Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Advertisements

Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Bidder’s Conference March 15, 2008.
Arkansas MSP Grants: Statewide Evaluation Plan Judy Trowell Arkansas Department of Education Charles Stegman Calli Holaway-Johnson University of Arkansas.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
TRC RFA WEBINAR Thursday, January 16, :00 a.m.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Title II, Part B Competitive Grant Program No Child Left.
BIDDERS CONFERENCE September 16, 2009 Proposals Due: November 12, 2009 RFP: Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant.
Oklahoma’s Math and Science Partnership (Title 2 Part B) Gloria Bayouth Executive Director, Office of Federal Programs Jennifer Lamb Director of Elementary.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Introduction to the MSP Management Information System Molly Hershey-Arista December 16, 2013.
Preliminary Highlights from the Noyce National Program Evaluation May 30, 2013 Ellen Bobronnikov Cris Price.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No
The Evaluation of Mathematics and Science Partnership Program A Quasi Experimental Design Study Abdallah Bendada, MSP Director
Evaluating Outcomes Across the Partnerships Tom Loveless Director, Brown Center on Education Policy The Brookings Institution Saturday,
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What? Half million dollar MSP grant with additional financial support from industry partners.
MATH/SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP BASICS The U.S. Department of Education´s Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) program is administered by the Academic Improvement.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 17, 2011 Webinar and Meeting.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Programs U.S. Department of Education: Baltimore Regional Meeting February 14-16, 2011.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Teaching*: An Exemplary Texas MSP Program Gina S. Day Deputy Associate Commissioner,
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: FY 2005 Summary.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: An Introduction for New State Coordinators February /2013.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Programs U.S. Department of Education: San Diego Regional Meeting February 22, 2010.
MSP Annual Performance Report: Online Instrument MSP Regional Conferences November, 2006 – February, 2007.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships program U.S. Department of Education Regional Conferences February - March, 2006.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort in K-16 Teaching and Learning James E. Hamos Directorate for Education & Human.
The Evaluation of Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program A Quasi Experimental Design Study Abdallah Bendada, Title II Director
Welcome to the San Francisco Mathematics and Science Partnerships Regional Meeting March 21-23, 2011.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Program State Coordinators’ Meeting.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Program State Coordinators Meeting.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov January 6, 2009 Common Issues and Potential Solutions.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What is Lenoir STEM? A program funded by MSP grant with additional financial support from industry.
Mathematics and Science Partnership APR Updates apr.ed-msp.net.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Grant.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar.
Enhancing Education Through Technology ( EETT/Title II D) Competitive Grant Application Technical Assistance Workshop New York State Education Department.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Teachers Teach Teachers:
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education

Conceptual Model of Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Develop partnership of high-need school districts and an IHE’s science, technology, engineering, mathematics faculty Improve classroom instruction Provide professional development to strengthen teachers’ content knowledge Improve student achievement in mathematics and science

Mathematics and Science Partnerships at a Glance  Over 57,000 educators participated nationwide.  Approximately 3,900 IHE faculty participated in ED MSP projects.  Over 6,300 organizations partnered to form 626 projects across the country.  Enhanced the quality of classroom instruction for over 2.8 million students.

MSP Funding  MSP provided $179 million dollars through a formula to the states.  State received awards ranging from $890,414 to over $21.9 million dollars.  Projects received awards ranging from $16,496 to $8.2 million.  Over two-thirds received $100,000 - $500,000 in state funding. Project Budgets from State MSP Grants, Performance Period 2008 Project budgetsPercent of projects $100,000 or less13% $100,001 to $200,00038% $200,001 to $500,00030% $500,001 to $1,000,00017% $1,000,001 or more2% Total100%

Characteristics of MSP Projects  50% led by LEAs  37% led by IHEs  13% led by non-profits, regional educational agencies, or other organizations  The median number of educators served per project was 43. (Range from 4 to 3,944)  An average of 6 IHE faculty participated per project.

Profession Development  MSP projects reported having one of two main targets for providing professional development for teachers: 1. Individual teachers (84 percent) – Teachers from one or more schools or school districts participate as individuals in order to improve their own content knowledge and teaching skills. 2. Entire schools or districts (16 percent) – Designed to improve mathematics and/or science instruction throughout a school or a set of schools. These projects often train teachers to become mathematics or science leaders in their schools/districts.

Professional Models  37 percent of projects focused on mathematics.  31 percent of projects focused on science.  32 percent of projects focused on mathematics and science. Average Professional Development Hours, by Professional Development Model Type, Performance Period 2008 Professional Development Model Percent of projects (2008) Total Median Hours (2008) Total Median Hours (2007) Summer Institute only3%80 Summer Institute with Follow-up 56%96100 Focus on School Year Activities 41%8074

Teachers’ Content Knowledge Results Percent of Teachers with Significant Gains In Content Knowledge, of Those Teachers with Pre-Post Content Assessments, Summed Across All Projects, Performance Period 2008 Content area Total number of teachers served Percent of teachers with content assessments Percent of teachers with significant gains Mathematics content knowledge 36,54643%67% (68% ‘07) Science content knowledge 31,76247%73% (73% ‘07)

Students’ Content Knowledge Results Percent of Students Scoring at Basic or Proficient or Above, of Students Taught by MSP Teachers And Assessed In Each Content Area, Performance Period 2008 Content area Total number of students taught by MSP teachers Percent of students with assessment data Percent of assessed students scoring at proficient level or above Mathematics content knowledge 1,442,25443%58%(45% ‘07) Science content knowledge 1,252,85326%58%(49% ‘07)

Evaluation Designs  3%Experimental  49%Quasi-Experimental  25%One group pre/post  12%Mixed methods  11%Other

Final Reports with Strong Evaluation Designs 204 Final Reports Submitted  84 projects reported experimental or quasi-experimental design.  49 submitted complete data for both treatment and comparison groups.  Percent of evaluations with experimental or quasi- experimental design that examined each type of outcome: --Student Achievement (56 %) --Teacher Content Knowledge (31%) --Teacher Classroom Practice (13%)

MSP Performance Period 2008 Summary  $179 million in federal resources were granted to 626 projects to provide professional development to K-12 educators.  The typical project provided professional development to 43 educators, and involved 6 IHE faculty members from both STEM disciplines and Schools of Education, receiving 97 hours of PD in a year.  The majority (79 percent) of teachers who participated in MSP projects were elementary and middle school teachers.  A large majority of teachers made statistically significant gains in their content knowledge (67% math, 73% science).  Quality of instruction improved for 2.8 million students throughout the nation.

vs.

Contact Information Pat O’Connell Johnson Team Leader United States Department of Education (202)

Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) Program U.S. Department of Education: Baltimore Regional Meeting February , 2011