Democracy: What is It? (Cont’d) March 2nd, 2004

Democracy -- A Process Representative (Delegate) Democracy Direct Democracy Participatory Democracy Representative (Trustee) Democracy Opportunities for Mass Participation HIGH LOW

Democracy -- The Outcomes Low High Protection of Individual Rights Communitarian Emphasis on General Welfare of the Community Libertarian Emphasis on Limited Government and Rights of the Individual

MODELS OF DEMOCRACY Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t General Welfare High Mass Participation Low Mass Participation Majoritarian Democracy Elite Democracy

Models of Democracy majoritarian democracy majoritarian democracy most important goal is maximizing mass participation most important goal is maximizing mass participation high mass participation will result in decisions being made that maximize the general welfare high mass participation will result in decisions being made that maximize the general welfare

Models of Democracy elite democracy elite democracy most important goal is the general welfare most important goal is the general welfare requires an elite capable of pursuing the long-term interests of society requires an elite capable of pursuing the long-term interests of society –actually values low mass participation

Models of Democracy liberal democracy liberal democracy most important goal is protecting individual rights most important goal is protecting individual rights does not prefer low mass participation but may be willing to accept it does not prefer low mass participation but may be willing to accept it

Models of Democracy majoritarian democracy majoritarian democracy most important goal is maximizing mass participation most important goal is maximizing mass participation high mass participation will result in decisions being made that maximize the general welfare high mass participation will result in decisions being made that maximize the general welfare – majoritarian democratic critiques of other models elite democracy – there is no such thing as an elite that is not self-interested and will look after the good of the general masses elite democracy – there is no such thing as an elite that is not self-interested and will look after the good of the general masses liberal democracy – emphasis on individual rights is used to limit government in order to protect small, priveleged groups liberal democracy – emphasis on individual rights is used to limit government in order to protect small, priveleged groups

Models of Democracy elite democracy elite democracy most important goal is the general welfare most important goal is the general welfare requires an elite capable of pursuing the long-term interests of society requires an elite capable of pursuing the long-term interests of society –actually values low mass participation – elite democratic critiques of other models liberal democracy – undue focus on individual rights limits government’s ability to pursue the general welfare of the community liberal democracy – undue focus on individual rights limits government’s ability to pursue the general welfare of the community majoritarian democracy – masses are too uninterested, incompetent or, at worst, dangerous to be given control over decision-making majoritarian democracy – masses are too uninterested, incompetent or, at worst, dangerous to be given control over decision-making

Models of Democracy liberal democracy liberal democracy most important goal is protecting individual rights most important goal is protecting individual rights does not prefer low mass participation but may be willing to accept it does not prefer low mass participation but may be willing to accept it – liberal democratic critiques of other models elite democracy – if unchecked, elites will use power to infringe the rights of individuals elite democracy – if unchecked, elites will use power to infringe the rights of individuals majoritarian democracy – if unchecked, majority will infringe the rights of minorities (tyranny of the majority) majoritarian democracy – if unchecked, majority will infringe the rights of minorities (tyranny of the majority)

Models of Democracy – Viewing Democracy Over Time elite democrats elite democrats – the masses will always be incapable of making decisions for the long-term common good liberal democrats liberal democrats – elites and the majorities will always be prone to infringing individual rights if given the chance majoritarian democrats majoritarian democrats – elites will always be self-serving – masses can learn over time to become better democratic citizens if given a meaningful opportunity to do so elite and liberal democrats would argue that the risk is too great elite and liberal democrats would argue that the risk is too great

CLASSIFYING DEMOCRACIES within a range of models incorporating some minimum amount of meaningful citizen input and some minimum protection of basic rights, there are different models of democracy within a range of models incorporating some minimum amount of meaningful citizen input and some minimum protection of basic rights, there are different models of democracy choice of models is completely normative choice of models is completely normative there is no “right” model there is no “right” model the best model of democracy is contestable the best model of democracy is contestable

CLASSIFYING DEMOCRACIES... typology of models of democracy as a “map” for comparing democratic systems typology of models of democracy as a “map” for comparing democratic systems – tells us what to look at in undertaking comparisons – emphasizes the relative nature of models of democracy democracy as a concept is multi-faceted and complex democracy as a concept is multi-faceted and complex – forces the consideration of two questions to what degree are different political systems based on different models of democracy? to what degree are different political systems based on different models of democracy? to what degree do different political systems look like their underlying model of democracy in practice to what degree do different political systems look like their underlying model of democracy in practice

Things to Remember... there is no one, single, accepted model of democracy there is no one, single, accepted model of democracy – within a range of basic elements (consent of the governed, protection of individual rights), democracy means different things to different people

The State of Democracy In the Contemporary World

The State of Democracy Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2002 Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2002 – political freedom freedom to form political parties freedom to form political parties open competition in free and fair elections open competition in free and fair elections – civil liberties personal freedoms (e.g. speech, press) personal freedoms (e.g. speech, press) religious, ethnic, linguistic rights religious, ethnic, linguistic rights

The State of Democracy total countries=192 total countries=192 electoral democracies=121 (63%) electoral democracies=121 (63%) – 1987=40% free countries=89 (46%) free countries=89 (46%) many countries are electoral democracies without being free!! many countries are electoral democracies without being free!!

The State of Democracy Over Time

The State of Democracy top rankings top rankings – 34 countries (all Western industrialized countries) including... Australia Australia Canada Canada France France Germany Germany UK UK United States United States

The State of Democracy worst rankings worst rankings – 9 worst Burma Burma Cuba Cuba Iraq Iraq North Korea North Korea Libya Libya Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Sudan Sudan Syria Syria Turkmenistan Turkmenistan

The State of Democracy the number of free democratic societies is growing the number of free democratic societies is growing – however, the number of electoral democracies has grown faster than the number of free democratic societies – electoral democracy does not equal free democracy