Center for Scientific Review (CSR). Office of the Director National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIH Peer Review: Continuity and Change
Advertisements

What’s NIH? National Cancer Institute National Eye Institute National Heart, Lung, and Blood Inst. National Human Genome Research Inst National Institute.
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) R15 AASCU November 5, 2009 Mary Ann Guadagno, PhD Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health.
Office of Research Support.  Departmental Grant Manager – Enters information into SPS.  Sponsored Projects System (SPS) is where Grant Managers can.
1 Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Bioscience/Biomedical Research at Idaho State University Christopher Daniels, Ph.D. Director, ISU Biomedical Research Institute and Professor of Pharmaceutical.
NIH F-31 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Predoctoral Fellowships to Promote Diversity in Health-Related.
National Institutes of Health K awards Margie Lee Dept Population Health BHSI Fellowship Writing Workshop Phase 1 – Feb 5, 2011.
American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2011 November 3, 2011 Approaches to Biomedical Research and Development Portfolio Analysis: Examples From the.
ACADEMIC RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT AWARD AREA (R15) Paula Flicker.
How to get funded from the National Institutes of Health Minda R. Lynch, Ph.D., Chief Behavioral and Cognitive Science Research NIDA.
Weathering the Storm: How to Establish and Sustain an Independent Research Career in an Era of Limited Funds Lawrence J. Prograis, Jr., M.D Senior Scientist,
NIH Regional Seminars 2014 Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.Dana Plude, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy OfficerBiobehavioral and Behavioral Processes IRG National Institutes.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute James P. Kiley, Ph.D. National Heart,
NIH OBSSR Summer Institute July 2012 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overview of the NIH Peer Review Process.
NIH Regional Seminars 2015 Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.Dana Plude, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy OfficerBiobehavioral and Behavioral Processes IRG National Institutes.
1 NIH Summer Training Institute Funding Opportunities at NICHD Valerie Maholmes, Ph.D., CAS Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health &
Gene Ontology Project
The NIH Peer Review Process and Grant Writing
Short Overview of the NIH SBIR/STTR Program “Lab to Life”
Bethesda, MD. NCI National Cancer Institute NCCAM National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine NCMHD National Center for Minority Health.
“The Grant Proposal Pathway” Hypothesis: Understanding what happens to a proposal between the time it is submitted and a funding decision is made will.
Working with NIH Program Officials: Pre-Award & Post-Award Shawn Gaillard, NIGMS and Francisco Sy, NIMHD 2013 NIH Regional Seminar, Baltimore, MD.
Peer Review of NIH Research Grant Applications Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Mouse; NOTC1; Q01705 Function: protein binding Process: Notch signaling pathway Process: positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter.
NIAID Commitment to Influenza Research and Preparedness F. Gray Handley Associate Director for International Research Affairs National Institute of Allergy.
Office of the Director National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Arthritis.
Avrom Caplan, PhD Associate University Dean for Research
NIH International Programs
The Review of Your NIH Grant Application Begins Here Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. Director NIH Center for Scientific Review.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2009 November 14, 2009 Building Data Systems to Support Evaluation in a Biomedical Research and Development.
The Grant Renewal Review Process Nywana Sizemore, PhD Scientific Review Officer Molecular Oncogenesis - MONC Oncology I - Basic Translational - OBT Integrated.
National Institutes of Health. Much of the biomedical research in the United States is supported by the Federal Government, primarily the National Institutes.
Jo Anne Goodnight NIH SBIR/STTR Program Coordinator NIH Mission Improve human health through biomedical and behavioral research, research training and.
1 CSR’s Mission and Function and What’s New in Peer Review Martha M. Faraday, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Division of AIDS, Behavioral & Population.
NIH Grant Renewal Review Process (and Beyond)
1 Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal
An Overview of Peer Review at CSR – Critical Do’s and Don’ts Joy Gibson, D.Sc. Director, Division of Translational and Clinical Sciences American Association.
BME 301 Lecture Twenty-Three. How are health care technologies managed? Examples: MRI Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Vitamin C treatment for scurvy Research.
NIH F-32 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Postdoctoral Fellowships
The Search for a “Better Way:” Reauthorization of the National Institutes of Health Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., Director, NIH July 19, 2005 House Energy and.
The NIH Funding Process Peggy McCardle, PhD, MPH Child Development & Behavior Branch National Institute of Child Health & Human Development We wish to.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal Angela Y Ng, MBA, PhD Scientific Review and Referral Officer Center for Scientific Review NCI DCB New Grantee Workshop.
Gene Ontology Project
NIH Grant Writing Tips Kelli A. Komro, MPH, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, COM Associate Director, Institute.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
FACULTY of ARTS and SCIENCES HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN HARVARD DIVINITY SCHOOL Center for the Study of World Religions Summer.
“The Grant Proposal Pathway” Hypothesis: Understanding what happens to a proposal between the time it is submitted and a funding decision is made will.
Office of Research Support.  Departmental Grant Manager – Enters information into SPS.  Sponsored Projects System (SPS) is where Grant Managers can.
NIH Regional Seminars 2015 Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.Weijia Ni, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy OfficerChief, RPHB, Center for Scientific Review National Institutes.
Organizational Funding Portfolios and Beyond: Assessing the Full Research Landscape Panel Session 731 American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2012 October.
How to get funded from the National Institutes of Health Minda R. Lynch, Ph.D., Chief Behavioral and Cognitive Science Research NIDA.
Challenges and Opportunities in Peer Review A Vision for Ensuring Its Strategic National Value toni scarpa Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
Jeanne McDermott, PhD,MPH,CNM Program Officer Division of International Training and Research Fogarty International Center National Institutes of Health.
NIH HIV/AIDS Research Priorities
HIV/AIDS Implementation Science Research Across NIH: Recent Highlights, Current Priorities, and Partners Christopher Gordon, PhD Branch Chief, Division.
Understanding NIH Peer Review
American Evaluation Association
The Influence of Domain-Specific Metric Development on Evaluation and Design: An Example from National Institutes of Health Technology Development Programs.
NIH Study Section Review Process
“How Can Providers Address the Lack of R01 Studies. ” Robert H
The NIH Peer Review Process
Peer Review of NIH Research Grant Applications
Overview of the Health & Human Services SBIR/STTR Programs
Presentation transcript:

Center for Scientific Review (CSR)

Office of the Director National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Institute on Aging National Institute on Aging National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Eye Institute National Eye Institute National Human Genome Research Institute National Human Genome Research Institute National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Institute of Mental Health National Institute of Mental Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Institute of Nursing Research National Institute of Nursing Research National Library of Medicine National Library of Medicine Center for Information Technology Center for Information Technology Center for Scientific Review Center for Scientific Review National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Fogarty International Center Fogarty International Center National Center for Research Resources National Center for Research Resources National Institutes of Health Clinical Center Clinical Center National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

Center for Scientific Review (CSR) Focal Point for Initial Review at NIH Central receipt point for PHS applications Referral to Institutes and to IRGs and Study Sections Review of most research and research training applications for scientific merit

Applications Submitted to NIH Approximately 45,000 grant applications are submitted to NIH each year. CSR is responsible for the review of over half of these applications.

CSR Reorganization Initiatives Examination and re-organization of CSR study sections based on: –integration of review activities of NIMH, NIAAA, and NIDA –alignment of CSR initial review groups and study sections with current trends in science

CSR Review Divisions Division of Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms Donald Schneider, Ph.D. Division of Physiological Systems Michael Martin, Ph.D. Division of Clinical and Population-Based Studies Elliot Postow, Ph.D. Biochemical Sciences IRG (BCS) Zakir Bengali, Ph.D. Biophysical and Chemical Sciences IRG (BPC) John Bowers, Ph.D. Cell Development and Function IRG (CDF) Marcia Steinberg, Ph.D. Genetic Sciences IRG (GNS) Camilla Day, Ph.D.* Immunological Sciences IRG (IMM) Calbert Laing, Ph.D. Infectious Diseases and Microbiology IRG (IDM) Rona Hirschberg, Ph.D. Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neurosciences IRG (MCDN) Carole Jelsema, Ph.D. Cardiovascular Sciences IRG (CVS)) Jeanne Ketley, Ph.D. Endocrinology & Reproductive Sciences IRG (ENR) Sooja Kim, Ph.D. Integrative, Functional & Cognitive Neuroscience IRG (IFCN) Christine Mellchior, Ph.D. Musculoskeletal & Dental Sciences IRG (MSD) Daniel McDonald, Ph.D. Nutritional and Metabolic Sciences IRG (NMS) Sooja Kim, Ph.D. Pathophysiological Sciences IRG, (PPS) Mustaq Khan, Ph.D. AIDS and Related Research IRG (ARR) Ranga V. Srinivas, Ph.D. Behavioral & Biobehavioral Processes IRG (BBBP) Anita Sostek, Ph.D. Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience IRG (BDCN) Elliot Postow, Ph.D.* Oncological Sciences IRG (ONC) Syed Quadri, Ph.D. Surgery, Radiology, and Bioengineering IRG (SRB) Eileen Bradley, D. Sc. *Acting Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior IRG (RPHB) Michael Micklin, Ph.D. Social Sciences, Nursing, Epidemiology and Methods IRG (SNEM) Robert Weller, Ph.D.

Number of R01 Applications Reviewed in the Neuroscience Study Sections (10/98 – 10/00 Councils) Number of Applications (total = 7015) 46.3% 16.8% 9.3%8.9%8.4% 10.2%

Percent of R01 Applications Reviewed in the Neuroscience Study Sections Scoring 15 th Percentile or Better (10/98 – 10/00 Councils) n=538 n=189 n=78 n=58 n=83 Percent of Applications Total (3251) (1180) (655) (624) (592)

Percent of R01 Applications Reviewed in the Neuroscience Study Sections Scoring 25 th Percentile or Better (10/98 – 10/00 Councils) n=894 n=307 n=134 n=106 n=141 Percent of Applications Total (3251) (1180) (655) (624) (592)

Number of R01 Applications Reviewed in the Behavioral and Social Sciences Study Sections (10/99 – 10/00 Councils) 25.7% 17.7% 11.2% 14.2% 9.2% 22.0% Number of Applications (total = 2294)

Percent of R01 Applications Reviewed in the Behavioral and Social Sciences Study Sections Scoring 15 th Percentile or Better (10/99 – 10/00 Councils) n=100 n=58 n=63 n=23 n=27 Percent of Applications Total (590) (406) (326) (257) (211)

Percent of R01 Applications Reviewed in the Behavioral and Social Sciences Study Sections Scoring 25 th Percentile or Better (10/99 – 10/00 Councils) n=150 n=93 n=97 n=58n=48 Percent of Applications Total (590) (406) (326) (257) (211)

Number of R01 Applications Reviewed in AARR7 and AARR8 Study Sections (10/98 – 10/00 Councils) 38.0% 31.7% 8.3% 11.2%10.7% Number of Applications (total = 410)

Percent of R01 Applications Reviewed in AARR7 and AARR8 Study Sections Scoring 15 th Percentile or Better (10/98 – 10/00 Councils) n=29 n=15 n=7 n=6 Total (156) (130) (46) (34) Percent of Applications

Percent of R01 Applications Reviewed in AARR7 and AARR8 Study Sections Scoring 25 th Percentile or Better (10/98 – 10/00 Councils) n=48 n=29 n=10 n=7 Total (156) (130) (46) (34) Percent of Applications

Percent of NIDA R01 Applications Reviewed in “Patient-Oriented” Study Sections Scoring 15 th Percentile or Better (10/99 – 10/00 Councils or 10/98 – 10/00 Councils*) n=8 n=3 n=4 Total (77) (13) (32) (17) (45) Percent of Applications n=7

Percent of NIDA R01 Applications Reviewed in “Patient-Oriented” Study Sections Scoring 25 th Percentile or Better (10/99 – 10/00 Councils or 10/98 – 10/00 Councils*) n=10 n=5 n=6 Total (77) (13) (32) (17) (45) Percent of Applications n=13

Percent of NIDA R01 Applications Scoring 15 th Percentile or 25 th Percentile or Better in the Neuroscience and Behavioral and Social Science Study Sections (10/98 – 10/00 Councils) Percent of Applications