Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov. 2006 INGV BET: a probabilistic tool for Eruption Forecasting and Volcanic Hazard Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia COV4 meeting - Quito, Ecuador, Jan , 2006 BET: A Probabilistic Tool for Long- and Short-term Volcanic.
Advertisements

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia European Geosciences Union, General Assembly 2006, Vienna, Austria, 02 – 07 April 2006 BET: A Probabilistic.
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia The International Merapi Workshop 2006, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Sectember 2006 BET: A Probabilistic Tool.
EGU General AssemblyEGU INGV-DPC Project UNRESTVienna, 05/05/2010.
EXPLORIS Montserrat Volcano Observatory Aspinall and Associates Risk Management Solutions An Evidence Science approach to volcano hazard forecasting.
1 Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff simulations An introduction and review of different techniques M. Shafii, Dept. Of Hydrology, Feb
A Brief Introduction to Bayesian Inference Robert Van Dine 1.
Volcano Observatory Best Practice Workshop Near Term Eruption Forecasting Near Term Eruption Forecasting Erice, Sicily (IT), September 2011 CALDERAS.
TNO orbit computation: analysing the observed population Jenni Virtanen Observatory, University of Helsinki Workshop on Transneptunian objects - Dynamical.
Creating probability forecasts of binary events from ensemble predictions and prior information - A comparison of methods Cristina Primo Institute Pierre.
Statistical Postprocessing of Weather Parameters for a High-Resolution Limited-Area Model Ulrich Damrath Volker Renner Susanne Theis Andreas Hense.
Warner Marzocchi, Laura Sandri INGV, Via D. Creti 12, Bologna, Italy Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Considerazioni.
1 Graphical Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating Latent Class Models: An Application to Depression in the ECA Study Elizabeth S. Garrett Department of Biostatistics.
Application of SASHA for Portugal cases: mainland Portugal Carvalho A. (LNEC), Albarello D. (Un. Siena), Meroni F. (INGV) and Zonno G. (INGV)
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
This presentation can be downloaded at Water Cycle Projections over Decades to Centuries at River Basin to Regional Scales:
Comparing volcanic risk at Volcán de Fuego and Cerro Quemado, Guatemala. PhD research proposal by Rüdiger Escobar Wolf.
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
1 CS 430 / INFO 430 Information Retrieval Lecture 12 Probabilistic Information Retrieval.
1 CS 430 / INFO 430 Information Retrieval Lecture 12 Probabilistic Information Retrieval.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Full.
A Concept of Environmental Forecasting and Variational Organization of Modeling Technology Vladimir Penenko Institute of Computational Mathematics and.
Baysian Approaches Kun Guo, PhD Reader in Cognitive Neuroscience School of Psychology University of Lincoln Quantitative Methods 2011.
Extreme Value Analysis, August 15-19, Bayesian analysis of extremes in hydrology A powerful tool for knowledge integration and uncertainties assessment.
The Calibration Process
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Global.
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 5 - Software Testing Techniques.
Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
September 20101Master of Science in Geological & Mining & Sciences Michigan Technological University – College of Engineering Historic Activity Records.
Demand Forecasting By Prof. Jharna Lulla.
Eruption Forecasting through the Bayesian Event Tree: the software package BET_EF INGV BET: a probabilistic tool for Eruption Forecasting and Volcanic.
1 Bayesian methods for parameter estimation and data assimilation with crop models Part 2: Likelihood function and prior distribution David Makowski and.
WSEAS AIKED, Cambridge, Feature Importance in Bayesian Assessment of Newborn Brain Maturity from EEG Livia Jakaite, Vitaly Schetinin and Carsten.
BSBPMG508A Manage Project Risk 11.4 Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis Adapted from PMBOK 4 th Edition InitiationPlanning ExecutionClose Monitor Control.
Eruption Forecasting through the Bayesian Event Tree: the software package BET_EF INGV PART II: BET_EF installation PART II: BET_EF installation.
VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.
Statistical Decision Theory
Introduction to MCMC and BUGS. Computational problems More parameters -> even more parameter combinations Exact computation and grid approximation become.
The “EPRI” Bayesian M max Approach for Stable Continental Regions (SCR) (Johnston et al. 1994) Robert Youngs AMEC Geomatrix USGS Workshop on Maximum Magnitude.
CEE-SECR 2009 October Moscow, Russia Proposal Feasibility Study using Stochastic Risk Model Anton Khritankov.
Eruption Forecasting through the Bayesian Event Tree: the software package BET_EF INGV PART III: How BET_EF works PART III: How BET_EF works.
1 Probabilistic Scenario Analysis (PSA) 2 PSA -History In 1940’s - work on the atomic bomb In the 1950's - used as "what if" scenarios for nuclear proliferation.
Estimating Component Availability by Dempster-Shafer Belief Networks Estimating Component Availability by Dempster-Shafer Belief Networks Lan Guo Lane.
BSBPMG504A Manage Project Costs 7.1 Estimate Costs Adapted from PMBOK 4 th Edition InitiationPlanning ExecutionClose Monitor Control The process of developing.
INGV Real time volcanic hazard evaluation during a volcanic crisis: BET_EF and the MESIMEX experiment W. Marzocchi 1, L. Sandri 1, J. Selva 1, G. Woo 2.
Statistical Decision Theory Bayes’ theorem: For discrete events For probability density functions.
Introduction to LDA Jinyang Gao. Outline Bayesian Analysis Dirichlet Distribution Evolution of Topic Model Gibbs Sampling Intuition Analysis of Parameter.
FastOpt Quantitative Design of Observational Networks M. Scholze, R. Giering, T. Kaminski, E. Koffi P. Rayner, and M. Voßbeck Future GHG observation WS,
An Introduction to Kalman Filtering by Arthur Pece
MATH 643 Bayesian Statistics. 2 Discrete Case n There are 3 suspects in a murder case –Based on available information, the police think the following.
Chapter 20 Classification and Estimation Classification – Feature selection Good feature have four characteristics: –Discrimination. Features.
Long-term forecasting of volcanic explosivity
November 3 IDR To do: What we have, what we’d like to do Modeling Mathematical/numerical approaches What we need inside the codes Tasks.
Because of its elevation (4,392 m), relief, hydrothermal alteration, ice cap, glacier-fed radial valleys, and proximity to suburbs of the Seattle-Tacoma.
A summary lecture on two long-lived eruptions, and how we as scientists might respond to such events.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Decision Analysis.
COV outline Case study 1: Model with expert judgment (limited data): Perceived probability of explosive magmatic eruption of La Soufriere, Guadeloupe,
Naïve Bayes Classifier April 25 th, Classification Methods (1) Manual classification Used by Yahoo!, Looksmart, about.com, ODP Very accurate when.
Jiancang Zhuang Inst. Statist. Math. Detecting spatial variations of earthquake clustering parameters via maximum weighted likelihood.
Ch 1. Introduction Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, C. M. Bishop, Updated by J.-H. Eom (2 nd round revision) Summarized by K.-I.
Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting experts’ probabilities Anthony O’Hagan et al 2006 Review by Samu Mäntyniemi.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
The Calibration Process
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design
More about Posterior Distributions
Environmental Statistics
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
Chapter 26 Estimation for Software Projects.
Presentation transcript:

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV BET: a probabilistic tool for Eruption Forecasting and Volcanic Hazard Assessment W. Marzocchi, L. Sandri, J. Selva INGV-Bologna BET: a probabilistic tool for Eruption Forecasting and Volcanic Hazard Assessment W. Marzocchi, L. Sandri, J. Selva INGV-Bologna Project INGV-DPC V4: “Innovative techniques to study active volcanoes”. Responsibles: W.Marzocchi, INGV-Bo, A. Zollo, Univ. of Naples

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV V4 Project Website (

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV OUTLINE of the presentation Defining BET General theoretical description plus some details BET software Main features of the BET_EF code MESIMEX application Checking how BET works

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV What is BET? BET (Bayesian Event Tree)statistical code eruption forecasting (BET_EF) (BET_VH)epistemicaleatory BET (Bayesian Event Tree) is a new statistical code to estimate and visualize short- to long-term eruption forecasting (BET_EF) and volcanic hazard (BET_VH) and relative uncertainties (epistemic and aleatory) BET Output: BET Output: Time and space evolution of the probability function of each specific event in which we are interested in. BET Input: BET Input: Volcanological data, models, and/or expert opinion. These data are provided by the end-user. BET transforms these information into probabilities

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV The method is based on three basic steps 1. Design of a generic Bayesian Event Tree Bibliography â Newhall and Hoblitt, Bull. Volc (for step 1) ã Marzocchi et al., JGR 2004 (for steps 2 and 3) ã Marzocchi et al., 2006; IAVCEI volume on statistics in Volcanology (for steps 2 and 3) ã Marzocchi et al., 2006, submitted to Bull. Volcan.(full description of BET)Bibliography â Newhall and Hoblitt, Bull. Volc (for step 1) ã Marzocchi et al., JGR 2004 (for steps 2 and 3) ã Marzocchi et al., 2006; IAVCEI volume on statistics in Volcanology (for steps 2 and 3) ã Marzocchi et al., 2006, submitted to Bull. Volcan.(full description of BET) How BET works? 2. Estimate the conditional probability at each node 3. Combine the probabilities of each node to obtain probability distribution of any relevant event

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV The probability  of the SELECTED PATH is the product of conditional probability  i at ALL SELECTED BRANCHES:  1 ] [  2 ] [  3 ] [  4 ] [  5 ] … The probability  of the SELECTED PATH is the product of conditional probability  i at ALL SELECTED BRANCHES:  1 ] [  2 ] [  3 ] [  4 ] [  5 ] … BET Structure & Probability BET_EF short to long-term BET_EF BET_VHlong-termBET_VHlong-term

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY AT THE NODE:  k  =   k (M)  + (1-  k (NM)  CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY AT THE NODE:  k  =   k (M)  + (1-  k (NM)   k (M)  MONITORING PART Monitoring Data & Models  k (M)  MONITORING PART Monitoring Data & Models  k (NM)  NON-MONITORING PART Non-monitoring Data, Geological & Physical Models  k (NM)  NON-MONITORING PART Non-monitoring Data, Geological & Physical Models MONITORING DATA State of unrest  at t 0 through FUZZY LOGIC MONITORING DATA State of unrest  at t 0 through FUZZY LOGIC Conditional Probability [  K ] (Node k)

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Bayes theorem MODELS Prior MODELS Prior DATA Likelihood … each part  k (.)  (monitoring and non-monitoring) At each node we account for: Models + data Epistemic and aleatoric uncertainities At each node we account for: Models + data Epistemic and aleatoric uncertainities POSTERIOR PDF  k  =  k (.)  [H (.) |  k (.)  H (.)  (no epistemic uncertainty)

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Through FUZZY SET theory… Through expert opinion and/or looking at “analogs” (need of WOVOdat!), the user defines: 1.the SET of parameters at each node 2.INTERVAL OF VALUES as threshold for each parameter Smooth variation of probabilities are found for small changes in monitoring parameters (smooth transitions) Through FUZZY SET theory… Through expert opinion and/or looking at “analogs” (need of WOVOdat!), the user defines: 1.the SET of parameters at each node 2.INTERVAL OF VALUES as threshold for each parameter Smooth variation of probabilities are found for small changes in monitoring parameters (smooth transitions) … going into some details : including monitoring degree of anomaly z i measure State of unrest  A priori model [  k (1) ]

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV … going into some details: from monitoring to probability  k (M) |H] =  k (1)  [H (1) |  k (1)  H   Z (k) =  i z i degree of anomaly at the node  1 - exp(-  (k) ) Average of  k (1)  Monitoring part z i degree of anomaly of i-th parameter BET computes: The user: input measures

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV BET_EF PACKAGE

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Event Tree for BET_EF Number & geometry chosen by the user Number of size groups defined by the user

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV BET_EF Package Hazard procedure Target volcano Event selection (Unrest + Magmatic Intrusion + Eruption+Vent all locs + SIZE=2+) OUTPUT

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Probability visualization ABSOLUTE PROBABILITYCONDITIONAL PROBABILITY AT THE NODE Selection done: (1) unrest -> (2) magmatic intrusion -> (3) eruption -> (4) location all -> (5) SIZE=2+ Probability that all the events in the selected path occur contemporaneously Probability that the events at the selected node occur, given previous nodes

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Monitoring measures Measured values are directly input in BET_EF at nodes 1, 2, 3, & 4

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Probability Maps Probability maps are visualized in BET_EF. Each grid point is defined by a probability distribution (epistemic uncertainity); the parameter of each distribution are reported in tables.

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Probability Maps Probability maps may also be loaded in GoogleEarth, complete with 3D plot, description of the parameters of the probability distribution at each grid point.

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV BET_ UPGRADE (example node 1) modelsdatamonitoring thresholds

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Major requirements to load a volcano in BET_EF are: 1.Models and/or theoretical believes, and/or expert elicitation 2.Catalog of past volcanic events and related phenomena 3.Monitoring parameters and relative threshold intervals 4.Number and geometry of vent locations Application to volcanoes ALL VOLCANOES can be loaded in BET_EF with the BET_UPGRADE PACKAGE Until now, we have (preliminary) implemented BET_EF for Mt. Vesuvius, and we are doing the same for Campi Flegrei (INGV-DPC V3_2 and V3_4 projects).

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV BET_EF will be distributed for free after a pilot test carried out by volcanologists with experience in managing volcanic crises.

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Application to MESIMEX You can download a report (in Italian) at the web site BET_EF code applied to MESIMEX. The code is developed in the INGV-DPC V4 project (leaded by W. Marzocchi & A. Zollo). The details are in Marzocchi et al., 2006; submitted to Bull. Volc. Monitoring parameters and thresholds are taken from Marzocchi et al., JGR, A revision of parameters and thresholds is under consideration in the project INGV-DPC V3_4 Vesuvius (leaded by R. Cioni & E. Del Pezzo)

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Application to MESIMEX 17 Oct. 2006, 08:00; Probability per month Conditional Probability of specific size: Monitoring-independent! VEI=3: 64% VEI=4: 25% VEI=5+: 11%

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV  CO 2 flux = 10 Kg m -2 d -1  Other parameters inside the background Application to MESIMEX 17 Oct. 2006, 09:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Application to MESIMEX 17 Oct. 2006, 09:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV  Maximum magnitude in the last month = 4.2  Other parameters inside the background  N. events in the last month = 38  CO 2 flux = 10 Kg m -2 d -1  Seismic events localized out of crater Application to MESIMEX 18 Oct. 2006, 07:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Application to MESIMEX 18 Oct. 2006, 07:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV  CO2 flux = 20 Kg m -2 d -1  Maximum magnitude in the last month= 4.2  Other parameters inside the background  N. events in the last month = 61  LP events in the last month = 2  T fumaroles = C  Presence of SO 2  Localization of VT and LP Application to MESIMEX 19 Oct. 2006, 09:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Application to MESIMEX 19 Oct. 2006, 09:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV  CO 2 flux = 30 Kg m -2 d -1  Maximum magnitude in the last month= 4.2  Other parameters inside the background  N. events in the last month = 104  LP events in the last month = 26  T fumaroles = C  Presence of SO 2  Localization of VT and LP   , d  /dt = d -1   3.6 Hz, d  dt = -0.4 Hz d -1 Application to MESIMEX 19 Oct. 2006, 18:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Application to MESIMEX 19 Oct. 2006, 18:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV  CO 2 flux = 300 Kg m -2 d -1  Maximum magnitude in the last month= 4.2  Other parameters inside the background  N. events in the last month = 183  LP events in the last month = 61  T fumaroles = C  Presence of SO 2  Localization of VT and LP   , d  /dt = d -1   3.5 Hz, d  dt = -0.5 Hz d -1 Application to MESIMEX 20 Oct. 2006, 15:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Application to MESIMEX 20 Oct. 2006, 15:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV  CO 2 flux = 400 Kg m -2 d -1  Maximum magnitude in the last month= 4.2  N. events in the last month = 258  LP events in the last month = 131  T fumaroles = C  Presence of SO 2  Localization of VT and LP   , d  /dt = d -1   2.5 Hz, d  dt = -1 Hz d -1 (tremor episodes)   0.3 (variations in hypocenters location) Application to MESIMEX 21 Oct. 2006, 17:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV Application to MESIMEX 21 Oct. 2006, 17:00; Probability per month

Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV  BET is a transparent tool to calculate and to visualize probabilities related to eruption forecasting/hazard assessment  BET “dynamically” manages long-term (land use planning of the territory) and short-term (during emergency to help managing of short-term actions, e.g., evacuation) probabilities for each kind of possible event  BET considers all of the available (and relevant) information (models, state of the volcano, geologic/volcanologic/historic data, monitoring observations, expert elicitation); the output is the quantitative merging of all of them  BET takes properly into account the epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. This allows to highlight what we know and what we do not know about the system, indicating future possible works to improve the scheme  BET uses fuzzy logic to manage monitoring measurements smooth transitions in probability and overcome single threshold definition Points to take home