K. Sproule, C. Kieran, C. Doss, & A. Quisumbing Gender, Headship, and the Lifecycle: Landownership in Asia March 24, 2015 World Bank Washington, DC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Gender Analysis
Advertisements

Gender and Safe Motherhood
Department of Gender and Womens Health Addressing gender in HIV/AIDS Indicators: Key issues to consider Department of Gender, Women and Health World Health.
Demographics and Market Segmentation: China and India
Measuring Gender Equality and Institutions Improving Data Collection and Data Quality Nistha Sinha Economist, Gender and Development Unit The World Bank.
Gender Asset Gaps Cheryl Doss, Yale University Presented at the Gender and Assets Workshop, World Bank, June 2012.
Who shall inherit the land? Exploring gendered patterns of land inheritance in Nigeria Ephraim Nkonya a Chiara Kovarik a Helen Merkelova b a International.
1 Widows Land Security in the Era of HIV/AIDS: Panel Survey Evidence from Zambia By Antony Chapoto, T.S. Jayne and N. Mason Food Security Research Project,
Trends in Women’s Philanthropy Dr. Debra Mesch Director, Women’s Philanthropy Institute Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University Procura 15 th Anniversary.
Are there gender differences in the impact of land security? : Evidence from Urban Lesotho Rie Muraoka Mywish K. Maredia Songqing Jin (Michigan State University)
Education and entitlement to household income. A gendered longitudinal analysis of British couples Jerome De Henau and Susan Himmelweit IAFFE annual conference,
Drivers of commercialisation in agriculture in Vietnam Andy McKay and Chiara Cazzuffi University of Sussex, UK Paper in progress as part of a DANIDA/BSPS.
Friday, May 01, 2015 Strengthening Women’s Property Rights Ruth Meinzen-Dick Senior Research Fellow Coordinator International Food Policy CGIAR Systemwide.
Gender Equality and Social Institutions International Expert Workshop Measuring Gender Equality – Taking Stock, Looking Forward OECD Development Centre.
Marriage market in urban settings in Egypt Zeinab Khadr.
ICES 3° International Conference on Educational Sciences 2014
Gender and Economic Transformation in Africa Cheryl Doss Yale University Presented at the African Centre for Economic Transformation July 18, 2012.
EMPOWERING WOMEN: LEGAL RIGHTS AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES IN AFRICA Mary Hallward-Driemeier Office of the Chief Economist, The World Bank.
LAND OWNERSHIP AND FARM MANAGEMENT IN ECUADOR: EGALITARIAN FAMILY FARMING SYSTEMS AND GENDERED CONSTRAINTS Carmen Diana Deere Gender and Assets Workshop,
The Future of India in the World Economy Comments by Johannes Jütting OECD Development Centre Paris, 22 June, 2007.
Carmen Diana Deere Center for Latin American Studies and Food & Resource Economics University of Florida.
C. Doss, C. Kieran, S. Kim, A. Quisumbing & K. Sproule Examining Gender Inequalities in Land Rights Indicators in Asia March 24, 2015 World Bank Washington,
1 The Effect of Benefits on Single Motherhood in Europe Libertad González Universitat Pompeu Fabra May 2006.
Poverty and Income Distribution in Ethiopia: By Abebe Shimeles, PhD.
United Nations Statistics DivisionRegional Workshop on Integrating a Gender Perspective in the Production of Statistics, Amman, Jordan, 1-4 December 2014.
How Much Do Women in Africa Contribute to Agriculture? Luc Christiaensen, Talip Kilic, Amparo Palacios-López, AGRICULTURE IN AFRICA TELLING FACTS FROM.
Integrating a gender perspective into poverty statistics United Nations Statistics Division.
SESSION 2: REMITTANCES GENDERED DETERMINANTS AND IMPACTS The impact of remittances and gender on household expenditure patterns: Evidence from Ghana Juan.
What do Gender Specific Indicators Tell Us About the Business Environment? Sarah Iqbal April 6th, 2011 The Enabling Environment and Policy Reforms to Support.
1 21ST SESSION OF AFRICAN COMMSION FOR AGRICULTURE STATISTICS WORKSHOPWORKSHOP HELD IN ACCRA, GHANA, 28 – 31 OCTOBER 2009 By Lubili Marco Gambamala National.
Rural Non-Farm Enterprises Operate Mainly in Survival Mode Paula Nagler and Wim Naudé Annual Bank Conference on Africa, Paris, 23 June 2014 AGRICULTURE.
Innovations in Methodologies for Analyzing the Gender Asset Gaps in Agriculture Cheryl Doss, Yale University ICAE 2012, Foz do Igazu, Brazil.
FORGOTTEN MARRIAGES? MEASURING THE RELIABILITY OF RETROSPECTIVE MARRIAGE HISTORIES March 20, 2012 INED – Quality and Comparability of Demographic Data.
0 Child Marriage Key Findings and Implications for Policy Edilberto Loaiza UNFPA, New York Vienna, November 25, 2013.
Bequest motives revisited: Evidence from a randomized choice experiment Valerie Mueller¹ and Ayala Wineman² ¹International Food Policy Research Institute,
Sunday, August 30, 2015 Women’s Status and the Changing Nature of Rural Livelihoods in Asia Agnes Quisumbing International Food Policy Research Institute.
Tracking progress in rural women’s economic empowerment Ana Paula de la O Campos Social Protection Division (ESP/FAO-UN) Milan, 29 May 2015 Technical Seminar.
Review of Paper: Understanding the"Family Gap" in Pay for Women with Children Study addresses an economic/social issue using statistical analysis: While.
Jordan Chamberlin 1,2, Munguzwe Hichaambwa 2, Nicholas Sitko 1,2 (1) Michigan State University, USA (2) Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute,
Gender and Assets Cheryl Doss, Yale University. Is there a gender-asset gap? Does it matter? How do we understand the causes and consequences of the gender-asset.
Recent Trends in Worker Quality: A Midwest Perspective Daniel Aaronson and Daniel Sullivan Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago November 2002.
Michigan State University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics Measuring Impacts of HIV/AIDS on African Rural Economies T.S. Jayne Michigan State University.
The Cultural Geography of Gender. Cultural Influences on Gender Roles Cultural norms can control the advancement or subjugation of women and their status.
Gender disparities in human development Side event on the margins of the 59 th Commission on Status of Women Human Development Report Office Milorad Kovacevic,
How have family households in Scotland changed over time 2001 – 2011? Clare Simpson Parenting across Scotland.
Integrating a gender perspective into poverty statistics Workshop on Integrating a Gender Perspective into National Statistics, Kampala, Uganda December.
Why Measure Asset Ownership and Control at Individual Level – Importance for Policy Making in Ghana Ghana Statistical Service 30 th July, 2013 Bangkok,
Introduction When IDP camps were closed at the end of the 2 decade conflict in Northern Uganda. Former IDP were confronted with either ‘Return’ or ‘Resettlement’
Access and Control over Land in Rwanda An Intrahousehold Analysis Florence Santos, Diana Fletschner and Vivien Savath March 2014.
Land, Assets and Livelihoods Gendered Analysis of Evidence from Odisha Vivien Savath, Diana Fletschner, Amber Peterman, Florence Santos March 25,2014.
Can Household Dietary Data and Adult Male Equivalent Distribution Assumptions Accurately Predict Individual Level Food Consumption in Ethiopia? Lauer,
Expected Learning Objectives Participants should understand the following: The concepts of ‘gender’ and ‘sex’. The term ‘gender equality.’ The importance.
WOMEN’S PROPERTY, MOBILITY AND DECISION-MAKING: EVIDENCE FROM RURAL KARNATAKA, INDIA Hema Swaminathan, Rahul Lahoti, Suchitra J. Y. Centre for Public Policy.
LAND OWNERSHIP AND FARM MANAGEMENT IN ECUADOR: PERCEPTIONS OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES Jennifer Twyman, University of Florida IAFFE Annual Conferemce. Barcelona.
PROPERTY STATUS AND INTER SPOUSAL DYNAMICS IN DECISION-MAKING IN KARNATAKA Hema Swaminathan, Suchitra J. Y., Rahul Lahoti Centre for Public Policy Indian.
Older household headship and gendered pattern of poverty: Evidence from Thailand, Malee Sunpuwan Target journal: Asia Pacific Population Journal.
+ The Likelihood of Marriage for Educated, Urban Chinese Women with High Income Levels EDUCATION INCOME PROFESSION FAMILY FUTURE.
A Gendered Approach to Credit Demand: Evidence from Marsabit District, Kenya Anne Gesare, Megan Sheahan, Andrew Mude, Rupsha Banerjee ADRAS IBLI Academic.
Saturday, February 06, 2016 Examining gender differences in asset accumulation in transition economies Agnes Quisumbing International Food Policy Research.
Specific Issues of Gender in Accessing Social Protection and Labour Market Opportunitites Athia Yumna, The SMERU Research Institute.
Review of Literature on Women’s Land Rights: Gaps and Findings Amanda Richardson Resource Equity.
Women, work, and gender roles in Latin America Hugo Ñopo Washington, Dec
The Economic Costs of Educational Inequality in Developing Countries Wael Moussa, Ph.D. Carina Omoeva, Ph.D. Charles Gale March 2016 FHI 360 Education.
Correlates of HIV testing among youth in three high prevalence Caribbean Countries Beverly E. Andrews, Doctoral Candidate University.
Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Longman PoliticalScienceInteractive Magleby & Light Government by the People Chapter 5 The.
The Gender Asset Gap Project in Ghana
Longman PoliticalScienceInteractive
Beyond Ownership: Women’s and Men’s Land Rights in sub-Saharan Africa
Legal Reform and Women’s Empowerment in the Public and Private Spheres
Presentation transcript:

K. Sproule, C. Kieran, C. Doss, & A. Quisumbing Gender, Headship, and the Lifecycle: Landownership in Asia March 24, 2015 World Bank Washington, DC

MOTIVATION Our work on gendered land ownership in Asia (Kieran et al.) establishes that there are gender gaps in landownership, but does not provide guidance on how to reduce them. Women’s unequal access to and ownership of land held by the household has been argued as the most obvious area of gender disparity (Lastarria-Cornhiel et al. 2014). Changes in household structure may also affect women’s land rights, whether through marriage or its dissolution (Deer and Doss, 2006). Because landownership data are rarely available at the individual level, much of the previous analysis has focused on differences in land rights between male and female headed households. Developing policies to redress gender inequalities in landownership requires nuanced understanding of household and individual characteristics as well as social, cultural, and legal institutions.

EMPIRICAL APPROACH Work with the four nationally representative data sets analyzed in Kieran et al. (2015), but with a closer focus on correlates of landownership (Bangladesh, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Vietnam). These four countries have different social and cultural norms, as well as very different political histories. Examine determinants of landownership across households: both the probability of being a landowner as well as the area of land owned. Examine distribution of land owned within landowning households, using household fixed effects to control for household-level unobservables.

COUNTRY CONTEXT: Bangladesh Customary and religious laws limit women’s ability to own property despite equality under Bangladeshi law. Patrilineal/patrilocal Majority Islamic Customary practices of benami and naior Village exogamy

COUNTRY CONTEXT: Tajikistan Cultural practices and lack of land rights knowledge limit women’s land ownership. Land owned by state but long term lease rights exist Patrilineal Dekhan farm collectives Difficult process to obtain individual title; overall percentage of owned land (male or female) is very low Higher prevalence of female headed HHs

COUNTRY CONTEXT: Timor-Leste Customary law predominates; some matrilineal communities, but majority are patrilineal and favor men. Constitution guarantees equal land rights to men and women Volatile history Multiple land-use regimes exist, but customary laws predominate Land acquired predominately through inheritance

COUNTRY CONTEXT: Vietnam Progressive land laws to redress gender disparities in land ownership; cultural norms and inconsistent application of law still hinders women. Land owned by state but long term user rights exist (LUCs) 2003 law requires both husband and wife’s name on asset documents Inconsistent enforcement of laws; customary law discriminates against women Regional differences

Gender inequalities in the probability of being a landowner are evident

Male and female landowners have different land and human capital endowments

Demographic characteristics of male and female landowners are quite different

RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. What is the probability that an individual is a landowner, whether solely or jointly, taking into account individual and household characteristics? 2. What influences the area of land owned by an individual, and do these patterns differ for men and women? 3. What is the intrahousehold distribution of land, by individual, controlling for household-specific unobservables?

EMPIRICAL SPECIFICATION Probit: Probability of owning any land (whether solely or jointly)= f (sex, headship status, position in household dummies, age categories, marital status, education, household size, household age and sex composition, household land variables, regional dummies) Tobit: Area of land owned (sum of solely and jointly owned land, in acres) = g (sex, headship status, position in household dummies, age categories, marital status, education, household size, household age and sex composition, household land variables, regional dummies) OLS with hh fixed effects: Area of individual land owned (whether solely or jointly) minus household land area per adult = h (sex, headship status, female x household structure dummy, female x household land owned, female x whether land is irrigated, female x household size, female x religion and/or ethnicity dummies, age categories, marital status, and schooling, household dummies )

CROSS-COUNTRY FINDINGS: SUMMARY Being female Lowers the probability of being a landowner Men in dual headed households more likely to own land compared to women in other hh types Being the head of household Increases the probability of owning land and the average area of land owned Age Increases probability of landownership Education level Increases probability of owning land, with some exceptions Marital status Being married increases probability of landownership or area of land owned, but mostly for men Household size No consistent patterns across all countries

COUNTRY-SPECIFIC FINDINGS Education level In Timor-Leste and Vietnam, more educated individuals own less land area than those with no schooling In Bangladesh, more educated individuals own less land than those with no schooling Marital status Compared to never married persons: in Tajikistan and Vietnam, married individuals are more likely to own land; in Bangladesh, married individuals own larger areas of land In Bangladesh, divorced women have less land area owned compared to never-married women; “divorce penalty” exists for both men and women in Vietnam In Tajikistan, divorced individuals have larger areas of land

Determinants of within-household land distribution, by individual, in landowning households with at least one adult male and adult female Dependent variable: Individual land owned - household average land area owned per adult BangladeshTajikistan Timor-LesteVietnam Sex dummy (female=1) *0.44*** -0.13(0.03)(0.07)-0.06 Headship dummy (HH head=1)0.56***0.28***0.36***0.95*** -0.05(0.01)(0.04)-0.03 female x head-0.34***-0.10*** *** -0.12(0.03)(0.10)-0.06 female x DHH *** * -0.12(0.01)(0.06)-0.05 female x MHH *** (0.03)(0.07)-0.08 female x HH land area-0.48***-0.23***-0.17***-0.42*** -0.06(0.02)(0.03)-0.03 female x irrig HH land-0.05* *** -0.03(0.01)(0.03)-0.03 female x HH size **-0.01 (0.00)(0.01)-0.01

FINDINGS FROM INTRAHOUSEHOLD REGRESSION Sex Women in landowning households own less land relative to the average amount owned per adult Females in Vietnam and Timor-Leste have larger landholdings compared to household average, owing to policy reform and culture Head of household Being the household head increases the size of land owned However, in Bangladesh, Tajikistan and Vietnam, female heads have less land compared to others within the same household Household wealth As the household’s land increases, women tend to own less land relative to the household average

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Across counties, being female lowers the probability of being a landowner. Being the head of household increases the likelihood of owning land and the average area of land owned. In general, women in each household type are less likely to own land than are men in dual headed households, with some exceptions. Individuals in all countries acquire land over the course of the life cycle. No consistent patterns across all countries with regards to the relationship between landownership, education, and household size.

CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER RESEARCH Conclusions Tying plot-level data to individual characteristics reveals nuances and helps identify entry points for intervention. Because country contexts are different, country-specific results may be most influential in driving policy and advocacy efforts. Further research Explore in more depth the relationship between household wealth and women’s landownership. Further investigate effect of marital dissolution on men’s and women’s landownership=> implications for marriage and inheritance law. Take into account historical and political factors in making policy recommendations to increase gender equality in land ownership.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this work was provided by the Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR), Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets. We are grateful to IFPRI colleagues Kamiljon Akramov, Karen Brooks, Chiara Kovarik, Wahid Quabili, and Mara van den Bold, as well as Amber Peterman, a former colleague now at the University of North Carolina, for their guidance in helping us contextualize and analyze the data. We would also like to acknowledge Nynne Warring from the Social Protection Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) for helpful comments regarding the Gender and Land Rights Database.

WORKS CITED Doss, C. R., C. Kovarik, A. Peterman, A. Quisumbing, and M. van den Bold. Forthcoming. “Gender Inequalities in Ownership and Control of Land in Africa.” Agricultural Economics. Ahmed, A Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS) 2011– 2012 (datasets). Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. World Bank Vietnam 2004 Household Living Standards Survey. ———. 2007a. Tajikistan 2007 Living Standards Measurement Survey. ———. 2007b. Timor-Leste 2007 Survey of Living Standards.

THANK YOU

Table 2: Summary characteristics of adults and landowners 18 and over, by sex, Bangladesh All adults (n=16,649) Women (n=13,605) Men (n=12,622) t-test of difference (p-value) All landowners (n=4,753) Female landowners (n=1125) Male landowners (n=3628) t-test of difference (p-value) Individual characteristics Proportion in population (0.01) 0.44 (0.01) NA 0.25 (0.01) 0.2 (0.02) 0.8 (0.02) 0.00 Age (years) (0.48) (0.74) (0.57) (0.62) (1.08) (0.67) 0.12 Proportion married 0.67 (0.016) 0.69 (0.02) 0.65 (0.02) (0.02) 0.57 (0.05) 0.91 (0.02) 0.00 Education (years) 4.24 (0.17) 3.68 (0.18) 4.95 (0.25) (0.12) 2.46 (0.21) 3.55 (0.13) 0.00 Proportion owning land 0.25 (0.01) 0.09 (0.01) 0.46 (0.01) NA Area of land owned by individual (acres) NA 0.75 (0.04) 0.51 (0.08) 0.81 (0.05) 0.00 Household characteristics a Household size 5.05 (0.09) 5.05 (0.11) 5.05 (0.08) (0.07) 4.05 (0.13) 4.87 (0.07) 0.00 Whether HH is dual-headed 0.94 (0.01) 0.93 (0.01) 0.96 (0.00) (0.01) 0.81 (0.02) 0.97 (0.00) 0.00 Whether HH is male-headed 0.03 (0.00) 0.03 (0.01) 0.02 (0.00) (0.00) 0.04 (0.01) 0.02 (0.00) 0.28 Whether HH is female headed 0.03 (0.00) 0.04 (0.00) 0.01 (0.00) (0.00) 0.15 (0.02) 0.01 (0.00) 0.00 Dependency ratio 1.21 (0.07) 1.29 (0.11) 1.10 (0.08) (0.11) 1.29 (0.14) 1.56 (0.13) 0.14 Total land area owned by household (acres) 1.03 (0.09) 1.01 (0.10) 1.05 (0.12) (0.05) 0.96 (0.12) 0.89 (0.05) 0.57 Proportion living in HHs w/ irrigated land 0.63 (0.02) 0.64 (0.02) 0.62 (0.02) (0.02) 0.60 (0.04) 0.59 (0.02) 0.90 a Characteristics of the households in which the female or male adults or landowners live. Notes: Standard errors in parentheses. Table uses individual weights for all adults 18 and over.

Table 3: Summary characteristics of adults and landowners 18 and over, by sex, Tajikistan All adults (n=17,627) Women (n=9,280) Men (n=8347) t-test of difference (p-value) All landowners (n=3,262) Female landowner (n=504) Male landowners (n=2,758) t-test of difference (p-value) Individual characteristics Proportion in population NA Age (years) (0.16) (0.18) (0.21) (0.42) (0.85) (0.42) 0.00 Proportion married 0.69 (0.01) 0.67 (0.01) 0.71 (0.01) (0.01) 0.29 (0.03) 0.96 (0.01) 0.00 Education (years) (0.06) 9.87 (0.07) (0.06) (0.11) 8.38 (0.26) (0.10) 0.00 Proportion owning land 0.17 (0.01) 0.05 (0.00) 0.31 (0.01) NA Area of land owned by the individual NA 0.26 (0.01) 0.25 (0.02) 0.26 (0.01) 0.35 Household characteristics a Household size 8.60 (0.12) 8.57 (.12) 8.65 (.12) (0.10) 7.45 (.19) 8.07 (0.11) 0.00 Whether the HH is dual-headed 0.86 (0.01) 0.84 (0.01) 0.88 (0.01) (0.01) 0.32 (0.03) 0.95 (0.01) 0.00 Whether the HH is male-headed 0.03 (0.00) 0.02 (0.00) 0.04 (0.00) (0.00) 0.00 (0.00) 0.03 (0.00) 0.00 Whether the HH is female headed 0.11 (0.01) 0.14 (0.01) 0.08 (0.01) (0.01) 0.68 (0.03) 0.01 (0.00) 0.00 Dependency ratio 0.84 (0.01) 0.85 (0.01) 0.81 (0.01) (0.02) 1.11 (0.05) 0.96 (0.02) 0.00 Total land area owned by household (acres) 0.33 (0.02) 0.33 (0.02) 0.34 (0.02) (0.02) 0.37 (0.03) 0.42 (0.02) 0.09 Proportion living in HHs w/ irrigated land 0.63 (0.02) 0.63 (0.02) 0.64 (0.02) (0.02) 0.84 (0.03) 0.82 (0.02) 0.39 a Characteristics of the households in which the female or male adults or landowners live. Notes: Standard errors in parentheses. Table uses individual weights for all adults 18 and over.

Table 4: Summary characteristics of adults and landowners 18 and over, by sex, Timor-Leste All adults (n=12,449) Women (n=6,473) Men (n=5,976) t-test of difference (p-value) All landowners (n=3,230) Female landowners (n=517) Male landowner s (n=3,314) t-test of difference (p-value) Individual characteristics Proportion in population NA Age (years) (0.23) (0.28) (0.31) (0.47) (1.02) (0.51) 0.00 Proportion married 0.56 (0.01) 0.60 (0.01) 0.51 (0.01) (0.01) 0.20 (0.03) 0.89 (0.01) 0.00 Education (years) 5.21 (0.16) 4.27 (0.18) 6.23 (0.17) (0.16) 1.27 (0.24) 3.38 (0.19) 0.00 Proportion owning land 0.20 (0.01) 0.06 (0.00) 0.35 (0.01) NA Area of land owned by individual (in acres) NA 0.60 (0.04) 0.71 (0.11) 0.59 (0.04) 0.20 Household characteristics a Household size 7.04 (0.14) 6.96 (0.14) 7.14 (0.14) (0.08) 4.79 (0.24) 5.77 (.08) 0.00 Whether HH is dual-headed 0.84 (0.01) 0.83 (0.01) 0.84 (0.01) (0.01) 0.26 (0.04) 0.92 (0.01) 0.00 Whether HH is male-headed 0.05 (0.01) 0.03 (0.00) 0.07 (0.01) (0.01) 0.02 (0.01) 0.07 (0.01) 0.00 Whether HH is female headed 0.11 (0.01) 0.14 (0.01) 0.09 (0.01) (0.01) 0.72 (.04) 0.01 (0.00) 0.00 Dependency ratio 1.00 (0.02) 1.04 (0.03) 0.96 (0.02) (0.03) 0.91 (0.05) 1.29 (0.03) 0.00 Total land area owned by household (in acres) 0.56 (0.06) 0.44 (0.08) 0.68 (0.08) (0.16) 1.24 (0.20) 1.33 (0.16) 0.67 Proportion living in HHs w/ irrigated land 0.09 (0.01) 0.07 (0.01) 0.10 (0.01) (0.02) 0.15 (.03) 0.16 (.02) 0.79 a Characteristics of the households in which the female or male adults or landowners live Notes: Standard errors in parentheses. Table uses individual weights for all adults 18 and over.

Table 5: Summary characteristics of adults and landowners 18 and over, by sex, Vietnam All adults (n=16,649) Women (n=13,605) Men (n=12,622) t-test of difference (p-value) All landowners (n=4,753) Female landowners (n=1125) Male landowners (n=3628) t-test of difference (p-value) Individual characteristics Proportion in population (0.00) 0.49 (0.00) NA 0.27 (0.00) 0.31 (0.01) 0.69 (0.01) 0.00 Age (years) (0.14) (0.19) (0.15) (0.22) (0.32) (0.22) 0.00 Proportion married 0.64 (0.00) 0.63 (0.01) 0.65 (0.01) (0.01) 0.66 (0.01) 0.96 (0.00) 0.00 Education (years) 8.02 (0.09) 7.56 (0.10) 8.47 (0.09) (0.09) 7.32 (0.14) 8.08 (0.09) 0.00 Proportion owning land 0.27 (0.00) 0.16 (0.00) 0.38 (0.01) NA Average area of land owned by individual (acres) NA 0.95 (0.04) 0.71 (0.04) 1.06 (0.04) 0.00 Household characteristics a Household size 5.45 (0.05) 5.44 (0.01) 5.45 (0.05) (0.04) 4.7 (0.05) 5.09 (0.04) 0.00 Whether HH is dual-headed 0.85 (0.01) 0.81 (0.01) 0.88 (0.01) (0.01) 0.67 (0.01) 0.95 (0.00) 0.00 Whether HH is male- headed 0.03 (0.00) 0.02 (0.00) 0.04 (0.00) (0.00) 0.00 (0.00) 0.03 (0.00) 0.00 Whether HH is female headed 0.13 (0.01) 0.16 (0.01) 0.09 (0.00) (0.00) 0.32 (0.01) 0.02 (0.00) 0.00 Dependency ratio 0.5 (0.01) 0.52 (0.01) 0.48 (0.01) (0.01) 0.53 (0.01) 0.58 (0.01) 0.00 Total land area owned by household (acres) 0.84 (0.03) 0.82 (0.03) 0.86 (0.04) (0.04) 0.80 (0.04) 1.10 (0.04) 0.00 Proportion living in HHs w/ irrigated land 0.46 (0.01) 0.46 (0.01) 0.47 (0.01) (0.01) 0.53 (0.02) 0.63 (0.01) 0.00 a Characteristics of the households in which the female or male adults or landowners live Notes: Standard errors in parentheses. Table uses individual weights for all adults 18 and over.