Capstone II Group II CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS ON HIGHWAY EXPANSION U.S. 83 LA JOYA RELIEF ROUTE Presented By: Idalia De Hoyos Maria Trevino Rolando Cuellar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
Advertisements

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
TRE ANNUAL MEETING Grant Levi, NDDOT Director November 26,
Texas Department of Transportation.  Authorized under TEA-21  Discretionary Program (Fed Earmarks)  Pharr District Allocations 1.Border State Insp.
Friends of the Fox River November 9, 2014 Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Functional Classification Maranda Obray, Transportation Planner Idaho Transportation Department.
COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.
Florida Department of Transportation District 4 TSM&O Program Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) Installation in South Broward County ATMS.
Presentation to the Orange County-City of Orlando Consolidation of Services Study Commission Transportation Committee Meeting September 8, 2005.
NE 203 rd Street & NE 215 th Street Intersection Improvements between US 1 & West Dixie Highway Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Upcoming Project Development.
Highway 169 Phase 2 (Part 2) – Cross Range Expressway April 30, 2014 Public Information Meeting Taconite Community Center.
Congressional District Projects New CD-3 SMART 160 Trail: — This trail will be a multiple use trail and will offer access to a network of current and proposed.
Imagine the result European Infrastructure Friedrich Schneider, Executive Board Member August 4, 2010.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
The Bakken Boom – Transportation Impacts Rory Nelson ND Energy Impact Coordinator.
US 101 Corridor Plan Prepared by: Oregon Department of Transportation May 2013.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
TRENDS AND HIGHWAY CLASSIFICATIONS Spring Examples of highway design problems
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Imagine the Possibilities… Vision from the 2002 Rail Plan.
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
High Desert Corridor -New State Route 138/E-220 Agency coordination Meeting March 2011 “We’re here to get you there!”
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
Testing the Hypothesis Bill Schafer Director, Strategic Planning March 21, 2007 Can Rail Reduce Congestion?
State Route 109 (Portland Bypass) Robertson & Sumner County, TN NEPA Public Hearing November 12, 2015.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Think Globally, Act Locally August 19, Introduction Why freight is important to central Ohio Global implications and impacts Highway system challenges.
How a Project Becomes a Project Michelle Ellias DOT SW Region Programming Engineer DNR/DOT Meeting December 4, 2012.
STA US-30 Presentation for TRAC – October 13, 2015
August 19, 2015 Port Bienville Rail EIS Scoping Meeting Presented by: Rhea Vincent Mike McGuire.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Oregon Department of Transportation This program works with communities, law enforcement and internal ODOT partners regarding all aspects of transportation.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
By: Patricia Amaro, Billy Pappas, Ryan Steele, and DJ Soven.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
Major Project Scoping Committee.  Two previous studies to develop improvements for the I-35W Corridor ◦ Project Limits were from 42 nd to I-94 ◦ Project.
Framework for Rail Planning and Project Development.
Trade Transportation Activities Report Bill Frawley, TTI 2012 Border to Border Transportation Conference South Padre Island, TX November 14, 2012.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Dig Once (with Many Partners) The Dakota County Broadband Network State Broadband Task Force June 15, 2016.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Madera Ranchos Avenue 12 Enhancement Plan Community Visioning Workshops Workshop #3 – July 30, 2009.
West of England Joint Transport Study
Jamestown 2007 Anniversary Celebration
17. Managing GIS © John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Mobility Choice Blueprint
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
SR 400 Express Lanes: Market Sounding
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
MODULE 5: TSMO to Improve Reliability
Engineered Scoring System for Bicycle Lane Mapping Development Pedro Zavagna, Mena Souliman  The University of Texas at Tyler, Departments of Civil Engineering.
Lyle Parkway to SR 540 (Winter Lake Road)
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Parks Highway Reconstruction: Lucas Road to Big Lake Road
MODULE 5: TSMO to Improve Reliability
Presentation transcript:

Capstone II Group II CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS ON HIGHWAY EXPANSION U.S. 83 LA JOYA RELIEF ROUTE Presented By: Idalia De Hoyos Maria Trevino Rolando Cuellar Ashley Wheeler John Sandoval Griselda Hernandez Nelson Aguilar

Slide Presentation Contents What did we learn…………………………………………..…..3 Network Rail Case study………………………………….…..4 What is the approach the team will take……………..5 Map of the plan…………………………………………….… Plan logistics...………………………………………………..….. 7 Timeframe…………………………………………………………..8 Process………………………………………………………….…....8 Information Gathering………………………………………...9 Purpose….………………………………………….……….………10 Objective……..………………………………………….…….…..11 Process……………………………….……………….…………….12 Coordination………………………………………….…………..13 Advantages…………………………………………….…………. 14 Disadvantages………………………………………..…………..15 Conclusion……………………………………………….…………16 References………………………………………………….…

Network Rail Case Study We learned from the Network Rail Case Study: Any major engineering project requires planning for activities, sequencing, timing, and budgeting. Critical Path Analysis includes: ◦Purpose ◦Objective ◦Process ◦Coordination ◦Advantages and Disadvantages ◦Conclusion

What did we learn? Critical Path Analysis takes planning which require diagrams, graphs, and charts. Data needs to be collected in order to plan accordingly. Roles need to be assigned. In order to plan a project there has to a purpose. After purpose is pinpointed, group will find the process, co-ordination, and everything else will fall into place.

Applying What We Learned Critical Path Analysis on Highway Expansion *U.S. 83 La Joya Relief Route

Photo Credit: (ProgressTimes, 2011) Map Of the Plan

Plan Logistics Project Scope ◦Four lane controlled access expressway facility Project Limits ◦From: 1.0 miles east of FM 886 to: 0.5 mile west of Showers Road Resource: (Pharr District Texas Department of Transportation, 2015)

Photo Credit: (Pharr District Texas Department of Transportation, 2015)

How we went about gathering information Interview with John Womack; Expansion Consultant for the City of Peñitas Texdot.gov The Monitor Newspaper

Purpose/ Advantages: Relief traffic flow Circumvent the school zones, lower speed limits and avoid traffic light Attract new businesses to the city

Objective: Creation of/Improvements on: Construction of four lane controlled access highway Reduce traffic congestion Improve ◦ Traffic Mobility ◦Traffic Safety ◦Corridor Connectivity Resource: (Pharr District Texas Department of Transportation, 2015)

Process: Plan and Design Court Hearings Purchasing lands Local, County, State and Federal government need to come to agreement on funds Resource: (Pharr District Texas Department of Transportation, 2015)

Coordination: Decision Tree Choosing most appropriate: ○ Plan ○ Design Engineers created several planned routes the final plan route was the US 83 La Joya Relief Route (Womack, 2015)

Disadvantages Gas wells affected (Womack, 2015) Condemnation process (Womack, 2015) Unexpectable and intangible aspects of the project (Womack, 2015) “Divert some of the 40,000 cars on the stretch of U.S. 83 away from the cities’ cores, potentially costing local businesses a reliable stream of customers” (Janes, 2011) Construction time from start to finish

Conclusion: Use of Critical Path Analysis on the project of U.S. 83 La Joya Relief Route. Expose project details of Relief Route Understand how Leadership can be shown in different organizations.

References Janes, J. (2011, July 25). La Joya bypass offers economic promise for western Hidalgo County. Retrieved from TheMonitor.com: bypass-offers-economic-promise-for-western-hidalgo-county/article_f12056f f3-85ff- 0f3ad85aeeff.html bypass-offers-economic-promise-for-western-hidalgo-county/article_f12056f f3-85ff- 0f3ad85aeeff.html Pharr District Texas Department of Transportation. (2015, September 15). US 83 Relief Route. Retrieved from Texdot.gov: relief/111512_presentation.pdf relief/111512_presentation.pdf ProgressTimes. (2011, July 22). Retrieved from La Joya bypass using partnership for funding: bypass-using-partnerships-for-funding.html bypass-using-partnerships-for-funding.html Womack, J. (2015, September 16). Expansion Consultant. (I. De Hoyos & N. Aguilar, Interviewers)

Questions???