V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Revised CAMx 2004 Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.
Advertisements

Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Revised CAMx Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation December.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Latest CAMx 2018 Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team ENVIRON International Corporation Alpine.
CENRAP Modeling Workgroup Mational RPO Modeling Meeting May 25-26, Denver CO Calvin Ku Missouri DNR May 25, 2004.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Meteorological Modeling Presentation to the SWCAA By ENVIRON International Corporation Alpine Geophysics, LLC.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) Emission Inventory Comparison 2008 vs 2011 vs 2018 vs 2020 University of North.
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Chemistry, Fertilizer, and the Environment Mandi Bottoms, Curriculum and Evaluation Specialist.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2011 Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International.
WRAP CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results Implementation Workgroup Meeting August 29, 2006.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling Results and RMC Status report Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
WRAP Fugitive Dust Emission Summary and Evaluation (AoH Phase II/TSS Task 7b) ENVIRON International Corporation 15 November 2005 Tempe, AZ.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Initial CAMx Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation October.
Monday April 2, 2012 (Discussion & Worksheet – Weather, Climate, and the Atmosphere)
1 Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ PM2.5 Source Apportionment Estimates Kirk Baker and Brian Timin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
Regional Modeling Center Workplan Fire/Carbon/Dust Workshop May 24, 2006.
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
EANET activities and the applicability to model development Kazuhide Matsuda ADORC.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt GRGAQS: Meteorological Modeling Presentation to the SWCAA By ENVIRON International Corporation Alpine Geophysis, LLC.
1 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase II Work Plan: 2002 and 2018 Area Source Inventory Improvements and Area Source Controls Evaluation WRAP Stationary Sources Forum.
October 1-3, th Annual CMAS Meeting1 Effects of Liquid Water on Secondary Inorganic Aerosol in Central California During a Winter Episode 1 Planning.
Fugitive Dust Project Phase One The WRAP Emissions Forum contracted with a team of contractors lead by ENVIRON to produce regional PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
1 CRGAQS: Meteorological Modeling prepared for Southwest Clean Air Agency 19 June 2006 prepared by Alpine Geophysics, LLC ENVIRON International Corp.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
SJV PM10 SIP Modeling & Data Analysis December 5, 2002 Policy Committee Meeting.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Revised/Final 2018 CAMx Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx 2004 PSAT Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Impact assessment of anthropogenic emission control upon aerosol mass burden during heavy pollution episodes over North China Plain Meigen Zhang, Xiao.
California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study: Update March 17, 1999 Air & Waste Management Association Conference.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Regional Haze Rule Promulgated in 1999 Requires states to set RPGs based on 4 statutory factors and consideration of a URP URP = 20% reduction in manmade.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon and Dust – Sacramento, CA - May 23-24, 2006 WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Regional Modeling Center ENVIRON; UCR.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 December WRAP Modeling Forum Conf Call Call Information: December 20, 1pm.
Humidity. These figures were all obtained from the National Climatic Data Center.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Emissions Background and Rationale North American SO 2 Emission Rates North American NO x Emission Rates Contact: Bret Schichtel,
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: New CAMx 2018 Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team ENVIRON International Corporation Alpine.
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
EPA Region 10 Cumulative Effects Analysis Methodology Development Rob Wilson and Herman Wong WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 16, 2003.
Growth and Control for LADCO Round2 Modeling
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
CRGAQS: CAMx 2018 Results Presentation to the
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
WRAP RMC Windblown Dust Emission Inventory Project Summary
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
PM2.5 Soil/Crustal Sensitivity Runs
CRGAQS: Latest CAMx 2018 Results R2
CRGAQS: CAMx PSAT Results
CRGAQS: Final 2018 CAMx Results
Presentation transcript:

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Revised CAMx 2004 Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation May 2, 2007

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt Today’s Presentation Describe OR/WA emission changes Describe November 2004 met changes Revised 2004 CAMx simulation results Next Steps

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt Additional WA Funding 2004 and 2018 emission improvements 2004 November meteorological improvements Rerun CAMx –2004 Base Case, August and November episodes –2018 Future Case, August and November episodes –2018 “What-if” scenarios –2004 and 2018 PSAT runs, both episodes

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt OR/WA Emission Changes Reviewed/changed ammonia emissions: –All CAFOs increased: x1.2 for OR, x1.4 for WA –Three Mile Canyon near Boardman increased x4.3 head count and “flush” operations identified –Certain fertilizer application types increased x3.3 for anhydrous and aqueous x2.7 for nitrogen solution –Checked monthly fertilizer allocation by state (but not changed) –No 2018 WRAP ammonia – WRAP used 2002 numbers for 2018 We used 2002 WRAP outside OR/WA for 2018 We used 2004 OR/WA for 2018

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt OR/WA Emission Changes Reviewed/changed residential wood combustion: –ODEQ revealed x2 over estimate from surveys –WRAP 2018 RWC indicates x7 growth for OR, x3 growth for WA, from our 2004 RWC –WRAP emissions contractor (ERG) stated a 4% growth (population-based) –We reduced 2004 RWC by 50% and grew by 4% for 2018 –Monthly profiles differ in 2004 from 2018 (but not changed)

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt OR/WA Emission Changes Reviewed wind-blown dust methodology –Found some minor issues, but did not change given very small component of overall PM

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November Met Changes Background –August is performing OK, but November lacks secondary aerosols Lack of fog reduces aqueous SO4 production Low humidity reduces NO3 condensation Hypothesis: If we can get the fog right, –Aqueous SO4 production can occur –High humidity will help increase condensation of ammonium nitrate

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November Met Changes Approach 1)Gather satellite imagery for the period (provided by Paul) 2)Calculate MM5 average fog water content occurring over the episode -- use as the default water content to fill in the fog “holes” 3)Evaluate imagery against CAMx cloud plots to identify onset of fog and spatial extent – use terrain fields to define valleys and basins where the fog consistently forms and lingers 4)Use results from (2) and (3) to fill in fog in CAMx cloud field 5)Modify CAMx chemistry routine to ensure that relative humidity is 100% for a cloudy grid cell

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt August 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt August 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt August 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt August 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt August 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt August 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt August 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt November 2004 Results

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt Next Steps 2018 runs are “in the oven” 2018 “what-if” scenarios are about to start 2004/18 PSAT runs will start after these are completed Complete technical report