1 NAEP Results Data to Spur District Reform Deb Lindsey, Director Office of Research and Evaluation Milwaukee Public Schools.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.

Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.

o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.

Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.

Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.

Heather Zavadsky, Ph.D. Bringing School Reform to Scale: Moving From Islands of Greatness to Successful Systems.

Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,

Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.

Welcome to Third Grade Curriculum Night Our Goal is that by the end of the year all students will score a level 3 or 4 on the Math and Reading End of Grade.

Foundations for Success Initial Findings and New Directions Jason Snipes Director of Research Council of the Great City Schools Defining the Achievement.

Previous Year Four Overview Grant Budget Resources This presentation allows you to:  review the overall expectations for Focus Schools, as outlined in.

SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan

AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.

Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.

RTI 2 Murfreesboro City Schools Lessons Learned Linda Gilbert, Director of SchoolsLinda Gilbert, Director of Schools Caresa Brooks, Coordinator, Reading/InterventionCaresa.

Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin

Goal: The Watertown Unified School District will increase its use and understanding of formative assessments in math, reading, language arts, as well as.

1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.

Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.

RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.

Response to Intervention USING RTI FOR NONACADEMIC INTERVENTIONS: PART II.

Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.

Boston Public Schools Elementary Math Plan: District-Wide Reform in Math Teaching and Learning Presented by: Linda Ruiz Davenport, Director of Elementary.

STAN KOGUT  SUPERINTENDENT ROBERTA PERCONTI  DIRECTOR OF SIS INGHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT RtI Initiative Update Any Time, Any Place,

Welcome to Third Grade Curriculum Night Our Goal is that by the end of the year all students will be proficient and prepared for fourth grade.

I NTRODUCTION TO S CHOOL C OUNSELING February 2013.

Working Together ~ Achieving More Systematic Approach to Working Together ~ Achieving More William G. Andrekopoulos Superintendent of Schools.

Creating SMART Goals Refer to pgs in spiral conference binder.

Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.

How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.

MAISA Annual Conference June 21, 2012  Leadership and vision  Focused and intentional action  Knowledge and capacity building  Accountable for student.

1. What is Response to Intervention (RtI): (response to intervention and instruction) Providing high quality instruction to all students through the use.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Pittsfield Public Schools September 23, 2009.

Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.

A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.

Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.

PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.

Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.

1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.

Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.

1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.

Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.

PBIS POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS Created by Roxann Johnson Learning Plan 6 Models of Behavior Management.

DECEMBER 19, 2013 PRESENTATION TO THE TRSD SCHOOL BOARD Timberlane District Action Plans.

 Response to Intervention A Good Fit for SAS Jan Cantrill (Pudong) Sarah Pearlz (Puxi)

Sharing in Leadership for Student Success MPS Principal Breakfast Milwaukee Public Schools 23 April 2008.

Patti Book, Brenda Kephart, Kristi Sandvik.  Profile of Hillsboro School District  Map of the Journey  Current Location  Next Destination  Challenges.

Scaling Up in Illinois Illinois STS Team Deb Kunz Brenda Melcher Barbara Sims.

Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.

Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.

What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.

ITQ Institute Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics June 5, 2014 Focus 4; Communicating with Constituents; June 2014.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction The California Story Presented for the National Center on.

Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.

Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.

Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio

Responsiveness to Instruction Vermont Principals Association Strand August, 2011 Julie Benay, M.Ed.

WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.

Multi-Tiered System of Supports William Avila, Director Student Support Services Dr. Rachel Monarrez, Assistant Superintendent, Educational Services Marlo.

RSU #38 Response to Intervention

Local Control Accountability Plan

Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.

Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?

Dr. Julie Beddow-Schubert EC4 Principal Curriculum Director

Colchester Public Schools

Common Core State Standards May 2011

Presentation transcript:

1 NAEP Results Data to Spur District Reform Deb Lindsey, Director Office of Research and Evaluation Milwaukee Public Schools

Background Council Strategic Support Team reviews Research-Assessment School Safety Instructional Programs-Reading/Math Student Discipline External Literacy Review District Identified For Improvement (DIFI) Level 5

Common Findings Long history of decentralization Insufficient accountability systems High suspension rates Persistently low achievement Lack of strategic focus General complacency with poor outcomes

MPS Response and Progress Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in an RtI framework Mathematics text adoption narrowed options to three for schools Adopted new strategic plan, Working Together, Achieving More Redesigned data warehouse with dashboard metrics—lagging & leading—aligned to strategic plan; SIP goals/strategies = Strategic plan

July 2010 New administrative team led by Dr. Gregory Thornton, Superintendent Relentless focus on measurable outcomes NAEP results used to communicate the need for change to various constituencies, internal and external NAEP results build urgency to work collaboratively to improve student outcomes

Reading Results Performance in Milwaukee is far below that of most TUDAs Data are consistent with results seen on state tests Data helped build a case for a single textbook adoption in reading for all but the few highest performing schools with low student mobility Data supported development of a comprehensive literacy plan for the district

Math Results Despite 5 years of intensive mathematics work with teachers, performance is among the lowest of all TUDAs Attainment on state tests has been slowly improving, but status relative to national standards is far too low Will develop comprehensive math plan to address students’ knowledge and skills as well as staff Will consider reducing textbook to single adoption

What’s Next? Additional examination of exclusion rates Improved communication within the district about the assessment Continued use of data both for both internal and external discussions-urgency and consistency! Will serve as a benchmark of progress over time – 2011 test will be second round as a TUDA but very early in new work around improving reading and math instruction