SPDG Performance Measure Discussion Monday, March 14 th 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Advertisements

April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Training in Instructional Consultation, Assessment & Teaming Todd A. Gravois, Ph.D. Edward Gickling, Ph.D. & Sylvia Rosenfield, Ph.D.
FOUNDATION UNIT Teaching Research Assistance to Childcare Providers.
Title II-A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality ESEA Application Workshop April 21-22, 2015.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Title I and IDEA Coordination of ARRA Funds. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) provides funds to save and create jobs and to reform.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Teaming with Kansas: An Early Childhood Personnel Development Partnership Kansas Technical Assistance System Network ( TASN) Quarterly Meeting February.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
State Personnel Development Grant SPDG. Project Goals Improve outcomes for students by: − Increasing skill of educators using research/evidence-based.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida PS/RtI Train the Trainers Regional Meetings.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
Melinda Jones Ault University of Kentucky Technology Innovators’ Conference Washington D.C. November 16, 2004 Working with Schools: Innovative Research.
APR Know-how Jennifer Coffey November 2013 The Revised SPDG Program Measures and Other Reporting Requirements.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 5. Agenda for Today Stakeholder involvement Review Draft SSIP –Baseline Data / Target setting –Introduction –Data.
WELCOME WELCOME PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OSEP PROJECT DIRECTORS’ VIRTUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 27, 2015.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
CSEFEL State Planning Rob Corso. CSEFEL  National Center focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children.
The Significance Section Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
AEA 267 Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance The KASAB June, 2011 KASAB: Knowledge Attitude Skills Aspiration Behavior.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
Focus on Professional Learning Communities State Personnel Development Grant D. Ahrens 5/10/2013.
Welcome to Directors’ Program Measure Webinar - Presenter: Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D., OSEP Project Officer, SPDG Program Lead.
1.  May 27, 2010: Informational Webinar on Technical Assistance & Dissemination (TA&D) Centers  Description: The purpose of the session is for States.
Tuesday, March 29 th 2011 SPDG Performance Measure Discussion.
Tuesday, April 12 th 2011 SPDG Performance Measure Discussion.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
Professional Growth Plan Committee Information Session January, 2008 Expectations for Classroom Observations by School Leaders.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Ronald J. Tomalis, Secretary of EducationCarolyn.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
Iowa’s SPDG/SSIP Alignment March Who is collaborating? Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids (C4K) Pre-K K-3 Assistive technology Significant Disabilities.
Cyndi Boezio, PhD Colorado Department of Education Supervisor for the Office of Learning Supports CO SPDG Director Reporting on the Training Implementation.
ND State Personnel Development Grant North Dakota Scaling- up and Implementation Science Framework (ND-SISF )
District Literacy Leaders Network Meeting March 24, :00am-12:00pm Dr. LaWonda Smith Manager, English Language Arts Dr. Argentina Back Manager, Multilingual.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Grant Management PLC Session Discussion facilitated by Jennifer Coffey November 2011 Performance Measurement Discussion Dial-in: Participant.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Federal Determination Levels Vanessa Winborne Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education & Family Services.
SPDG Bidders’ Webinar #3 February 25, 2016 Jennifer Coffey & Susan Weigert.
84.323A State Personnel Development Grants Program FY 2015 Competition Jennifer Coffey, PhD December 15 th, 2014.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Supporting All Teachers for All Students: SATFAS
Knowledge and Competency Framework Early Childhood Administrators
High Quality Coaching: How Do We Know It? April 1, 2015
Grace Zamora Durán, Ed.D. April 19, 2010
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Introduction to Coaching
Assessing Professional Learning via Data Management Systems
Schoolwide Programs.
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer
APR Informational Webinar
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Instruments for Measuring High Quality PD Denise Andreski & Elaine Pierrel Maryland SPDG Evaluators This suite of tools was developed to evaluate the extent.
Presentation transcript:

SPDG Performance Measure Discussion Monday, March 14 th 2011

Projects use high quality training methods that support the attainment of identified training outcomes and competencies. Training participants demonstrate improvement in knowledge and skills as a result of the training. Professional development activities directly support improvement strategies outlined in their State Performance Plans (SPPs)/Annual Performance Reports (APR). Projects use SPDG professional development funds to provide activities designed to sustain the use of SPDG-supported practices. Highly qualified special education teachers that have participated in SPDG supported special education teacher retention activities remain as special education teachers two years after their initial participation in these activities. Personnel in schools or early childhood settings continue to implement SPDG-supported practices with fidelity two years after initial implementation.

Training Methods Projects use high quality training methods that support the attainment of identified training outcomes and competencies. Will define “high quality”, “training methods” and describe the parameters for training outcomes and competencies.

Outcomes from Training Training participants demonstrate improvement in knowledge and skills as a result of the training. Will describe the parameters of “improvement” and how improvement will be reported

Alignment with SPP/APR Professional development activities directly support improvement strategies outlined in their State Performance Plans (SPPs)/Annual Performance Reports (APR). Panel will be looking at the SPP/APR to see SPDG activities described as improvement activities.

Sustaining Implementation – Project Activities Projects use SPDG professional development funds to provide activities designed to sustain the use of SPDG-supported practices. Will provide a list of activities that assist in full implementation and sustaining implementation (e.g., coaching, systems interventions, facilitative administration). Will need to determine the extent to which these practices need to be used to effective support and sustain implementation.

Sustaining Implementation – School Outcomes Personnel in schools or early childhood settings continue to implement SPDG-supported practices with fidelity two years after initial implementation. School-wide vs. only certain teachers/classrooms – how capture and aggregate? Benchmark and measure of fidelity would be determined by each project for their innovation

Teacher Retention Highly qualified special education teachers that have participated in SPDG supported special education teacher retention activities remain as special education teachers two years after their initial participation in these activities. Will describe what counts as a teacher retention activity. Will define “initial participation” Definition of “highly qualified” per ESEA & IDEA