A Look at Learning: A Comprehensive System for Improving English Learners’ Academic Achievement Irma Bravo Lawrence Stanislaus County Office of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K-5 Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Update
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 New Hampshire’s preK-16 Literacy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Deb Wiswell & Linda Stimson NH Literacy Task Force July 23, 2007.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ricki Sabia, JD edCount, LLC Senior Associate and NCSC Technical Assistance and Parent Training Specialist Universal Design for Learning: Working to Create.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
TEAM MADRAS: Are YOU on the team? Madras Middle School Professional Development Plan Proposal by Donna Eskut - July 2013 Presented to Madras.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
English Language Arts Program Update Dr. Lisa M. White School Committee Meeting January 24, 2011.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
NC Department of Public Instruction Instructional Services- English as a Second Language and Learn NC – UNC Chapel Hill School of Education Joy McLaughlin,
LAUSD Student Data ELD Implementation Report 2006.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Academic Program Survey Kern County Superintendent of Schools Office RSDSS Region 8.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Dr. Vashti K. Washington Superintendent of Schools Presented by Dr. A. Lee Holmes Chief Officer of Academics and Human Resources September 9, Presented.
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
LCAP Goal 3 Quality Leadership, Teaching, and Learning MARCH 8, 2016 THE OFFICE OF LEADERSHIP AND LEARNING.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Huntsville City Schools
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
Promoting Reflective Practice Local District 6 February 18, 2005
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
A Model for Building and Using Professional Learning Communities
Presentation transcript:

A Look at Learning: A Comprehensive System for Improving English Learners’ Academic Achievement Irma Bravo Lawrence Stanislaus County Office of Education Yee Wan, Ed.D. Santa Clara County Office of Education BCN Meeting March 18, 2010

Agenda 1. Rationale 2. What is A Look at Learning? 3. Ten Research Highlights 4. Goals of the A.L.L. Collaborative 5. Implementation Example 6. Questions and Comments 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination2

Rationale Respond to the need for teachers to implement research-based strategies for English learners in the classroom. Provide job-embedded long-term professional development that is sustainable, coherent and that builds district/school capacity with EL expertise. 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination3

Tool Development Timeline 2007–2008Revised the existing ELD and SDAIE observation tools Summer 2008Held two statewide document review meetings Sept – July 2009 Developed tools and held focus group meetings Sept – nowPiloting tools for 17 districts across 7 counties Jan – nowRefining tools and continuing to develop videos 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination4

2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination What is A.L.L.? A Look at Learning is designed to maximize English learner academic achievement by: 1.providing job-embedded professional development on research-based practices for English learners models of exemplary practices in videotaped classrooms grade level/department collaborations teacher action plan student work reflections 2.providing coaching support to teachers 5

Cycle of Inquiry for Collaboration Teams 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination6 4. Reflection and Next Steps 2. Complete Teacher Action Plans 1. Observed Exemplary Practices In Videotaped Classrooms 3. Analyze Student Work

Teacher Action Plan Cover Sheet 1. State the Standard(s) 2. Content Objective –How is the objective measured? –What is the expected level/score to meet standard? 3. Language Objective –How is the objective measured? –What is the expected level/score to meet standard? 4. Materials Used 5. Evidence of Student Learning 6. Instructional Strategies Used 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination7

Teacher Action Plan Implementation Reflection 1. Review your team’s action plan 2. Review student work samples a.How do your student work samples reflect students’ learning of content and language objectives? b.Which part of the student work reflects learning the content objective? c.Which part of the student work reflects learning the language objective? d.Complete Teacher Reflection B after reviewing student work samples. 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination8

Teacher Action Plan Implementation Reflection Be prepared to share out 1.Which instructional strategy was implemented? 2.What is one success? 3.What is one challenge? 4.What did you learn by reviewing student work samples side by side with the content and language objectives? 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination9

A.L.L. Observation Cycle , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

Ten Research Highlights EvidenceResearch 1.Strong primary language background (August & Shanahan, 2006; Genesee et al., 2006; Goldenberg, 2008) 2.Equitable classroom environment (Gibbons, 2002; Marzano, 2007; Olsen 2006) 3.High quality interactions (Gibbons, 2002; Marzano, 2007; Walqui, 2000; Zwiers, 2007) 4.Explicit, structured, and interactive instruction (August & Shanahan, 2006; Goldenberg, 2008; Marzano, 2007) 5.Clear content and language objectives (Goldenberg, 2008; Hill & Flynn, 2006; Marzano, 2007; Zwiers, 2008) , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

Ten Research Highlights EvidenceResearch 6.Students grouped in a variety of ways (Gibbons, 2002; Marzano, 2007; Zwiers, 2008) 7.Cognitively engaged in the learning process (Cummins, 2001; McLaughlin, et al., 2005; Solis, 2008) 8.Opportunities to reflect on students’ own learning (Chamot & O’Malley, 1994; Marzano, 2007) 9.Academic oral language development (August & Shanahan, 2006; Genesee et al., 2006; Goldenberg, 2008) 10.Practice and application opportunities (Chamot & O’Malley, 1994; Gibbons, 2002; Marzano 2007) , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

System Tools ELD Observation Summary Form SDAIE Observation Summary Form Pre-observation Planning Guide Post-observation Debriefing Guide Observation Notes Pages for ELD and SDAIE Settings Glossary of Terms Videos Video Supplements , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

ELD/SDAIE Observation Summary Form (K-12) Focus AreaTeacher Practice Student Engagement I.Learning Environment A.Engaging Students B.Promoting Equity and Inclusion C.Student Behavior to Be Observed II.PlanningA.Ensuring Full Access to Curriculum B.Building High Quality Instruction and Materials C.Student Behavior to Be Observed III.Applying Best Teaching and Learning Strategies A.Accessing Background Knowledge B.Scaffolding Instruction C.Student Behavior to Be Observed IV.Using Assessment for Differentiation A.Differentiating Instruction B.Using a Variety of Assessment Strategies C.Student Behavior to Be Observed 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination14

Copyright © 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education15 ELD Observation Summary Form (K-12) Copyright © 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education15

A.L.L. Collaborative Goals: 1.Structure systemic effort in supporting achievement of all students, particularly English learners 2.Build district and school capacity in developing leaders with English learner expertise 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination16

A.L.L. Collaborative 3.Promote teacher efficacy by focusing on the alignment of practices with needs shown in student achievement data analysis 4.Ensure viable systemic professional development for teachers of English learners 5.Leverage resources across districts within county and across counties 2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination17

Implementation Model of A.L.L. Patterson Joint Unified School District: (All district sites are participating in Year One of A.L.L.) One high school, one Alt. Ed., one middle school and 6 elementary schools. Total student population is over 5,100 and approximately 41% English Learners. Each site has analyzed student achievement data, considered the professional development history, the implementation of EL methodology and has identified the area of focus. Some sites have focused on only ELD or SDAIE but the secondary schools select by department , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

Creekside Middle School , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

Patterson Joint Unified Implementation Model with SCOE To implement a district-wide English Learner program review that would address differentiation and appropriate research-based EL methodology. Stanislaus COE initiated a plan to individualize the implementation of A.L.L. that would meet the needs of each site. “A Look At Learning” will support Teachers of English Learners through collaboration focusing strategic steps using sound tools for observation and reflection , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

Professional Development Days Each site received a two hour training on foundations of effective instruction for ELs either during the spring of 2009 or the fall. A full-day of training to introduce A.L.L. was given on September 17 and October , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

Implementation continued: The district has instructional coaches at each site that lead this effort along with the a site administrator. Two follow-up, after school meetings took place to assess and monitor progress. Coaches meet with the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services monthly. Each site decides how many teachers participate in the observation cycles, but all receive professional development with the videos , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

Next Steps One more meeting is scheduled in May. Surveys have provided feedback a couple of times. SCOE has participated in a couple of observations and debriefs. The district plans to continue with A.L.L. next year , Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination

2010, Santa Clara County Office of Education Documents approved for dissemination For More Information For access to the sample video clips, please visit Password: elsuccess The video clips will be posted until June 30,