Next week’s assignment: 1) Using clumping indexes, LAI and  values for a conifer stand (Loblolly pine forest, Duke Univ.) and for a Eucalyptus plantation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transpiration Mr. West AP Biology
Advertisements

A Simple Production Efficiency Model 1/18 Willem de Kooning ( ) A Tree in Naples.
ISOTOPES AND LAND PLANT ECOLOGY C3 vs. C4 vs. CAM.
C3, C4, and CAM plants all have the same goal, to make carbohydrates. What happens to the triose-phosphates made in the Calvin cycle? 1.Used to synthesize.
Stable Isotope Analyses of Carbon Dioxide Exchange in Forest and Pasture Ecosystems L. Flanagan, J. Ometto, T. Domingues, L. Martinelli, J. Ehleringer.
Grape Physiology Section 3 Stomata Photosynthesis.
Relationships among photosynthesis, foliar nitrogen and stomatal conductance in tropical rain forest vegetation Tomas Domingues; Joe Berry; Luiz Martinelli;
Institute of Horticultural Production Systems Vegetable Systems Modelling Hartmut Stützel and Tsu-Wei Chen Plant canopies under drought stress– structures,
Biosphere/Atmosphere Interactions Biology 164/ Joe Berry Chris Field Adam.
6/2/2015 A GAP-FILLING MODEL (GFM) FOR TOWER-BASED NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY MEASUREMENTS Zisheng Xing a, Charles P.-A. Bourque a, Fanrui Meng a, Roger.
Weather Water in the Atmosphere May 14, Precipitation Precipitation is any form of water that falls from a cloud. Water vapor is the source of all.
Assessing Douglas-fir water-use history using stable isotope ( 13 C and 18 O) in tree rings: principles and potential J. Renée Brooks Western Ecology Division,
 P = -2T/r Example: calculate  P for r = 1 x m and 1 x m. About -0.15MPa for 1µm, and -1.5 MPa for 0.1 µm.
Modelling the response of wheat canopy assimilation to CO 2 using two models of different level of empiricism D Rodriguez 1,2, F Ewert 3, J Goudriaan 1,
Aseel Samaro Exploring the role of stomata.  Plants are found in a huge range of habitats.  In order to photosynthesise, plants need a supply of.
Understanding Weather Water in the Air Ch. 2 Sec. 1 p
ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology
Convection Convection: transfer of heat by a flowing liquid or gas
Measuring Stomatal Conductance
Stomatal Conductance and Porometry
Integrating Fluxes of Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor From Leaf to Canopy Scales Dennis Baldocchi Ecosystem Science Division/ESPM UC Berkeley.
Plant water regime Transpiration Leaf energy balance Fick laws
Chapter 5 The Biosphere: The Carbon Cycle of Terrestrial Ecosystems
 W  S  P  g How do we express  S,  P, &  g in units of pressure?  S, the solute pressure or solute potential.  S = -RTC S Where R.
Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Transfer (SVAT) Models
Evaporation What is evaporation? How is evaporation measured? How is evaporation estimated? Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 3.5 and 3.6 With assistance.
Calculating Optimal Root to Shoot Ratio to Balance Transpiration with Water Uptake Rate and Maximize Relative Growth Rate. Dr. Vincent P. Gutschick, Dept.
Enhanced Ecosystem Productivity in Cloudy or Aerosol-laden Conditions Xin Xi April 1, 2008.
What is Fog? Fog is essentially a dense cloud of water droplets, or cloud, that is close to the ground. Fog forms when warm, moist air travels over a cold.
Transpiration.
PHOTO BY S. MANZONI Eco-hydrological optimality to link water use and carbon gains by plants Manzoni S. 1,2, G. Vico 2, S. Palmroth 3, G. Katul 3,4, and.
Water and Carbon Cycles in Heterogeneous Landscapes: An Ecosystem Perspective Chapter 4 How water and carbon cycles connect the organizational levels of.
Transpiration. the release of water vapor by plants to the atmosphere “is not an essential or an active physiological function of plants” a largely passive.
Transpiration Transpiration is the loss of water from a plant by evaporation Water can only evaporate from the plant if the water potential is lower in.
Ground-based energy flux measurements for calibration of the Advanced Thermal and Land Application Sensor (ATLAS) Eric Harmsen, Associate Professor Dept.
Simulation of Individual Leaf Size and Canopy Development: Approaches to Carbon Allocation and Growth Strategies. Dennis Timlin 1, David Fleisher 1, Soo-Hyung.
Plant water regime Regulation of gas exchange by stomatal opening –Stomatal limitation of transpiration rate and photosynthetic rate –Water use efficiency.
Some challenges of model-data- integration a collection of issues and ideas based on model evaluation excercises Martin Jung, Miguel Mahecha, Markus Reichstein,
Physical and Biological Processes that Controls Water Vapor Exchange between Vegetation and the Atmosphere Dennis Baldocchi Department of Environmental.
The Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (SPA) Model Multilayer canopy and soils, 30 minute time-step Standard components –Radiative transfer scheme (sun/shade) –Soil.
ChEAS 2005 D.S. Mackay June 1-2, 2005 Reference canopy conductance through space and time: Unifying properties and their conceptual basis D. Scott Mackay.
Relative Humidity. Humidity  the measure of the amount of water in the air  high humidity =lots of moisture in the air.
Key words needed in you paragraph:  Carbon dioxide  Stomata  Closed in hot sunny conditions  Water loss  Photosynthesis (slow down)  Guard cells.
Predicting Current and Future Tree Diversity in the Pacific Northwest I R S S Richard Waring 1 Nicholas Coops 2 1 Oregon State University 2 University.
Landscape-level (Eddy Covariance) Measurement of CO 2 and Other Fluxes Measuring Components of Solar Radiation Close-up of Eddy Covariance Flux Sensors.
What Happens to Precipitation?
What Happens to Precipitation?
MODIS Net Primary Productivity (NPP)
Evapotranspiration Eric Peterson GEO Hydrology.
Dixon & Joly, ca A leafy branch subjected to a pressure of 0.3 MPa could draw up water from an external vessel that was at atmospheric pressure.
Jan. 20, 2011 B4730/5730 Plant Physiological Ecology Biotic and Abiotic Environments.
Introduction to Energy Management. Week/Lesson 5 Psychrometrics: The Properties of Air.
Estimating the Reduction in Photosynthesis from Sapflow Data in a Throughfall Exclusion Experiment. Rosie Fisher 1, Mathew Williams 1, Patrick Meir 1,
Perspectives on water cycling in ecosystem models Sarah Davis June 12, 2012 Water in Bioenergy Agroecosystems Workshop.
Jacobs et al. (1996) Stomatal behavior and photosynthetic rate of unstressed grapevines in semi-arid conditions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2,
The Use of Portable Gas Exchange Systems to Measure Plant Leaf Photosynthesis: Comparing Different Methods to Control Humidity Bailey Kramer  Dr. Tali.
Physical and Biological Processes that Controls Water Vapor Exchange between Vegetation and the Atmosphere Dennis Baldocchi Department of Environmental.
대기 중 CO 2 변화에 따른 토양 CO 2 방출량 변화 ( DYNAMICS OF SOIL CO 2 EFFLUX UNDER VARYING ATMOSPHERIC CO 2 CONCENTRATIONS ) Dohyoung Kim Duke University July
Hydraulic Redistribution of Soil Water in a Drained Loblolly Pine Plantation: Quantifying Patterns and Controls over Soil-to-Root and Canopy-to-Atmosphere.
Field Data & Instrumentation
3-PG The Use of Physiological Principles in Predicting Forest Growth
Conghe Song Department of Geography University of North Carolina
Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Transpiration.
C3, C4, and CAM plants all have the same goal,
Transpiration Transpiration is the loss of water from a plant by evaporation Water can only evaporate from the plant if the water potential is lower in.
13-14 Continued Air is supersaturated when the partial pressure of water exceeds the saturated vapor pressure. Dew point is the temperature where partial.
SBI3U Day 4 – Leaf Structure and Function
Moisture in the Atmosphere
Photosynthesis & CR EQ: How is energy acquired and used by organisms?
Presentation transcript:

Next week’s assignment: 1) Using clumping indexes, LAI and  values for a conifer stand (Loblolly pine forest, Duke Univ.) and for a Eucalyptus plantation (New Zealand), calculate their Monthly GPP (potential GPP). - Loblolly pine:  = 2.37 gC MJ -1 APAR - Eucalyptus plantation:  = 3.85 gC MJ -1 APAR 2) Assuming that all of the above parameters vary by plus or minus 20%, calculate how Annual GPP would be affected for each forest type. GPP -20% +20% LAI , Clumping =constant GPP -20% +20% Clumping , LAI =constant GPP -20% +20%  Clumping, LAI =constant GPP -20% +20% LAI , Clumping =constant GPP -20% +20% Clumping , LAI =constant GPP -20% +20% Clumping, LAI =constant  Loblolly pine Eucalyptus

1)Using clumping indexes, LAI and  values for a conifer stand (Loblolly pine forest, Duke Univ.) and for a Eucalyptus plantation (New Zealand), calculate their Monthly GPP (potential GPP). -Loblolly pine:  = 2.37 gC MJ -1 APAR ; - Eucalyptus plantation:  = 3.85 gC MJ -1 APAR

Actual GPPs Pine = 2500 gC m -2 year -1 Euca = 3300 gC m -2 year -1 2) Assuming that all of the above parameters vary by plus or minus 20%, calculate how Annual GPP would be affected for each forest type.

GPP =  {f(D)f(T)f(  ) f(CO2)}*  APAR “Productivity” equation Constraints to photosynthesis  = A leaf / PAR Maximum potential photosynthesis rate Canopy quantum efficiency A leaf = c a (1- c i /c a ) * g leaf Light supply and light capture

CO 2 moves from the air to the leaf to the chloroplast by diffusion (but really CO2 moves both directions) At the same time, H 2 O vapor moves out of the leaf by diffusion (but really H2O vapor moves both directions)

C a = external CO 2 concentration (note that this leaf has stomata only on the “abaxial” or bottom side. Some leaves also have stomata on the adaxial, or upper surface. Leaves with stomata on both sides are called “amphistomatous”) C i = internal CO 2 concentration. This value can be measured (indirectly) with common gas exchange instruments Some definitions ….

CO 2 diffuses into leaves, moving “down” a concentration gradient C a = ppm? Typical CO 2 concentration of a C3 plant at midday is about ppm The CO 2 concentration at the site of fixation approaches “zero”

The diffusive movement of CO 2 into and out of a leaf can be described by Fick’s Law: Net flux =  concentration * conductance (a membrane or barrier with a “conductance” to substance “x” = g x ) Net flux of “x” = F x [x o ] = concentration of “x” on the “outside” of “barrier” [x i ] = concentration of “x” on the “inside” of the “barrier” Fx = ([x o ] – [x i ]) * g x

Conductance is a PROPERTY of leaf, kind of analogous to its “porosity” to CO 2 or H 2 O vapor. It is NOT a “rate”!!! Conductance is the inverse of resistance. Both quantities are commonly used. The symbol “g” is commonly used for conductance, “r” for resistance g H2O = conductance to water vapor g CO2 = conductance to CO2 g s = stomatal conductance (usually to water vapor) g l = total leaf conductance (usually to water vapor) The units used for conductance and resistance can be very confusing -

Applying Fick’s Law to carbon assimilation : Net C assimilation = (c a -c i ) * g leaf Or: A leaf = c a (1- c i /c a ) * g leaf (Norman 1982; Franks & Farquhar 1999)

Factors affecting net assimilation (A) and stomatal conductance (g leaf ): Vapor pressure deficit, D (that is related to the humidity of the air) Soil Moisture,  Temperature, T A leaf = c a (1- c i /c a ) * g leaf f(D,  ) f(T)

f(D,  ) f(T)

Humidity and vapor pressure deficit The portion of total air pressure that is due to water vapor is water vapor pressure (e a ) measured in kPa

When air has no extra capacity for holding water, the vapor pressure is termed: saturation vapor pressure (e s, units kPa) Saturation vapor pressure is mostly a function of air temperature When air temperature falls without a change in water content, the point of condensation is called the dew point temperature

Relative Humidity is the ratio between actual vapor pressure (e a ) and saturation vapor pressure (e s ) RH = e a /e s Vapor Pressure Deficit (D) is the difference between saturation vapor pressure (e s ) and actual vapor pressure (e a ) D = e s - e a

Stomata respond to the vapor pressure deficit between leaf and air (D). Stomata generally close as D increases and the response is often depicted as a nonlinear decline in g s with increasing D. (Breda et al. 2006) (Oren et al. 1999) Stomata (canopy) conductance D (kPa) Relative conductance g leaf /g leaf-maximum D (kPa)

LnD (Vapor pressure deficit) Vapor pressure deficit, D (kPa) Relative conductance g leaf /g leaf-maximum Relative conductance g leaf /g leaf-maximum g leaf /g leaf-maximum = -0.6 LnD g leaf /g leaf-maximum = 1 (Oren et al. 1999)

Stomata respond to the vapor pressure deficit between leaf and air (D). Stomata generally close as D increases and the response is often depicted as a nonlinear decline in g s with increasing D. If D <1, then g leaf /g leaf-max = 1  A leaf /A leaf-max = 1   /  max = 1 If D > 1, then g leaf /g leaf-max = -0.6 LnD +1  A leaf /A leaf-max < 1   /  max < 1

Stomata respond to changes in soil moisture (  ). During water shortage, when  drops below ca. 0.2, g leaf declines gradually down to very low values Soil moisture,  (m 3 m -3 ) Modified after Breda et al. (2006)

Soil moisture,  (m 3 m -3 ) g leaf /g leaf-maximum = s  +b Relative conductance g leaf /g leaf-maximum g leaf /g leaf-maximum = 1 s Soil moisture,  (m 3 m -3 ) Relative conductance g leaf /g leaf-maximum

If  > 0.2, then g leaf /g leaf-max = ?  A leaf /A leaf-max = ?   /  max = ? If  < 0.2, then g leaf /g leaf-max = ?  A leaf /A leaf-max < ?   /  max < ? Stomata respond to changes in soil moisture (  ). During water shortage, when  drops below ca. 0.2, g leaf declines gradually down to very low values

f(D,  ) f(T)

Temperature effect on C i /C a and on net assimilation C i : Typical CO 2 concentration is about ppm C a = external CO 2 concentration (C a = ppm?)

Temperature (  C) 0 A/A max Ci/CaCi/Ca Temperature (  C) Warren and Dreyer (2006)

If T 30  C, then c i /c a = ?  A leaf /A leaf-max = ?   /  max = ? If 20  C<T <30  C, then ci/ca = ?  A leaf /A leaf-max = ?   /  max = ? c i /c a respond to changes in temperature (T). Under low or high T, c i /c a increases gradually to high values

Final assignment: Just calculate GPP and have fun experimenting ! GPP =  {f(D)f(T)f(  ) f(CO2)}*  APAR

References Breda N. et al Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review. Annals of Forest Science. 63: Dye, P.J. et al Verification of 3-PG growth and water-use predictions in twelve Eucalyptus plantation stands in Zululand, South Africa. For. Ecol. Management. 193:197–218 Franks PJ, Farquhar GD A relationship between humidity response, growth form and photosynthetic operating point in C3 plants. Plant, Cell Environment 22:1337–1349. Norman J. M Simulation of microclimates, in Biometeorology in integrated pest management, edited by J. L. Hatfield and I. J. Thomason, p , Academic, New York. Oren R. et al Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell and Environment 22: Waring W.H. and S.W. Running Forest ecosystem analysis at multiple scales. 2 nd Ed. Academic press. San Diego, CA 370p. Warren C.R. and E. Dreyer Temperature response of photosynthesis and internal conductance to CO2: results from two independent approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: