DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees and Fee Setting Methodology Nick Villalpando Chief Financial Officer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operational Budgeting Chapter 22.
Advertisements

City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
January 7, 2011 Overview of Governor’s Introduced Amendments to the Direct Aid to Public Education Budget (and other Public Education Funding)
NC Shared Services Funding Model Evolution North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services.
OPERATIONAL BUDGETING
Texas Department of Information Resources Board Meeting 9:30 a.m., February 7, 2013 Room 1-104, W.B. Travis Building 1701 North Congress Avenue.
Fiscal Year University of Nevada School of Medicine Self-Supporting Budgets.
Principles of Budgeting. Learning Objectives Discuss concepts of budgeting. Identify examples of budget-planning steps. Identify examples of stages of.
Infant Toddler Rate Increase November Infant Toddler Rate Analysis Based on the analysis of rates for educators in infant and toddler programs,
Infant Toddler Rate Increase October Infant Toddler Rate Analysis Based on the analysis of rates for educators in infant and toddler programs, and.
Budgeting According to hotel management consultant Kirby Payne, ‘Managing expenses is among the most important things a manager does. (I never say it.
Trademark Fee Cost Analysis TPAC Briefing June 9, 2009.
Texas Department of Information Resources Information Resources/Technology Initiatives.
February  Intro  Budgeting Timeline  Update on NSTAR upgrade  Budgeting Changes and Guidelines  HR position budgeting  Finance budgeting 
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Financial Report March 26, Contents 1. Unaudited FY2005 vs Audited FY – Actual vs Forecast 3. Financial Reporting – Initiatives & Issues.
2006 Budget Recommendation September 20, Agenda Budget Preparation Policy Issues Recommended Budget Assumptions Sensitivity Finance and Audit Committee.
Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager.
5 C H A P T E R Operating Budgets.
1 American Library Association ALA Finances 101 Financial Handout Operating Agreement, Indirect Costs and Budget Guidelines.
BUDGETING – CRADLE TO BOARD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA CAUBO – Pre-conference June 23, 2007.
The Art & Science of Budgeting Steve Zimmerman Spectrum Nonprofit Services CALCASA September 14, 2010.
2015 Fiscal Year-End Activities for Recharge Centers Internal / External Sales Office.
Recommendation for Board approval of updated nodal fee filing Steve Byone Overview –Historical summary –Highlights from approved interim Nodal Surcharge.
Reviewing Internal Sales Activity / Rates Reviewing Internal Sales Activity / Rates Internal / External Sales Office.
Office of Policy and Management State of Connecticut Presentation to the State Contracting Standards Board January 18, 2006 Office of Policy and Management.
Evaluating Investments in Information Technology Shannon Crump December 9, 2002 ISM 6021.
Welcome to the 43 rd Annual General Meeting. Call to Order College of Occupational Therapists of Manitoba.
SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FUNDING Angela P. White, Ph.D.
University of Minnesota Office of Internal / External Sales Fiscal Year-End Actions for Internal/External Sales Organizations.
Academic Senate Presentation on FY 2007 Budget April 3, 2007.
Copyright © 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved. HOUSEKEEPING MANAGEMENT SECOND EDITION ︳ MATT A. CASADO.
AMS Final Budget Fiscal Year Overview Final Budget Summary Process and Features Finances: o Revenues o Expenditures o Balance o Changes Future.
Initiative 1100: Summary & Impact 1 Rick Garza Deputy Administrative Director.
Information Technology FY 2016 Recommended Budget Joint Finance Committee/ Council June 1,
1 Presentation to the CSU Board of Trustees Committee on Finance 2004/05 Budget Issues November 19, 2003.
CPS ® and CAP ® Examination Review MANAGEMENT, Fifth Edition By Haney and Mazzola ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River,
OCFO - Financial Status of USPTO May 7, FY 2010 Status Authorized level of $1,887.0 million Mid-year Budget Execution Review currently underway.
Welcome to the 44 th Annual General Meeting. Call to Order.
September Board Meeting FY08 and FY09 Spending Plan.
1 Fiscal Year 2014 Operating Budget UM Board of Curators FINANCE COMMITTEE June 13, 2014.
1 West Contra Costa Unified School District July 23, Day Budget Revision.
Charter School Finance School Business Alexis Schauss, Director October 2015.
Merit Program  Overview – General Information  Employee Eligibility  Merit Allocation Pools & Funding  Merit Awards, Process, Rules  Draft.
Chapter # 19: Sales Mix Considerations Margin of Safety Operating Leverage Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis Business Applications of CVP Additional Considerations.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
Hands on Budgeting Wendy Watson April 18, Agenda Why and when to budget? Types of budgets Revenues Expenses Cost allocation Types of budget Reports.
Budget FY 2013 Kim Rupert, CPCM, CFCM Austin, Texas March 24, 2012.
1 Service Center FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation Training Proposed Policy Revisions & Guidelines for Preparing FY2007 Billing Rate Proposals.
Initial Guidance for the Agreement Community GSA-Lease Costs April 2015 Presenter: Michael Peranio.
FY PROPOSED BUDGET  A "Target Level" expenditure base was established for all departments six- months’ worth of operations (July 1, 2016 – December.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
Cattlemen’s Beef Board Planning & Budgeting Process.
Financial Report through Q1 FY 2015 February 23, 2015
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
City of richmond FY mid-year budget review
Developing a Financial Plan
Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis
FY13 Budget Planning Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING COUNCIL March.
Internal/External Sales Activity related to:
Financial planning.
Fiscal Year-End Activities for Internal/External Sales
Conversation with Kent on Budget Matters
Michael McKee | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
BLHC Funds Flow Plan Steering Committee
2018–19 Budget Conversations Presenters: Graham Carr, Provost and VP, Academic Denis Cossette, Chief Financial Officer September 2018.
Budgeting and Financial Management
Fiscal Years 2019/20 and 2020/21 Biennial Budget Adoption
Presentation transcript:

DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees and Fee Setting Methodology Nick Villalpando Chief Financial Officer

Budget Assumptions/Philosophy DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 2 Ninety-eight percent of DIR’s funding comes from fees charged to government entities who use DIR services. Administrative (cost-recovery) fees are set at levels intended to be sufficient to recover DIR’s operating costs. Due to inherent uncertainties with forecasting customer demand for DIR services, actual revenues may be more or less than amounts needed to recover costs for a given year. Costs associated with overhead activities and other functions that DIR is mandated to perform are allocated to each cost- recovery program.

Indirect Cost Activities DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 3 Indirect Administration Executive Administration General Counsel Human Resources Finance and Accounting Information Resources Communications and Strategic Partnerships Indirect Other Information Technology Policy and Guideline Development Statewide Technology Planning Statewide Security Indirect Costs are allocated to cost-recovery programs based on full time equivalent positions

Fee Evaluation and Setting Process 1.Determine total operating expenses to be recovered by administrative fees Direct Program Costs and Indirect Costs (Administration and Other Costs) 2.Forecast customer demand for goods and services Consider multiple factors that impact customer demand Determine impact of vendor pricing on volume and estimated fee revenue 3.Set fees at levels that will recover operating costs based on forecasted customer consumption Finance Division Recommendation Executive Director Approval DIR Board Approval 4.Monitor financial operating results throughout the year to determine if DIR is generating revenue at level needed to recover cost; take corrective action if necessary DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 4

Operating Expenses to Be Recovered Cooperative Contracts OPERATING EXPENSEFY 2013FY 2012VARIANCE $VARIANCE % Admin Fee Revenue$5.8$5.3$0.59% Direct Expenses Salaries % Professional Fees1.14.3(3.2)(74%) Software/Software Maintenance–––– Other–––– Indirect Expenses Indirect Admin1.92.0(0.1)(5%) Indirect Other0.20.3(0.1)(33%) Total Expenses (3.1)(36%) Net Revenue$0.2(3.4)3.6106% Dollars in millions Note: Forecasted revenues and expenses continue to be revised and do not reflect potential FY2012 unexpended balances. DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 5

Administrative Fees Cooperative Contracts Fees are paid to DIR by vendors who sell goods and services to eligible customers Vendor prices charged to customers include the DIR fee Current administrative fees range from 0.25% to 0.50% of vendor sales Current FY13 revenue estimate is $5.8 million – based on $1.5 billion customer volume DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 6

Operating Expenses to Be Recovered Data Center Services OPERATING EXPENSEFY 2013FY 2012VARIANCE $VARIANCE % Admin Fee Revenue$4.3$4.5$(0.2)(4%) Direct Expenses Salaries2.22.4(0.2)(8%) Professional Fees–––– Software/Software Maintenance–––– Other–––– Indirect Expenses Indirect Admin1.71.8(0.1)(6%) Indirect Other0.2 –– Total Expenses (0.3)(7%) Net Revenue$0.2$ % Dollars in millions Note: Forecasted revenues and expenses continue to be revised and do not reflect potential FY2012 unexpended balances. DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 7

Administrative Fees Data Center Services DIR charges a 2.95% administrative fee to DCS customers The fee is applied to the monthly customer invoice based on amounts charged by DCS vendors Current FY13 revenue estimate is $4.3 million – based on $152 million customer volume DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 8

Operating Expenses to Be Recovered Communications Technology Services DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 9 OPERATING EXPENSEFY 2013FY 2012VARIANCE $VARIANCE % Admin Fee Revenue$16.6$17.3$(0.7)(4%) Direct Expenses Salaries4.14.8(0.7)(15%) Professional Fees % Software/Software Maintenance0.81.5(0.7)(47%) Other2.32.7(0.4)(15%) Indirect Expenses Indirect Admin3.84.0(0.2)(5%) Indirect Other0.5 –– Total Expenses (1.0)(6%) Net Revenue$(0.2)$(0.5)$0.360% Dollars in millions Note: Forecasted revenues and expenses continue to be revised and do not reflect potential FY2012 unexpended balances.

Administrative Fees Communications Technology Services CTS division delivers a range of services to customers Capitol Complex Telephone System (CCTS) TEX-AN Statewide Telecommunications Wireless Services Services are divided into three categories for fee setting Vendor-provided services (voice minutes, circuits, wireless, etc.) DIR-provided services (CCTS line charges, voice mail, data, etc.) DIR-provided customer-specific solutions DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 10

Current Administrative Fees Communications Technology Services Vendor-provided services 2% to 12% administrative fees Current FY13 revenue estimate is $10.1 million DIR-provided services Pricing varies based on service type Current FY13 revenue estimate is $6.3 million DIR-provided customer-specific solutions Pricing varies based on service type Current FY13 revenue estimate is $187 thousand Total Current FY13 Administrative Fee Revenue Estimate is $16.6 million Based on the following customer volumes (total $228.1 million): CCTS – $4.3 million TEX-AN – $74.1 million, Wireless & Local Services – $149.7 million DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 11

Operating Expenses to Be Recovered Texas.gov DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 12 OPERATING EXPENSEFY 2013FY 2012VARIANCE $VARIANCE % General Revenue$0.7 $–$–– Direct Expenses Salaries0.5 –– Professional Fees0.1 –– Software/Software Maintenance–––– Other–––– Indirect Expenses Indirect Admin0.1 –– Indirect Other–––– Total Expenses0.7 –– Net Revenue$–$–$–$–$–$–– Dollars in millions Note: Forecasted revenues and expenses continue to be revised and do not reflect potential FY2012 unexpended balances.

Operating Expenses to Be Recovered Indirect Expenses OPERATING EXPENSEFY 2013FY 2012VARIANCE $VARIANCE % Salaries$5.3$5.4$(0.1)(2%) Professional Fees1.92.1(0.2)(10%) Software/Software Maintenance0.5 –– Other0.70.9(0.2)(22%) Total Indirect Expenses$8.4$8.9$(0.5)(6%) Dollars in millions Note: Forecasted revenues and expenses continue to be revised and do not reflect potential FY2012 unexpended balances. DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 13

Operating Expenses to Be Recovered Total Agency DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 14 OPERATING EXPENSEFY 2013FY 2012VARIANCE $VARIANCE % Revenue$27.4$27.8$(0.4)(1%) Direct Expenses Salaries9.29.8(0.6)(6%) Professional Fees6.58.7(2.2)(25%) Software/Software Maintenance0.81.5(0.7)(47%) Other2.32.7(0.4)(15%) Indirect Expenses Indirect Admin7.57.9(0.4)(5%) Indirect Other0.91.0(0.1)(10%) Total Expenses (4.4)(14%) Net Revenue$0.2$(3.8)$4.0105% Dollars in millions Note: Forecasted revenues and expenses continue to be revised and do not reflect potential FY2012 unexpended balances.

Next Steps DIR Finance team to prepare final administrative fee and FY2013 operating budget recommendations for Executive Director approval Obtain DIR board approval at August 30 board meeting DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees 15