Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
Advertisements

Generation of the transpolar potential Ramon E. Lopez Dept. of Physics UT Arlington.
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
Ion Equatorial Distributions from Energetic Neutral Atom Images Obtained From IMAGE during Geomagnetic Storms Zhang, X. X., J. D. Perez, M.-C. Fok D. G.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
IMF Bx influence on the magnetotail neutral sheet geometry and dynamics E. Gordeev, M. Amosova, V. Sergeev Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg,
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
An analysis of the 23 rd Solar Cycle’s High Speed Solar Wind Streams activity: sources of radiation hazards in Geospace Space Weather Effects on Humans:
Magnetic Clouds: A Possibility of Forecasting Geomagnetic Storms I.ANTONIADOU (1), A.GERANIOS (1), Μ.VANDAS (2), O.MALANDRAKI (3) (1) University of Athens,
Lecture 3 Introduction to Magnetic Storms. An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF. Magnetospheric storms are large,
Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
Magnetic Storm Generation by Various Types of Solar Wind: Event Catalog, Modeling and Prediction N. S. Nikolaeva, Yu.I. Yermolaev, and I. G. Lodkina Space.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Olga Khabarova Heliophysical Laboratory, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow, Russia
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
On the February 14-15, 2011 CME-CME interaction event and consequences for Space Weather Manuela Temmer(1), Astrid Veronig(1), Vanessa Peinhart(1), Bojan.
Response of the Polar Cusp and the Magnetotail to CIRs Studied by a Multispacecraft Wavelet Analysis Axel Korth 1, Ezequiel Echer 2, Fernando L. Guarnieri.
Multi-level observations of magneto- acoustic cut-off frequency Ding Yuan Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
Large electric fields near the nightside plasmapause observed by the Polar spacecraft K.-H. Kim 1, F. Mozer 2, and D.-H. Lee 1 1 Department of Astronomy.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Heliospheric Observations during October – November 2003 Hari Om Vats Physical Research Laboratory Ahmedabad INDIA ICRC.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
WG3: Extreme Events Summary N. Gopalswamy & A. Vourlidas.
Identifying the Role of Solar-Wind Number Density in Ring Current Evolution Paul O’Brien and Robert McPherron UCLA/IGPP.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
Japan, ICRC 2003 Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,,
GEOEFFECTIVE INTERPLANETARY STRUCTURES: 1997 – 2001 A. N. Zhukov 1,2, V. Bothmer 3, A. V. Dmitriev 2, I. S. Veselovsky 2 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium.
CME Propagation CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 11, April 10 Spring 2008.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas S OLAR E VENTS TOWARDS THE E ARTH IN 2002 B.Schmieder (1), N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin (1), K. Bocchialini (2), M. Menvielle.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Correlation of magnetic field intensities and solar wind speeds of events observed by ACE. Mathew J. Owens and Peter J. Cargill. Space and Atmospheric.
ABSTRACT Disturbances in the magnetosphere caused by the input of energy from the solar wind enhance the magnetospheric currents and it carries a variation.
The large scale convection electric field, ring current energization, and plasmasphere erosion in the June 1, 2013 storm Scott Thaller Van Allen Probes.
Summary Using 21 equatorial CHs during the solar cycle 23 we studied the correlation of SW velocity with the area of EIT CH and the area of NoRH RBP. SW.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
Poster X4.137 Solar Wind Trends in the Current Solar Cycle (STEREO Observations) A.B. Galvin* 1, K.D.C. Simunac 2, C. Farrugia 1 1.Space Science Center,
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Extremely Intense (SML ≤ nT) Supersubstorms (SSS)
Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel MD, USA
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Consequences of the Anomalous Expansion of CMEs in Solar Cycle 24
Solar Events towards the Earth in 2002
TYPICAL PROFILES AND DISTRIBUTIONS OF PLASMA AND MAGNETIC FIELD PARAMETERS IN MAGNETIC CLOUDS AT 1 AU Luciano Rodriguez[1], Jimmy J. Masias-Meza[2], Sergio.
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Magnetic clouds and their driven shocks/sheaths near Earth: geoeffective properties studied with a superposed epoch technique Dasso S.1,2, Masías-Meza.
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
Introduction to Space Weather
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
Presentation transcript:

Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types in this study and their geoeffectiviness Δt, -Bzmax, and (-VBz)max in relation with the Dst index Correlation between (-VBz)max and Dst index Solar cycle 23 Conclusions SHINE WORKSHOP 2005 STUDENT’S SESSION Magnetic Clouds and their Geoeffectiviness

Magnetic Clouds (MCs) are perturbations in the interplanetary medium often observed in situ by spacecraft. These perturbations satisfy the next three characteristics: (1)the magnetic field is higher than the ambient solar wind field (2)the magnetic field rotates smoothly on a plane, and (3) the temperature is lower than in the solar wind. MCs are good candidates to study their geoeffectiviness

MC Shock -104 nT In this event the storm is caused by a MC which has a long-lasting and well order magnetic field in the south Bz component STORM CAUSED BY MC B (nT) Lat. angle Temperature (K) Density (p/cm 3 ) Speed (km/s) Pressure (nPa) Plasma β Dst (nT) OMNIWeb,Wind (20-23/04/2001)

STORM CAUSED ONLY BY SHEATH REGION MC -110 nT In our data set, sheath regions with south Bz component (9 events) generate Dst dips of around -127nT In this event the storm is caused by the sheath region and not by the MC Shock B (nT) Lat. angle Density (p/cm 3 ) Temperature (K) Speed (km/s) Pressure (nPa) Plasma β Dst (nT) OMNIWeb, Wind (05-10/11/1997)

MC -43 nT -68 nT TWO- STEP STORMS EVENT A two-step storm event has the next three conditions (Kamide et al., 1998) : (1) the first dip must be less than -30nT, and be separated from the second dip by more than 3 hours (2) the later dip must be greater than the previous one, and (3) there must be no storm sudden commencement (SSC) between the two dips In this event sheath and MC are geoeffective causing a two-step storm event. Shock B (nT) Lat. angle Temperature (K) Density (p/cm 3 ) Speed (km/s) Pressure (nPa) Plasma β Dst (nT) OMNIWeb, Wind ( /1998)

Two-step storm events Dst caused by sheath Dst caused by MC MF Distribution S S S S S S S N S S N S S S N S S N In the table the first S indicates that the sheath has a south Bz component, the second letter indicates the MF distribution in the leading part of MC, and the last letter indicates the MF distribution in the trailing part of MC. Two-step storms do not show a prefence related to the magnetic field (MF) distribution.

Magnetic Clouds with south BzMagnetic Clouds with south-north Bz Dst frequency Averaged storm intensity (minimum Dst) = -90 nT MCs with a south Bz configuration are more geoeffective than MCs with south-north Bz configuration. Averaged storm intensity (minimum Dst) = -81 nT 15 events24 events 0 -29

9 events MCs with South-North Bz + Sheath with North Bz 12 events Average Dst = nTAverage Dst = nT Sheath regions with south Bz configuration enhance the MC-magnetosphere interaction. This is more notorious MCs that have a S-N configuration. MCs with South-North Bz + Sheath with South Bz Dst frecuency Average Dst = nTAverage Dst = -101 nT MCs with South Bz + Sheath with North Bz MCs with South Bz + Sheath with South Bz 7 events

-100 nT < Dst < = -20 nT Dst < = -100 nT Δt is the temporal interval where the MCs and sheath regions have a south Bz component. Duration of south Bz component does not determine alone the strength of the geomagnetic storm. Δt parameter for MCs and sheath regions

-100 nT < Dst < = -20 nT Dst < = -100 nT -Bzmax has higher values for extreme storms and lower values for low to high intensity storms. -Bzmax parameter for MCs and sheath regions

-100 nT < Dst < = -20 nT Dst < = -100 nT High values for (-VBz)max are related to extreme storms and low values are related to medium storms. This is in agreement with previous results, i.e. R. K. Burton et al., 1975; Yuming Wang et al., 2003; and X. H. Xue et al., (-VBz)max for MCs and sheath regions

MCs It shows that the most intense storms are related to high values of (–VBz)max, and vice versa. The correlation shows that the most intense storms are related to high values of (-VBz)max, and vice versa. Sheath regions for the 2-step storms events Correlation between (-VBz)max and Dst index Sheath regions

Jan-96 Solar cycle 23 Comparison between the sunspot number and temporal evolution of the Dst index for geomagnetic storms caused by MCs and sheath regions. Jan-96 Jan-96 Dec-96 Dec-97 Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 MCs and sheath regions Jan-96 Dec-96 Dec-97 Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02

CONCLUSIONS MCs with south Bz configuration are more geoeffective than MCs with s-n Bz configuration. Sheath regions with south Bz enhance the MC-magnetosphere interaction. In some cases the sheath is the only region which interacts geoeffectivily. Two-step storm events are generated by a sheath region with south Bz followed by a MC with south Bz somewhere inside the cloud. When MC or a sheath region has a south Bz component for a long time it does not mean it will cause a storm of extreme intensity. –Bzmax has high values for extreme storms and low values for moderate storms. High values of (-VBz)max are related to extreme storms and low values are related to moderate storms. The correlation between (–VBz)max and Dst index for MCs is CC = and for sheath regions is CC = The most intense storms caused by MC and sheath regions occur during the solar maximum.

EVENT TYPES IN THIS STUDY: 1) MC with south or south-north Bz 2) MC with south Bz + sheath region 3) MC with south-north Bz + sheath region