Utilizing Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Technology without the need for Ground Control Points Mike Gilkey and Tom Hughes 3DAerial Solutions LLC 2015 Ohio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REQUIRING A SPATIAL REFERENCE THE: NEED FOR RECTIFICATION.
Advertisements

From Imagery to Map: Digital Photogrammetric Technologies 13 th International Scientific and Technical Conference From Imagery to Map: Digital Photogrammetric.
ODS3F –Observation and Detection Systems For Forest Fire Monitoring
“The Case for Continuing and Strengthening NDGPS in Louisiana” Roy K. Dokka, Ph.D. Center for GeoInformatics and Louisiana Spatial Reference Center Louisiana.
New Products Stefano Rosato Dealer Conference New Products.
Geospatial Technologies Used in Land Administration Kevin Daugherty Land Administration Solutions Manager Geospatial World Forum Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Research in California State Parks California Natural Resources Agency – GIS Day 2014 Sacramento, November 13.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Aparajithan Sampath, Don Moe, Jon Christopherson, Greg Strensaas. ASPRS, April Geometric Evaluation.
Said El Said ITS Program Manager Traffic Operations Division.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
1. LiDAR Mapping Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) mapping provided for the United States International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) – established.
Aerial photography and satellite imagery as data input GEOG 4103, Feb 20th Adina Racoviteanu.
Education for Height Modernization Dr. Stacey D. Lyle, RPLS.
GPS Receivers: Basics and Selection T.S. Stombaugh, J.D. Luck and S.A. Shearer Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering University of Kentucky.
NRCS Global Positioning Systems (GPS) & Geographic Information Systems (GIS) RESOURCE INVENTORY  Soil Survey  National Resources Inventory (NRI)  Wetlands.
Geographic Information Systems
Harry Williams, Cartography1 Total Station Surveying & GIS. INTRODUCTION TO GIS A Geographic Information System is a combination of software and hardware.
RTK Networks – What, Why, Where? Eric Gakstatter Presented March 4, 2010 LSAW Annual Meeting Tacoma, WA.
UAV for Surveyors and Spatial Analysts An emerging technology for the Geospatial Industry Warren Eade– Mapping and Mobile Manager.
Imagery for Supporting FSA Farm Programs Review FSA Requirements for Imagery Identify and Evaluate Possible Alternatives Recommend Plan of Action Objectives.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
DORIS - DAYS Toulouse May 2-3, 2000 DORIS Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite  Basic system concept  Main missions  Schedules.
Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the Geodetic Surveys in Israel Gershon Steinberg Survey of Israel 1 Lincoln St. Tel-Aviv 65220, Israel Gilad.
Integrating GPS and GIS: The Basics 6/19/12 Presented By: Doug Kotnik, GISP Precision Laser and Instrument.
S D Laser Scanning of Acropolis of ATHENS. 3D scanning of the Wall and the Rock of Acropolis Athens and 3D model creation.
Affordable UAV Technology - GSAM Presentation May 2011
CZEPOS – a Multipurpose Positioning System for the Czech Republic Oldřich Pašek – Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre Jan Řezníček – Land.
© 2009 Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. OPUS and VRS for QA Surveys of the PAMAP Program Eric M. Orndorff, MS, PLS Zach Lupold, BS Great Lakes Region Height.
What is GPS??? GPS is short for Global Positioning System
Best Practices for Managing Aerial and UAS Frame Imagery
Trimble Solution for Cadastral Surveying
Built in Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Data Collection and Quality Assurance Ron Howard Jr., EI Environmental Coordinator Russell Koenig, PS, EI Surveyor DLZ Ohio, Inc Ohio GIS Conference.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Getting the Value from Guidance Systems, Light Bars, and GPS Marvin Stone Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering.
CHICAGO --- INDIANAPOLIS --- KANSAS CITY --- MILWAUKEE --- ST. LOUIS/ST. PETERS High-Accuracy GPS for GIS: From 1ft to 4in.
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future GLONASS Russia’s global satellite navigation system 24 satellites in three.
Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features N C R S T INFRASTRUCTURE.
2010 LiDAR Collection in West Virginia’s Coal Fields West Virginia GIS Conference June 9, 2010.
Airborne Lidar Calibration Approaches Defining calibration techniques and assessing the results JAMIE YOUNG LIDAR SOLUTIONS SPECIALIST.
Leaf-off accuracy of mapping-grade GPS receivers Pete Bettinger Michael Ransom James Rhynold University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry and Natural.
High-Accuracy GPS for GIS: From 1ft to 4in.
1 Wisconsin Crop Management Conf. 1 Integrating UAV’s into your crop management system January 14, 2015 Brian D. Luck, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Extension.
Use of High-Rate CORS for Airborne Positioning Theresa M. Damiani NOAA- National Geodetic Survey, Geosciences Research Division CGSIC 2013, Nashville 1b.
Surveying and Mapping Techniques in Land Management Matthew Delano, LS Trimble Cadastral Solutions 18 th September 2012.
The INDOT CORS Indiana GIS Conference February 19, 2008 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering, INDOT Thomas A. Mahon, PE, LS Survey.
Precision Agriculture: GPS and Differential Corrections.
Flight Planning and Navigation GPS Navigation © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Aerospace Engineering.
The Global Positioning System. Early Satellite Systems Satellite Surveying started more than 30 years ago. Now, High accuracy could be achieved in real.
SGM as an Affordable Alternative to LiDAR
Unmanned Aircraft for Agricultural Applications Unmanned Aircraft for Agricultural Applications (UAAA) Joe Sommer Professor of Mechanical.
An Accuracy Assessment of a Digital Elevation Model Derived From an Airborne Profiling Laser Joseph M. Piwowar Philip J. Howarth Waterloo Laboratory for.
Revised 10/30/20061 Overview of GPS FORT 130 Forest Mapping Systems.
Tim Stombaugh  Dr. Suzanne Smith, Director ◦ (859) ;  Ryan Nolin, Engineer Associate ◦ (802) ;
SME Associates LLC Providing Innovative Solutions DRONE MONITORING JAMES P. MENGE PE, CHP 1.
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
Roadway Center Line and Feature Extraction Remote Sensing in Transportation August 2001 HSA Consulting Group, Inc. Presentation to the National Consortium.
Anurag Ohri, Manish Sahu Department of Civil Engineering,
Drones & UAV’s A UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) or UAS (Unmanned Aerial System) is any aircraft that can navigate without a human pilot on board. Sometimes.
Positional Accuracy Comparison of a DJI Phantom 4 and a Sensefly eBee
Drone Mapping & UAV’s Jonathan J. Hodel, PE, GISP
Global Positioning System
Using Photogrammetry to Generate a DEM and Orthophoto
Cameras In The Sky UAV Technology in Construction
A Preliminary Mapping Accuracy Assessment of UAV Photogrammetry
Washington Geological Survey
How(UAVs) are used in Disaster Management
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY
Presentation transcript:

Utilizing Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Technology without the need for Ground Control Points Mike Gilkey and Tom Hughes 3DAerial Solutions LLC 2015 Ohio GIS Conference September , 2015 | Hyatt Regency Columbus| Columbus, Ohio

Overview UAS technology effectively complements existing techniques, fitting between large-area satellite/manned aircraft imagery and smaller coverage, time-consuming, but highly accurate terrestrial approaches The standard senseFly eBee can achieve 3 cm Orthomosaic (horizontal) and 5 cm Digital Elevation Model (vertical) accuracy. This provides an expected level of accuracy of between 1-3x Ground Sample Distance (GSD), but requires use of Ground Control Points (GCPs) The senseFly eBee RTK can achieve 3 cm horizontal and 5 cm vertical accuracy with an expected level of accuracy of between 1-3x GSD without using GCPs 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 2

3D Aerial Solutions 3D Aerial is an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) technology company ▫ Based in Dayton, OH. We provide commercial UAS flying services with the eBee. ▫ Received FAA Section 333 exemption and blanket COA in March 2015 ▫ FAA aircraft registration complete in May 2015 ▫ Over 150 flights, > 37 flight hours since June We also provide UAS consulting services and are a sales representative for senseFly products. 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 3

senseFly eBee eBee ~1.5 pound take off weight 38 inch wingspan EPP foam and composite construction 160 W brushless DC motor ~50 minutes of flight mph cruise speed operates in winds up to 28 mph Radio link to 1.8 miles Sony WX 18.2 MP camera (others available) GSD: down to 0.6 inch DEM accuracy: ~1-3x GSD (with GCP) Accuracy (with GCP): 1.2 in (hort), 2.0 in (vert) Accuracy (no GCP): ft (hort & vert) 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 4

senseFly eBee RTK (Real Time Kinematic) eBee ~1.6 pound take off weight 38 inch wingspan EPP foam and composite construction 160 W brushless DC motor ~40 minutes of flight mph cruise speed operates in winds up to 28 mph Radio link to 1.8 miles Sony WX 18.2 MP camera (others available) L1/L2, GPS & GLONAS RTK receiver GSD: down to 0.6 inch DEM accuracy: ~1-3x GSD Accuracy (no GCP): 1.2 in (hort), 2.0 in (vert) 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 5

Bundled Software The eBee comes with the following software ▫ eMotion 2: Flight planning and control application for precision image collection  Produces geotagged images with selected resolution and overlap to support desired GIS products ▫ Postflight Terra 3D (Pix4D Product): Photogrammetry application to create 2-D orthomosaics and 3-D DSM  Outputs are compatible with most major GIS packages including erdas, ArcGIS, Global Mapper and Quantum GIS There are no additional subscription fees with either package and software updates are provided for the life of the product. 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 6

Postflight Terra 3D 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 7

Postflight Terra 3D 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 8

9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 9 Process Flow Generate Products Pre-Mission Planning Pre-Flight Checklist Fly Mission Post Flight Checklist Data Merge Data Processing

3 Methods to use eBee RTK Virtual Reference Station (Base Station not required) ▫ Create DSMs and orthomosaics using reference station networks to achieve highly accurate absolute geotags. ▫ Useful when you want to benefit from the high absolute accuracy achievable using an Ntrip networks, or when surveying equipment is unavailable or inconvenient. Unknown point (Post process) ▫ Geotag relative to an approximate base station position, then post-process GNSS data to reach high absolute coordinate accuracy. ▫ Useful for green-field surveying when no GCPs have been set, when in-field time is limited, or it is impractical to survey beforehand. Known point (Use base station) ▫ Obtain high absolute coordinate accuracy using your precisely measured base station position as a GCP. ▫ Useful when a survey has already been completed and reference points are already marked out. No post-processing is needed to achieve RTK-level geotag accuracy. 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 10

A study of point cloud accuracy Two experiments were conducted 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 11 Flight OneFlight 2 Assess maximum accuracy of eBee RTK Assess impact of adverse lighting and weather on accuracy RTK using VRS Area: 49.4 acres GSD:.98 inch Imaging altitude: 266 ftImaging altitude: 531 ft Overlap: 80% Perpendicular flightsNo perpendicular flights Bright sunny dayCloudy (low light) and windy (20 mph)

Accuracy Measurements Accuracy was calculated using Root Mean Square Error 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 12 n is the number of points Xdata is the X coordinate of the dataset Xcheck is the X coordinate of a reference point

Results 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 13 Verification Points in the Point Cloud Orthomosaic and DSM Accuracy Conclusions: With high overlap and high resolution (2.5cm), we can see that, in these ideal lighting and weather condition, the 3Bee RTK can achieve a very high level of accuracy, both horizontally (2.6cm) and vertically (3.1cm) Conclusions: As both the DSM and orthomosaic are based on the point cloud, the final accuracy is clearly slightly lower, horizontally (3.3cm) and vertically (3.5cm)

Results continued 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 14 Inaccurate Geotags Low light, windy conditions Conclusions: Even with inaccurate geotags in 10% of the images, the accuracy of the entire dataset is maintained, thanks to the capabilities of Postflight Terra 3D Conclusions: Flights over the same zone during windy and low light level conditions demonstrated that the eBee RTK has no difficulty achieving one to three times GSD accuracy, in line with senseFly’s claims

Conclusions The eBee RTK offers a convenient and efficient method to to create accurate DSM without the need for ground control points Under ideal conditions, accuracy of 2.6 cm horizontally and 3.1 cm vertically was obtained Performance degrades gracefully under deteriorated environmental conditions, with demonstrated accuracy of 8.9 cm horizontally and 7 cm vertically. 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 15

References eBee RTK Accuracy Assessment A. Roze 1, J-C. Zufferey 2, A. Beyeler 3, A. McClellan 4 1 Application Engineer, senseFly, 2 CEO, senseFly, 3 CTO, senseFly, 4 Technical Writer, senseFly eBee RTK Extended Users Manual, Revision 1 / September 2014, senseFly Ltd. 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 16

9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 17

Virtual Reference System (VRS) VRS is a system of hardware and software designed to facilitate real-time GPS/GNSS positioning based on a set of reference stations Ohio Dept Of Transportation (ODOT) utilizes its CORS (Continuously Operating Reference Station) network (Trimble) to perform the role of the reference stations Eliminates the need for a separate base station 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 18

ODOT VRS RTK Network 9/22/15Ohio GIS Conference 19