Vendor Selection Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. Alemi at Georgetown 2 Objectives Model decision makers preferences Facilitate communication and documentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Info 2040 Foundation of Quantitative Analysis
Advertisements

0 0 Exploring a Range of Decision Making Techniques Nov 18,2009 John Bates ( )
Child Protection Rapid Assessment Tool
Seeing Change Through to the Classroom Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
DECISION MODELING WITH Multi-Objective Decision Making
Tutorial on Tukey Charts Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D. Sunday, 11/25/2007.
1 1 Slide Chapter 10 Multicriteria Decision Making n A Scoring Model for Job Selection n Spreadsheet Solution of the Job Selection Scoring Model n The.
Risk Analysis & Management. Phases Initial Risk Assessment Risk Analysis Risk Management and Mitigation.
Campus Gradebook IN1000. Overview & Agenda This course will cover the basics of setting up the lesson planner, using the Gradebook, and generating reports.
Performance Appraisal
Introduction to Decision Analysis
Rapid Analysis Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. Analysis takes time and reflection People must be lined up and their views sought. People must be lined up and their.
Decision Trees Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. Coming Up How to construct a decision tree? –Components of a tree –Interviewing decision makers How to analyze a.
INTRO TO RATING SCALES 2014 v1.0. Define Decision: Build Rating Scales 2 Identify Alternatives Identify Criteria Identify Participants Build Ratings Scales.
FARROKH ALEMI, PH.D. Measurement of Severity from Claims Data.
XmR Chart Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. Purpose of Control Chart  Real or random.  Tell a story of changes in outcomes of the process.
Traditional Approach Using Questionnaires. 2 Introduction  Questionnaires  for acquiring large amount of information  Questionnaires allow us to study:
Descriptive Statistics: Part One Farrokh Alemi Ph.D. Kashif Haqqi M.D.
Designing for the Web 7 Useful Design Principles.
MATH1342 S08 – 7:00A-8:15A T/R BB218 SPRING 2014 Daryl Rupp.
Measurement in Exercise and Sport Psychology Research EPHE 348.
Severity Index for patients with Liver Cirrhosis disease Health Decision Analysis Yokabid Worku
BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS Level I. OBJECTIVE Be able to define communications.
Selma Unified School District Department of Curriculum and Instruction Kindergarten Release Day Day 1 Sept. 17, 2010.
Jason Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS School of Business
1 1 Slide © 2004 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 17 Multicriteria Decisions n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical Solution and.
Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis, 3e, by Cliff Ragsdale. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning Multicriteria Decision Making u Decision.
VistA Needs Assessment Vendor Selection Role of Information.
Project Initiation Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. Course on Project Management Project Phases 1. Initiation 2. Planning 3. Execution 4. Controlling 5. Closing.
Unit 14: Developing a Corrective Action Program Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  The purpose of a CAP  How a CAP benefits and supports.
Integrating Technology & Media Into Instruction: The ASSURE Model
Modeling Preferences of a Group Member Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
Mass s Tailored to Individuals Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING FRAMEWORK Farrokh Alemi Ph.D..
An Overview of Statistics Section 1.1. Ch1 Larson/Farber 2 Statistics is the science of collecting, organizing, analyzing, and interpreting data in order.
INTRODUCTION TO COLLECT PRIORITIES 2014 v COLLECT.
Participatory Vendor Selection Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
Introduction to the Course Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. This course provides a managerial perspective on the effective use of data and information technology.
What Is Statistics Chapter 01 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Multi-Criteria Analysis - preference weighting. Defining weights for criteria Purpose: to express the importance of each criterion relative to other criteria.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e \by Render/Stair/Hanna M1-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Analytic Hierarchy.
June 2003George Mason University1 Needs Assessment Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Hiring Matrix Training
Screening for Stroke and Cognitive Impairment Chapter 4: How to Administer Cognitive Screening in Stroke.
0 Calculation of Return on Investments Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Research Methods, 10eCopyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 13 QuestionnairesandInstruments.
Data Classification Lesson 1.2.
Introduction to the Course Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. This course provides a graduate level managerial perspective on the effective use of data and information.
S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology 1 Decision Analysis Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University.
How to administer Cognitive Screening?. Setting the Stage 1.The well-seasoned professional can take minutes to complete. Novices may want to allow.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Master’s Thesis Antti Punkka “ Uses of Ordinal Preference Information in Interactive Decision.
ICME Interdisciplinary Case Management Experience.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Selection III: Interviewing.
ESTIMATING WEIGHT Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG712.
DADSS Multiattribute Utility Theory. Administrative Details Homework Assignment 6 is due Monday. (slightly shorter) Homework Assignment 7 posted tonight.
NAM Talent Development & Performance Management Brought to you by your friendly Human Resources Team! Success Factors Performance Management System Training.
Levels of Measurement
Project Initiation & Planning
Project Initiation Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
A Scoring Model for Job Selection
Community Project- Guide to Coaching Sessions
Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D. Sunday, February 06, 2005
Analytic Hierarchy Process Prepared by Lee Revere and John Large
Business Meetings : Purposes
Quantitative Techniques for Decision Making-4 (AHP)
Identify & Document Client Requirements.
Comparing two Rates Farrokh Alemi Ph.D.
Agenda for This Week Monday, April 25 AHP Wednesday, April 27
Team Check-Up Orientation Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Vendor Selection Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.

Alemi at Georgetown 2 Objectives Model decision makers preferences Facilitate communication and documentation

Alemi at Georgetown 3 What is a model of values? Quantify preferences Higher numbers more preferred options Assumptions Decision makers have options Selection is based on preferences Preferences are based on attributes

Alemi at Georgetown 4 Additive Multi-Attribute Value Model Overall Value = V (A 1 ) + V (A 2 ) V (A n ) Value on Attribute 1 Value on Attribute 2 Value on Attribute n

Alemi at Georgetown 5 Misleading Numbers Numbers approximate preferences Nominal scale Ordinal scale Interval scale

Alemi at Georgetown 6 Steps in Vendor Selection 1. Select process 2. Select attributes 3. Select cases 4. Rate vendor performance 5. Set priorities 6. Recommend action 7. Document action

Alemi at Georgetown 7 Step1: Select Process Who decides? What must be done? What judgments must be made? How can the model of the judgment be used? Administrator?

Alemi at Georgetown 8 Step1: Select Process Who decides? What must be done? What judgments must be made? How can the model of the judgment be used? Administrator Select a vendor for long term

Alemi at Georgetown 9 Step1: Select Process Who decides? What must be done? What judgments must be made? How can the model of the judgment be used? Administrator Select a vendor for long term Performance of vendors on several attributes

Alemi at Georgetown 10 Step1: Select Process Who decides? What must be done? What judgments must be made? How can the model of the judgment be used? Administrator Select a vendor for long term Performance of vendors on several attributes Model can document the decision

Alemi at Georgetown 11 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 12 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 13 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the expert to introduce himself c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 14 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 15 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples of EHR that worked well and those that worked poorly d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 16 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 17 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 18 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 19 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 20 Step 2: Select Attributes a) Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing b) Ask the experts to introduce themselves c) Start with tangible examples d) Ask directly for additional attributes e) Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 21 Step 2. Select Attributes Introduce yourself and your purpose Be judicious about pausing Ask the experts to introduce themselves Start with tangible examples Ask directly for additional attributes Arrange the attributes in a hierarchy Always use the expert's terminology Use prompts that feel most natural Take notes, and do not interrupt

Alemi at Georgetown 22 Step 2: Select Attributes Do it again Start with list Solicit changes Record comments Avoid clicks Speak back to the entire group Maintain eye contact

Alemi at Georgetown 23 Step 2: Select Attributes Example attributes Easy to use Improve one or more business processes Most value for cost Fit with long term business strategy Vendor responsive to practice information needs Strong testimonies from prior users In use by other practice sites Compatible with existing systems

Alemi at Georgetown 24 Step 2: Select Attributes Vendor AVendor BVendor C AttributeWeightLevelRatingLevelRatingLevelRating Ease of use2 minutes3 minutes5 minutes Cost11,000/bed15,000/bed9000/bed ReputationGoodExcellentGood

Alemi at Georgetown 25 Step 3: Prepare Test Scenarios Make a case to enter Cover extremes Check for multiple entry Ask for revision procedures

Alemi at Georgetown 26 Step 4: Vendor Performance Test all on same cases Check performance on each attribute Rate performance on each attribute Standardize ratings

Alemi at Georgetown 27 Step 4: Vendor Performance Average time to enter patient data 2 minutes Between 3 minutes 5 minutes

Alemi at Georgetown 28 Step 4: Vendor Performance Vendor AVendor BVendor C AttributeLevel Ease of use2 minutes3 minutes5 minutes Cost11,000/bed15,000/bed9000/bed ReputationGoodExcellentGood

Alemi at Georgetown 29 Step 5. Rate Vendors on Single Attributes Double anchored assessment method 100 to best 0 to worst Rate the remaining levels

Alemi at Georgetown 30 Step 5. Rate Vendors on Single Attributes 2 minutes, minutes, ? 5 minutes, 0

Alemi at Georgetown 31 Step 5. Rate Vendors on Single Attributes Vendor AVendor BVendor C AttributeWeightLevelRatingLevelRatingLevelRating Ease of use2 minutes1003 minutes805 minutes0 Cost11,000/bed 70 15,000/bed /bed100 ReputationGood0Excellent100Good0

Alemi at Georgetown 32 Step 6: Set Priorities Assess ratio of importance Attributes are rank ordered Least important is assigned 10 points Rate how many times more important … Standardized weights Divide by sum

Alemi at Georgetown 33 Step 6: Set Priorities If reputation is 10, how many more times is ease of use more important? How many more times is cost more important than ease of use?

Alemi at Georgetown 34 Step 6: Set Priorities Example Weights

Alemi at Georgetown 35 Step 6: Set Priorities Vendor AVendor BVendor C AttributeWeightLevelRatingLevelRatingLevelRating Ease of use minutes1003 minutes805 minutes0 Cost ,000/bed 70 15,000/bed /bed100 Reputation 0.2 Good0Excellent100Good0

Alemi at Georgetown 36 Step 7: Recommend Action Calculate weighted sum Recommend best score

Alemi at Georgetown 37 Step 7: Recommend Action Vendor AVendor BVendor C AttributeWeightLevelRatingLevelRatingLevelRating Ease of use minutes1003 minutes805 minutes0 Cost ,000/bed 70 15,000/bed /bed100 Reputation 0.2 Good0Excellent100Good0 Total1.0 =100*.3+70*.4=80*.3+100*.2=100*.4

Alemi at Georgetown 38 Step 6: Recommend Action Vendor AVendor BVendor C AttributeWeightLevelRatingLevelRatingLevelRating Ease of use minutes1003 minutes805 minutes0 Cost ,000/bed 70 15,000/bed /bed100 Reputation 0.2 Good0Excellent100Good0 Total1.0 =100*.3+70*.4=80*.3+100*.2=100*.4

Alemi at Georgetown 39 Step 7: Document What was selected? What was the process? Why was it selected? What contingencies were thought through?

Take Home Lesson Process Matters