APCA A Market Directed Inventory System (MDIS) National Farmers Union Annual Convention Omaha, Nebraska March 5, 2012 Daryll E. Ray and Harwood D. Schaffer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joseph W. Glauber Chief Economist, USDA USDA 89 th Agricultural Outlook Forum February 21,
Advertisements

Chart source: Knowledge Exchange Division, CoBank, ACB (confidential and proprietary) 13 th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Convention December 6-7, 2010 Economic.
A New Approach to Providing an Agricultural Safety Net Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University Presented at.
Socio-Economic Impacts of U.S. Ethanol Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
1 Informa Economics 2007 Agriculture Policy Roundtable Commodity Market Update By Jim Sullivan Informa Economics 2007 Agriculture Policy Roundtable Commodity.
APCA So What’s the Deal With Agriculture? Daryll E. Ray and Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center National Family.
The Scenarios: An Analysis of Safety Net Alternatives December 4, 2000 Presentation to the U.S. Rice Federation Las Vegas, Nevada FAPRI
Photos courtesy of USDA Jason Henderson Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch May 14, 2008 U.S. AGRICULTURE: What Goes Up Must.
APCA 2012 FB Prospects, Challenges, & Options Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Nebraska Farmers Union’s 97 th.
APCA Ethanol Ecstasy But… Isn’t Long-Term Euphoria a Contradiction in Terms? Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center.
The Scenarios: An Analysis of Safety Net Alternatives Prepared at the Request of Rep. Charles Stenholm January 18, 2001 Presentation to the All Commodity.
Exciting Times? The Outlook for U.S. Agriculture during a World Food Crisis Dr. Vincent Smith Professor of Agricultural Economics Department of Agricultural.
Allan Gray and Chris Hurt, Purdue University 2002 Farm Bill Decision Time Allan Gray and Chris Hurt Purdue University.
The 2012, 2013, 2014 Farm Bill (The Agricultural Act of 2014) Will Snell – University of KY
Pat Westhoff FAPRI at the University of Missouri ( Session on “Policy Options.
AGRICULTURE SUBSIDIES. WHAT IS A SUBSIDY? Have you ever purchase something even though you didn’t have all the money for it? (not including buying things.
2014 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Back to the Future? 2015 Crop and Income Outlook: Conserve Cash Now Gary.
Agriculture: Farmers’ Problems, Government Policies, and Unintended Effects Del Mar College John Daly ©2002 South-Western Publishing, A Division of Thomson.
Keith Torgerson, NDSCS. Farms in the Annual Red River Valley Annual Report FINAN, the analysis software, allows us to take a closer look at the farms.
Agricultural Economics Grain Market Outlook by Cory G. Walters University of Kentucky (859)
Rethinking US Agricultural Policy: Changing Course to Secure Farmer Livelihoods Worldwide Daryll E. Ray Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Kelly J. Tiller Agricultural.
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 General Overview Crop Program Changes Dairy Provisions.
Farm Management 2012 Non-Math M/C Problems. Crop prices increase, causing Marcia’s sales income to increase while leaving her cash operating expenses.
APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis.
2007 Montana Agricultural Outlook George Haynes Vincent Smith David Buschena Department of Agricultural Economic & Economics and MSU Extension.
APCA New Directions for Agricultural Policy Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Farm Bureau Farm Policy Forum Washington.
Pat Westhoff FAPRI-MU director University of Missouri Farm Bill Decision Aid Training.
2005 Red River Valley Farm Averages Ron Dvergsten, Dean Management Education Keith Torgerson, NDSCS.
APCA Corn, Ethanol, & Tortillas Short-Term vs Long-Term Realities Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Global Agri-Food.
The 2007 US Farm Bill: Analysis of the USDA proposals Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis DG for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
2012 Farm Management Non-Math M/C Questions. 8. A acre equals A hectares B hectares C hectares D hectares E. None of the above.
Perspectives on Impacts of the 2002 U.S. Farm Act Paul C. Westcott Agricultural Economist U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service April.
APCA Current vs. Long-Term Challenges for Agriculture Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Kansas Farmers Union Annual.
Farm Management Multiple Choice Non-Math The present value formula for estimating land prices (PV = annual net returns ÷ discount rate) assumes.
APCA Commodity Policy: Is This What We Signed Up For? Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center 2011 National Farmers Union.
Global Policies and Risk Management Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
APCA The Setting for 2012 FB Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center 2010 NASDA Annual Meeting Dover, Delaware September.
APCA U.S. Farm Policy & World Ag Trade: Implications for U.S. Agriculture Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Midwest/Great.
APCA Export-Based Prosperity for US Crop Agriculture: Long Promised; Will It Happen? Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis.
APCA Agricultural Policy Options for Improving Energy Crop Economics Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
Influences of Decoupled Farm Programs on Agricultural Production Paul C. Westcott and C. Edwin Young Agricultural Economists U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Biofuel Policy Effects on Soil Erosion C. Robert Taylor, Auburn University Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M.
The ACRE Decision Bruce A. Babcock Iowa State University Presented at the North Dakota Corn Growers Association Annual Convention. Fargo, ND. February.
APCA The 2012 Corn Predicament Daryll E. Ray and Harwood D. Schaffer University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture Agricultural Policy Analysis Center.
Department of Economics Crop Market Outlook Northeast ISU Research Farm 2008 Fall Field Day Nashua, Iowa Sept. 4, 2008 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain.
APCA Economic Synergism Between Agricultural and Energy Policies Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
APCA A Market Directed Inventory System (MDIS) National Farmers Union February 29, 2012 Daryll E. Ray and Harwood D. Schaffer Agricultural Policy Analysis.
Corn and Soybean Issues for 2006 Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University Presented at.
APCA Farmer-Owned Reserve Study 2011 NFU Fall Fly-In Washington D.C. September 12, 2011 Daryll E. Ray Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of.
APCA Leveling the Policy Framework Between Crops and Biomass Daryll E. Ray, Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte, and Harwood D. Schaffer University of Tennessee.
APCA A New Era for Agriculture? Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Fourth Annual Water Law, Policy and Science Conference.
Corn and Wheat Market Overview and Outlook by Cory G. Walters Southern Regional Outlook Conference Agricultural Economics.
A New Approach to Providing an Agricultural Safety Net Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University Presented.
U.S. Farm Policy Choices in 2007 Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University Presented at Outlook Conference 2006.
2014 State Farm Management Non- Math Problems. 7. How many pounds are in a metric ton? A. 2,000.0 B. 2,204.6 C. 3,666.7 D. 4,012.5 E. None of the above.
Bull or Bear? Samuel E. Kain Accredited Land Consultant
ACRE Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Price outlook for the 21 covered commodities and risk considerations
Ron Dvergsten, Dean Management Education
2005 Red River Valley Farm Averages
Are we where we want to be with commodity programs?
The Outlook for Crop Agriculture and the New Farm Bill
Drought, Politics and Risk Management Strategies
What to Expect when you’re Expecting a Farm Bill
Farm Bill Outlook and the Potential Impact on Agriculture
2019 Wisconsin Agricultural Outlook Forum
Commodity Market Outlook
US and NC Agricultural Outlook
Rethinking US Agricultural Policy: Changing Course to Secure Farmer
Agricultural Marketing
Presentation transcript:

APCA A Market Directed Inventory System (MDIS) National Farmers Union Annual Convention Omaha, Nebraska March 5, 2012 Daryll E. Ray and Harwood D. Schaffer Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

APCA Policy Description Objectives of MDIS – Bulk of revenue from market receipts – Reduce government payments while maintaining farm income – Reduce price volatility that otherwise would cause “viable and profitable” agricultural firms to go out of business including: Crop farmers Livestock producers Ethanol producers Agricultural processors

APCA Policy Description Two Parts to the MDIS Analysis – Historical Rerun of history from 1998 to 2010 Except the commodity programs are replaced with MDIS – Ten Years into Future Analysis covers 2012 to 2021 using the ten-year USDA baseline released in February of 2012 The baseline is shocked to mimic the variability experienced during 1998 thru 2021 Compare MDIS with current program variations

APCA Policy Description MDIS Specifications for Historical Study Period, 1998 thru 2010 – Initial corn loan rate set at midpoint between variable and full cost of production – Indexed with a prices paid by farmers index – Other crop loan rates set to historic loan rate ratios with corn – Release prices are set at 160% of loan rates

APCA Policy Description MDIS Specifications for Study Period – MDIS maximums Corn – 3 billion bushels Wheat – 800 million bushels Soybeans – 400 million bushels – Farmer storage payment rate 40¢/bu./yr – Set-aside available if needed – Eliminate Direct Payments, LDPs, & CCPs

APCA Corn Prices Historic Baseline Release Price Loan Rate

APCA Corn Prices Historic Baseline MDIS Release Price Loan Rate

APCA Corn Prices Average Per Year Over Each Period Historic Baseline MDIS $2.05 $2.68 $4.02 $3.71 $2.81 $3.07

APCA 8 Crops - Government Payments Historic Baseline MDIS $ Billion

APCA 8 Crops – Government Payments Average Per Year Over Each Period Historic Baseline MDIS $ Billion $14.8 $4.8 $6.8 $3.6 $11.7 $4.3

APCA Corn Exports - Quantity Historic Baseline MDIS Million Bu.

APCA Corn Value of Exports Average Per Year Over Each Period Historic Baseline MDIS $ Billion $3.9 $4.8 $8.3 $7.7 $5.6 $5.9

APCA 8 Crops Value of Exports Historic Baseline MDIS $ Billion

APCA 8 Crops - Value of Exports Historic Baseline MDIS $ Billion $15.6 $19.1 $32.8 $31.2 $22.2 $23.7

APCA MDIS Stocks Corn Wheat Million Bu. Soybeans

APCA Corn – Value of Production plus Government Payments Average Per Year Over Each Period Historic Baseline MDIS $ Billion $26.4 $28.2 $51.5 $46.5 $36.1 $35.2

APCA Realized Net Farm Income Average Per Year Over Each Period Historic Baseline MDIS $ Billion $49.8 $50.8 $55.8 $51.5 $52.1 $51.1

APCA Summary Historical Analysis Over the Study Period, , with MDIS in Place: – Government payments 60% lower – Increased crop prices and increased reliance on market receipts – Value of exports $20 billion higher – Lower price volatility benefitting: Crop farmers Livestock producers and industrial users Consumers and agricultural processors

APCA But What About the Future? Two distinct sets of “future” analyses: –One straight-line “future” represented by the 2012 USDA baseline –A “future” roughly patterned after the historical experience of and the variation we experienced tested against various policies: a)With current policies in place b)Elimination of Direct Payments c)Raise Loan Rates with no DPs d)MDIS

APCA Corn Prices

APCA 8 Crops – Value of Production Million $

APCA 8 Crops – Value of Exports Million $

APCA 8 Crops – Government Payments Million $

APCA Value of Production + Government Payments - Cash Expenses: 8 Crops Million $

APCA Realized Net Farm Income Million $

APCA But What About the Future? Two distinct sets of “future” analyses: – One straight-line “future” represented by the 2012 USDA baseline – A “future” roughly patterned after the historical experience of and the variation we experienced tested against various policies: a)With current policies in place b)Elimination of Direct Payments c)Raise Loan Rates with no DPs d)MDIS

APCA Corn Yield Shock Baseline Yield Shock Bu/Ac.

APCA Corn Prices Shocked Baseline Below $3.00 Above $7.00

APCA 8 Crops - Government Payments Million $

APCA Value of Production + Government Payments - Cash Expenses: 8 Crops Million $ Shocked Baseline

APCA Realized Net Farm Income Million $

APCA But What About the Future? Two distinct sets of “future” analyses: – One straight-line “future” represented by the 2012 USDA baseline – A “future” roughly patterned after the historical experience of and the variation we experienced tested against various policies: a)With current policies in place b)Elimination of Direct Payments c)Raise Loan Rates with no DPs d)MDIS

APCA 8 Crops - Government Payments Million $

APCA Value of Production + Government Payments - Cash Expenses: 8 Crops Million $

APCA Realized Net Farm Income Million $

APCA But What About the Future? Two distinct sets of “future” analyses: – One straight-line “future” represented by the 2012 USDA baseline – A “future” roughly patterned after the historical experience of and the variation we experienced tested against various policies: a)With current policies in place b)Elimination of Direct Payments c)Raise Loan Rates ($3.50 for corn, etc.) with no DPs d)MDIS

APCA 8 Crops - Government Payments Million $

APCA Realized Net Farm Income Million $

APCA But What About the Future? Two distinct sets of “future” analyses: – One straight-line “future” represented by the 2012 USDA baseline – A “future” roughly patterned after the historical experience of and the variation we experienced tested against various policies: a)With current policies in place b)Elimination of Direct Payments c)Raise Loan Rates ($3.50 for corn, etc.) with no DPs d)MDIS

APCA Policy Description MDIS Specifications for Study Period –MDIS corn loan rate set at $3.50 –Other crop loan rates set to historic ratios with corn – Minimize distortion –Release price is set at 160% of loan rate

APCA Policy Description MDIS Specifications for Study Period –MDIS maximums Corn – 3 billion bushels Wheat – 800 million bushels Soybeans – 400 million bushels –Farmer storage payment rate 40¢/bu./yr –Eliminate Direct Payments, LDPs, & CCPs except for rice and cotton

APCA Corn Price Loan Rate and Release Price

APCA Corn Price Loan Rate and Release Price with Baseline

APCA Corn Price Loan Rate and Release Price with Scenarios

APCA

APCA Corn Prices Average Per Year Over Each Period Shocked Baseline MDIS $3.43 $4.07 $5.75 $5.29 $4.59 $4.68

APCA MDIS Stocks Corn Wheat Million Bu. Soybeans

APCA 8 Crops – Value of Exports Million $

APCA 8 Crops - Value of Exports Average Per Year Over Each Period Shocked Baseline MDIS $ Billion $29.9 $35.4 $46.5 $47.0 $38.2 $41.2

APCA 8 Crops - Government Payments Million $

APCA 8 Crops – Government Payments Average Per Year Over Each Period Shocked MDIS $ Billion $4.9 $3.0 $2.3 $4.9 $2.6 $4.9

APCA 8 Crops – Government Payments Average Per Year Over Each Period Shocked New LR No DP MDIS $ Billion $14.8 $3.0 $0.2 $2.3 $6.5 $2.6

APCA Value of Production + Government Payments - Cash Expenses: 8 Crops Million $

APCA Value of Production + Government Payments - Cash Expenses: 8 Crops Average Per Year Over Each Period Shocked MDIS $ Billion $16.0 $33.8 $66.7 $59.5 $41.4 $46.6

APCA Realized Net Farm Income Million $

APCA Realized Net Farm Income Average Per Year Over Each Period Shocked MDIS $ Billion $59.2 $70.6 $92.4 $88.5 $75.8 $79.5

Conclusions and Policy Implications – MDIS allows market forces to work Wide price band Reduces erroneous/exaggerated market signals that lead to inefficient resource allocation and non-optimal investment decisions – MDIS provides important trade benefits Helps ensure grain is available for export even in the “tight” times so U.S. remains a dependable supplier Eliminates “dumping” charges by export competitors and enhances value of exports, improves balance of trade

Conclusions and Policy Implications – MDIS helps stabilize grain prices internationally Benefits producers and consumers for which grain is a staple – MDIS could save tens of billions of dollars in: Existing commodity payment programs Emergency payments that inevitably would come with a market crash Government subsidies to exploding revenue insurance liabilities – Above all, crops farmers get their income from market and grain demanders are not subsidized or “overcharged.”

Thank You