LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Detector Hall Configuration Overview New baseline (Hybrid A’) proposed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kitakami IR Access Discussions T. Markiewicz/SLAC 13 May 2014 SiD Meeting / AWLC Fermilab.
Advertisements

SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Assembly Hall in Hybrid-A’ and ILD 2014/9/6 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
SiD assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May. 14, 2014 ALCW 2014, Fermilab Infrastructures & Timeline for Hybrid Access.
CFS near term & Required ADI input CFS near term & Required ADI input 6-12 month activities, required ADI information 10. AUG 2014CFS-ADI Joint Meeting1.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Reduced Bunch Number 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
DH in Hybrid-A and ILD 2014/9/5 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
Cryogenic cavern in Asian site Conceptual design of the cryogenic system Layout of the cryogenic plant for site A & B New layout of the cryogenic system.
Global Design Effort - CFS for Asian Single Tunnel Configuration Design Progress Masanobu Miyahara KEK.
LCC Linear Collider Collaboratio ILC - CFS 12 November 2013 LCWS13 Tokyo University 1 Site-specific CF design from TDR LCWS13, 12 November 2013 Atsushi.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC CFS and Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC CFS AND GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP GENERAL.
CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group.
1 Alternative assembly option of ILD Y.Sugimoto 2010/10/18 ILD Integration
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Positron Source Relocation 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
Global Design Effort - CFS SiD Collaboration Meeting - SLAC 1 VERTICAL ACCESS ILC IR LAYOUT for SiD and ILD CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
LCWS14 - Belgrade October 6-10, 2014 Conventional Facilities & Siting Working Group Summary V Kuchler, M Miyahara, J Osborne.
ILC experimental area - How to ‘develop’ CFS details for TDP (cavern size, number of shafts, HVAC, EL spec etc) ? - KEK site specific issues CFS V.Kuchler.
PD5: Detector Integration / Machine Detector Interface T. Markiewicz/SLAC 15 May 2014 SiD Meeting / AWLC Fermilab Summary.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
1 Global Design Effort TILC08 - WG1 Summary WG-1: Cost Reduction Studies J. Carwardine, T. Shidara, N. Walker (For WG-1 participants)
More than an idea not yet a project 1 Meeting Issues & Goals CFS-ADI Tokyo 2014 Mike Harrison.
27 Nov 07 VM Workshop Global Design Effort 1 ILC – Superconducting Linear Collider Marc Ross, Project Manager GDE Fermilab.
TDR Status of Asian CFS Team Part II: The ILC Baseline Reference Ch.SectionSubsectionsAuthor1 st draft 112: Asian Region Siting Studies Overview Location.
10/2010 IWLC2010 Global Design Effort 1 Brief Overview of Interaction Region Conventional Facilities in RDR Times Presenter Tom Lackowski.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC10 Beijing, March, Single-Tunnel Accelerator Configuration Of Asian Region Atsushi Enomoto (KEK)
The fourth Baseline Technical Review (BTR) - Conventional Facilities and Siting March 2012 All changes made to the CFS 2007 Reference Design during.
ILD requirement for assembly space and time 2015/11/3 Yasuhiro 1.
Strategy of detector solenoid construction Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 1.
Experimental Areas Studies Lessons learnt at CMS M Gastal & CMS Technical Coordination (A Ball, W Zeuner)
3/20/11 ALCPG11 Global Design Effort 1 CFS Detector Hall Considerations Tom Lackowski.
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
Access Yard Assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC), November 13, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
Construction Schedule for Baseline and Hybrid A’ Configuration 1 5 th September, 2014 J-POWER MDI-CFS Meeting - Ichinoseki City, JAPAN.
March 22, –  Design Concept & Hall Layout  Access Tunnel  Top heading Tunnel  Displacement of detector hall by push-pull operation.
Assembly scenario of ILD Si trackers 2015/4/21 Yasuhiro 1.
ILD and SiD in Japanese site (from discussions in SiD/ILD E/D Interface Working Meeting) Yasuhiro Sugimoto, Marco Oriunno 2011/12/15 SiD
1 May 22, Y.Sugimoto Update of detector hall in mountain region.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site 2011/11/30 Yasuhiro CFS Webex meeting 1.
S UPER B site status report S. Tomassini INFN-LNF On behalf of SuperB Collaboration SuperB general meeting– Frascati – December 1-5, 2009.
AWLC14 - FERMILAB May 12-16, 2014 Conventional Facilities & Siting Working Group Summary V Kuchler, A Enomoto, J Osborne.
An idea of ILD general assembly plan 2015/10/8 Yasuhiro Integration Meeting 1.
Access Hall Study for Cryogenics High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK- LC Project Office Masanobu Miyahara 2 Nov
1 Update of detector hall in mountain regions Y.Sugimoto in Granada.
ILC Utility Design Study for Kitakami-site
Civil Design for Tunnel Case Studies
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
2016/9/30 Yasuhiro Infra/CFS mini-ws
Updated Design of Detector Hall
Introduction and Meeting Objectives
Detector Utility/Service Cavern
Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting
LCWS11 AWG9 PARALLEL SESSION SUMMARY
Marco Oriunno (SLAC), March 12, 2014 MDI WG
Experimental hall design in Japanese site
Current Site Status at IP Preliminary survey of campus
Detector Service Cavern for ILC
Hybrid Access Optional Study
Summary Some Issues of Future Consideration
Detector hall in mountain regions
Status of Cryogenics Facilities Design
Change Request Panel report
Cost & Schedule between Shaft and Adit for Access of Detector Hall
Detector hall in mountain regions
Extract from today’s talk given to DCB
Kitakami IR Access Discussions
8-10 April 2014 CFS-ADI Joint Meeting
Presentation transcript:

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Detector Hall Configuration Overview New baseline (Hybrid A’) proposed KEK Linear Collider Project Office Masanobu Miyahara 13 Jan SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Ⅰ. Prospect of the Design & Construction at IR Ⅱ. Overview of the DH Scheme Change Ⅲ. Outline of the Ground facilities arrangement Ⅳ. Summary Contents 2SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Basic D. Detailed D. Surface Design Construction (Assembly) Com. Construction Under Ground Installation Commissioning IR Construction can be considered in three Phases Assembly Pre-assembly Operation Phase-1 Testing Pre- Design TDR Conceptual D. EDR Project Approval Ground Breaking Prospect of the DH Design & Construction at IR Assumption! Phase-2 Phase-3 RDR Phase-1 Construction phase of the Underground & Above ground facilities Phase-2 Machine Assembly phase during the Underground construction Phase-3 Installation & Testing phase after the Detector assembling completion Scope of ILC project schedule Pre-Project Construction Phase 3SiD Workshop at SLAC Operation Phase Design Phase

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Overview of the DH scheme change From the EDMS Benno List Assembly Hall Main Shaft Utility Shaft Damping Ring BDS Access Portal Detector Hall Access Tunnel 3D Design Integration model: Underground and Surface Facilities 3D Model: New Baseline Proposal (Hybrid A’) 4SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator PM-8 PM-12 PM-13 PM+8 IR PM-10 PM+13 PM+12 PM+10 Satetsugawa River Longitudinal section of KITAKAMI Site Mt. HAYAMA-yama IP & Access Point moved approximately 800 m to the North New Baseline location in KITAKAMI Site 5SiD Workshop at SLAC Mt. AWARA-yama

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator TDR BaselineNew Baseline Installation Maximum Load: 400t - Through Access Tunnel - Special large trailer Assembly Period: short - 3Y (only in the underground) Maximum Load: 4000t(Gantry) - Through Vertical Shaft - Gantry Crane Assembly Period: long - 5.5~6Y (including on the surface) Accessibility Electric Car or Walking (Access Tunnel) Elevator or Walking (EV in the Utility Shaft, AT) Disaster Prevention Evacuation: through AT Exhaust(air, smoke, He): Through AT Evacuation: through US & AT Exhaust(air, smoke, He): Through VS Utility Service (Supply & Return) Cooling Water, Air, Helium: - Through AT Cooling Water, Air, Helium: - Through VS Value of the DH scheme change Comparison study of the basic function 6SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Underground Facilities Detector Hall Access Tunnel Damping Ring BDS Tunnel Main Shaft Utility Shaft Access Tunnel -Detector Hall w25m x h42m x L108m -Main Shaft Φ18m x h100m -Utility Shaft Φ10m x h100m -Access Tunnel w8.0m x h7.5m Overview of the DH scheme change 3D Integration Model : Geometry & Underground Facilities 7 SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Access Tunnel Damping Ring BDS Tunnel Assembly Hall Utility Service Building Underground & Above Ground Facilities Overview of the DH scheme change 8SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator TDR Baseline Overview of the DH scheme change 9SiD Workshop at SLAC 144m Remarks AT connection is perpendicular to DH at ILD side Assembling space is 33m outside of park position Utility Shaft /D10m SiD 108m Remarks Connecting points of access tunnel are located at both end of Detector hall Because securing the separation distance from alcoves in the point of cavern stability. New Baseline Proposed (Hybrid A’) ILD SiD Main Shaft MS/D18m

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Outline of Baseline & New Baseline TDR BaselineNew Baseline Proposed Experimental hall (DH) is located below peak of Mt. HAYAMA. Transportation of the components: through the Horizontal tunnel Accelerator transportation(DR) : through the Horizontal tunnel(AT) Experimental hall (DH) is located in the north side foot of Mt. HAYAMA. Transportation of large components: through the Vertical shaft (D18.0m) Security of the flat land for Detector assembly above the IR DH/AT W8m Grad10% Assembly Yard DH DR Surface Yard DR/ AT W8m Grad10% DH/AT W11m Grad7% Assembly Yard DH DR DR Surface Yard DR/ AT W8m Grad10% Overview of the DH scheme change Mt. HAYAMA 10SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Assembly scheme & Transportation TDR BaselineNew Baseline Proposed Detector must be assembled in the DH underground after pre-assembled in the above ground facilities. These pieces are transported to DH by the special large trailer. Magnetic field measurement must be carried out in DH. Detector is assembled and tested mainly on the above ground. Heavy equipment is lowered to DH using temporary gantry crane (4000t). Magnetic field measurement can be carried out at the assembly hall on the above ground. Overview of the DH scheme change 11SiD Workshop at SLAC CMS like AssemblySpecial large trailer

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Construction Cost Impact TDR BaselineNew Baseline Proposed Two access tunnels were assumed in the baseline for DR & DH. DH cavern volume is bigger in order to secure assembling work space. All piping and cabling from the surface are very large quantity for through the access tunnel. Permanent large crane equipment is necessary in DH for assembly work. DH construction costs are estimated to be reduced slightly than Baseline. Main factor of cost reduction - Reduction of DH cavern volume (160,000m3→120,000m3) - Significant reduction in service length of mechanical facilities. (Cooling Water, Drainage, Ducting,etc.) - Initial cost reduction of Handling Equipment. Baseline Hybrid-A’ Overview of the DH scheme change 12SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Schedule Impact TDR BaselineNew Baseline Proposed Total periods from construction start to assembling work completion is needed for 116 months. Excavation volume of DH cavern is big (W=25m, H=42m,L=142m) An assembly period after the DH cavern completion is so long Total period from construction start to install completion is 103 months. Excavation volume of DH cavern is smaller (W=25m, H=42m,L=108m) Most of assembly work are performed on the ground, assembly period at the underground is short. Hybrid-A’ Overview of the DH scheme change 13SiD Workshop at SLAC 116 months 103 months

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Research Office bldg. Cooling Towers 20 units Cooling Towers for CGP 5 units He Gas tanks 1,600m3 Integrated Service bldg. 40m x 100m Cryogenic plant 40m x 30m Utility plant area 40m x 40m Electric facility 20m x 20m UT Shaft & Entrance hall 40m x 30m Parking space Assembly hall. 27m x 181m Emergency Generator 20m x 20m Facility Arrangement on the above ground in Operation Phase Site Area Upper/DH: 50,000 m 2 Lower/DR: 20,000 m 2 Outline of the ground facilities 14SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator 37.0m52.5m Assembly Area Main Shaft 67.0 (65.0)m64.0 (62.0m)m 20.0m (20.0m) 17.0(15.0)m Platform 12.5m Platform 25.0m 50.0m Shaft Construction Area 27.0 (25.0)m Outer space ILD: L67.0m x w27.0m SiD: L64.0m x w27.0m Outer space ILD: L67.0m x w27.0m SiD: L64.0m x w27.0m ILDSiDCommon ILD 18.0m 62.0m SiD 181.0m Required Space of Assembly Hall Outline of the ground facilities 15SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Ground facilities in Operation FacilitiesCondition Assembly HallW27m×L181m×H31m A=4,900m 2 Research Office Bldg. W50m×L20m× ? stories A=? m 2 (Tentative DRAFT) Integrated Utility Service Bldg. W40m×L100m×H30m H15m A=4,000 m 2 Cryogenic plant area. W40m×L30m×H15m A=1,200 m 2 Utility plant area. W40m×L40m×H7m A=1,600 m 2 Electric facility area. W20m×L40m×H7m A=800 m 2 including Emergency Generator and Fuel tanks UT shaft entrance and control W40m×L30m×H7m A=1,200 m 2 Cooling TowerFor Cryogenic: 5 units. (15m x 12m, A=180 m 2 ) For other facilities: 20 units. (50m x 12m, A=600 m 2 ) Cryogenic plant tanksHe gas tank 1,600 m 3 Ni liquid tank 10,000 L He Buffer Tanks10,000 L : Outline of the ground facilities 16SiD Workshop at SLAC

Other Surface Facilities at IR LINEA COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator In case of the central campus will be located in the distance Consideration of the Social Service Facilities Should we consider whether the following surface facilities are necessity? CategoryFacilityScaleRemarks Research Life Support Cafeteria?Canteen, Coffee lounge Convenience shop?Foods & Drink, etc. Medical office??Health center? Nurse’s room? AccommodationShort-term stay??Need or not? InformationVisitor Center??Visitor lounge, Site tour? Others?? Outline of the ground facilities  Study of the necessary facilities and calculation of optimal size are needed. 17SiD Workshop at SLAC

LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Summary The total construction period can be reduced about 1y. Accessibility to the underground is good and attractive. The construction cost is also perspective cheaper than the baseline. DH Scheme change Above Ground facilities The basic plan of the Assembly hall can be almost agreed. Utility facilities will need more detailed study in near future. More study about the necessary facility at IR is required. Future Prospect and Problems Basic planning is important activity toward the design stage. Geological Survey is an important issue for the decision of DH location and structure. 18SiD Workshop at SLAC