REDD Alert: Governance package Joyeeta Gupta and the IVM team
Int. Forestry agreements Int. climate & forestry ag. National forestry gov. Incentives & disincentive Redesign of incentives Human behaviour Other driving factors Impact on forests Architecture: Regime design Incentives: What incentives are created? Agency: Who is pushing the regime? Access: How are basic rights affected? Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place? Functions: What functions are served?
Int. Forestry agreements Int. climate & forestry ag. National forestry gov. Incentives & disincentive Redesign of incentives Human behaviour Other driving factors Impact on forests Architecture: Regime design Incentives: What incentives are created? Agency: Who is pushing the regime? Access: How are basic rights affected? Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place? Functions: What functions are served?
Incentives, Architecture, Agency, Access and Allocation, Functions International climate Related forestry issues Implications for national policy International forestry agreements REDD Implications for national policy International forestry agreements Linkages and comparative assessment International National
PublicPrivate Global level Region al level CBD WHCCITES UNCCD UNFCCCWTORamsarILO UNPFII UNFF UNEP UNDP FAO World Bank IMF FSC C&I processes [NGOs] [Business] MCPFE ATO CBFP AFP CCAD Alpine Convention ACTO ASEAN SADC LRTAP UN-REDD ITTO FLEG Western Hemisphere Convention COMIFAC GEF EU PEFCC [Donors] CPF
UNFCCC CBD Ramsar ILO CITES WTO ITTO FSC
UNFCCC CBD Ramsar ILO CITES WTO ITTO FSC Provisioning Functions Spiritual & recreational functions
Deliverable 1: Conclusions Issue for long on agenda and yet no regime; different actors try to fill the void – Why? (sovereignty; lack of real commitment; conflict with decentralization/subsidiarity; high opportunity costs) Very few focus on sustainable forest management (e.g. ITTA) Differential drivers; no regime aims at tackling key causes Coordination efforts (CPF) weak
Forest and climate related regimes Criteria for selection of regimes Selection of regimes Description and analysis of regimes
Criteria for selection of regimes Mandate to address deforestation Availability of relevant policy documents Track record of bodies Inclusion of incentives/ disincentives Covering different functions/ services Active in shaping REDD discussions Involvement of case study countries
Selection of regimes Climate change ?? Does the above selection imply a loss of knowledge? Does this need to be compensated?
Design of analysis Architecture: Brief outline of key features Agency: Who is pushing for what in the regime? Access and allocation: what does the regime say about who has/ should have access to forestry and how allocation of forest services/ functions are organized? Policy: key policy goals Incentives and disincentives: Which instruments does it include? Impact on national policy: What is the impact of these instruments on national policy in general and in the case study countries in particular? What are the lessons learnt?
Int. Forestry agreements Int. climate & forestry ag. National forestry gov. Incentives & disincentive Redesign of incentives Human behavior Other driving factors Impact on forests Architecture: Regime design Incentives: What incentives are created? Agency: Who is pushing the regime? Access: How are basic rights affected? Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place? Functions: What functions are served? Focus on
Int. Forestry agreements Int. climate & forestry ag. National forestry gov. Incentives & disincentive Redesign of incentives Human behavior Other driving factors Impact on forests Architecture: Regime design Incentives: What incentives are created? Agency: Who is pushing the regime? Access: How are basic rights affected? Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place? Functions: What functions are served? Focus on Case studies and economic analysis
For D 4.4 Comparative Case study