1 Berendt: Advanced databases, first semester 2011, 1 Advanced databases – Inferring new knowledge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ontologies and Databases Ian Horrocks Information Systems Group Oxford University Computing Laboratory.
Advertisements

Chronos: A Tool for Handling Temporal Ontologies in Protégé
Based on “A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL” © 2005, The University of Manchester A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Session 3: Additional.
Protege Tutorial Based on ProtegeOWLTutorial at protege website.
Protege Tutorial Based on ProtegeOWLTutorial at protege website.
Tutorial Le Phuoc Son Hoang Huu Hanh Hue University.
Of 27 lecture 7: owl - introduction. of 27 ece 627, winter ‘132 OWL a glimpse OWL – Web Ontology Language describes classes, properties and relations.
OWL TUTORIAL APT CSA 3003 OWL ANNOTATOR Charlie Abela CSAI Department.
Ontologies? Semantic Web? OWL? – Making sense of it all
Berendt: Advanced databases, winter term 2007/08, 1 Advanced databases – Inferring implicit/new.
Ontologies and the Semantic Web by Ian Horrocks presented by Thomas Packer 1.
Chapter 8: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents – Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Wiley, 2005.
The Semantic Web Week 15 Reasoning with (and Visualising) Ontologies Module Website: Practical :Protégé-2000 WITH.
How can Computer Science contribute to Research Publishing?
Tools for Developing and Using DAML-Based Ontologies and Documents Richard Fikes Deborah McGuinness Sheila McIlraith Jessica Jenkins Son Cao Tran Gleb.
Machine Reasoning about Anomalous Sensor Data Matt Calder, Francesco Peri, Bob Morris Center for Coastal Environmental Sensoring Networks CESN University.
From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language
ICAIL 2007 DESI Workshop Panel presentation Marie-Francine Moens Centre for Law and ICT/ Department of Computer Science Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,
1 Berendt: Advanced databases, winter term 2007/08, 1 Advanced databases – Defining and combining.
1 Berendt: Advanced databases, winter term 2007/08, 1 Advanced databases – Defining and combining.
Protege OWL Plugin Short Tutorial. OWL Usage The world wide web is a natural application area of ontologies, because ontologies could be used to describe.
8/11/2011 Web Ontology Language (OWL) Máster Universitario en Inteligencia Artificial Mikel Egaña Aranguren 3205 Facultad de Informática Universidad Politécnica.
1 Berendt: Knowledge and the Web, 1st semester 2014/2015, 1 Knowledge and the Web Inference on the Semantic.
SQL Databases are a Moving Target Juan F. Sequeda – Syed Hamid Tirmizi –
OWL 2 in use. OWL 2 OWL 2 is a knowledge representation language, designed to formulate, exchange and reason with knowledge about a domain of interest.
Ontology Repositories: Discussions and Perspectives Mathieu d’Aquin KMi, the Open University, UK
BioHealth Informatics Group A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Session 2: Defined Classes and Additional Modelling Constructs in OWL Nick Drummond.
1 Berendt: Advanced databases, first semester 2009, 1 Advanced databases – Introduction and overview Prof.
KM’s Inference Algorithm Peter Clark Knowledge Systems Boeing Math & Computing Technology.
Integrating lexical units, synsets and ontology in the Cornetto Database Piek Vossen 1, 2, Isa Maks 1, Roxane Segers 1, Hennie van der Vliet 1 1: Faculty.
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
1 Berendt: Advanced databases, 1st semester 2012/2013, 1 Advanced databases – Inference on the Semantic Web.
Based on “A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL” © 2005, The University of Manchester A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Session 2: Defined.
© O. Corcho, MC Suárez de Figueroa Baonza 1 OWL and SWRL Protégé 4: Building an OWL Ontology Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Oscar Corcho {mcsuarez,
OilEd An Introduction to OilEd Sean Bechhofer. Topics we will discuss Basic OilEd use –Defining Classes, Properties and Individuals in an Ontology –This.
Organization of the Lab Three meetings:  today: general introduction, first steps in Protégé OWL  November 19: second part of tutorial  December 3:
2nd Feb 2005Protege-OWL tutorial, © 2005 Univ. of Manchester1 Protégé-OWL Tutorial Session 2: Defined Classes Nick Drummond.
Forschungszentrum Informatik, Karlsruhe FZI Research Center for Information Science at the University of Karlsruhe Variance in e-Business Service Discovery.
Ontology Engineering Lab #5 – September 30, 2013.
1 1 The Databases Specialisation: Advanced Databases; Current Trends in Databases Bettina Berendt September 2009 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department.
ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING Lab #2 – September 8,
ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING Lab #3 – September 15,
Berendt: Advanced databases, winter term 2007/08, 1 Advanced databases – Inferring implicit/new.
1 1 1 Berendt: Advanced databases, first semester 2008, Advanced databases – Semantic Web Mining.
Ontology Engineering Lab #4 - September 23, 2013.
Modeling Life Science Knowledge with OWL 1.1 Michel Dumontier & Natalia Villanueva-Rosales Department of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, School of.
Observation vs. Inferences The Local Environment.
Web Ontology Language (OWL). OWL The W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL) is a Semantic Web language designed to represent rich and complex knowledge about.
1 1 Advanced Databases; Current Trends in Databases Bettina Berendt / Ilija Subašić September 2011 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Computer.
1 Berendt: Advanced databases, first semester 2008, 1 Advanced databases – Defining and combining.
BioHealth Informatics Group Copyright © 2005, The University of Manchester1 A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Additional Exercises: Common Errors.
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST WP4: Ontology Engineering Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Michel Klein Vrije Universiteit.
Mathematical Service Matching Using Description Logic and OWL Kamelia Asadzadeh Manjili
Ccs.  Ontologies are used to capture knowledge about some domain of interest. ◦ An ontology describes the concepts in the domain and also the relationships.
COMPUTER SYSTEM FUNDAMENTAL Genetic Computer School INTRODUCTION TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LESSON 11.
OWL (Ontology Web Language and Applications) Maw-Sheng Horng Department of Mathematics and Information Education National Taipei University of Education.
Based on ProtegeOWLTutorial at protege website
DOMAIN ONTOLOGY DESIGN
Information Organization
Session 2: Defined Classes Nick Drummond
Ontology.
CS646: OWL Tutorial (session 2)
ece 720 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Foundations of the Semantic Web: Ontology Engineering
Ontology.
READY?.
Ontologies and Databases
Data and Applications Security Developments and Directions
Test-Driven Ontology Development in Protégé
Deniz Beser A Fundamental Tradeoff in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Hector J. Levesque and Ronald J. Brachman.
Presentation transcript:

1 Berendt: Advanced databases, first semester 2011, 1 Advanced databases – Inferring new knowledge from data(bases): Some observations about problems with deductive reasoning and inconsistencies, and with other data- quality problems, in HW 1 and 2 Bettina Berendt Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Computer Science Last update: 6 December 2011

2 Berendt: Advanced databases, first semester 2011, 2 Common issues in HW1 and HW2 (1) n Intended differences between UML/ER model and OWL ontology l „Semantic“ differences vs. Differences due to expressivity l Attention: look at constraints! l TODO: describe which is which (and why) n Unintended differences between UML/ER model and OWL ontology l Cardinality/multiplicity restrictions l TODO: check for each one, add where applicable n (This occurred mainly when there were „semantic“ differences“): subclass vs. Instance l HEURISTIC: ? l TODO: ?

3 Berendt: Advanced databases, first semester 2011, 3 Common issues in HW1 and HW2 (2) Inconsistent ontologies n Cardinality constraints violated l TODO: ? n Missing data in the data source l TODO: ? n Datatype incompatibilities l TODO: ? n Axioms violated l TODO: ? n Own ontology not uploaded, but recreated (with divergences9 l TODO: ? n Outlook: inconsistent data l TODO: ?

4 Berendt: Advanced databases, first semester 2011, 4 Common issues in HW1 and HW2 (3) n The reasoner does not infer what it should do l EXPLANATION (I think): inadequate usage of sufficient and necessary conditions [cf. Pizza Tutorial] l TODO: ?