Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
Advertisements

Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
What Does Rigor Look Like?
Little Red Riding Hood & Cognitive Rigor Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together Presented by April 23, 2013
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Writing a Usable and Working Curriculum Background with Step-by- Step Guidance.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
TEACHING INFORMATIVE WRITING FROM SOURCES Chapter 6 Best Practices in Writing Instruction George E Newell Jennifer VanDerHeide Melissa Wilson.
OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN
Standards Academy Grades 3 and 4 Day 1. Objectives Understand the Critical Areas of our grade levels. Examine the importance of vertical alignment across.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Building Students’ Deep Understanding through a Common Core-Aligned Unit Setting the Stage  Reflect on planning and pedagogical practices in context of.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge A HEAP of Complexity. BLOOM’S TAXONOMYBLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY KNOWLEDGE “The recall of specifics and universals, involving little.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Teachers Helping Teachers Align Units with the Common Core/ Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy September 24, 2012 Presented by Elin Reuben Karma.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
How to Ask Reading Questions 北一女中 寧曉君老師
Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Version. Bloom’s Taxonomy of Instructional Activities ( REVISED VERSION – PAGE 52) Create Evaluate Analyze Apply Understand Remember.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Bloom’s Critical Thinking Questioning Strategies A Guide to Higher Level Thinking Ruth SundaKyrene de las Brisas.
BBI3420 PJJ 2009/2010 Dr. Zalina Mohd. Kasim.  Bloom’s taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956) provides 6 levels of thinking and questioning. A close.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
Do Now Take a minute to write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” as it relates to instruction, learning, and assessment. Compare your definition.
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Benjamin Bloom (et al.) created this taxonomy for categorizing levels of abstraction of questions.
Higher Order Thinking Skills
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
QUESTIONING! 10/15. Agenda Discuss open-ended questions Discuss different question stems and levels Blooms and Costas Watch a clip on gun violence and.
Teaching and Thinking According to Blooms Taxonomy human thinking can be broken down into six categories.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Dr. Middlebrooks. Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
What is RIGOR in the Math Classroom?. Presenter Introduction: Stephanie Darley East Valley RttT Math Coach Curriculum Coach at DHHS Been with TLG for.
THE C OMMON C ORE, & C OGNITIVE R IGOR Language Arts Council Meetings Fall 2012 Adapted from Karin K. Hess materials.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
And PARCC
Common Core State Standards Mapping to the Core May 21, 2013.
Facilitating Higher Order Thinking in Classroom and Clinical Settings Vanneise Collins, PhD Director, Center for Learning and Development Cassandra Molavrh,
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Are your students thinking more deeply or just working harder
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Rigor/Relevance For All Students Common CORE January, 2013
A classification of learning objectives within education
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”
A guide to reading, writing, thinking and understanding
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
Preplanning Presentation
BBI3420 PJJ 2009/2010 Dr. Zalina Mohd. Kasim
Higher Order Thinking Skills
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix
Presentation transcript:

Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists

Intended Outcomes: Complete a rigor chart on a current unit Develop more unit activities to fill in rigor chart Revise unit based on completed rigor chart and observations and reflections Submit revised unit (don’t forget common core labels ) and completed rigor chart Complete and turn in exit activity

What is rigor? Show-And-Tell-Themes Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” as it relates to instruction, learning, and assessments. Collaborate with the person next to you

Definition of Cognitive Rigor We believe that rigor is…. Rigor -

Developing a Cognitive Rigor Matrix Currently, we use two different tools to describe cognitive rigor. Each addresses something different. RBT (Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy) – What type of thinking (verbs) is needed to complete a task? DOK (Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) – How deeply do you have to understand the content to successfully interact with it? How complex or abstract is the content?

Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) & Bloom’s Cognitive Process Dimensions (2005) Knowledge– Define, duplicate, label, list, name, order, recognize, relate, recall Comprehension—Classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize, report, review, select, translate Application– Analyze, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, practice, write Analysis– Analyze, appraise, explain, calculate, categorize, compare, criticize, discriminate, examine Synthesis– Rearrange, assemble, collect, compose, create, design, develop, formulate, manage, write Evaluation– Appraise, argue, assess, choose, compare, defend, estimate, explain, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value Remember– Retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, recognize, recall, locate, identify Understand – Construct meaning, clarify, paraphrase, represent, translate, illustrate, give examples, classify, categorize, summarize, generalize, predict Apply – Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation; carry out or use/apply to an unfamiliar task Analyze – Break into constituent parts, determine how parts relate Evaluate – Make judgments based on criteria, check, detect inconsistencies/fallacies, critique Create – Put elements together to form a coherent whole, reorganize elements into new patterns/structures.

What is DOK?What is DOK? – Let’s watch Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge Levels  DOK-1 – Recall & Reproduction – Recall of a fact, term, principle, concept; perform a routine procedure; locate details  DOK-2 – Basic Application of Skills/Concepts – Use of information; conceptual knowledge; select appropriate procedures for a given task; two or more steps with decision points along the way; routine problems; organize/ display data; interpret/use simple graphs; summarize; identify main idea; explain relationships; make predictions  DOK-3 – Strategic Thinking – Requires reasoning, or developing a plan or sequence of steps to approach problem; requires decision making or justification; abstract, complex or non-routine; often more than one possible answer; support solutions or judgments with text evidence  DOK-4 – Extended Thinking – An investigation or application to real world; requires time to research, problem solve, and process multiple conditions of the problem or task; non-routine manipulations; synthesize information across disciplines/content areas/multiple sources.

Depth of Knowledge

DOK is about depth & complexity – not difficulty! **Difficulty is a reference to how many students answer a question correctly.  The intended student learning outcome determines the DOK level. What mental process must occur?  While verbs may appear to point to a DOK level, it is what comes after the verb that is the best indicator of the rigor/DOK level. Describe the process of photosynthesis Describe how the two political parties are alike and different Describe the most significant effect of WWII on the nations of Europe

Hess’ Cognitive Rigor Matrix: Applies Webb’s DOK to RBT Cognitive Process Dimensions Depth + Thinking Level 1 Recall & Reproduction Level 2 Basic Skills & Concepts Level 3 Strategic Thinking & Reasoning Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember Recall, locate basic facts, details, events Understand Select appropriate words to use when intended meaning is clearly evident Specify, explain relationships, summarize, identify main ideas Explain, generalize, or connect ideas using supporting evidence Explain how concepts or ideas specifically relate to other content domains or concepts Apply Use language structure or word relationships to determine meaning Use contest to identify meaning of word, obtain and interpret information using text features Use concepts to solve non-routine problems Devise an approach among many alternatives to research a novel problem Analyze Identify whether information is contained in a graph, table, etc. Compare literacy elements, terms, facts, events, analyze format, organization, & text structures Analyze or interpret author’s craft to critique a text Analyze multiple sources or texts Analyze complex/ abstract themes Evaluate Cite evidence and develop a logical argument for conjectures Evaluate relevancy, accuracy, & completeness of information Create Brainstorm ideas about a topic Generate conjectures based on observations or prior knowledge Synthesis information within one source of text Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts

Some general rules of thumb If there is only one correct answer, it is probably level DOK 1 or DOK 2 –DOK 1: you either know it (can recall it, locate it, do it) or you don’t –DOK 2 (conceptual): apply one concept, then make a decision before going on applying a second concept If more than one solution/approach, requiring evidence, it is DOK 3or 4 –DOK 3: Must provide supporting evidence and reasoning (not just HOW solved, but WHY – explain reasoning) –DOK 4: all of “3” + use of multiple sources or texts

Hess CR Matrix Write the number for each set of questions in the correct cell in the CR Matrix Depth + ThinkingLevel 1 Recall & Reproduction Level 2 Basic Skills & Concepts Level 3 Strategic Thinking & Reasoning Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

“Answers” for Discussion Depth + ThinkingLevel 1 Recall & Reproduction Level 2 Basic Skills & Concepts Level 3 Strategic Thinking & Reasoning Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember (6) What color was Red’s cape? Where was little red riding hood going? What did the wolf do to trick Little Red Riding Hood? How did the story end? Understand (4) Who was the main character? What was the story’s setting? (1) Retell or summarize the story in your own words. Apply (7) Identify transitional words and phrases to help you know the sequence of events in the story. Analyze (8) What are some examples of personification in the story? What is the same and different about your grandmother’s house and the house in the story? (3) Are all wolfs (in literature) like the wolf in this story? Support your response using evidence from other texts. Evaluate (2) What is your opinion about the intelligence of the wolf? Justify using details/evidence from the story. Create (5) Write a telephone conversation between Little Red Riding Hood and her mother that explains the wolf incident.

Reflect on the matrix. Are all the cells filled? Are there areas that need to be addressed? What are the overall learning goals & expectations (and cognitive demand) of the unit? Does the cognitive demand of the assessments match the stated learning expectations? Do the learning activities in the unit have the coherence & increasing cognitive rigor to get students there? Some Implications for applying rigor to a unit design/ re-design:

Resources DOK Livebinder

Your Assignment: Complete a CR matrix on your unit Reflect on the CR matrix and create activities where needed Revise your unit Submit/turn in unit and CR matrix Exit survey

Questions