NYS Professional Development Standards Based on National Staff Development Council Standards and goal: Every educator engages in effective professional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campus Improvement Plans
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
SAISD Office for Professional Learning Advisory Board March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy 623 S. Pecos.
Up-Date on Science and SS February 2015 Faculty Meeting.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York September 15, 2010.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
THE DRAFT MULTI-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN Toronto Catholic District School Board 1.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Implementation of CCSS CCCOE Curriculum Council November 2011.
Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Assessment for Learning and Development Principal Council Meeting North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Office of Early Learning February 2014.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
WCPSS Coaching Framework Strengthening Consistency, Cohesion, and Clarity for Coaches in WCPSS.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Data Driven Instruction & School-Based Inquiry What we know to this point…
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
Welcoming, caring, respectful, and safe learning and working environments and student code of conduct A presentation for EIPS leadership, COSC, EIPS staff,
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Evaluation: An Opportunity to leverage learning at all levels School Board Presentation – May 22, 2013.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
NC Digital Learning Competencies School Administrators and Classroom Teachers ****** Partnering for Education Impact April 19, 2016.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Accreditation External Review
State Board of Education Progress Update
Implementing Race to the Top
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

NYS Professional Development Standards Based on National Staff Development Council Standards and goal: Every educator engages in effective professional development every day so every student achieves.

Why Professional Development Standards? To ensure consistent, high quality, ongoing professional development that has a positive impact on student learning and achievement Already in place in NYS: regulation and guidance (PDP, APPR, Code of Ethics, Part 80, etc.) Regulation always accommodates some local control – hence anecdotal evidence of large differences in local implementation The development of NYS PD Standards was intended to be a resource and a tool – not additional regulation - to support greater coherence with, and across, local differences and needs

The Process PD subcommittee of PSPB (also subcom’s on mentoring and professional teaching standards) Research and review of NSDC, other state standards 3-day small-group writing retreat - summer 2007 Public input and feedback - spring 2008 Revise with stakeholder input/feedback – summer/fall 2008 PSPB approval – winter 2008 Board of Regents approval - February 2009

Implementation Recommendations (approved by Bd. of Regents) Use PD Standards as a guidance document in planning and implementing effective professional development Disseminate PD Standards through a multitude of providers of state-supported professional development Reference/ incorporate PD Standards within regulations and SED planning documents Support the use of PD Standards through the future development of rubrics

Guidance document - underway Describe possible uses and applications for standards (PDP planning, self-assessment, eval of PD, etc.) Describe possible roles of multiple stakeholders (teachers, principals, district administrators, staff developers, consultants, IHEs, etc.) Invite local construction and sharing of tools and resources for Statewide publication and dissemination Process – call together a field-based group to review and select ‘best-of’? PPT’s for local facilitation of aligning various efforts with standards at multiple levels –awareness, understanding, teacher reflection and use not proprietary, can be adapted for local use

[possible ‘understanding’] Hallmarks of effective professional development  Supports a culture of continuous improvement  Improves the learning of all students  Based on research-based expectations for teachers/students  Supported by professional learning communities  Uses collaborative leadership and shared responsibility to improve instruction and learning  Is job-embedded, sustained, provides practice and reflection  Includes adequate resources Do we meet these criteria in our professional development? How? Where do we need to improve?

[ possible ‘reflection and practice’ ] Standard Six: Student Learning Environments 6. Professional development ensures that educators have the knowledge and skill to create safe, secure, supportive, and equitable learning environments for all students.  How does our professional development provide opportunities to create this community and climate of caring, respect, and high achievement?  How does our professional development aid us in analyzing data on student behavior/climate to inform our instruction and promote supportive learning environments?

Proposed timeline for roll-out Draft guidance document to PSPB - June 2009 Finalize and publish guidance – summer/fall 2009 Bring to stakeholder groups (SCDN, TCs, SETRC, BETAC, RSSCs, etc.) – SY Solicit tools/rubrics developed in field – late spring 2010 Vet tools/rubrics – summer 2010 Publish tools/rubrics – initial fall 2010, ongoing

SCDN role(s) Collaborate in development of guidance document Facilitate roll-out of Standards to NYS schools and districts, PD provider networks, etc. Facilitate ‘awareness’ through ‘deep understanding’ of standards at multiple levels (Board of Ed, buildings, teachers…) Ensure vendor/consultant awareness of, and alignment to, Standards Contribute to development of tools and resources for Statewide dissemination (rubrics, evaluation formats, practices …) Serve on ‘vetting’ group for above Align your own PD work with Standards And/or …. ??

Your input, questions, ideas are welcomed