PMT Output, ATWD input, and Trigger Comparator Input Issues IceCube Note _105 Gerald Przybylski Lawerence Berkeley National Laboratory August 22, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operational Amplifiers 1. Copyright  2004 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Microelectronic Circuits - Fifth Edition Sedra/Smith2 Figure 2.1 Circuit symbol.
Advertisements

Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) And
Sensors Interfacing.
Potentialities of common-used TDC chips for high-speed event timer design E. Boole, V. Vedin Institute of Electronics and Computer Science, Riga, Latvia.
Digital to Analog and Analog to Digital Conversion
Specific requirements for analog electronics of a high counting rate TRD Vasile Catanescu NIHAM - Bucharest CBM 10th Collaboration Meeting Sept 25 – 28,
The NO A APD Readout Chip Tom Zimmerman Fermilab May 19, 2006.
A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
Signal Digitization Issues for the NLC Muon Detector Mani Tripathi UC, Davis 8/5/03 Starting Point: 1.Time of arrival measurement with O(1 ns) resolution.
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
EE311: Junior EE Lab Phase Locked Loop J. Carroll 9/3/02.
© 2012 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All rights reserved. Electronic Devices, 9th edition Thomas L. Floyd Electronic Devices Ninth.
Introduction to Op Amps
Ph. Farthouat CERN ELEC 2002 ADC 1 Analog to Digital Conversion  Introduction  Main characteristics –Resolution –Dynamic range –Bandwidth –Conversion.
Digital to Analog Converters
Part I: Amplifier Fundamentals
ECAL electronics Guido Haefeli, Lausanne PEBS meeting 10.Jan
Content Op-amp Application Introduction Inverting Amplifier
HIAPER Cloud Radar Transceiver Exciter Receiver Oscillators High-Powered Amplifier Calibration Exciter Receiver Oscillators High-Powered Amplifier Calibration.
Electronic Devices Ninth Edition Floyd Chapter 13.
ITOP carrier amplifier test at Indiana University G. Visser 4/27/2015 (latest update) I use the recently (here) characterized JT0947 ch3 as input source.
Analog Electronics Lecture 5.
10/13/2004EE 42 fall 2004 lecture 191 Lecture #19 amplifier examples: comparators, op amps. Reminder: MIDTERM coming up one week from today (Monday October.
Announcements Assignment 5 due tomorrow (or now)
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.
DOM Input Issues: PMT Output, ATWD input, and Trigger Comparator Design Criteria ICENOTE105 DOM input issues Gerald Przybylski Lawrence Berkeley National.
ACOE2551 Microprocessors Data Converters Analog to Digital Converters (ADC) –Convert an analog quantity (voltage, current) into a digital code Digital.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Analog to Digital Converters (ADC) 1
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
© 2012 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All rights reserved. Electronic Devices, 9th edition Thomas L. Floyd Electronic Devices Ninth.
SIGMA-DELTA ADC SD16_A Sigma-Delta ADC Shruthi Sujendra.
1 Fundamentals of Microelectronics  CH1 Why Microelectronics?  CH2 Basic Physics of Semiconductors  CH3 Diode Circuits  CH4 Physics of Bipolar Transistors.
DOM MB Status October 14, 2003 Gerald Przybylski Lawerence Berkeley National Laboratory GTPrzybylski 20/14/03 LBNL.
ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION & PLC DKT Signal Conditioning Circuits.
25th June, 2003CMS Ecal MGPA first results1 MGPA first results testing begun 29 th May on bare die (packaging still underway) two chips looked at so far.
Introduction to MicroElectronics
Lecture 2: Filters.
Feature Extraction IceCube Collaboration meeting in Berkeley, March 2005 Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Software Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL Chuck McParland.
Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.
DOM MB Test Results at LBNL Main Board Readiness Status Review LBNL, July 2003 Azriel Goldschmidt.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
June 30th 2008Jacques Lefrancois1 CW base studies Last week June 24th at calo meeting : news that preliminary test done by Yuri Gilitski indicated that.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
Op amp 2 Active Filters.
1 Chapter 8 Operational Amplifier as A Black Box  8.1 General Considerations  8.2 Op-Amp-Based Circuits  8.3 Nonlinear Functions  8.4 Op-Amp Nonidealities.
PRESENTATION ON:  Voltage Amplifier Presentation made by: GOSAI VIVEK ( )
EKT 314/4 WEEK 5 : CHAPTER 3 SIGNAL CONDITIONING ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION.
Function Generators. FUNCTION GENERATORS Function generators, which are very important and versatile instruments. provide a variety of output waveforms.
Digital-to-Analog Analog-to-Digital
FUNCTION GENERATOR.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Created by Tim Green, Art Kay Presented by Peggy Liska
Electronic Devices Ninth Edition Floyd Chapter 14.
(4) Filters.
Electronic Devices Ninth Edition Floyd Chapter 13.
B.Sc. Thesis by Çağrı Gürleyük
EI205 Lecture 13 Dianguang Ma Fall 2008.
KRB proposal (Read Board of Kyiv group)
L. Ratti, M. Manghisoni Università degli Studi di Pavia INFN Pavia
Design of Digital Filter Bank and General Purpose Digital Shaper
BESIII EMC electronics
Presented by T. Suomijärvi
Chapter 5: Active Filters
Introduction to the Oscilloscope Engr. Annalyn soria Lecturer.
Presentation transcript:

PMT Output, ATWD input, and Trigger Comparator Input Issues IceCube Note _105 Gerald Przybylski Lawerence Berkeley National Laboratory August 22, 2002 Rev A: May 14, 2003

Input Referenced Noise The input amplifier to the most sensitive input of the ATWD contributes the dominant noise (excluding the PTM itself) in that channel. For the selected device, the manufacturer’s data sheet specifies 3.5nV/  Hz noise. The x5 gain configuration of the amplifier results in a bandwidth of about 150 MHz. Therefore, the input referenced noise is about 43 uV. The criteria for acceptance is that the input referenced noise be a small fraction of the PMT response to a single photon (photoelectron), or mean SPE amplitude.

ATWD Input Noise The RMS noise of an ATWD input is about one ADC count, or 2 mV. Each event is captured on a set of 128 sample capacitors, each of which is digitized by a dedicated ADC channel. Each ADC channel has its own threshold variation which adds to the (Wilkinson) common ramp voltage. The peak-to-peak variation of an ATWD channel is about five counts (10 mV at a typical gain setting). Criteria for acceptance is that the digitizer quantization noise, the input noise, and the pattern noise be a small fraction of the mean SPE amplitude measured in ADC counts of the ATWD.

Mean SPE in ADC Counts The arbitrary decision has been made that the mean SPE amplitude should be 40 ADC counts, or about 80 mV for typical ATWD operating conditions.

ATWD Input Dynamic Range 1.The arbitrary decision has been made that the a 200 SPE signal delivered to the ATWD should have an amplitude of 1Volt peak. 2.The arbitrary decision has been made that the PMT output for saturated pulse height should not exceed the span of the ATWD.

The Least Sensitive ATWD Input Item 1 dictates the PMT HV setting which will produce a mean SPE amplitude of 5mV delivered to the amplifiers preceding the ATWD. Item 2 dictates the scaling of the PMT signal in the least sensitive input of the ATWD. AMANDA string 18 experience leads us to expect that the PMT output will saturate at about 2V. If so, the net gain between the PMT anode and the least sensitive input of the ATWD is unity. Recent experience with the IceCube standard PMT suggests that rescaling will be necessary to accommodate the higher output of the tube. (per Keal Hansen) As a result, the new setting is: Gain=2/3

The Most Sensitive ATWD Input The mean SPE amplitude in ADC counts times the ADC step size divided by the mean SPE amplitude in volts gives the net gain preceding the ATWD input. (40count/SPE x 2mV/count) / 5mV/SPE = 16. Given the first stage gain of 5, the second stage gain is 3.2. Actually, the gains of the two stages were selected so that both amplifiers had approximately the same bandwidth at the maximum output amplitude they were expected to deliver. Additionally, the input amplifier has programmable limits which are implemented to protect the ATWD input from excessive drive.

The Mid-level ATWD Input The arbitrary decision has been made that the second most sensitive input to the ATWD should have a stage roughly the gain of the geometric mean between the most and least sensitive input. Therefore, the stage gain is a factor of 4. Since the expected signal amplitude is high, amplifier noise is negligible compared with quantization noise, and amplifier noise ATWD input noise and pattern noise.

ATWD Pedestal Pattern As explained before, the ATWD pedestal pattern is a systematic source of measurement error. The same ADC subsystem is used to digitize each ATWD input. The pedestal pattern can be recorded, and subsequently subtracted from the digitized signal as a correction. The correction can be performed in firmware, in software in the DOM, in software, in the string processor, or off-line. Each option has advantages… Pedestal subtraction before compression is attractive.

PMT Anode “Compression” Past experience with similar photomultiplier tubes leaves the impression that the the anode output is linear to about half of saturation amplitude. If the non-linear performance of the PMTs can be characterized, and is similar from one PMT and another, then effective dynamic range of the DOM can be extended above 200 PE, at the sacrifice of some precision. The characterization of the non-linearity is beyond the scope of this discussion, however, the characterization of the compression may yield valuable physics information.

Dynamic Range Revisited Since the gain of the photomultiplier depends on its anode voltage, the PMT HV must be adjusted to deliver the correct value of mean SPE to the DOM analog input. The adjustment and calibration procedures are beyond the scope of this discussion. Choosing a different (perhaps lower) mean SPE value will result in different PMT saturation characteristics, which might, or might not, be advantageous for physics data acquisition and analysis.

Event Trigger Input Rapid response to PMT signals places great demands on the trigger system, motivating the selection of fast voltage comparators to initiate the ATWD capture circuitry. The flattest, lowest ‘propagation delay vs. input overdrive’ is most desirable. The input overdrive specification is indicative of the comparator input noise band and gain. For small pulse input, one must overcome the noise band to induce the comparator to change state. 3 to 5 mV signal is necessary to cause the comparator change its output state. Additionally, the comparators are wired to latch into the triggered state until reset (a feature precluding oscillation). To insure that the mean SPE reliably triggers the comparator, the mean SPE amplitude at the comparator should be several times the comparator threshold. A factor of five seems to be a satisfactory compromise between overdrive to the comparator, and bandwidth reduction related to the gain at which the stage operates. The recovery time from saturation for the amplifier preceding the trigger comparator can pose a problem if it exceeds the capture time of an event. Recent wide-band, low power products meet the requirements. (e.g., for the AD8014, the 60ns recovery time << 450ns ATWD capture time)

The Fast ADC Input Gain and Shaping. Discussion: The fast ADC signal is tapped off at the DOM MB input connector, amplified, and shaped by two cascaded second-order active filter amplifier stages. By implementing a simple circuit has unity gain at DC, so the Fast ADC input tracks the ATWD pedestal voltage. The stage gains are tuned to deliver the desired pulse height for an SPE input.

2 nd Order Filter Effects Preserves the area of a pulse (unity gain). Spreads the pulse in time. Fall time longer than rise time. Roughly halves output amplitude. Suppresses high frequency noise. Can be configured to also deliver gain. Separable component of 4 th order filter.

Gain Configuration Strategy If any stage in the fADC analog amplifier chain is to saturate, it should be the last one. Gain of 3 for each of the two 2 nd order filters yields acceptable values of circuit components. (circuit strays insignificant) Use the input buffer stage for isolation and gain adjustment. Prudent to design in gain >1. Filtering suppresses the effects of peaking.

Limiting Parameters 5mV SPE, 10ns FWHM ≈ triangle pulse with area 50mVns. Optimum pulse sampling: 3 or more samples above baseline or pedestal. Sampling period = 25 ns Mean SPE signal = 8 Counts 2mV per ADC count

fADC Operating Parameters Non-inverting (negative going signals) Output biased to ATWD input pedestal 50ns rise-time => RC = 22.5e-9 (~ 6 MHz BW) (verified by spice simulation) 2 samples on rising edge => 50 ns rise-time Stage gains yielding desired signal: Buffer: x 2.66 First filter: x 3 Second filter: x 3 (verified by spice simulation)

The fADC Analog Devices AD9215BRU-65 - Rated to 65 MSPS - 10 bit parallel output (1023 counts) - Differential input => inverted off-set operation - 80 mW power consumption - Span configurable (=2V for IceCube) - 12-bit pin-for-pin substitute power)

Considerations and Restrictions As the requirements are written, the fADC signal path gain is fixed relative to the ATWD signal path gain. If the PMT HV changes to alter the dynamic range of the ATWD signal path could (are likely to) result in non-optimal pulse amplitude at the fADC input.

fADC Topics for Reconsideration Extensive testing during 2003 can, and should either confirm the existing gain and filter characteristics. If they are not optimum, there is time to make adjustments before production for deployment into the ice. Since PMT HV adjustments to extend the dynamic range are possible, a gain controllable amplifier should be considered for the buffer stage of the fADC signal path. Since the operating parameters of IceTop cover an extended dynamic range, a gain controllable amplifier for the buffer stage of the fADC signal path will yield welcome flexibility in configuration. The Analog Devices AD8369 binary programmable variable gain amplifier can deliver adequate noise performance in the projected fADC input bandwidth.