Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues JEANNE PERKINS Consultant, ABAG Earthquake and Hazards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting USGS Research to Use: User Perspectives on Research Evolution, Accomplishments, and Challenges USGS Earthquake Hazards Program (EHP) Lloyd S. Cluff.
Advertisements

Infrastructure Interdependencies Research Update Dana Brechwald, Earthquake and Hazards Specialist Lifeline Committee Meeting January 31, 2013.
Infrastructure Interdependencies Research Approach
1 The Bay Area Toll Authority — Back to the Future? Steve Heminger Executive Director Steve Heminger Executive Director.
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission Greater Vancouver’s Livability Forum June 1, 2009 TOLL: The Four Letter Word of.
Disaster Preparedness and Recovery: Louisiana’s Experience Donald J. Vandal Deputy Commissioner for Finance & Administration Louisiana Board of Regents.
Liquefaction, Landslides, and Fault Rupture Tom Holzer Research Engineering Geologist 1.
LOMA PRIETA, CA EARTHQUAKE OCTOBER 17, 1989 Dr. Walter Hays, Global Alliance For Disaster Reduction.
National Focus, Local Touch COLLABORATION IS THE KEY Ellis M. Stanley, Sr., CEM General Manager, Emergency Preparedness Department City of Los Angeles.
38° 37.5° 37° 123°122°121° google: cisn shakemap nc
EBMUD: A Decade of Seismic Mitigation Progress – More Work to Do By Bill Cain, S.E. Project Manager Seismic Mitigation Planning Member, ABAG Lifeline Infrastructure.
Class 14a: Natural hazards Vulnerability and disaster Geologic events Climatic events.
Fall 2006 MUSE 11B Catastrophic Earthquakes. There are many types of catastrophic events Both natural and manmade.
California Earthquakes. Sylmar Earthquake About: When: 6:00 A.M. February 9, 1971 Where: San Fernando Valley What: Ruptured segment of the San Fernando.
Long-Term Disaster Recovery Top 10 Action Items Association of Bay Area Governments April 2010.
Regional Long-Term Disaster Recovery Planning Association of Bay Area Governments April 2010.
Application of HAZUS TM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project Prepared for: Federal Emergency Management Agency Central US Earthquake Consortium Prepared.
C.E.R.T. Community Emergency Response Team What is it, who are they?
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part III Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
 New Zealand Earthquake New Zealand Earthquake  6.3 Magnitude Earthquake  185 Deaths  injuries  Over 1,400 buildings were red or yellow tagged.
1 Electric and Gas Service: Recovery after Disaster Association of Bay Area Governments Infrastructure Interdependencies Workshop Jon Frisch Manager, Business.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
LOMA PRIETA EARTHQUAKE OF WHAT WAS IT? The Loma Prieta earthquake, also known as the World Series earthquake, was a major earthquake that struck.
Dam Failure Dams are generally an expensive structure that directly affect the economy of the area through power generation, flood control and water supply.
Future Bay Area Earthquakes – Water & Sewer Issues JEANNE PERKINS ABAG Earthquake and Hazards Program Consultant.
Understand Bay Area Problems. Bay Area Faults Earth Material.
Implementing HAZUS-MH in Pre-Disaster Mitigation
Congressional Hazards Caucus October 11, Scenario Study Area More than half state’s population. –Six of the 10 largest cities in state. Cornerstone.
Session 131 A community profile provides a base for overlay analysis and for discussing a hazard’s impacts on a community.
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
Regional Transportation Emergency Management Plan BARCFirst, BENS & BRMA Joint Infrastructure Symposium June 25, 2009 Radiah T. Victor, Sr. Program Coordinator.
The Next Bay Area Earthquake
The next big earthquake at SFO (coming soon) Tom Brocher USGS, Coordinator, NC Earthquake Hazard Investigations M Hayward.
BUILDING RESILIENT COMMUNITIES Dr. Barbara Carby The Cayman Islands LEADERS 2006, Jamaica.
Chris Tokas S.E. Manager, Hospital Seismic Retrofit Program Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Status of the California Hospital Seismic.
PROJECT IMPACT Building Disaster-Resistant Communities.
The Bay Area Transportation Challenge: An Overview Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission September 2007.
Bay Area Earthquake Impacts and Earthquake Impacts on Utilities and Transportation Systems Infrastructure Interdependencies Workshop I – Utilities and.
EARTHQUAKE Preparing for and Responding to Disasters.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Zack Bick Erin Riggs Alicia Helton Cara Dickerson Presentation by:
SEISMIC HAZARD. Seismic risk versus seismic hazard Seismic Hazard is the probability of occurrence of a specified level of ground shaking in a specified.
Final Infrastructure Interdependencies Research Approach Dana Brechwald, Earthquake and Hazards Specialist Lifeline Committee Meeting October 25, 2012.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Earthquake Risk in the Bay Area: The Hayward Fault Ellen Metzger BAESI March 23, 2013.
JASON MASTERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES - PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Association of Bay Area Governments School & Health Care Systems School & Health Care Systems Bay Area Disaster.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Association of Bay Area Governments Role of K-12 Schools and Universities in Long-Term Disaster Recovery Jeanne.
Metropolitan Transportation Commission & Bay Area Toll Authority January 19, 2006 Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE PART 2: Informing Community Stakeholders About Global Earthquake Disaster Situations Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
1 Case Study: Pacific Gas & Electric Company San Francisco Lifelines Council Edwards Salas Senior Vice President, Engineering and Operations, PG&E February,
Bay Area Toll Bridges By: Rachel Sanders and Zeltzin Lucas.
1868 Hayward Earthquake “the great San Francisco earthquake” Shaking intensities were strong from San Leandro south through Hayward towards Alvarado They.
Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
San Francisco Earthquake 1989 Loma Prieta. What happened? October 17 th pm 20 seconds duration Magnitude 7 Intensity IX Enormous amounts of damage.
1 Caltrans District 4 - ABAG Workshop - INFRASTRUCTURE INTERDEPENDENCIES January 31, 2012 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) www. dot.ca.gov.
THE MAGNITUDE 6.0 NAPA, CA EARTHQUAKE 3:20 AM, AUGUST 24, 2014 Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
Water Sector Presentation II for ABAG Interdependencies Workshop I Steve Dennis Alameda County Water District January 31, 2012.
THE FIVE PILLARS OF DISASTER RESILIENCE Part 2: Protection Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. TAIWAN PART I: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Union City A SSOCIATION OF B AY A REA G OVERNMENTS.
JASON MASTERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SENIOR
Application of HAZUSTM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project
Presentation to Coachella’s City Council October 8, 2014
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE PART 3: Helping Community First Responders Prepare for Expected And Unexpected Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake Mitigation and Reconstruction
HayWired We Can Outsmart Disaster
Presentation transcript:

Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues JEANNE PERKINS Consultant, ABAG Earthquake and Hazards Program

Realistically – earthquakes dominate any analysis. 141

Shaking Hazard - Loma Prieta Versus Entire Hayward Shaking Hazard - Loma Prieta Versus Entire Hayward

Key External “inputs” to business?* Key External “inputs” to business?* 1 - People? safety/housing/families? 2 - Transportation? roads/bridges/airports? 3 - Utilities? power/ communications / water? *NOTE: these are “beyond” your facilities and equipment

1 – People: Housing Impacts 1 – People: Housing Impacts

Past Housing Impacts Over 16,000 uninhabitable units in Loma Prieta Over 46,000 uninhabitable units in Northridge Over 155,000 uninhabitable units in future Hayward or San Andreas earthquakes

What Happens - M 6.9 on Entire Hayward Fault What Happens - M 6.9 on Entire Hayward Fault 155,700 uninhabitable units (300,000 – Katrina) 356,600 people displaced (1,700,000 – Katrina) 110,300 peak shelter population

What Happens - M 6.7 on Southern Hayward Fault What Happens - M 6.7 on Southern Hayward Fault 93,000 uninhabitable units 220,000 people displaced 70,000 peak shelter population

The Nightmare Goes On and On...

The Housing Crisis Goes On and On... SHELTERING Peak - 70,000 people on day 7 25,000 in shelters on day 90

.. and On and On... DOLLAR LOSSES Residential Losses = $ 90 Billion Losses Covered by Earthquake Insurance = $ 4.4 Billion – 5%

Multifamily vs. Single-Family 84% of the problem in the Southern Hayward Earthquake Nightmare

Collapse: 1994 Northridge Quake

Who Has the Housing Problem? Workers repairing the housing Workers repairing the roads Workers repairing the pipelines Workers running the offices ALL OF USALL OF US

2 - Transportation Impacts

2 PAST EARTHQUAKES 142 road closures in Loma Prieta 140 road closures in Northridge 18 FUTURE EARTHQUAKES 17 Bigger than these earthquakes 0 Bigger than New Orleans

What Happens - M 6.9 on Entire Hayward Fault -- 1,650 total closures – (1,138 if South Hayward) Most toll bridges not usable for days Some problems in the Hwy. 101 and 37 corridors in Marin, SF and San Mateo counties Entire East Bay isolated

7 state-owned toll bridges: ◦San Francisco-Oakland Bay ◦San Mateo-Hayward ◦Dumbarton ◦Richmond-San Rafael ◦Carquinez ◦Benicia-Martinez ◦Antioch PLUS - ◦Golden Gate (GGBHD) * Golden Gate Bridge owned and operated by the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (GGBHTD) * Initial Mitigation Priority = Key Facilities Initial Mitigation Priority = Key Facilities

Yes! Progress!

Recovery Timeline

PROBLEM = Roads vs. Transportation Structures Hundreds of road closures due to faulting and liquefaction and…. These same roads will have water pipeline breaks. Isolation and HORRIBLE access with repairs delayed due to number, not complexity, of problem.

Airport System Impacts

What Happens - M 6.9 on Entire Hayward Fault What Happens - M 6.9 on Entire Hayward Fault SFO probably disruption / access OAK probably CLOSED SJC disruption - should be OK due to retrofit /rebuilding completed in 2003 ABAG working to get a recovery plan for airports

3 - Utility System Impacts

What Happens to Water Lines- M 6.9 on Entire Hayward Fault What Happens to Water Lines- M 6.9 on Entire Hayward Fault 507 documented water pipeline leaks/ruptures in Loma Prieta BUT IN A HAYWARD QUAKE: 5,500 leaks/ ruptures due to shaking PLUS 100 or more due to landslides PLUS 500 due to faulting PLUS 1,000-2,000 ? due to liquefaction

Initial Mitigation Priority = Key Facilities Initial Mitigation Priority = Key Facilities Water storage Aqueducts Water treatment Wastewater treatment Pumps and pumping plants Tunnels

Distribution Systems Not Yet Fixed Assume that water may be disrupted for weeks or months – not 72 hours. Additional delays due to problems with the roads (access) and impacted workers.

Bay Area Earthquakes – Big Picture Efforts Bay Area Earthquakes – Big Picture Efforts

Bay Area Multi-Jurisdiction Local Hazard Mitigation Plan GOAL – To develop a disaster-resistant region by Reducing the potential loss of life, property damage, and environmental degradation from natural disasters, while Speeding economic recovery from those disasters.

Long-Term Recovery Initiative GOAL – 3 years to recovery – not 10 years Financing Recovery Recovery of Government Housing (including soft-story) Business (particularly small local ones)

Long-Term Recovery (continued) Utilities and Transportation Schools and Education Health Care Land Use Change Governance

Where is ABAG’s information on the internet? AND we need your feedback on these MITIGATION and RECOVERY efforts!