Evidence and Information for Policy Health as a multi-dimensional construct and cross-population comparability Colin Mathers (WHO) on behalf of Taskforce.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United NationsUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Population Unit International initiatives on health and disability statistics.
Advertisements

2/8/2014 Measuring Disability and Monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities… … the work of the Washington Group on Disability.
Employment quality in the OECD Better Life Initiative Anne Saint-Martin Meeting of the Group of Experts on Measuring Quality of Employment September.
The ICF and statistics on disability and health Classification, Assessment, Surveys and Terminology (CAS/EIP) World Health Organization Geneva T Bedirhan.
The Budapest Initiative*: Measuring Population Health Status in Surveys and Censuses * The Joint UNECE/WHO/Eurostat Task Force on Measurement of Health.
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
Cultural practices and Environment and Participation assessment Classification, Assessment, Surveys and Terminology (CAS/EIP) World Health Organization.
The French experience with G eneral a ctivity L imitation i ndicator 6 th Tasf Force on health expectancies. June 2 d 2OO8.
Measuring the Participation of Families with Disabled Children ESRC User Fellowship Mark Woolley, Family Fund Seraphim Alvanides & Rob Forsyth University.
Disability Statistics at NCHS: An Update
Sedentary Lifestyle Are We So Lazy That It’s Killing Us?
Understanding children’s well-being: A national survey of young people’s well-being 27 January 2010.
The Definition and Measurement of Disability
Using the ICF as a Framework for Washington Group Measures Barbara M. Altman Jennifer Madans Elizabeth Rasch National Center for Health Statistics.
Worksite Solutions and Wellness Programs Felicia Wade,MD March 31 st, 2007 UMDNJ Confronting the Challenge of Obesity in Our Communities.
Measuring Disability in a Survey or Census Context: Parallel Work Advancing the Field Barbara M. Altman, Ph.D. Disability Statistics Consultant.
Working Paper No.3 Add.5 11 November 2005 STATISTICAL COMMISSION andSTATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOREUROPEAN COMMUNITIES EUROPE (EUROSTAT)
Jennifer Madans Associate Director for Science
General Disability Measures Used in Developed Countries: Question Characteristics Beth Rasch representing the collaborative work of the UN, ISTAT, and.
SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounts: A Proposed Outline and Road Map Sixth Meeting of the UN Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting.
SPECA Regional Workshop on Disability Statistics: Dec 13-15, 2006 Purposes of Disability Statistics Jennifer Madans and Barbara Altman National Center.
Successful Ageing of the Oldest Old in China Du Peng Gerontology Institute, Renmin University of China.
National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop
1 Task Force on the Development of a Common Instrument to Measure Health States: Measuring Social Relationships (plus Communication) Cameron N. McIntosh;
A comparison of barriers to physical activity faced by older and younger adults with mobility impairments Vijay Vasudevan,
Liesl Eathington Iowa Community Indicators Program Iowa State University October 2014.
ABS approach to collecting disability data and relationship to the ICF.
September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Internationally Comparable General Disability Measures Barbara M. Altman National Center for Health Statistics.
Brief Historical Overview of the Budapest Initiative and Testing Activities January 2010 Palais des Nations, United Nations Geneva, Switzerland.
Comparable Health Data Between Canada and the U.S. n Many organizations such as the United Nations, World Health Organization and the Organization of Economic.
Proposed items for the measurement of Dexterity, Vitality, Affect, Vision Lidia Gargiulo, Gabriella Sebastiani, Alessandra Tinto & Elena DePalma – ISTAT,
1 Task Force on the Development of a Common Instrument to Measure Health States: Measuring Anxiety Cameron N. McIntosh; Julie Bernier; Jean-Marie Berthelot;
Report on the Budapest Initiative* *Joint UNECE/WHO/Eurostat Task Force on Measurement of Health Status Jennifer H. Madans National Center for Health Statistics,
Report on Joint UNECE/WHO/Eurostat Task Force on Measurement of Health Status Jennifer H. Madans U.S.A.
#1 STATISTICS 542 Intro to Clinical Trials Quality of Life Assessment.
10/13/2015 Monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities… … and the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Mitchell.
UNICEF’s work and planned activities for the production of data on children with disabilities Claudia Cappa, Data and Analytics Section, UNICEF, NY.
ICF in the Australian context Working Paper No.5 21 November 2005 STATISTICAL COMMISSION andSTATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOREUROPEAN.
Washington City Group on Disability Statistics February 18-20, LANGUAGE AND CULTURAL ISSUES IN SURVEYS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION H. Van Oyen, Scientific.
Department of Health Sciences The Structure and Content of the European Health and Social Integration Survey (EHSIS) Washington Group meeting, 2011 Bermuda.
Measuring Disability in school-aged children: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey PH Pastor, CA Reuben, ME Loeb NCHS Washington,
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Section 1 Els R. Nieuwenhuijsen, PhD, MPH, OTR.
Proposed Purpose of an Internationally Comparable General Disability Measure Jennifer H. Madans, Barbara M. Altman, Elizabeth K. Rasch – NCHS Malin Synneborn,
1 Task Force on the Development of a Common Instrument to Measure Health States: Identification of Domains Sarah Connor Gorber; Cameron N. McIntosh; Julie.
Working Paper No.3 Add.4 11 November 2005 STATISTICAL COMMISSION andSTATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOREUROPEAN COMMUNITIES EUROPE (EUROSTAT)
ESS F5 Health & Food Safety UNECE/WHO/Eurostat - Measurement health status - Budapest 14-16/11/2005 Slide 1 of 10 Working Paper No.4 Rev.1 14 November.
Gender Statistics on Health Linda Hooper UNECE Statistical Division.
Extended sets – draft proposal Washington Group Meeting Dublin, Ireland 19 – 21 September 2007 Margie Schneider (Workgroup coordinator)
1 Task Force on the Development of a Common Instrument to Measure Health States: Conceptual and Logistic Issues in Item Construction Cameron N. McIntosh;
SPECA Meeting, Paris, June 16, 2006 Activities Related to Health and Disability Statistics in the UNECE Region and Globally Jennifer H. Madans for the.
Social statistics by industry - Introducing the social dimension into environmental accounts Maja Larsson & Martin Villner.
The WG Workgroup on Child Functioning and Disability Elena De Palma *, Roberta Crialesi *, Mitchell Loeb** Washington Group on Disability Statistics *Italian.
Measuring Disability: Results from the 2001 Census and the 2001 Post-Censal Disability Survey Statistics Canada January 10, 2003.
Washington D.C. February Washington City Group on Disability Statistics 1 The ICF model and survey- instruments Niels Kr. Rasmussen National Institute.
Arpo Aromaa, KTL Background, Terminology and Scope (Comment from Discussant) Working Paper No November 2005 STATISTICAL COMMISSION andSTATISTICAL.
1 Task Force on the Development of a Common Instrument to Measure Health States: Measuring Cognition Cameron N. McIntosh; Sarah Connor Gorber; Julie Bernier;
Vicky Copley, PHE Risk Factor Intelligence
UKPHR Consultative Forum 5 th November 2015 Dr Anne Kilgallen.
… the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Jennifer H. Madans National Center for Health Statistics, USA for the Washington Group on Disability.
Recent developments on disability statistics in the European Union Lucian AGAFITEI Eurostat Unit F5 “Health and food safety; Crime” 10 th meeting of the.
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
WHO ICF KNR 279.
Measurement and Health Information Systems Working Paper No.8 11 November 2005 STATISTICAL COMMISSION andSTATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION.
Stephen Nkansah-Amankra, PhD, MPH, MA 1, Abdoulaye Diedhiou, MD, PHD, H.L.K. Agbanu, MPhil, Curtis Harrod, MPH, Ashish Dhawan, MD, MSPH 1 University of.
PT 142 – Assessment in Physical Therapy Prepared by: Almira A. Tagala-Manuel, PTRP Prepared by ATM for PT 142 students AY
WG/UNICEF Child functioning module: Preliminary results from Samoa & Supporting documentation Mitchell Loeb National Center for Health Statistics/ Washington.
The concept and approach of European Quality of Life survey
Internationally Comparable General Disability Measures
Measuring outcomes Emma Frew October 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Evidence and Information for Policy Health as a multi-dimensional construct and cross-population comparability Colin Mathers (WHO) on behalf of Taskforce on Health Status Working Paper No.1 22 November 2005 STATISTICAL COMMISSION andSTATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOREUROPEAN COMMUNITIES EUROPE (EUROSTAT) CONFERENCE OF EUROPEAN WORLD HEALTH STATISTICIANS ORGANIZATION (WHO) Joint UNECE/WHO/Eurostat Meeting on the Measurement of Health Status (Budapest, Hungary, November 2005) Session 1-Invited paper

Evidence and Information for Policy Background Previous meeting (Geneva May 2004) –Broad agreement on approach –Taskforce set up to develop proposals for instrument –Also to further articulate the arguments supporting the conceptual approach Taskforce has prepared three papers –on conceptual approach –criteria for choice of domains, and –proposals for items This talk will give overview of paper 1

Evidence and Information for Policy Outcome of Geneva 2004 meeting Focus is on measurement of health states of individuals in surveys This requires a multi-dimensional approach: a focus on a core set of domains of functioning rather than on a single global question Measurement focus is on an individual's capacity to function in each domain.

Evidence and Information for Policy Rationale for further articulation To support the instrument development process, it is important to have: –a clear conceptual framework for defining and choosing health domains –clear and unambiguous definitions of what it is intended to measure in health domains

Evidence and Information for Policy Overview of issues addressed Health status and health states Multi-dimensional approach ICF as the framework What should be measured in domains Distinguishing health states from determinants and consequences Health states as attributes of individuals Cross-population comparability

Evidence and Information for Policy Health status and health states

Evidence and Information for Policy Health status and health states Health states: functioning in a set of domains "right now" Health states may potentially include some or all ICF categories, not just the parsimonious set chosen for measurement Health status: includes health states, diseases and injuries, mortality risks, physiological risk markers and POSSIBLY health prognosis, resilience, risk factors.

Evidence and Information for Policy Health trajectories and health states B Physically fit, unipolar depression during younger adult ages A smoker, atherosclerosis from age 45, later heart disease C HIV positive

Evidence and Information for Policy Mobility AffectPainCognitionSelf-Care Usual Activities Domains of health

Evidence and Information for Policy Mobility AffectPainCognitionSelf-Care Usual Activities Overall level of health Domains of health Health state valuations

Evidence and Information for Policy Summarizing the measurements v = f (c 1, c 2, c 3, ……., c n ) summary index of health state + indicators for mortality risks by cause, age, sex etc + indicators for disease and injury causes + indicators for risk factors and determinants + indicators for health interventions + indicators for other aspects of well-being/quality of life + ….. Mobility AffectPainCognitionSelf-Care Usual Activities Domains of health (c 1, c 2, c 3, ……., c n ) Health state profile Health status

Evidence and Information for Policy Multi-dimensional approach During the last three decades, there has been general acceptance of an approach to describing health states and disability of individuals in terms of multiple domains of health, and in developing self-report instruments that seek information on each of these domains

Evidence and Information for Policy Examples of health domains

Evidence and Information for Policy Health State Descriptions Mobility AffectPainCognition Vision Hearing VitaityDigestion Core health domains – common to most instruments Other potential health domains Skiing Inter- personal

Evidence and Information for Policy Challenge for the development of a health state interview instrument Identify the most parsimonious set of health domains with the highest explanatory value. Mobility Vision Hearing Communi cating Universe of health domains Cognition Interpersonal relationships ???? Skiing?

Evidence and Information for Policy International Classification of Functioning and Health ICF

Evidence and Information for Policy ICF as the framework Provides conceptual underpinning (universe of domains, plus impairment, capacity and performance) Provides a starting point for identifying a parsimonious set of domains These may be domains, subdomains or items in the ICF classificatory framework Does not provide guidance on which domains are core 'health' or parsimonious

Evidence and Information for Policy What should be measured in domains Body functions and structures  impairment Activity/participation domains  Capacity OR Performance Measurements of these quantities must at minimum be for ordered categorical values Quantity should map to a unidimensional scale (observed or latent, ordinal or cardinal) not mix two or more dimensions

Evidence and Information for Policy Capacity versus performance Performance measures difficulty in doing domain tasks in the current environment Capacity measures difficulty in doing domain tasks in a standardized environment eg. for seeing a standard environment might involve clear air and normal levels of good lighting Performance changes with changes in the environment, whereas capacity does not How far does a questionnaire need to go in defining normative environment?

Evidence and Information for Policy Determinants and consequences Important to distinguish health states from determinants and consequences The same determinant may be associated with different health states in different individuals The same health states may be associated with different levels of well being and quality of life in different individuals

Evidence and Information for Policy Environmental factors Causes of health states Mobility AffectPainCognitionSelf-Care Usual Activities Underlying disease and injury causes according to ICD rules HIV/AIDS Diabetes Panic disorder Road traffic accident Health state

Evidence and Information for Policy Environmental factors Causes of health states Mobility AffectPainCognitionSelf-Care Usual Activities Risk factors HIV/AIDS Diabetes Panic disorder Coronary heart disease Disease and injury causes Health state Unsafe sex Smoking Physical inactivity Overweight Road traffic accident

Evidence and Information for Policy Attributes of individuals Health states are individual attributes Measured at individual level (not at level of body parts, or of groups such as families, households, cities etc) Aggregated across individuals to produce summary information for population groups (eg. prevalence rates for difficulties in domains, average levels of domain capacities etc)

Evidence and Information for Policy Cross-population comparability Same measurement set (domains, capacities, scales etc) Same questions and instruments - cultural and translation issues Addressing the fundamental problem of comparability of use of response categories eg. does 'moderate difficulty' in mobility mean the same thing to a 80 year old and a 20 year old, to an American and a Chinese? Addressed in more detail in later session

Evidence and Information for Policy Operational issues Time frame for questions on current health state How explicit do we need to be in survey questions on distinction between capacity and performance? What about aids and appliances, eg. hearing aids, glasses, contact lens

Evidence and Information for Policy Terminology Health status -- used generally to refer to all measures related to health (diseases, health states, mortality risks, risk factors?, prognosis? ) Health state – capacities of an individual in all important domains of health Health profile -- a vector of capacity scores for important domains of health Health state valuation -- a preference based single cardinal number summarizing the health profile Quality of life measure -- refers to a broader class of appraisal measures that may relate to health status, wellbeing, satisfaction or utility

Evidence and Information for Policy Agreement on a common framework for measuring health status Health states are an multi-dimensional attributes of individuals Measurement of health states  determining capacities of individuals on multiple domains of health Functioning within health domains is conceptually distinct from overall well-being or quality of life Health states must be kept distinct from determinants and interventions