Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, 2005 1/11 Art Duval and Helmut Knaust Student Outcomes in Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEXT STEPS Decide if you want to work with NCAT by November 1, 2007 Send Carol Twigg an with a copy to Kevin Lemoine.
Advertisements

© The University of Texas at El Paso Course-based Program Assessment Helmut Knaust & Joe A. Guthrie Department of Mathematical Sciences The University.
Summer Institute, May16,  Peer review process that evaluates educational programs and services for quality.  Transferability of credit hours.
Student Internships and Learning Outcomes Assessment By Harpal S. Dhillon, AGSB University Helmut Pusterer, AGSB University Manpreet K. Dhillon, Hult International.
 A description of IGETC policies and procedures used to inform students about successful transfer.
All-Campus Meeting of Faculty & Staff Monday, August 19, 2013 G. Michael Pratt, Ph.D Associate Provost, Miami University Dean, College of Professional.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
Department of Mathematical Sciences The University of Texas at El Paso 1 Program Assessment Presentation May 15, 2009 Joe Guthrie Helmut Knaust.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
A “Realistic Appraisal” of Student Educational Planning The SMC Counseling Approach to Assessing SLOs Esau Tovar, Santa Monica College Accreditation Institute.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
Writing Effective Assessment Plans. Why Assessment Plans? Facilitates periodic, not episodic assessment of student learning and program outcomes Serves.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
Change is a Process Organizational Stages Individual Stages (ADKAR) Business Need Concept and Design Implementation Post-Implementation Awareness Desire.
Writing Effective Assessment Plans Office of Assessment and Accreditation Indiana State University.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
State of the Department ABET 2000 Update Presentation to External Review Board October 19, 2001.
EPortfolio Assessment Pilot. Agenda Purpose of the ePortfolio assessment pilot CSD use of ePortfolio English department use of ePortfolio Future applications.
UNA’S QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN RESEARCH LITERACY IMAGINE... INVESTIGATE... COMMUNICATE Building Success through Discovery.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Principles of Assessment
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Academy for Student-Centered Learning – Workshop Two Melia Fritch, Shawna Jordan, & Shannon Washburn October 28, 2013 CREATING STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
Kevin Boston.  Currently offers one undergraduate degree ◦ Degree receives accreditation from both:  The Society of American Foresters  Accreditation.
OBE Briefing.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Visual Art GPS Roll Out.  Student achieves standard  Project  Lesson plans  Fulton County Art Curriculum  GPS  National Standards.
Developing Programmatic Objectives Presentation to Department of English SUNY Oneonta October 1, 2008.
Department Mission Statement and Program Learning Outcomes.
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
TEAM-Math Teacher Leader Meeting October 28, 2004.
Understanding the Common Core Kansas Development of Common Core Standards.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Strategic Planning Committee Report 2009 Winter Meeting Newark Marriott Hotel 7 February 2009 By Gerard A Alphonse for Art Winston, Chair.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
1 OSU-Okmulgee Assessment Plan 2003 Welcome to Phase I Training.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Objective: Reviewing the vision and restarting the work. Agenda 1.Design 21 overview 2.Accept Fall 09 timetable draft 6 3.Career Academies: Brainstorming.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Developing Common Course Syllabi November 20, 2010 Heather Sass, Education Consultant Preview.
STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPING ACTION PLANS April
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Refresher Course on Assessment A Workshop for Department Chairs, Program Directors, and Others January 22, 2016.
Post University. INSTITUTION: Post University, Waterbury,CT NAMES of Team members: Dylan Clyne, Maura Bozeman and Randal Streck VISION – Our departmental.
Involve internal and external stakeholders using various communications tools. Align and focus the entire school system with measurable outcomes. Excite.
ECE Assessment Program Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
LSSU Assessment Timeline Phase I (Completed by December 2009) –Create Institutional Assessment Structure –Create Department Assessment Teams –Write College.
School of Liberal Arts September 9, Overview of Accreditation Process Assessment Plans Resources.
Taste of Taskstream Aaron Detty Assistant Professor
Office of Planning & Development
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Administrative Review
General Education Redesign Task Force
ASSESSMENT Overview January 30, 2006 and February 1, 2006
Accreditation follow-up report
Presentation transcript:

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Art Duval and Helmut Knaust Student Outcomes in Mathematics

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Starting Point: Pretty much at zero. Creation of a Strategic Planning Committee –Consisting of five department members “High profile”: Department chair as committee chair “Departmental opinion leaders” Representing all sub-disciplines within the department Varying experience from Assistant Professor to Full Professor January 2004

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Hour-long meetings (nearly) every week Working on a Vision and Mission Statement –Lots of “talking” –Slowly coming to an understanding about the future path of the department –Very slow but steady progress January 2004 – October 2004

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 “Homework assignment” for committee members –What do we want our students to be able to do? The next committee meeting –Surprise: All committee members envision quite similar student outcomes! –Committee works for an hour on refining three objectives Early November 2004

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Department meeting (Take I) –Discussion about the competencies and possible assessment strategies Committee chair researches assessment strategies in the literature and at other mathematics departments November 2004

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Department meeting (Take II) –More discussion about the competencies –After some changes the competencies are accepted –Department agrees in principle to assessment by student portfolios. Committee (with extra members) writes a draft version of student assessment procedures Early December 2004

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 “To Do” items Finalizing the student assessment plan Implementation of the assessment plan starting in Fall 2005 Spring 2005

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Our general design principles for competencies and their assessment List general abilities rather than knowledge domains Uniform formulation of student competencies for all degree plans in the department Assessment will (hopefully) provide useful feedback to the department

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 The Three Competencies 1. Given initial information and data from various domains, students will be able to identify problems, and using appropriate mathematical tools, formulate and solve them. 2. Students will be able to understand, create and analyze mathematical proofs. 3. Students will be able to communicate mathematics clearly in oral and written form.

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Student Portfolio Assessment “Student achievement of the above three competencies will be assessed with the help of student portfolios. After graduation a student’s portfolio will be analyzed by a specially selected committee. Emphasis will be put on comparative analysis of the quality of the material submitted at various points of time of a student’s education at our institution so that the student’s progress may be analyzed. By assessing individual students’ portfolios, over time, the Department of Mathematical Sciences will gain insight into the teaching effectiveness of its programs and into suitable ways of improving them. Each of the competencies is currently being assessed in appropriate courses, but no permanent record of these assessments is being kept. The portfolios will meet that need.”

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Art Duval Helmut Knaust Student Competencies (Draft) Competencies.pdf Department Compact (Draft) compact.pdf