Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview 2012-2013 Stan Rounds Superintendent 2012-2013 Stan Rounds Superintendent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The Heart of Improvement: Leadership. The Story of Thomasville City Schools…
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
Superintendent’s Welcome & Briefing Administrator’s Retreat August 5, 2010 Las Cruces Public Schools Stan Rounds Administrator’s Retreat August 5, 2010.
1 Collective Accountability To The Work “Learning Is The Work” -Michael Fullan.
Secondary Experience and Achievement TASK FORCE Staff Leads: Matt Duffy, Brigitte Marshall, Alison McDonald.
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Ensure All Students are Prepared for Success District and Schools’ SACS Accreditation Plans.
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Branford High School Principal – Seth Thoreson. % Proficient in Reading % Proficient in Math % Proficient in Writing % Proficient in Science % Learning.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
Los Angeles Virtual Academy A learning portal to the future.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Administrators Academy August 9, Closing the Achievement Gap.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Mission of Restoration
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
©2012 Texas Education Agency and the University of Texas System GRANT WALK-THROUGH 1.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Framework for Enhancing Student Learning School District 63 (Saanich)
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent

There are virtually no documented instances of troubled schools being turned around in the absence of intervention by talented leaders. While other factors contribute to such turnarounds, leadership is the catalyst. Kenneth Leithwood How Leadership Influences Student Learning

Focus of Evaluation Responsibility to own the accountability The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing - student achievement! Accomplishing EPSS goals Monitoring multiple data sources and engaging in rapid resets when things aren’t working Ensuring innovative, rigorous, relevant, engaging, and responsive instructional programs Adhering to federal, state, and district policies and regulations Engaging parents in the educational process

Evaluation process Responsibility to own the accountability Principal and evaluator engage in monthly conversations about student success - what do the data say? Principals capacity to meet performance expectations (Principal Leadership Competencies) Establish and monitor appropriate professional development goals and learning opportunities for staff Commit to conducting classroom walkthroughs and engaging analysis of data that result in rapid resets when necessary

Evaluation timeline Responsibility to own the accountability Self-assessment (Form A) and Professional Development Plan (Form B) ed to evaluator and Karen Robles prior to initial visit Initial formal conference - September 10 to 14, 2012 Second formal conference - November 12 to 16 PDP Mid-year Review - January 2013 Third formal conference - February 25 and March 7, 2013 Synthesis of performance with Superintendent - between April 8 and May 3, 2013

Instructional Leadership Responsibility to own the accountability What’s the evidence? Principal is the first and foremost teacher and learner in the building? EPSS goals are data driven and 75% of students are meeting benchmarks (rapid resets are implemented when they are not). Strategies and actions address the learning needs of the 25% in lower quartile and 75% of the upper quartile. Tier I and Tier II interventions are data driven, monitored, and show that students are making appropriate progress. Acceleration options are available based on data. K-3 teachers are all using district CCSS pacing guides. All 4-12 teachers are using NM adopted standards in all content areas. Elementary students are learning science and social studies daily, are exposed to healthy options, and are provided recess daily.

Communication Responsibility to own the accountability What’s the evidence? Common definitions are established for RIGOR, RELEVANCE, and ENGAGEMENT and understood by teachers and staff and observable in all learning settings. Priority instructional areas agreed on, a walkthrough protocol developed, and a schedule is developed. Walkthrough data are collected, analyzed, feedback provided to teachers. and results in rapid resets. Data meetings held weekly and walkthroughs capture evidence that data is driving the instructional program. Achievement data for all subpopulations is monitored with appropriate actions to address the learning needs of all students. The principles of Invitational Education are evident (people, places, policies, programs, & processes) and rapid resets initiated and monitored for effectiveness.

Professional Development Responsibility to own the accountability What’s the evidence? Driven by student data and agendas linked, with appropriate notation, to specific data. Is standards-based and reflects appropriate research. Analysis of surveys regarding quality is evident and informs future learning options at the site. Classroom walkthroughs document evidence that strategies and knowledge gained in professional development sessions is evident in classroom practice.

OPerations management Responsibility to own the accountability What’s the evidence? Campus is reflective of the key principles of invitational education. Attendance interventions for students and families follow requirements in Policy JHB. School budget reflects student needs. Campus is orderly and inviting to students, parents, and community members. Classrooms and meeting spaces are organized for the intended purpose and rapid resets made when walkthrough data reflect otherwise. Textbooks, supplies, and other learning resources available to students to meet learning objectives. Technology in use by students at least 60% of the time (two out of three walkthroughs).

Scope of responsibility in secondary schools Responsibility to own the accountability What’s the evidence? The middle school and high school principal develops, supports, encourages, and supervises programs that lead to increased STUDENT attendance, achievement, and graduation rates resulting in college readiness and work skills to meet the diverse needs of the community. For instance: Number of students passing state examination, diversity of AP enrollments, language proficiency, passing rates for Algebra I, attendance and Tier I interventions, graduation rate increase from last three years, Tier II interventions based on data, purposeful scheduling based on data, student clubs and activities, scores on college readiness exams, parent conferences, targeting the best teachers for high needs classes, and evidence of rapid rests when things aren’t working