PERCEPTION. Why an issue? Sensory perception a key source of our beliefs about the world. Empiricism – senses the basis of knowledge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is the World Like for Other People? Perception and Reality Things Are Not Always As They Seem...
Advertisements

“What Is It Like To Be a Bat?”. Depth Perception The world (visually) appears to us as though it is three-dimensional. Some things appear closer to us.
Perception & the External World
© Michael Lacewing Direct realism Michael Lacewing
Meditations on First Philosophy
Berkeley’s idealism (brief)
Huiming Ren Shandong University of China. What we could learn from the case of veridical perceptions.
Sense Perception: Appearance and Reality
By Amelia, Caitlin, Dani and Andrew
Defending Common Sense Direct Realism. The trouble with sense-data  Key feature of Representative Realism and anti-realist theories. But…  The object/appearance.
General Psychology (PY110) Chapter 3 Sensation and Perception.
Direct realism Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Representative realism Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Direct and representative realism Michael Lacewing
Indirect realism Michael Lacewing
Defending direct realism Hallucinations. We can identify when we are hallucinating Another sense can help us detect what is reality and what is a hallucination.
A classic philosophical conundrum: If a tree falls in a forest and no-one hears it fall, does it make a sound?
Criticisms of Direct Realism The Time Lag Argument
Michael Lacewing Idealism: objections Michael Lacewing
The Problems of Philosophy Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey.
Quantum theory and Consciousness This is an interactive discussion. Please feel free to interrupt at any time with your questions and comments.
Philosophy of Mind Lecture 6 The Phenomenology of Experience and the Objects of Perception.
“The Problem of Knowledge” Chapter 1 – Theory of Knowledge.
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
Finding our way back  The initial result of Descartes’ use of hyperbolic doubt is the recognition that at least one thing cannot be doubted, at least.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Perception is… Awareness of things (aka reality) through our 5 senses Sight Smell Touch Hearing Taste.
Sense Perception Chapter 4.
Human Nature 2.3 The Mind-Body Problem: How Do Mind and Body Relate?
Berkeley’s idealism (long) Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
BERKELEY AND IDEALISM Strange to claim there is an external world;
The Problem of Knowledge 1 Pages 3-9. Table of Contents Quotes p. 3 Quotes Introduction p. 4 Introduction Common sense p. 4-7 Common sense Certainty p.
Epistemology Tihamér Margitay, Péter Hartl 2. Perception.
Feedback from 5 mark question: Outline and explain the argument from perceptual variation as an objection to direct realism. Point to consider: DR = objects.
KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXTERNAL WORLD THEORIES OF PERCEPTION.
A tree falls in a forest but there is no one to hear it, does it make a sound?
The secondary quality argument for indirect realism R1.When I look at a rose, I see something that is red. R2.The red thing cannot be the rose itself (since.
Need worksheet from yellow folder – arg from perceptual variation.
Eliminative materialism
11/3 & 11/4 Do Now: Take out your TOK ESSAY!!!! Do Now: Take out your TOK ESSAY!!!! Make sure your NAME & TITLE are at the top!!!! Make sure your NAME.
What is an example of a secondary quality?
Phenomenalism. …  To be is to be perceivable  Problems with Idealism – Commitment to God or to the ‘gappy’ existence of objects Confusion at the heart.
Perception. Introduction 5 senses: sight, touch, sound, taste and smell Sacrifice a sense? Least & most willing? Least = vision – identified with knowledge.
TOK: Ways of Knowing Sense Perception. ‘ He who has been bitten by a snake fears a piece of string’ Persian proverb.
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Testi Fil. in Inglese Lezione 8, (1a ora)
Scientific Realism: Appearance and Reality Reality what a concept Ian Hacking.
Michael Lacewing Sense data Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Direct Realism Understand the Direct Realists Argument
Michael Lacewing Direct realism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Direct Realism Criticisms
On your whiteboards… What key information can you remember about Direct Realism? (Without your notes) What is the argument from illusion? Why is it a problem.
Indirect realism Learning objectives: to understand the objection to indirect realism that it leads to scepticism about the nature of the external world.
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Michael Lacewing Indirect realism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Indirect Realism Understand the argument put forward by the indirect realist. Explain how a indirect realist would respond to perceptual problems. ‘Does.
The secondary quality argument for indirect realism
Michael Lacewing Berkeley’s idealism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
2 The Matrix (2) What is Reality?.
Unit 2: How can we ever achieve certainty?
Recap So Far: Direct Realism
Recap – Direct Realism - Issues
Do we directly perceive objects? (25 marks)
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
What keywords / terms have we used so far
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
Think / Pair / Share - Primary + Secondary Qualities
2 The Matrix What is Reality (2).
2 The Matrix (2) What is Reality?.
Presentation transcript:

PERCEPTION

Why an issue? Sensory perception a key source of our beliefs about the world. Empiricism – senses the basis of knowledge.

Key questions What is the relationship between me (the subject) and the world? What is the relationship between appearance and reality? When I perceive something, what is it that I am aware of? How are misperceptions and illusions to be explained? What happens when an object is not being perceived? What can we know of it?

The common sense approach to the questions… One’s awareness or perception is directly of the object. The object exists independently of us. The object is the cause of my perceptual experience. When unperceived the object retains (at least some of) its properties.

The challenge of illusions

PARIS IN THE THE SPRING

The challenge to direct realism The Time-Lag Argument. There is a time lag between my perception of an object and the object actually having the properties I perceive it to possess.

Well-known objection to direct realism but one that is easily answered. It trades on a confusion between two senses of immediate. Immediate #1:without delay Immediate #2:direct, without anything coming between.

A bigger worry… Misperception and Illusion a round coin can appear elliptical from certain angles, a straight stick bent when in water, parallel lines convergent as they move into the distance, a non-existent limb can feel painful to an amputee The basic problem is how to explain why an apparently direct relationship with the world can give rise to such errors. Also – think about how we can explain the phenomenal sameness of really seeing a small green man and having an hallucination of a small green man.

Physics and perceptual experience Physics tells us how the world really is. Yet we do not experience the world as it is described in our best physical theory, even though according to direct realism it is with the world as such that I have direct contact. Furthermore, at least some of the properties an object has seem to depend upon the perspective of the observer

The appeal to representative realism… Faced by the challenges to direct realism, particularly the view that the realist struggles to explain the obvious fact that we do suffer misperceptions and illusions. The realist can suggest that our direct awareness is of inner, mental objects representing the thing out there in the world. That is, we preserve realism by introducing sense data.

Hmm… Let’s try to picture the claim…

What the hell are sense-data? If I see a dagger or hallucinate one, it looks the same. There is a dagger-shaped object in my visual field. This object is called a (visual) sense-datum. A visual sense-datum is a two-dimensional object with a certain shape and coloured a certain way. My current visual experience is mosaic of such objects – of sense- data. As I look at the white disc before me, there is a white circular sense-datum as part of my visual experience. As I tilt the disc, it is replaced by a white elliptical sense-datum. Notice therefore that there is a distinction between the three- dimensional object in the world that remains the same and the two- dimensional sense-data that exist only so long as my visual experience does not change.

Why believe in sense-data? The Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction. Objects don’t really have colours or tastes, according to science. They are features of my ideas or sense-data. Perceptual relativity. There is a distinction between an object and its appearance: the circular disc may appear elliptical. We need to account for the fact that there is a circular thing in my visual experience. They explain misperception: the stick is not really bent but the stick-sense-datum is.

They explain hallucination: in normal perception, a real dagger causes a dagger- sense-datum in my visual experience. They explain how we can ‘see’ stars that may now be dead: the star’s light emitted millions of years ago causes a star-sense-datum when it reaches me. They fit in with modern physics: nothing is really coloured – colours are the properties of sense-data caused by the interaction of objects, light, my eyes and my brain.