ben.
Cloud fraction in midlatitude cyclones: observations vs models Catherine Naud, Columbia University Collaborators: James Booth (Columbia), Tony Del Genio.
A simple parameterization for detrainment in shallow cumulus Hirlam results for RICO Wim de Rooy & Pier Siebesma Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
Cloud-radiation interaction as simulated by the Canadian GEM model compared to ARM observations Danahé Paquin-Ricard Director: Colin Jones Codirector:
Evaluation of Cloud Properties in Six SCMs the ARM SGP Site under Different Dynamical Regimes Hua Song 1 Yangang Liu 1, Wuyin Lin 1, Yanluan.
Impact of Convective Triggering Mechanisms on CAM2 Model Simulations Shaocheng Xie, Gerald L. Potter, Richard T. Cederwall, and James S. Boyle Atmospheric.
What Are the Implications of Optical Closure Using Measurements from the Two Column Aerosol Project? J.D. Fast 1, L.K. Berg 1, E. Kassianov 1, D. Chand.
Toward Continuous Cloud Microphysics and Cloud Radiative Forcing Using Continuous ARM Data: TWP Darwin Analysis Goal: Characterize the physical properties.
Diagnosing and quantifying uncertainties of
Radar/Surface Quantitative Precipitation Estimation
GASS update By Jon Petch.
Three-category ice scheme
Met Office Unified Model and CloudNet
Aaron Kennedy, Xiquan Dong, and Baike Xi University of North Dakota
Assessment of NASA GISS CMIP5 and post-CMIP5 Simulated Clouds and Radiation fluxes Using Satellite Observations 1/15/2019 Ryan Stanfield(1), Xiquan Dong(1),
Application of Stochastic Techniques to the ARM Cloud-Radiation Parameterization Problem Dana Veron, Jaclyn Secora, Mike Foster, Christopher Weaver, and.
Presentation transcript:

Cloud fraction in SCMs: Representation of clouds constitutes a major source of uncertainty in climate models and thus future climate change projections. This motivates the quantitative evaluations of clouds in climate models against in situ and remote-sensing observational data. Using the single-column model (SCM) and evaluating SCM performances against measurements is a useful tool to diagnose the parameterization schemes in climate models. To make a statistically meaningful comparison and evaluation on modeled cloud fraction, three-year-long SCM simulations of seven GCMs participating in the FASTER project at the ARM SGP site have been carried out by DOE scientists at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and the other FASTER investigators. The results show that compared with the ARM cloud observations, most of the seven SCMs overestimate upper-level cloud fraction but underestimate lower-level cloud fraction. Further analyses reveal that the underestimation of lower-level cloud fraction in most SCMs is mainly due to their larger RH threshold used in cloud scheme, while biases in the upper-level cloud fraction for different SCMs exist for quite different reasons. These results shed new light on the challenge of accurately representing cloud fraction in climate models. Reference: Song, H., W. Lin, Y. Lin, A. B. Wolf, L. J. Donner, A. D. Del Genio, R. Neggers, S. Endo and Y. Liu (2014), Evaluation of Cloud Fraction Simulated by Seven SCMs against the ARM Observations at the SGP Site, J. Climate, accepted. Contact: Dorothy Koch, SC23.1,

Motivation ● This study is a companion paper on SCM simulated precipitation published in J. Climate in 2013, aiming to reveal cloud fraction parameterization problems by evaluating key features of cloud fraction simulated by seven SCMs against the ARM observations. Stratiform and non-stratiform partitioning analysis are performed and relationships of cloud fraction to relative humidity are investigated iconnection with model parameterizations. Results ● Most of the seven SCMs underestimate lower- level cloud fraction and overestimate upper- level cloud fraction. ● Both frequency distribution and partitioning analysis of cloud fraction reveal large discrepancies between the SCMs with prognostic cloud fraction schemes and those with diagnostic cloud fraction schemes. ● Underestimation of lower-level cloud fraction in most SCMs is mainly due to their larger threshold RH used in cloud scheme, while biases in the upper-level cloud fraction for different SCMs exist for quite different reasons. Evaluation of Cloud Fraction Simulated by Seven SCMs against the ARM Observations at the SGP Site Song, H., W. Lin, Y. Lin, A. B. Wolf, L. J. Donner, A. D. Del Genio, R. Neggers, S. Endo and Y. Liu (2014), Evaluation of Cloud Fraction Simulated by Seven SCMs against the ARM Observations at the SGP Site, J. Climate, accepted. Fig2. Vertical profiles of threshold RH in the ARM observations and 7 SCMs Fig1. Vertical profiles of 3-yr mean cloud fraction in the ARM observations and 7 SCMs Fig3. Model-observation differences in RH frequency (shading) and mean cloud fraction (contours) sorted by RH bins