Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementation Team August 19, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do we need a GN of NGOs? Yes! (as far as participation in the GN does not reduce/affect involvement in the GP/DRR) The GN should build on existing networks.
Advertisements

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
1 Measuring Progress: Monitoring and Evaluation in WRIA 8 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009 Scott Stolnack WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator.
3-Year Implementation Schedule. What is the 3-Year Implementation Schedule? A list of prioritized projects for implementers with a time frame to complete.
The Watershed Action Plan Chapter 10: Realizing the WMI Vision August Draft.
State of California Lahontan Water Quality Control Board Update on Salt & Nutrient Management Plans.
PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.
Lake-scale planning for management, conservation and restoration Objective: Bring together researchers, managers, NGO representatives and other interested.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Council Summer Meeting Fort Collins, Colorado July 22, 2008.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
WLCI Update July 23, 2010 Conserving World-class Wildlife Resources Facilitating Responsible Development.
EEP Watershed Planning Overview August 12, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Nationally recognized, innovative, non-regulatory program formed in July.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
2 1)Familiarize State agency staff with Water Plan Update 2013 information, tools and resources 2)Identify opportunities for State agencies to derive.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Incorporating Spatial Heterogeneity in Temperature into Climate Vulnerability Assessments for Coastal Pacific Streams NOAA, UW, USGS This project will.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Louisiana’s 2012 Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast Path Forward on Nonstructural Program Implementation CPRA Meeting - October 17, 2012.
Clackamas River Basin Council Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementer’s Perspective August 19, 2013.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Before you begin. For additional assistance, contact your club’s Information Technology Chairperson or Electronic Learning at:
In existence since 1981, the Commission for Women identifies areas of concern to women employees and students of Penn State, and suggests changes in existing.
NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
August 2013 Coastal Incentive Grant Program Cycle 17 Highlights Planning for Cycle 18 Coastal Advisory Council Annual Meeting July 31, 2014 Georgia Department.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
CLEAN WATER ACT Section 319 Grant Funds Robin F. “Rob” Rung Contracts / Grants Officer Water Quality Planning Bureau Department of Environmental Quality.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
The long, long road to inclusionary zoning Chatham County North Carolina.
Water Plan Update 2013 Wrap-Up Session Pre-work Survey Recap March 26, 2014.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
AHSS Council September Initial Recovery Strategy Deliverable Due to PSP in early October Focused on documenting / describing our work to date Will.
Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Sierra Water Workgroup Summit Daniel Schultz State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Rights June 12, 2014.
Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
The GEOSS Science & Technology Stakeholder Network – Workshop Goals Michael Nyenhuis Hans-Peter Plag.
…empowering communities through modeling and adaptive management Adaptive Management Conservation Strategies for Restoring Ecosystems.
Jeff Burkey King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) Open Forum Session 19.
Welcome Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan 2013 Annual Implementation Team Meeting August 19, 2013.
Community Engagement to Advance Mitigation Action.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Recommendations From the New Jersey Climate Adaptation Alliance Marjorie B. Kaplan, Associate Director Rutgers.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
Biodiversity Collaborative Draft Framework For Working Together.
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
LAND TRUSTS & BIRD CONSERVATION: A NEEDS ASSESSMENT ASHLEY DAYER, PH.D.
CBP CLIMATE RESILIENCY WORKGROUP Cross-Goal Climate Resiliency Analysis and Decision-Making Matrix and Implementation Methodology.
An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process
Task Force Activities We are working together on a new approach that identifies sources of PCBs and dioxins, directly applies a plan for reduction and.
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Colorado’s Forest Action Plan Mike Lester, State Forester and Director
Presentation transcript:

Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementation Team August 19, 2013

What is the role of the Implementation Team? Who is the team? Why do we have a team? What does it mean to be on the team? What has the team done? What may the team do in the future?

Who is the team? A group of Lower Columbia River Stakeholders Representing differing perspectives and missions Ultimately having common objective of working together to achieve recovery plan goals

Why do we have a team? The LCR Conservation and Recovery plan is voluntary Success of meeting plan goals will take concerted effort by all interested and affected entities Team members have the pulse of their local communities

What are the roles of the team? To provide advice, recommendations and support to the IC To assist with communication and coordination with local implementers To assist with advancement of recovery goals and development of 3YIS Encourage local implementers to work toward recovery plan implementation and 3YIS goals Assist local implementers in being more effective in implementation Facilitate information exchange and provide education to local implementers regarding the LCR plan Be a sounding board between local implementers and the IT team.

What has the team done? Currently the entire team meets one time per year to hear updates on the status of the LCR plan implementation. Formed focused workgroup to assist with prioritization of habitat enhancement projects and develop the first 3YIS. In the future team groups will be formed based upon past and present survey results. Groups formed will be in the 6 general categories and meet on an as needed basis Survey re: location and group type interest

20/50 responses on the questionnaire Area of interest YB-2, BC-2, Clat-3, Scap-1, Clack-7, Sandy-7, LG and UG-0, HD-1 Group interest: P&A-11, FG-6, RME-8, LRA-11, E&O 4, T&R-5, NI-1 Wide variety of implementation needs/concerns you may have. Will cue those up on individual action. Lower Columbia Implementation Team Survey Name: Affiliation: Title: Address: Phone: Which of following best describes your interests in the LCR Recovery Plan Implementation Team? Please check all that apply. Planning & Advisory Local Recovery Action Implementation Funding Guidance Education & Outreach RM&E/Technical Guidance Tracking & Reporting Other (please specify): I am not interested in participating on the Implementation Team In which basin(s) are you currently working in the LCR? Please list any organizations/lead contacts actively working in the LCR that you believe should be included on the LCR Implementation Team. 1) Organization, Name & Contact Info: 2) Organization, Name & Contact Info: 3) Organization, Name & Contact Info: Survey from August 2010

What is the plan for the team moving forward? Anticipate forming Local Recovery Action Implementation Team (s?) to assist identification of high priority projects where needed. Plan to form workgroups to discuss top 2 or 3 plan actions as determined by the 2013 survey, if interest can open re-survey. Engaging local implementers to determine if they can participate in high priority projects or assist with identification of the highest priority actions they could undertake and in the highest priority areas.

Is what I am doing contributing to the plan? If you are here and working in some capacity to create a better environment for listed fish species the answer is most likely YES! There are 308 actions listed in the plan some are global and some are basin specific. Not every action can be considered a high priority but attempts are made to capture contributions for all actions. Eventually all actions will need to be addressed in order to achieve the goals of the plan. I hope the team can assist with local agencies/municipalities/ect to carry the message that they ought to work within the highest priority action and area that fits within their missions. I hope the team can gain assistance when possible from these other groups to help implement high priority projects they are conducting.

April 2013 Survey Results Working with land managers to develop scenarios that reduce affects to the hydrograph from runoff Development of storm water management for urban areas and roads Enhanced protection for high quality habitat Mitigation of impacts within High Intrinsic Potential habitat Methodology to assess and ID population strongholds which are resilient to climate change. Methods to conduct and implement sediment source analysis in watersheds. streamlining the permit process LWD projects not covered under the State Forest Practices Act How do we achieve the LWD goals in the plan Creation of LWD banks Local workshops to develop conceptual high priority projects Reaching out beyond the watershed councils about recovery plan goals Riparian workshops for volunteers Incentives for habitat restoration Ecosystem markets Channel Migration Zone and FP development Response-Mark only 3, Rank Incentives for Habitat Restoration Response-Mark all and give rank Enhance protection of high quality habitat 2. Assess Stronghold pop's resiliant to climate change 2. Channel migration zone and FP issues 3. How to achieve LWD goals in the plan 3. Mitigation of impacts w/in HIP habitat 12 Responses; Mixed Message in Survey Request; Need to Re-do Survey

Questions?