HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Advertisements

AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #2 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta, Matthew Basiletti, Ryan Beech, Mike Van Meter.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck February 18, 2010.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
Project Presentation Boiler Xpress December 5, 2000 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal Van Meter AAE 451 Aircraft Design.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
Oculus Superne. 2 System Definition Review Mission Objectives Concept of Operations Aircraft Concept Selection Payload Constraint Analysis and Diagrams.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Christopher Cottingham
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Oculus Superne 1 1.) Introduction 2.) Mission & Market 3.) Operations
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok AAE451 Aircraft Design Professor Dominick Andrisani First Flight November 21,
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
Rear spar for control surface hinges Styrene foam wing core Balsa spars carry bending load 0.25 in x 0.25 in T.E. Reinforcement Materials Employed: Balsa:
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 33 GR3 Review. General strategy  Prior to class Review reading for lessons 23 – 32 Work / review problems #26 – 42 Review.
Over view Landing Gear Landing Gear Weight Determination Weight Determination Geometric Layout of Wing Structure Geometric Layout of Wing Structure Analysis.
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
Aero Design Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo
System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 1 System Definition Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella Brian.
Lesson 2-2a Principles of Flight
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo Josiah Shearon A IR HERCULES 1.
Craig Kohring, Pat Tice, Sean Dineen, Mark Gasser James Pallardy, Katie Schipf, AJ Dayvie.
1 Conceptual Design Review 4/17/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce Dauby Andrew Kovach Andrew.
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
BASICS OF RC PLANE. Overview  What is RC Plane?  RC Planes’ Parts and their Role  How planes fly?  Concepts and Terminologies of RC Plane  Stability.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
SR-71 Blackhawk Flight & Space $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Final Design Team 6 December 2 nd, UAV Team Specializations David Neira – Power & Propulsion Josiah Shearon – Materials Selection & Fabrication.
1 Real World Design Challenge Aircraft Overview 24 Sep Mrs. McDaniel Dr. Chris Shearer,
Bridget Fitzpatrick Patrick Dempsey Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #2 October 23, 2000.
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Theory of Flight All are demonstrated by the flight of the bird!
Structures PDR 1 Team Boiler Xpress Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal VanMeter October 12, 2000.
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Joe Lojek Justin Sommer James Koryan Ramy Ghaly November 7, 2006 Ducks on a Plane.
비행체 구조설계 Aircraft Structural Design
12/11/12 Brandon Campbell & Ernesto Chairez. Purpose  Civil Transport  Large Volume  Efficient  Quiet  Long Range.
Yaqoub Almounes John Cowan Josh Gomez Michael Medulla Mohammad Qasem
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
2007 SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
SAE Aero 2017 Midterm Presentation Joe Zongolowicz, Nick Montana, Frank Dixon, Kevin Scheventer, Kathy Hansen, Marquis Ward, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao,
SAE Aero 2017 Status Update Joe Zongolowicz, Thomas Houck, Kathy Hansen, Gerald Short, Marquis Ward, Zhangsiwen Xiao, Coleman Gordon, Kevin Scheventer,
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
Team 5 Final Design Review
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
Team 5 Final Design Review
c/Maj Christopher Greves
Weight and Balance Private Pilot Ground School
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
Dynamics and Control PDR 1
Presentation transcript:

HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON

Mission Statement To design a High Altitude / Long Endurance (HALE) UAV using alternative fuel sources to support homeland security efforts with a concentration in long term border security.

Design Changes v1 v3 v2 v4 v5 v6

Sauron v7

Design Changes – Wing and Tail

Design Changes – Landing Gear

Dimensions ParameterWingTail AirfoilSM701Jouk0015 Span (ft.) Reference Chord (ft.) Area (ft. 2 ) Cruise C L Span Efficiency1.01 Max C L 1.4 Power Generated (kW)16.93 Aspect Ratio29.6 Neutral Point Location (ft.)13.4 C.G. Location (ft.)13.2

Wing/Tail Lift Distribution

Structures – Materials HexPly M91 - Epoxy Matrix for primary aerospace structure High residual compression strength after impact (CAI) Supports automated manufacturing HexTow IM10 - Carbon Fiber 12k tow Suitable for weaving, pre- pregging, filament winding, braiding, and pultrusion Enhanced tensile properties Highest commercially available tensile strength * Avg. cost: $45/lb. M91/IM10

Structures – Materials Epoxy-Fiber (Prepreg) Combination (M91/IM10) Theoretical Values Cured Ply Thickness (in)~ Fiber Volume (%)~ 58.9 Laminate Density (g/cm 3 )~ 1.4 Laminate Modulus (GPa)~ 200 Tensile Strength (MPa)~ 3620 HexTow IM10 Carbon Fiber # of Filaments12000 Filament Diameter (microns)4.4 Tensile Strength (MPa)6964 Tensile Modulus (GPa)310 Strain (%)2.0 Density (g/cm 3 )1.79

Wing – Spar Design

Wing – Weight and Lift Distribution

Wing – Moment and Stress

Wing – Deflection

Wing Deflection Analysis

H &V Stabilizer Spar Design

Horizontal Stabilizer – Lift Distribution

H. Stabilizer – Moment and Stress

H. Stabilizer – Wing Deflection

Vertical Stabilizer – Weight and Lift Distribution

V. Stabilizer – Moment and Stress

V. Stabilizer - Deflection

Weight Breakdown Aircraft PartEmpty Weight (lbs) Wing Fuselage32.77 Horizontal Stabilizer10.24 Vertical Stabilizer3.98 Solar Cell87.53 Wing Spar70.38 Vertical Stab Spar0.71 Horizontal Stab Spar Motors16.00 Fuselage Formers15.00 Gear System40.00 Total Empty Weight ParameterEmpty Weight (lbs) Total Empty Weight Battery Payload Total834.44

Control Surfaces

Aileron Control Surface Area: 3% P cruise|61k ft = 13.8 deg/sec P stall|61k ft = 11.5 deg/sec Required Aileron Deflection =10°

Elevator Control Surface Area: 46.7% Pitch Rate= 9 deg/sec Required Elevator Deflection= -2.6° Lift Coefficient, C L Elevator Deflection (°)

Rudder Control Surface Area: 42.9% Rudder Deflection: 20° Maximum Sidewash: 10° Max Crosswind: 12.5 ft/s

Control Surface Demo

Airfoil Selection Wing AirfoilH&V Stabilizer Airfoil

Updated Drag Analysis

Sea Level45,000 feet61,000 feet79,000 feet Stall Speed (ft/s) Cruise Speed (ft/s) Max Speed (ft/s) Total Drag (lbs) Power Required (kW) Reynolds’ Number1,129, , , ,504.6 C Do Oswald’s Efficiency Max L/D

Updated Power Analysis

Takeoff ParameterSea LevelDenverAfghanistan Ground Roll [ft] V takeoff [ft/s] d ab|35ft [ft] d ab|50ft [ft] D total|35ft [ft] D total|50ft [ft] Thrust [lbs]

Landing ParameterSea LevelDenverAfghanistan V a [ft/s] γ a [deg] Radius [ft] Flare Height [ft] Flare Speed [ft/s] da 35ft [ft] da 50ft [ft] df [ft] V TD [ft/s] Thrust [lbs]

Constraint Diagram Original Current

Cost Analysis Fixed Costs for 5 Developmental Aircraft: –Engineering Costs: $29,869, –Flight Test Ops: $17,638, –Tooling: $4,567,827.99

Pricing

Pricing Summary Design Aircraft5 Engineering Costs $ 29,869, Flight Test Ops $ 17,638, Tooling Costs $ 4,567, Manufacturing Costs $ 3,411, $ 14,924, $ 65,298, $ 183,206, $ 285,693, Quality Control Costs $ 490, $ 2,146, $ 9,393, $ 26,353, $ 41,096, Total Materials Costs $ 889, $ 2,223, $ 15,567, $ 74,872, $ 149,002, Design Materials Costs $ 741, Production Materials Costs $ 148, $ 1,482, $ 14,826, $ 74,130, $ 148,261, Total Frame Costs $ 60,725, $ 75,229, $ 146,192, $ 340,366, $ 531,727, Minimum Price Per UAV $ 60,725, $ 7,522, $ 1,461, $ 680, $ 531, * +$2M per for custom sensory packages

Comparison to Competitors RQ-1/MQ-1 Predator –Unit Cost: $4.03M –360 Built MQ-9 Reaper –Unit Cost: $16.9M –104 Built RQ-4 Global Hawk –Unit Cost: $131.4M –42 Built Solara 50/60 –Unit Cost: $1-2M –N/A Built

Questions? 14 Days ‘Til Graduation

Double Camera

Summary