Progress in Chamber Simulation Experiments At UCSD Laser Facility Farrokh Najmabadi and Kevin Sequoia HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An introduction to Ultraviolet/Visible Absorption Spectroscopy
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
LC-ABD P.J. Phillips, W.A. Gillespie (University of Dundee) S. P. Jamison (ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory) A.M. Macleod (University of Abertay) Collaborators.
Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute of.
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory MERIT Experiment Status NFMCC Collaboration Meeting FNAL March 17-20, 2008.
CAVIAR – Continuum Absorption by Visible and Infrared Radiation and its Atmospheric Relevance How on schedule are we? Keith Shine Department of Meteorology,
Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, Bindhu Harilal, S.S. Harilal, John Pulsifer, Mark Tillack.
April 26, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer IceCube Spring Meeting 1 IceCube Digital Optical Module Production R. Nahnhauer DESY.
Report on E-165 Steve Schnetzer MCC Meeting June 28.
IFE Chambers: Modeling and Experiments at UCSD Farrokh Najmabadi 5 th US-Japan Workshop on Laser IFE March 21-23, 2005 General Atomics, San Diego Electronic.
Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, John Pulsifer HAPL Meeting December 5-6, 2002 Naval Research.
1 of 16 M. S. Tillack, Y. Tao, J. Pulsifer, F. Najmabadi, L. C. Carlson, K. L. Sequoia, R. A. Burdt, M. Aralis Laser-matter interactions and IFE research.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
Update on Armor Simulation Experiments At Dragonfire Facility Farrokh Najmabadi, John Pulsifer, Mark Tillack HAPL Meeting August 8-9, 2006 General Atomic.
Reference system and centralised calibration for milk (payment) testing Dave Barbano Cornell University Ithaca, NY.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Jun 4, 2012.
Status of EIC Calorimeter R&D at BNL EIC Detector R&D Committee Meeting January 13, 2014 S.Boose, J.Haggerty, E.Kistenev, E,Mannel, S.Stoll, C.Woody PHENIX.
Long Term Exposure of Candidate First Wall Materials on XAPPER February – May 2004 Presented by: Jeff Latkowski XAPPER Team: Ryan Abbott, Robert Schmitt,
Biomedical Applications of Plasma Spectroscopy: A Preliminary Study Dr. Unnikrishnan V. K. Associate Professor Department of Atomic and Molecular Physics.
Progress in Chamber Simulation Experiments At UCSD Laser Facility Farrokh Najmabadi Kevin Sequoia, Sophia Chen HAPL Meeting September 24-25, 2003 University.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
XAPPER Capabilities, Progress & Plans Presented by: Jeff Latkowski XAPPER Team: Ryan Abbott, Brad Bell, and Keith Kanz May 16, 2006 Work performed under.
PHOBOS TOF Construction Status
09/13/20111 Status of high intensity polarized electron gun project at MIT-Bates Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Chamber Development Plan and Chamber Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi HAPL Meeting November 12-13, 2001 Livermore, CA Electronic copy:
Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments – Initial Results from Fast Thermometer Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, John Pulsifer HAPL.
G2p/GEp Beamline Tim Michalski Project Lead. Beamline Overview Slow Raster Tungsten Calorimeter Upside Down Girder (correctors, BCM, superharp) FZ1 Magnet.
Status of Target Injector and In-Chamber Tracking Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Neil Alexander, Gottfried Besenbruch, Tom Drake, Brian Vermillion, Bob Stemke,
Progress Report on SPARTAN Simulation of IFE Chamber Dynamics Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting March 3-4, 2005 Naval Research Laboratory.
Armor Simulation Experiments At Dragonfire Facility Farrokh Najmabadi and John Pulsifer HAPL Meeting March 3-4, 2005 Naval Research Laboratory Washington.
Recent Results from Dragonfire Armor Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi, Lane Carlson, John Pulsifer UC San Diego HAPL Meeting, Naval Research Laboratory.
/15RRP HAPL Dec 6, Robert R. Peterson Los Alamos National Laboratory and University of Wisconsin Calculations of the Response of Inertial Fusion.
An RF & High-Speed Acquisition Systems for High-Gradient Tests at CLIC Test Facility Raquel Fandos.
Commissioning Status of Shintake Monitor (IP-BSM) T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Kamiya, S. Komamiya (Univ. of Tokyo), T. Okugi, N. Terunuma,
Performance Testing of a Risk Reduction Space Winds Lidar Laser Transmitter Floyd Hovis, Fibertek, Inc. Jinxue Wang, Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems.
M. Körfer, DESY Salzau Light guide dosimeters and loss monitors H. Henschel, J. Kuhnhenn Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft INT M. Körfer, K. Wittenburg.
RLSR 16/4/2015 UK Financial Plan & Risks. Content Finances – Cost to Completion Risks – Top level to completion – R9 working space – Summary 2 RLSR 24/11/2014.
The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line
Update on Armor Simulation Experiments At Dragonfire Facility Farrokh Najmabadi and John Pulsifer HAPL Meeting November 8-9, 2005 University of Rochester.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
Ivan Procházka, Jan Kodet presented at : seminart ACES – ELT Meeting, Fundamental Station Wettzell, Technische Univ.Muenchen, Germany May 8, 2009 Czech.
First Look at FLASH Thick Target Test Beam (Jan 2004) Results The Alumina Underground Jan. 13, 2004.
February 5-6, 2004 HAPL meeting, G.Tech. 1 Chamber Tasks Coordination Presented by A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from J. Blanchard and the HAPL.
Prediction of chamber condition at long time scale is the goal of chamber simulation research.  Chamber dynamics simulation program is on schedule. Program.
Status of the PMT light detection system Gian Luca Raselli 20-AUG-2015 ICARUS executive meeting.
On-line Sorting Technologies for CCA Treated Wood Sarasota Team Meeting February 27, 2001.
Plasma Processes, Inc. February 5-6, Engineered Tungsten for IFE Dry Chamber Walls HAPL Program Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology Scott O’Dell,
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
On-line Sorting Technologies for CCA Treated Wood Sarasota Team Meeting June 5, 2001.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
EMCAL Calibration & Assembly at Yale University Mark Heinz, Project Mgr EMCAL Meeting Nantes July 15, 2008.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Engineered-material exposure in Dragonfire – Progress Report Farrokh Najmabadi, Lane Carlson, UC San Diego HAPL Meeting, UW Madison October 22-23, 2008.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Vision of the Brillouin lidar operated from a helicopter. The center ray represents.
Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi, Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting April 8-10, 2003 Sandia National Laboratory,
Outline ATF’s Terawatt CO2 laser overview BESTIA concept (as presented at AAC ’14) Progress since AAC ’14 Current vision of the roadmap to 100 TW.
Matter in Extreme Conditions at LCLS:
Viewport 1, Sep. 26, 2007 Temperature (ºC) on HPU display Primary : 72
G0 Detector Working Group Meeting
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
C.F. Feb
C.F. Feb
Presentation transcript:

Progress in Chamber Simulation Experiments At UCSD Laser Facility Farrokh Najmabadi and Kevin Sequoia HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute of Technology Electronic copy: UCSD IFE Web Site:

Status of Diagnostics Development and Fielding From last HAPL Meeting:  High temperature sample holder has been operational for quite some time.  RGA system was installed on the chamber and is routinely used to monitor chamber environment. No trace of W was found in the chamber (from heating filament of the high-temperature sample holder).  QMS was tested but has been removed form the chamber until we are ready for test runs.  Fast Optical Thermometer: Proof-of-principle was demonstrated about Last Feb. Focus of our effort has been on improving system reliability and user friendliness: Major progress, unexpected problem. From last HAPL Meeting:  High temperature sample holder has been operational for quite some time.  RGA system was installed on the chamber and is routinely used to monitor chamber environment. No trace of W was found in the chamber (from heating filament of the high-temperature sample holder).  QMS was tested but has been removed form the chamber until we are ready for test runs.  Fast Optical Thermometer: Proof-of-principle was demonstrated about Last Feb. Focus of our effort has been on improving system reliability and user friendliness: Major progress, unexpected problem.  We have developed a highly reliable, fast optical thermometer!

Schematic of Multi-Color Fiber Optical Thermometer System is configured as three independent two- color thermometer

Calibration of Thermometer  NO! Fibers! From last HAPL Meeting:  Test 1: Successive calibration: the basis for developing calibration protocol.  Test 2: Chamber installation test: thermometer is removed from calibration stand, mounted in the chamber, returned to calibration stand. Calibration held in repeated tries  Test 3: Long-term reliability, i.e., how long the calibration is holding. Calibration was lost in the hour time scale: limited set of data; maximum deviation is ~20%, data is stochastic. Likely problem are the PMTs. From last HAPL Meeting:  Test 1: Successive calibration: the basis for developing calibration protocol.  Test 2: Chamber installation test: thermometer is removed from calibration stand, mounted in the chamber, returned to calibration stand. Calibration held in repeated tries  Test 3: Long-term reliability, i.e., how long the calibration is holding. Calibration was lost in the hour time scale: limited set of data; maximum deviation is ~20%, data is stochastic. Likely problem are the PMTs.  Temperature is calculated from measurement of radiated energy at two wavelengths: Thermometer is calibrated with a tungsten lamp

The New Design Uses a Single Fiber Coupler Between the Head and Splitter/Detector Assemblies  The optical signal is split in the detector assemblies as opposed to the head.  We have achieved excellent reliability!  Bonus: A factor of 2-4 reduction in fiber insertion loss!  The optical signal is split in the detector assemblies as opposed to the head.  We have achieved excellent reliability!  Bonus: A factor of 2-4 reduction in fiber insertion loss! Single fiber from head to splitter/detector Band-pass filter/focuser PMT Expander/ neutral filter splitter PMT

Thermometer Held Its Calibration Over a 12-day Reliability Test Run!  Over 100 measurements over a 12 day period including a partial assembly/disassembly!  Less than ± 1% change in calibration constant  Over 100 measurements over a 12 day period including a partial assembly/disassembly!  Less than ± 1% change in calibration constant Partial Assembly/disassembly

The Head and Splitter/Detector Assemblies Are Packaged in Robust, Low-Profile “Packages” Shorter head. PMTs Band-pass filter/ Collimator/focuser Splitter Fiber

Armor Irradiation Test Will Begin in Late February in Our New Laboratory  Armor Irradiation tests has been deferred because of the failure injection seeding system of our laser. For the same laser energy: With no injection seeding, temporal profile of target temperature fluctuates by 10% due to ns temporal variation in laser pulse. With no injection seeding, peak target temperature varies by ~10-15% (shot to shot).  We will begin armor testing after installation of new injection seeder in our new laboratory.  Armor Irradiation tests has been deferred because of the failure injection seeding system of our laser. For the same laser energy: With no injection seeding, temporal profile of target temperature fluctuates by 10% due to ns temporal variation in laser pulse. With no injection seeding, peak target temperature varies by ~10-15% (shot to shot).  We will begin armor testing after installation of new injection seeder in our new laboratory.

From a Vivarium to a Laser Lab – An Odyssey! After animals were removed. What a smell! 6 Months Later! Demolition is over and construction has begun! One of the construction crew hanging around! (Construction was completed 3 months behind schedule!) Finally!