Refining Key Questions: Interactive Case Study Quiz C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantitative Synthesis II: Interactive Quiz Thomas Trikalinos, MD, PhD Joseph Lau, MD Tufts EPC.
Advertisements

Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Protocol Development.
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence on Diagnostic Tests Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for.
5.0 Types of Reviews. Indispensable Rules of the Review Process Transparency Documentable Replicable.
Guidance notes Getting started… Go to the LNT website: Click.
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
April 2009 Netta Conyers-Haynes, Principal Consultant, Communications Kaiser Permanente National Guideline Program Implications of IOM SR Standards Wiley.
When To Select Observational Studies as Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
NURS 505B Library Session Rachael Clemens Spring 2007.
Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Clinical Practice October 2014 Dawn Stacey RN, PhD Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients Full Professor,
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
Topic Generation and Research Prioritization Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH, Executive Director Rachael Fleurence, PhD, Scientist Rick Kuntz, MD, MSc, Chair, PDC.
Topic Refinement Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide.
Analytic Frameworks Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Practice Quiz: Instructions You must view this in presentation mode. To do this, click on this icon at the bottom of the page:
Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in The Effective Health Care Program Supriya Janakiraman MD MPH AHRQ.
AHRQ’s Role in Comparative Effectiveness Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Alliance for Health Reform Briefing.
Address Refer to Slide 2 for instructions on how to view the full-screen slideshow.Slide 2.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
Systematic Review Module 1: Refining Key Questions C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford.
Systematic Reviews.
Community Support1 Elder Abuse Policy Presentation October 3, 2011.
A Comparison of 42 Local, National, and International HIA Guidelines Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH Katherine Hebert, MCRP Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH Sarah.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Systematic Review Module 7: Rating the Quality of Individual Studies Meera Viswanathan, PhD RTI-UNC EPC.
STANDARDS OF EVIDENCE FOR INFORMING DECISIONS ON CHOOSING AMONG ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO PROVIDING RH/FP SERVICES Ian Askew, Population Council July 30,
Organization and guideline development April 2010 ACCC The Netherlands.
Finding Relevant Evidence
Topic Refinement Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
Systematic Review Module 2: Analytic Frameworks Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor,
TEACH LEVEL II: CLINICAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES STREAM Craig A Umscheid, MD, MSCE, FACP Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology Director, Center.
RAPID INTERVENTION WITH GTN IN HYPERACUTE STROKE TRIAL: RIGHT New Trial Envelopes: April 2011.
Reporting the Review Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Systematic Review Module 11: Grading Strength of Evidence Interactive Quiz Kathleen N. Lohr, PhD Distinguished Fellow RTI International.
Evidence-Based Medicine: What does it really mean? Sports Medicine Rounds November 7, 2007.
Study Eligibility Criteria: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director, Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
When to Select Observational Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: Dan Jonas, MD, MPH Meera Viswanathan, PhD Karen Crotty, PhD, MPH RTI-UNC Evidence-based.
Analytic Frameworks: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor, Institute.
Quality Accounts Dr Cheryl Crocker Director Quality and Patient Safety/Executive Nurse.
Developing a Review Protocol. 1. Title Registration 2. Protocol 3. Complete Review Components of the C2 Review Process.
When To Select Observational Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Analytic Frameworks Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 21 Evidence in Learning and Teaching.
Presentation of Findings: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Jeff Seroogy, BS Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center Joseph Lau,
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
D. Only a Level 3 code requires a comprehensive ROS C. Both codes require high complexity decision making B. Level 2 codes require examination of only.
Focusing the question Janet Harris
What we’re working on.. Defining the role of different types of evidence in decision-making. Develop tools to go from evidence to decisions about clinical.
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute Nancy Berkman, PhDMeera Viswanathan, PhD
TCRF Strategic Planning Process A Stakeholders’ Consultative Retreat- Morogoro 26 th -27 April 2013.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
Assessing Applicability Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER Melissa McPheeters, PhD Co-Director, Vanderbilt EPC Engaging Stakeholders in EPC Work.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Teaching the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH): Taking a Medical Model and Making it a Curriculum Niladri Das, MD Faculty, UPMC St. Margaret Family.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
The Research Design Continuum
Data Extraction Interactive Quiz
BSHS 375 Help Bcome Exceptional/ bshs375.com
PCORI Research Priorities and Relevant Examples
Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz
The Effect of Emergency Department Waiting Time
Team Based Care Kick off Webinar
Presentation transcript:

Refining Key Questions: Interactive Case Study Quiz C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital Evidence-based Practice Center Speaker has no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this activity

Interactive Case Quiz: Instructions Open this presentation as a slideshow. This will activate the hyperlinks. When you come to a decision slide, choose the Red Box corresponding to the correct choice. If you are correct, you will be directed forward in the case. If you are incorrect, you will be directed back to the decision slide to choose again. – – Click on forward hyperlinks (Red Boxes) to proceed through the case based on your responses – – Click on the home hyperlink (Blue House Icon) to go back to the last correct step in the series

Participation Quiz: Question 1 All of the following statements about key questions in a systematic review are true except one; select the incorrect statement. They guide the literature search, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and types of data synthesized and reported. They must be clear, precise, and relevant to stakeholders. They are devised after the results of all relevant studies are known and pooled with other like studies. Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, et al. Identifying, selecting, and refining topics. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews; 2009 Apr.

They Guide All Subsequent Steps This is a true statement. Key questions guide many subsequent steps in the systematic review process. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Clear, Precise, and Relevant This is a true statement. Key questions need to be clear, precise, and relevant. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Devised Post-Hoc Good job! Key questions need to be devised before the results of studies are extracted and pooled. The key questions should drive the data to be extracted and pooled, not be driven by them. [SELECT RED BOX]

Participation Quiz: Question 2 An understanding of PICOTS and the analytic framework is needed before clear, concise, and relevant key questions can be written. Which of the following terms is correctly defined? P=Prospective I=Intervention C=Cohort study

P = Prospective This is incorrect. P stands for population, which the systematic review seeks to study. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

I = Intervention Good job! The I stands for intervention, the intervention that is being assessed in the systematic review. [SELECT RED BOX]

C = Cohort Study This is incorrect. The C stands for comparator, the group or groups being compared to the intervention. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Participation Quiz: Question 3 Key informants are representatives of stakeholders who volunteer to provide input into a systematic review. Which of the functions do they provide? Aid in formulating key questions that address real-world dilemmas Provide context to help discern content area and applicability Ensure transparency in the process

All of the Above Key informants perform all three vital function – – Formulating key questions that address real- world dilemmas – – Providing context to help discern content area and applicability – – Ensuring transparency in the process functions [SELECT RED BOX]

Participation Quiz: Question 4 Which of the following groups are not considered key informants in the Effective Healthcare Program? Clinicians Patients Researchers

Clinicians Clinicians such as physicians, pharmacists, and nurses are key informants in the Effective Healthcare Program. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Patients Patients are key informants in the Effective Healthcare Program. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Researchers Good job! Researchers develop data that goes into projects conducted as part of the Effective Healthcare Program but they are not considered key informants. Key informants include clinicians, patients, and health care decisionmakers. [SELECT RED BOX]

Participation Quiz: Question 5 Which of the following is true of public comments germane to the topic refinement process? Allows all interested parties to comment on any topic refinement projects they like Is restricted to members of the public selected by AHRQ to provide feedback Allows all interested parties to comment on a particular topic, but the number of topics they can respond to is restricted

Open to All, No Restrictions Good job! Interested people can comment on as many projects as they would like. This ensures transparency and relevancy. [SELECT RED BOX]

The Public Is Carefully Selected This is incorrect. Interested people can comment on as many projects as they would like. This ensures transparency and relevancy. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Open to All, But Limited Number of Projects This is incorrect. Interested people can comment on as many projects as they would like. This ensures transparency and relevancy. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Conclusions These five questions summarize the importance of key questions in the systematic review process. Key informants should reflect stakeholders interest in the topics to ensure relevance and transparency. Public comment is a final check of relevance and ensures transparency.