Highway Transportation Engineering ITS Case Study Component 1 – Student Guide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institutional and Cultural Barriers in Road Safety Peter Daly Chief Engineer Traffic and Roads.
Advertisements

Driver Behavior Models NSF DriveSense Workshop Norfolk, VA Oct Mario Gerla UCLA, Computer Science Dept.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Planning for Success: Applying Systems Engineering to ASCT Implementation TRANSPO 2012 October 29, 2012 Eddie Curtis, PE FHWA Office of Operations / Resource.
ITS Joint Program Office 62 nd Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 24, 2013 Walton Fehr.
Waheed Uddin, PhD., P.E. Professor and Director, CAIT Center for Advanced Infrastructure Technology Department of Civil Engineering The University of Mississippi.
Demolishing Information Silos for the Benefit of Customers Pete Johnston Programme Manager.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division Oregon Transportation Plan 2005 Modeling Alternative Policy Choices Becky Knudson,
Advanced Traveler Information System ATIS. What are Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ? The application of advanced sensor, computer, electronics,
Congestion Reduction Using Intelligent Transportation Systems Ben Sperry University of Evansville University of Evansville MESCON March 25, 2006.
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
Gainesville Area Traffic Management System. Traffic Management System  In 1984, the original Traffic Signal Master Plan was developed for the Gainesville.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
1 State of Good Repair Research Vincent Valdes Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation July 9, 2009.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) Presentation for the ITS America 2006 Annual Meeting May 9,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
The Emission Control Challenge Glenn Edge 17 July 2007.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
Congestion Pricing I. Introduction II. Need and purpose of multimodal system Traffic gridlock reflects an imbalance between road supply and road demand.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
ITS : A National and Regional Perspective Tony Kane American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ITS –DC DOT Workshop Howard University.
Eric Eiswerth Safety Research Project Manager FORD AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY OFFICE 2011 AASHTO Annual Meeting The Vehicle of the Future: Greener, Safer, Smarter.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
New Perspectives, Innovative Strategies and Integrated Approaches NTOC Talking Operations Web Conference June–July 2008 MANAGING TRAVEL DEMAND TO MITIGATE.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Planes, Trains, Automobiles and More Ardrey Kell High School February 23, 2012.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.
Is Transportation Sustainable?. Objectives By the end of this unit, students will be able to: 1.Examine and prioritize transportation project impacts.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
AT THE CROSSROADS Building for the Next Generation Council of State Governments May 30, 2008 Lexington, Kentucky.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Making Work Zones Work Better Chung Eng Work Zone Mobility & Safety Team Office of Transportation Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department.
1 Adaptive Control Software – Lite (ACS-Lite) Eddie Curtis, P.E. FHWA Resource Center / HOTM NTOC Webcast March 27, 2008.
New Uses for Archived Data Cathy McGhee, PE Senior Research Scientist Brian L. Smith, Ph.D. Associate Professor ITS America Annual Meeting May 2, 2005.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
Transportation Operations Goals and Accomplishments Institute of Transportation Engineers 2001 Spring Conference and Exhibit Dr. Christine Johnson D irector,
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION STUDY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
Traveler Information Applications: How Can VII Improve the Quality of Travel? TRB Session 644: Using VII Data, Part 1 Ben McKeever, US DOT, ITS Joint Program.
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
A case–driven comparison of Freeway Performance Measurement Systems by Shailesh Deshpande.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Highway Transportation Engineering ITS Case Study Component 3 – Instructor Guide.
2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute Austin Chamber of Commerce December 2015.
1 National Governors Association Roundtable Presentation April 2, 2001 Dr. Christine Johnson Director, ITS Joint Program Office Program Manager, FHWA Operations.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Engineering College, Tuwa. Design Engineering 1 - B  Guided by, SUBMITTED BY, PRAGNESH PATEL SHAH HETAXI ( ) RAJPUT VIVEK ( ) SOLANKI.
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DONE S.DHARANI DHARAN S.JEEVAANANTH KONGU POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Safer Work Zones Through ITS Interim Traffic Management System Florida Department of Transportation Tahira Faquir.
Integrity - Competence - Service Hogan Road/Exit 187 Proposed Improvements Public Informational Meeting June 9, 2016.
Intelligent Transportation System
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
Smart Cities Uroš Merljak.
Erasmus Intensive Program
Presentation transcript:

Highway Transportation Engineering ITS Case Study Component 1 – Student Guide

2 ITS Case Study Format and Purpose Component 1: PRESENTATION Component 2: TAKE HOME MATERIALS EXIT ONLY Component 3: DEBRIEF EXIT ONLY

3  ITS = Intelligent Transportation Systems  Systems that: □ Improve transportation safety and mobility □ Integrate advanced communications technologies into the transportation infrastructure and in vehicles □ Relieve congestion, improve safety, and enhance American productivity □ Reduce environmental impact What is ITS?

4 ITS: Examples and Potential Career Paths Video from the University of Minnesota – Twin Cities (10 minutes) Credit: Intelligent Transportation Systems Institute - Center for Transportation Studies –

5 Examples of ITS in Practice Oregon DOT Speed Warning Systems Oregon DOT Speed Warning Systems Caltrans Quick Map Caltrans Quick Map VDOT Traffic Management on I-66 VDOT Traffic Management on I-66 Coming Soon! Chicago, IL I-Pass and Open Road Tolling Chicago, IL I-Pass and Open Road Tolling

6 Today’s Transportation Challenges Data Sources: Traffic Safety Facts: 2010 Data, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (June 2012) 2011 Annual Urban Mobility Report, Texas Transportation Institute (Feb 2013) Safety 32,367 highway deaths in million crashes in 2011 Leading cause of death for ages 4, Safety 32,367 highway deaths in million crashes in 2011 Leading cause of death for ages 4, Mobility 5.5 billion hours of travel delay $121 billion cost of urban congestion Mobility 5.5 billion hours of travel delay $121 billion cost of urban congestion Environment 2.9 billion gallons of wasted fuel 56 billion lbs of additional CO 2 Environment 2.9 billion gallons of wasted fuel 56 billion lbs of additional CO 2

7 Benefits of ITS  Reduce delays between 5% and 40%  Reduce occurrence of crashes up to 40%  Reduce cost to motor carriers by 35%  Reduce travel times by up to 50% and increased reliability by 35%  Reduce incident duration by 40%, increased public support for DOT activities and goodwill  Reduced fuel consumption, travel time, and delay  Higher travel speeds, improved traffic flow and more satisfied travelers for all modes

8 How Do Signals Work? Signal Timing Plans

9 Signal Control Basics  From experience, you know a little about traffic signal control  Consider an example: □ Driving on a major thoroughfare, going the speed limit □ You make a number of lights and then all of the lights turn red at once and it’s possible to miss two, three, four lights in a row

10 Traffic Adaptive Traffic Responsive Time-based Signal Control System Types Uncoordinated Coordinated

11 Traffic Signal Performance: How Are We Doing?  National traffic signal assessment conducted by the National Transportation Operations Coalition (NTOC) □ Recent grades: ▪Year 2007: Grade D (65/100) ▪Year 2012: Grade D+ (69/100)  Areas of system improvement include: □ Signal timing reviewed for all at least every 3 years □ Traffic signals are coordinated □ All available signal timing features are considered National Traffic Signal Report Card 2012 ManagementD Traffic Signal OperationsC Signal Timing PracticesC Traffic Monitoring and Data Collection F MaintenanceC OverallD+ Why do you think national scores are low? How can systems be improved to accommodate changing traffic patterns and ease traffic congestion?

12 Digital, Programmable, Adaptive Thermostat Analog Thermostat How Do Adaptive Systems Work?

13 Adaptive Signal Control in the Real World Video – ATSAC: Behind the Scenes at L.A. Traffic Control (3:15) Credit: Streetfilms, Clarence Eckerson, Jr. –

14  Where is ASCT effective?  How is ASCT different from the traditional timing process?  How much does ASCT cost to implement per intersection?  How much do outdated signals and congestion cost us now?  Besides improving traffic flow and reducing congestion, what other benefits does ASCT provide? Using Adaptive Signal Control Technology

15 Adaptive Systems: Using Data Time Demand (VPH) PM Peak Period North and South Bound NB NB LT SB SB LT Total Demand 3:30-3: :30-4: :30-5: :30-6: Compare demand from 3:30-3:45 to demand from 5:30-5:45. Does what would work at 5:30 (peak 15 minutes) also work well at 3:30? Compare demand from 3:30-3:45 to demand from 5:30-5:45. Does what would work at 5:30 (peak 15 minutes) also work well at 3:30?

16 Benefits of Adaptive Signal Control Technology  Better □ Benefits to Road Users and Agencies ▪Travel time reduction 13% - 50% ▪Fuel Consumption 8% - 38% □ Ongoing performance measurement  Smarter □ Solves problems that are difficult to address with time-of- day and traffic responsive □ Saves cost of mundane data collection and retiming  Faster □ Reduces retiming intervals from years to minutes

17 Challenges of Adaptive Signal Control Technology  Expensive and complex implementation  May not be compatible with an existing system  Uncertainty in some of the benefits/validating benefits  Lack of knowledge related to ASCT in agencies  Arterial volumes might not fluctuate enough to warrant ASCT – ASCT may not be the best choice for all locations  Problems with the current state of traffic signal management, as evidenced by the grades from the National Traffic Signal Report Card

18 Determining the Best Solution Do you have to address each problem individually that comes your way? How can you group them together meaningfully? How do you know that you’re implementing the right or best solution? How do you know you have solved the problem? How do you measure success?

19 Why is GOST Important? What we are trying to achieve What needs to be done to achieve the goal Capabilities put in place to achieve the goal Specific methods to achieve the goal Goal Objective Strategy Tactic

20 Case Study: Adaptive Signal Control Technology  Context: □ You just started a new job as a Junior Traffic Engineer (Congratulations!) □ Your job is in the City of Hamilton □ Hamilton is a great place to live and work – as evidenced by the population growth in the past decade  Current situation: □ There are major traffic problems on the main arterial through Hamilton □ Adaptive signal technology has been proposed at 15 signalized intersections along the main arterial and in the vicinity to help Hamilton meet operational objectives that are not currently being met with the existing system/technology Hamilton

21 Directions for Completing the Case Study  Case study is divided into four tasks □ Each task provides all of the information you need (along with today’s lecture) to answer critical thinking questions provided at the end of the task. □ Spend about 30 minutes per task to review the information and answer questions. Defining your role and responsibilities Task 1 Identifying traffic patterns and existing signal architecture Task 2 Relating operational strategies to constituent interests, agency goals, and operational objectives Comparing and contrasting adaptive and non-adaptive technology systems Task 3 Task 4