Drivers’ attitudes towards driver assistance systems presented by Juliane Haupt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESafety 8 July e-Safety Working Group Brussels 8 July 2002 Sub-group 1: Autonomous In-vehicle Technologies.
Advertisements

ELECTRONIC STABILITY PROGRAM (ESP) LECTURER NAME: MR
Field Operational Tests in 7FP Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector DG INFSO - ICT for transport.
Defensive Driving What are the attributes of a good driver?
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 939–953 Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a.
User outreach and eSafety awareness Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications ETSC Conference, Brussels 21 February 2006.
Harrisonburg Police Department Explorer Program Meeting 6 Traffic Stop Introduction Patrol Briefing Observation
Field evaluation of an advanced brake warning system David Shinar Human Factors 1995 Presented by: Derrick Smets.
Introduction Electro-Mechanical Brake (1) EMB battery (2) EMB pedal unit with ECU (3) EMB wheel brake module (4) Sensors.
The Vehicle Industry, Regulation and Safety Philip McKenzie Australia.
A comparison of two cars I would like to own: a Mustang GT and a Toyota Camry Presented by: Lacy Voorhies Project 15- Car Purchase May 7, 2012.
Driving Intelligence Robert R. Arguelles Continental Teves, N.A. February 2 nd, 2004 Active Vehicle Safety: Advanced Vehicle Mobility and Stability Control.
3.1 Business and employment. Transportation - Reservation Systems.
Ian Fraser Highways Agency Co-operative Vehicle - Highway Systems Research.
Distribution of this document, usage or publishing of its content, as a whole or in parts, has to be confirmed by Continental. © Copyright by Continental,
United States Rulemaking on Electronic Stability Control (ESC) for Light Vehicles 138 WP.29 March, 2006 Informal document No. WP (138th WP.29,
Safety All The Time Oyuki Ogawa Executive Vice President DENSO CORPORATION.
WELCOME Road Safety Education By R.S. Raghunath.
Are Car Safety Concerns Universal? The Causes of Accidents According to Crowd Wisdom Ely Princeton Ely Princeton Dahan University.
Presented by: Helen Fahey Project 15: Buying Your First Car January 19, 2012.
AUTOTRONICS (VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM)
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
Effects on driving behavior of congestion information and of scale of in-vehicle navigation systems Author: Shiaw-Tsyr Uang, Sheue-Ling Hwang Transportation.
User experience with electric vehicles while driving in a critical range situation - a qualitative approach - Nadine Rauh, Thomas Franke, Josef F. Krems.
PRIVATE/PROPRIETARY Integrated Safety & Drowsy Drivers 2007 Wake Up, Michigan! September 20 th 2007 The Worldwide leader in Automotive Safety Systems Autoliv.
1 UNECE – Transport Division Eva Molnar, Director, UNECE May 2010 Automobiles and Sustainable Mobility FISITA World Congress.
 Active safety  Technology assisting in the prevention of a crash  Passive Safety  Primarily airbags  Seatbelts.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Cars - the better drivers ?
© Siemens AG, 2002 s CP RS Agenda The Role of IT for Accident-free Driving Interaction with driver’s physical condition Interaction with the roadside environment.
PRESENTATION SEMINAR ON GOOGLE DRIVERLESS CAR
A comparison of two cars I would like to own: a Ford Mustang and a Chevrolet Camaro Presented by: Zach Lewis Project 15 – Car Purchase 4/30/2012.
IntelliDriveSM Update
CEA activities and initiatives in road safety. Contents European Road Safety Action Programme & its progress the EU Agenda CEA & road safety Young drivers.
Integrating Trust and Driver’s Safety By Robin Mitchell.
Chapter 6 Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
Vehicle Safety Child Safety Seats Seatbelts Airbags ABS Brakes Required Equipment.
THE INFLUENCE OF RISK PERCEPTION AND SELF-ASSESSED DRIVING ABILITIES ON THE BEHAVIOR OF YOUNG DRIVERS PhD Dragan Jvanović PhD Predrag Stanojević MSc Dragana.
GRIDLOCK? – TRANSPORT IN 2030 THE FUTURE FOR PRIVATE TRANSPORT Professor Mike McDonald Director, Transportation Research Group Vice-Chair, European Road.
© 2006 PSEN Unit - #4 Let’s Go Driving Identification Evaluation Control Monitor.
Presented By: Matti Chrisman Project 15- Car Purchase May 3, 2012.
Technology in cars Research N. Jacob Thomas Mrs. Timm 12 G March 10, 2013.
Interactive Analyst Briefing
SENSOTRONIC BRAKE CONTROL
Madison MS SPF-SIG Community Survey Findings January 27, 2009.
DISTRACTED DRIVING. Overview: distracted driving > What is distracted driving? > What are the characteristics of distracted driving? > Attitudes and Concerns.
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES Presented by Anju.J.S. CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES.
Being “Active” with Safety How Can Administrators Change the Culture of Vehicle Purchasing? Presenter: Mark Francis (British Columbia) AAMVA Region IV.
DIRECTOR, ROAD SAFETY ANALYSIS
On-board Technologies
ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS
PRESENTED BY:BHABESH RANJAN MAHAKUD
PRESENTED BY: SHAHIN HUSSAN
Autonomous CAR.
Sunu Bagaskara Universitas YARSI
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Kia Introduced You New 2019 Kia Forte Compact Sedan – Westside Kia
Anti-Collision Sensor Market
Working Principle of Blind Spot Technology in Car
Vehicle Camera Market by Application (DMS, BSD, ACC, NVS, PAS), Product Type (Camera, Camera module), Technology (Infrared, digital,
The Safety Technologies to Consider While Buying a New Car.
Accelerating the Introduction of
On-board Technologies
The future is already here
Effects of an Aftermarket Crash Avoidance System on Warning Rates and Driver Acceptance in Urban and Rural Environments ADTSEA 2019 Burlington VT July.
Automotive Technology Principles, Diagnosis, and Service
Presentation transcript:

Drivers’ attitudes towards driver assistance systems presented by Juliane Haupt

Introduction Conclusion Study II Pre-Study Introduction Attitudes

20 licensed drivers (14 ♂, 6 ♀) Driving experience: >10,000km DAS experience: from almost no to high experience Method: 4 focus groups Pre-Study: Focus Groups Conclusion Study II Introduction Pre-Study

Participants did not perceive DAS as necessary for themselves but strongly supported that close persons (e.g.: partners, children) should use DAS –close persons are perceived as being more safe when driving cars equipped with DAS –the way of imposing the questions to participants influences the way of judging the safety of DAS. Pre-Study: Result extract Conclusion Study II Introduction Pre-Study

Study II : Questionnaire 211 licensed drivers (120 ♂, 91 ♀; average age: years; SD = years) DAS experience: from almost no to high experience Method: questionnaire Conclusion Pre-Study Introduction Study II

Study II : DAS experience 1.Did you - and if yes, when did you first - used the particular system?; 2.How often do you currently drive with the particular system activated? and 3.How familiar do you feel with the particular DAS? Conclusion Pre-Study Introduction Study II

Study II : DAS experience Anti-lock braking system (ABS) Traction control system (TCS) Electronic stability control (ESC) Automatic headlamps Curve light Advanced front-lighting system (AFS) Automatic beam switching Automotive night vision Rain sensor Head-up-Display (HUD) Braking Assistance System (BAS) Emergency brake assist Precrash warning system Hill-holder Hill Descent Control Cruise control Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) Navigation system Blind spot monitor Car-to-Car communication Tire-pressure monitoring system Traffic Sign Recognition Lane Keeping assistance (warning) Intelligent Speed Adaptation (active) Intelligent Speed Adaptation (warning) Parking system (active) Parking system (warning) Auto transmission Conclusion Pre-Study Introduction Study II Lane Keeping assistance (active)

Study II : Attitudes towards DAS 1.“Would you wish that closely related persons (parents, children, partner, friends) use the respective system?” (asked for each system listed in table 1) (answering mode ranging from 1 ‘no, not at all’ to 7 ‘yes, absolutely’) 2.“When a child is a passenger in the car, the respective system should be activated in order to be able to inform, warn or intervene if necessary.” (asked for each system listed in table 1) (answering mode ranging from 1 ‘absolutely not agree’ to 7 ‘absolutely agree’) 3.“The activation of the respective system so that it can inform, warn or intervene if necessary is dangerous.” (asked for each system listed in table 1) (answering mode ranging from 1 ‘absolutely not agree’ to 7 ‘absolutely agree’) Conclusion Pre-Study Introduction Study II

Study II : Results Look where you have to go: A Field Driving Study Discussion & Conclusion Quantitative vs. Qualitative Methods Main Objectives Applied Methods wuthin ADAPTATION F(28,1) = 62,151, p =.000, η 2 =.228

Study II : Gender differences Look where you have to go: A Field Driving Study Discussion & Conclusion Quantitative vs. Qualitative Methods Main Objectives Applied Methods wuthin ADAPTATION t( ) = , p =.047, d =.256 t(209) = , p =.033, d =.257 t(209) = , p =.046, d =.235 t(209) = , p =.035, d =.253 t(209) = , p =.027, d =.273 t(209) = , p =.000, d =.557

Study II : Results One significant correlation was found for the effect of drivers’ level of sensation seeking on attitudes towards a specific DAS. The higher participants scored in ‘sensation seeking’ the safer they judged the Traffic Sign Recognition System, r = 0.135, p =.025. Conclusion Pre-Study Introduction Study II

Conclusion Pre-Study Introduction Study II

in terms of safety, drivers’ evaluate the 29 systems differently gender is not a decisive factor influencing if a system is perceived as safe or not level of sensation seeking is not a decisive factor influencing if a system is perceived as safe or not The availability of DAS and to be able to afford (also advanced) driver assistance systems might contribute to a higher DAS experience in general public and consequently to a more distributed positive view on DAS Conclusion Study II Pre-Study Introduction Conclusion

Juliane Haupt “Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.” Winston Churchill Thank you for your attention!