Predicting climate change impacts on southern pines productivity in SE United States using physiological process based model 3-PG Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trees and Climate Change. Global Warming the recent increase of the mean temperatures in the earth’s atmosphere and oceans which is predominantly caused.
Advertisements

Figure 3. Outlines of the study with links between different components used. The figure presents the main inputs and outputs from the model used (Glob3PG)
Mike Smalligan, Research Forester Global Observatory for Ecosystem Services Forest Department, Michigan State University August 2011 Above Ground Biomass.
Peter S. Curtis Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Managing Great Lakes Forests for Climate Change Mitigation.
The C budget of Japan: Ecosystem Model (TsuBiMo) Y. YAMAGATA and G. ALEXANDROV Climate Change Research Project, National Institute for Environmental Studies,
Peter Ince U.S. Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, WI.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS of the FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR Southern Variant (FVS-Sn) Nathan D. Herring Dr. Philip J. Radtke Virginia Tech Department of Forestry.
FIA Data and Data Gaps Elizabeth LaPoint - NRS FIA Durham, NH June 2011.
Thinning Impacts on Even-aged Stands of Eucalyptus in Brazil Thinning Impacts on Even-aged Stands of Eucalyptus in Brazil June 21, 2010 Missoula, MT Western.
Climate Change Here and Now: Forest Ecosystem Impacts Steven McNulty Southern Global Change Program USDA Forest Service.
Premise Three Basic Forms of Uncertainty - Level of Change - Process Impacts - Time and Space 1.
Examining Clumpiness in FPS David K. Walters Roseburg Forest Products.
CALIBRATION 3-PG – Pinus pinaster Elemer Briceño 15/07/2008.
Managing forests for carbon storage Bill Keeton Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont.
Progress in Downscaling Climate Change Scenarios in Idaho Brandon C. Moore.
Climate Change as a Driver in Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreaks in Eastern Washington Washington State Climate Change Impacts Assessment Conference Seattle,
Climate Change and Douglas-fir Dave Spittlehouse, Research Branch, BC Min. Forest and Range, Victoria.
Forest Growth Model and Data Linkage Issues Limei Ran Carolina Environmental Program UNC Steve McNulty Jennifer Moore Myers Southern Global Change Program,
Dennis P. Lettenmaier Lan Cuo Nathalie Voisin University of Washington Climate Impacts Group Climate and Water Forecasts for the 2009 Water Year October.
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. USDA Forest Service GTR NE-343.
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
I N T E G R A T E D S I N K E N H A N C E M E N T A S S E S S M E N T INSEA PARTNERS Forest production and carbon storage -potentials of European forestry.
The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Nutrient Cycling and Forest Productivity By: Eric Sucre.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Climate Change Impacts on Georgia’s Natural Resources Steven McNulty, Ph.D. Research Ecologist USDA Forest Service Raleigh, NC.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey December 2007 Fort Benning Forest Status and Trends Shuqing Zhao 1, Shuguang Liu 2, Larry Tieszen.
Modeling climate change impacts on forest productivity with PnET-CN Emily Peters, Kirk Wythers, Peter Reich NE Landscape Plan Update May 17, 2012.
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
The Potential of the Alder Resource: Challenges and Opportunities David Hibbs and Andrew Bluhm Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative Department of Forest Science.
Combining historic growth and climate data to predict growth response to climate change in balsam fir in the Acadian Forest region Elizabeth McGarrigle.
FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS Project Level Carbon Accounting Toolkit CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products Department of Forestry, Australian National University.
Copyright © SRC 2012 Forestry Component of the PRAC Terrestrial Theme Mark Johnston and Elaine Qualtiere Saskatchewan Research Council 15 February 2012.
Conclusion Acknowledgements Preliminary results from this study showed that: The two Pine species show similar growth trends, with the most dominant species.
Fertilizing Interior Forests: the scientific basis (and some informed speculation) Rob Brockley B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range Kalamalka Forestry Centre.
Climate Change and The NW Power Supply Climate Impacts on the Pacific Northwest University of Washington April 21, 2009.
Return to FIA Home CURRENT U.S. FOREST DATA AND MAPS CURRENT U.S. FOREST DATA AND MAPS Forest age Forest ownership Timber harvest Urban influence Forest.
Forest simulation models in Portugal: main developments and challenges WG1 Luis Fontes and Margarida Tomé COST ACTION FP0603: Forest models for research.
A New Effort to Study Intensively Managed Pine Plantations CAPPS - Consortium for Accelerated Pine Production Studies.
Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Harold E. Burkhart Virginia Tech.
Adaptation to CC in African Forests UNDP Accra. Forest Model Climate Outcome Emission Scenario Timber Response Carbon Response Economic Outcome Ecosystem.
Next week’s assignment: 1) Using clumping indexes, LAI and  values for a conifer stand (Loblolly pine forest, Duke Univ.) and for a Eucalyptus plantation.
Lecture 10 FORE 3218 Forest Mensuration II Lectures 10 Site Productivity Avery and Burkhart, Chapter 15.
Natural Resources Ressources naturelles CanadaCanada Canadian Forest Service Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Forest Growth and Yield Xinbiao Zhu.
What Do NGOs Do With FIA Data? (Preview: a lot!) Christine Negra The Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment March 2009 SAF National FIA.
Development of a Forest Carbon Sequestration Protocol for the State of Georgia J. Siry, P. Bettinger, B. Borders, C. Cieszewski, M. Clutter, B. Izlar,
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
Effects of Intensive Fertilization on the Growth of Interior Spruce Presentation to: Interior Fertilization Working Group February 5/13 (revised March.
Inventory Approaches to Forest Baselines: MAV Bottomland Hardwoods Case Study James E. Smith and Linda S. Heath Northeastern Research Station Durham, NH.
Predicting Current and Future Tree Diversity in the Pacific Northwest I R S S Richard Waring 1 Nicholas Coops 2 1 Oregon State University 2 University.
CO2FIX Introduction and exercise Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Ecuador March, 2004.
Predicting current and future tree diversity in the Pacific Northwest I R S S Richard Waring 1 & Nicholas Coops 2 1 Oregon State University 2 University.
Eucalyptus globoidea productivity in New Zealand Dean Meason, Tobias Herrman, Christine Todoroki.
The role of climate in sugar maple health: Historical relationships and future projections.
Forest Knowledge Know-how Well-being State of Finland’s Forests 2012 Based on the Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management.
CLIMATE AND CLIMATE CHANGE REVIEW. WHAT CAUSES WIND ON A LOCAL AND GLOBAL LEVEL? WHAT CAUSES SEASONS? DO SEASONS OCCUR ALONG THE EQUATOR? WHY DO DESERTS.
Copernicus Observations Requirements Workshop, Reading Requirements from agriculture applications Nadine Gobron On behalf Andrea Toreti & MARS colleagues.
Ron Torgerson – FFSL Central Area Manager Nick Mustoe – Central Area Forester Fred Johnson – Fire Management Officer.
Incorporating Climate and Weather Information into Growth and Yield Models: Experiences from Modeling Loblolly Pine Plantations Ralph L. Amateis Department.
THE FUTURE CLIMATE OF AMAZONIA Carlos Nobre 1, Marcos Oyama 2, Gilvan Sampaio 1 1 CPTEC/INPE, 2 IAE/CTA LBA ECO São Paulo / 2005 November.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2014 Meeting Do Below Ground Processes Explain Differences in Growth, Productivity and Carrying Capacity of Loblolly.
The Cliff Notes on Biomass Fuels and Greenhouse Gas Levels Clean Air Task Force 18 Tremont Street Suite 530 Boston, MA Prepared for 2016 Northeast.
Determinants of Carbon Benefits for Transatlantic Wood Pellet Trade
Jean-Michel Carnus, Hervé Jactel, Floor Vodde
Western Mensurationists Meeting 2016
3-PG The Use of Physiological Principles in Predicting Forest Growth
150 years of land cover and climate change impacts on streamflow in the Puget Sound Basin, Washington Dennis P. Lettenmaier Lan Cuo Nathalie Voisin University.
Questions about Climate Change & Biomass Energy
Intermountain Forest Tree Nutrition Cooperative
Independent Energy Producers Association’s 37th Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Predicting climate change impacts on southern pines productivity in SE United States using physiological process based model 3-PG Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke School of Forest Resources and Conservation University of Florida

Outline 1.Southern forests in SE United States 2.3-PG Model 3.Model Calibration for Pinus elliottii (slash pine) 4.Model Validation 5.Case Study Climate Change Impacts on Productivity of Slash Pine Stands

Background Forests have multiple goods and services: wild-life, water, soil, C seq,… wood. In SE United States : 60% of landscape if forested including 28 million ha of southern pines. SE U.S. produces 58% of the total U.S. timber harvest and 18% of the global supply of roundwood (more than any other country). SE pine forests contain 1/3 of the contiguous U.S. forest C and can sequester 23% of regional GHG emissions. Most important southern pine species: Pinus taeda (loblolly pine), Pinus elliottii (slash pine) and Pinus palustris (longleaf pine).

BackgroundSlash Pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) Medium-Long-Lived. Fast-growing Important commercial species in SE United States Objectives: Pulpwood and sawtimber production Area of timberland: 4.2 million ha

Tree growth model based on : P hysiological P rinciples that P redict G rowth Light Interception Carbon Acquisition Carbon Allocation Forest Production : 3-PG (Landsberg and Waring, 1997)

3-PG Model BA Landsberg and Waring 1997

All modifiers affect canopy production: Temperature Frost Nutrition VPD ASW Age Max Canopy Quantum Efficiency (0  f i  1)  C = f T f F f N min{ f D, f  } f age f C   Cx CO 2 3-PG Model

Parameterization for Slash Pine Canopy Quantum Yield = mol CO 2 / mol PAR 3-PG Model  C = f T f F f N min{ f D, f  } f age f C   Cx where D = current VPD k D = strength of VPD response Gonzalez-Benecke et al. 2014

 C = f T f F f N min{ f D, f  } f age f C   Cx 3-PG Model Parameterization for Slash Pine Teskey et al Teskey et al. (in preparation)

Results Validation Sites 14 sites in US 7 sites in Uruguay 118 permanent plots 686 year x plot observations

Above Ground Biomass (Mg ha -1 ) Basal Area (m 2 ha -1 ) Volume (m 3 ha -1 ) Height (m) Trees per hectare Above Ground Biomass (Mg ha -1 ) Basal Area (m 2 ha -1 ) Volume (m 3 ha -1 ) Trees per hectare Height (m) Results Validation X=observed Y=predicted Gonzalez-Benecke et al Variable Bias (%) R2R2 AGB (Mg/ha) BA (m 2 /ha) Height (m) Nha (ha -1 ) VOB (m 3 /ha)

Case Study: Climate Change Effect on Slash Pine Productivity Future Climate Data: CanESM2 model Downscaled using MACA method (Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs) Scenarios (combination of climate and site quality) : Based on 2 RCPs (Representative Concentration Pathways) ScenarioClimate DataCO 2 - Historical1950 – ppm - RCP – ppm - RCP – ppm Based on Site Quality (site index) ProductivitySite Index - Low19 m - Medium23 m - High28 m

Historical Mean Annual Temperature (°C) and Mean Increment in Temperature due to Climate Change (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) Sites location 11 sites in SE US 4 sites in Northern Limit

Case Study Climate Change Scenarios Summary VariableRCP4.5RCP8.5 Tmax (C)+ 1.8 to to +4.8 Tmin (C)+ 1.8 to to +4.8 Rain (mm)- 49 to to 45 Radiation (%)+2% to + 6%+1% to + 6%

L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: L: M: H: Climate Change Effect on Slash Pine Productivity Change in Above Ground Biomass (Mg/ha) at age=25 years RCP's v/s Historical Scenarios L: Low Productivity M: Medium Productivity H: High Productivity

Climate Change Effect on Slash Pine Productivity Change in Above Ground Biomass (Mg/ha) at age=25 years RCP's v/s Historical Scenarios RCP 4.5RCP 8.5 Site Quality Low MediumHigh Site Quality Low MediumHigh

Conclusions: For Sites with Mean Annual Temperature > 19 C: Under RCP4.5 : AGB can be increased between 2% to 27% (Mean=8%). Under RCP8.5 : AGB can be increased between 2% to 44% (Mean=13%). For Sites with Mean Annual Temperature < 19 C (North Limit): Under RCP4.5 : AGB can be increased between 2% to 44% (Mean=17%). Under RCP8.5 : AGB can be increased between 8% to 63% (Mean=27%). Climate Change Effect on Slash Pine Productivity Under Future Climate Scenarios Used:

Conclusions: Responses to Climate Change should be larger in colder range of distribution. Responses to Climate Change should be larger in low productivity sites. Climate Change Effect on Slash Pine Productivity Under Future Climate Scenarios Used:

Acknowledgements