Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Advertisements

Information Technology Update Aaron Smallwood Manager, IT Business & Customer Services.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Update to RMS January 6, RMGRR – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline The revision will implement a written standard in the Retail.
Retail Sub-Committee Update Robert Connell June 14, 2002.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott April 24,
ERCOT Retail Market IT Update Aaron Smallwood Director, IT Operations Retail Market Subcommittee April 7 th, 2015.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
1 MIMO/Stacking (Including Tx SET Version 2.0) Post Implementation Success Report.
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force October 16, 2002.
Market Impact Assessment TF Final Report to RMS June 11, 2008.
Voting Items RMGRR072, Clarification that ESI ID Count is for Active REP of Record in the CBCI File “APPROVED” awaiting impact analysis RMGRR073, Mass.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott March 26,
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott February 27,
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis October 2, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
TX SET January 21, 2009 Retail Release Items for February 21, 2009 Kathryn Thurman ERCOT.
Rob Connell May 1, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Recommendations for improvements from EDIM team (ESI ID Data Integrity Management team)
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
TX SET v2.1 Implementation Plan. Table of Contents A.Shut Down Procedure B.Shut Down Timeline Details C.Conference Calls D.Additional Contingencies.
Texas SET Version 3.0 Production Implementation Plan.
Report to RMS January 14, TTPT Key Dates and Deadlines as of 1/14/03 1/05/04 - Mandatory Connectivity Kick Off Call & Penny Tests begin 1/12/03.
PR50121_07 Retail Business Processes (RBP) Project Update Retail Market Subcommittee November 8, 2006 Adam D. Martinez Mgr, Market Operations DPO.
1 ESI ID SERVICE HISTORY AND USAGE DATA EXTRACT SYSTEM CHANGE REQUEST (SCR 727) February 24, 2003.
Retail Transaction Processing Year End Review and Recent Issues RMS January 2007.
October 9, 2012 Commercial Operations Subcommittee RMS Update Kathy Scott RMS Vice Chair.
Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Retail Transaction Processing.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
1 Update on the 867_03 Contingency Plan Nancy Hetrick February 25, 2003.
1 TX SET Update to RMS November 12, RMGRR Activity RMGRR065 – Disconnect and Reconnect for Non-Payment Updates and Corrections – –Normal Timeline.
February 10, 2010 RMS ERCOT 1/24/10 Production Issue Overview and Lessons Learned Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
Issue 2007-I071 Modify Cancellation Window to Accept Cancels Closer to SMRD.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting January 17, 2006.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Follow up from April RMS presentation Expedited Switch/Customer Rescission (Retail Customer Choice Team)
Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Tuesday March 3, Primary Activities 1.ERCOT System Outages and Failures 2.MarkeTrak Performance 3.Discussed 4 th QTR Performance.
1 ERCOT Retail Release Overview. 2 How Are Changes Managed? Retail Testing Business Teams Development Teams Release Management Management of: Migration.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 17, 2006.
1 TDTWG March 4, 2009 Performance Measures Overview.
1DRAFT for DISCUSSION Transition From Non-IDR to IDR Load Profile and LSE 15-minute Data for AMS Market Advanced Readings and Settlements Taskforce 10/9/09.
Update to RMS January 10, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
1 Move-In Move-Out Task Force Update to RMS May 15, 2003.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
SHARYLAND TRANSITION TASKFORCE (STTF) UPDATE UPDATE TO RMS DECEMBER 18,
February 16, 2011 Retail Market Subcommittee Performance Measures 4th Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday May 6, Primary Activities 1.Reviewed ERCOT System Outages and Failures 2.Reviewed Service Availability 3.Reviewed.
MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
SCR786 Retail Market Test (Sandbox) Environment January 2016.
1 TX SET Update to RMS August 13, Issues Under Review I075 – CSA-By Pass flag is being used by CRs when they do not have a CSA established I075.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
PWG Demand Response Follow Up Jackie Ashbaugh October 23, 2007.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting August 16, 2005.
Alternative Proposal SCR786 Retail Market Test Environment September 2015.
1 Market Trials Update NATF January 5, 2010.
3 rd Party Registration & Account Management SMT Update To AMWG March 22, 2016.
Market Metrics Working Group May 02, 2006 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2006 Transaction Comparison.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC
Stacking Implementation Plan
CEO Report Thomas F. Schrader ERCOT Board of Directors May 17, 2005
Ohio Web Portal Ohio Edison, Illuminating Company, Toledo Edison
Presentation transcript:

Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison

Reporting Issues Taken from Page 3 – Attachment A 02 – Analysis of Performance Measures Report 1Q 2010 A reporting issue is an issue with the reporting tool, Electronic Transaction System (ETS). There is no impact with the transactions being sent to the Market Participants. Reporting Issue 1 There first reporting system issue this quarter was a missed reporting impact relating to the Expedited Switch resulted in protocol calculations that were inaccurate for the Switch 814_06 (Scheduled Notification). The protocol calculation was not changed in the ETS system. The calculation expected the 814_06 to be sent five days prior to the scheduled date. The process creates the transaction two days prior to scheduled date. Each 814_06 was calculated as being out of protocol due to this reporting system issue. This reporting issue was corrected with Emergency SIR The SIR was implemented on February 17, Manual calculations were made at the market level and are used in this quarter’s reports. The impact was in figures reported in both January and February. Reporting Issue 2 As part of the analysis process, the number of 814_06 transactions reported appears to be low and could be a potential issue. On-going analysis is being conducted to determine the accuracy of the 814_06 count in the reporting tool. This issue potentially impacts Switch, Standard Move-In and Priority Move-In 814_06 (Scheduled Notifications to losing CR). The percentage in protocol for the counts reported are correct. The issue is currently under analysis. 2

Variance Explanation 3 Processing Issue 1 System changes implemented on January 23 resulted in EDI transactions that were not able to be processed by market participants. A roll-back of the code and reprocessing of transactions resulted in transactions being out of protocol. This was most noticeable in the Standard Move-In business process 814_06 (Schedule Notification) transactions. Processing Issue 2 On March 1st, one market participant submitted over ten thousand 814_26 (Historical Usage Request) transactions. This is much higher than the normal volume. The resulting 867_02 Historical Usage transactions being forwarded impacted not only the 814_26 (Ad Hoc Historical Usage Requests) but those Historical Usage Requests included in the 814_01 (Switch), 814_16 (Standard Move-In and 814_16 (Priority Move-In) transactions. The resulting 867_02 (Historical Usage) transactions have a four hour turn around timing that resulted in a backlog and required longer than the four hours to clear all the files through the system. Processing Issue 3 The 814_06 Sent Pending (Schedule Notifications) transactions are to be sent by 6:00 a.m. On March 9th, batch processing was not completed until 7:37 a.m. resulting in 1,400 Standard Move-In notifications being out of protocol.

4 Switches PUC #36141 Performance Measures Retail Market Subcommittee Q1 2010Q Transaction Qty% % 814_01 194, , _02 12,964100%12,746100% 814_03 181,772100%162,928100% 814_04 184,434100%163,633100% 814_05 180,415100%163,055100% 814_06 147,86298%132,703100% 814_07 121,10499%121,14699% 867_02 Received 186,11598%162,07999% 867_02 Sent 186,11499%162,040100% 867_04 Sent 170,585100%162,766100%

5 Standard Move-In PUC #36141 Performance Measures Retail Market Subcommittee Q1 2010Q Transaction Qty% % 814_16 432, , _17 3,68999%9,550100% 814_03 429,009100%441,316100% 814_04 426,935100%436,557100% 814_05 420,969100%434,82499% 814_06 205,98699%156,18399% 814_07 187,85699%194,56099% 867_02 Received 387,63699%375,82298% 867_02 Sent 387,63199%375,616100% 867_04 Sent 393,115100%421,827100%

6 Priority Move-In PUC #36141 Performance Measures Retail Market Subcommittee Q1 2010Q Transaction Qty% % 814_16 154, , _17 2,850100%4,12399% 814_03 151,35299%127,91099% 814_04 152,026100%127,287100% 814_05 149,053100%126,84899% 814_06 74,680100%58,837100% 814_07 60,03798%50,47999% 867_02 Received 148,59397%118,47899% 867_02 Sent 148,58999%118,421100% 867_04 Sent 139,826100%118,304100%

7 Move-Out PUC #36141 Performance Measures Retail Market Subcommittee Q1 2010Q Transaction Qty% % 814_24 Received 346, , _24 Sent 239,161100%253,608100% 814_25 Received 240,865100%254,759100% 814_25 Sent 343,868100%364,370100% 867_03 Received 294, , _03 Sent 294,734100%341,203100%

8 ESI ID Create/Maintain PUC #36141 Performance Measures Retail Market Subcommittee Q1 2010Q Transaction Qty% % 814_20 Create 34,277-31, _21 Create 34,096100%31,843100% 814_20 Maintain 1,014,263-1,189, _21 Maintain 1,026,886100%1,184,668100%

9 Questions?