European Cartel Enforcement and Investigations ABA Antitrust 51st Annual Spring Meeting Alec Burnside April 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In-house lawyers and legal privilege in competition law investigations
Advertisements

RESTRICITVE PRACTICES AND LENIENCY Zuzana Šimeková European Union – Opportunities and Challenges June 2009, Dubrovnik.
National implementation of REMIT Henrik Nygaard, Wholesale and transmission (DERA)
Supply Chain Competition Compliance in Scotland Scottish Supply Chain Forum 14 June 2011 Garfield House Hotel, Cumbernauld Road, Stepps Mark Clough, Partner.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
The uneasy interface: leniency, disclosure and rights of defence in criminal and administrative anti-cartel enforcement Julian M. Joshua, Barrister Institute.
John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief, New York Field Office Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice Judicial Training Program Moscow, Russia July.
Liability and Procedure in European Antitrust Law The EU Damages Directive Does the European Union overstep the mark again?
Enforcement pluralism Regulation of market conduct –EU Commission General surveillance of compliance with the Treaty “Trustbuster”: DG Comp –National Competition.
EC Competition law – sanctions & procedure
1 ICN Cartels Working Group Application of leniency to individuals Stephen Blake Cartels and Criminal Enforcement Group UK Office of Fair Trading 27 January.
POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP ORIGINAL IDEAS. UNCOMMON SOLUTIONS. U.S. INTERNATIONAL CARTEL ENFORCEMENT Presented by Neil R. Ellis Vienna, Austria.
Italian Competition Authority European Competition Day – Brno 14 May 2009 Celebration of the Fifth Anniversary of the ECN Challenges for the Future Ombretta.
GCLC Luncheon Talk “International Cartel Enforcement” by W.J. Kolasky Comments by Onno W. Brouwer, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 29 September 2004, Brussels.
Investigation and Enforcement of competition law.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Young Competition Lawyers Initiative of the Canadian Bar Association’s National Competition Law Section Presents: AN INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL CONDUCT AND.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Amendment of the Czech Competition Act – novelties Act No. 360/2012 Coll. Of 19 September 2012.
Criminal Antitrust Practice Donald C. Klawiter J. Clayton Everett, Jr. Jennifer M. Driscoll.
The UK competition regime: an example of inter-institutional working Cathryn Ross Deputy Director of Remedies Competition Commission 2 February 2004.
European Commission – Directorate General for Competition Dr. K. Mehta, Director, Cartels A PRIMER ON ANTI-TRUST POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION UCL – Louvain-la-Neuve.
Tackling IT crime in a global context: the Convention on Cybercrime 3 years after Julio Pérez Gil University of Burgos, Spain.
Enforcement pluralism Regulation of market conduct –EU Commission General surveillance of compliance with the Treaty “Trustbuster”: DG Comp –National Competition.
Barbara Schulze Bundeskartellamt International Competition Matters ICN Cartel Workshop Cape Town Mini Plenary IV – Information Sharing: Barriers, Waives.
European Competition Policy. References Faull & Nikpay: The EC Law of Competition. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, 2007 Bellamy, C., Child, G. European.
Mini Plenary 3: Cartel Enforcement and Leniency in Developing Agencies Leniency Programme in Turkey Gülçin DERE Competition Expert Turkish Competition.
Cartel investigations in the EU: Procedural fairness for defendants and claimants Dave Anderson – Partner, Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP, Brussels UOHS St.
Welcome to Maastricht University. Faculty of Law Oral v. written evidence in the European Union Prof. André Klip Maastricht University, Ravenna 14 May.
1 6 th ICN CONFERENCE CALL ''Problems, pitfalls and recurring issues“ Leniency and International cooperation. Rafael Coloma, Deputy Director of International.
Interface between Leniency, Direct Settlement and Criminal Sanctions – A UK perspective European Competition Day, Brno Philip Collins Chairman Office of.
European Commission, DG Competition, Directorate G, Cartels Interface Between Leniency and Settlements in European Commission proceedings Sari Suurnäkki,
Insider trading Recent developments and some lessons from the EU experience Paulo Câmara, Director CMVM Moscow, Russian Corporate Governance Roundtable,
Individual liability for competition law infringements Koen Platteau UIA - Firenze 31 October 2014.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
International Cooperation in Cartel Investigations Regional Cooperation Hanna Witt Head of Cartel Enforcement, Swedish Competition Authority 2013 ICN Cartel.
Settlements Wouter Wils * BIICL, 15 May 2008 * All views expressed are strictly personal.
SNB - REACT Business Perspective IPR Protection April 1, 2009 Presentation Eli Mufisovski.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Dawn raids.
INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT Presentation by Duncan T. Morotsi 15 th March
Leniency Programme Igor Pospíšil Director of the Cartel Department St. Martin Conference 2009 November 12, 2009.
Leniency and Obtaining Evidence Hiroshi Nakazato Investigation Bureau Fair Trade Commission of Japan April 6 th 2006 OECD-KOREA.
Legal Protection of Competition 2. EC and National Competition law (Who applies which law, and why?) Michal Petr Office for the Protection of Competition.
International Cartels Cooperation Among International Antitrust Agencies.
EU Business Law: Anticompetitive agreements (Art. 101 TFEU) Dr. Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka.
81 st Lunch Talk of the Global Competition Law Center Markus Röhrig – April 28, 2016 The ECN+ Initiative: Outcome and Challenges of the Commission Consultation.
Commercial Law and International Transactions Basic Information on the Course Time & Location: –Thursday; room a.m. Commercial Law (lecturer.
Workshop on strengthening international legal cooperation among OSCE Member States to combat transnational organized crime (Vienna, 7-9 April 2008) Extradition.
HAVER & MAILÄNDER 1 Procedure in the light of the modernisation package -Regulation 17/62Regulation 1/2003 -Notification and exemptionautomatic derogation.
Competition Law Understand the legal rules relating to monopolies, mergers and anti-competitive practices.
competition rules in inland transport
Dr. Anastasios Xeniadis Dr. Luca Schicho
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
Adaption of antitrust compliance program
Competition law Class 8-9
2017 ICN Annual Cartel Workshop Romina Polley
the antitrust administrative proceedings
The EU Competition Law Fining System European Parliament Committee on economic and monetary affairs Working group on competition policy Antoine Winckler.
European Commission's fining policy 10 February 2015
ICN | The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
ICN Cartel Working Group SG-1
Commissioner’s Legal Advisor - Italian Competition Authority
Non-Discretionary Administrative Sanctions under the AMA in Japan
ICN Cartel Working Group SG 1 Call Series Linda Plumpton
The interaction between public and private enforcement of EU competition rules Helena Penovski European Competition Network and Private Enforcement Unit.
ICN CWG SG1 webinar on ‘”Parental liability”
Legal Implications of Brexit
Interplay of public and private enforcement – cartel sanctioning and deterrence ICN Cartel Working Group SG 1 call series 15 September 2015 Marc Braithwaite,
Information Sharing Mini Plenary 4 Antonio Capobianco
Presentation transcript:

European Cartel Enforcement and Investigations ABA Antitrust 51st Annual Spring Meeting Alec Burnside April 2003

1 Introduction Dramatic increase by European Commission in cartel enforcement and investigations –Highest ever imposed fine Hoffman-LaRoche 2001 (€462m) for 8 infringements –Highest ever imposed fine Lafarge 2002 (€249m) for 1 infringement –Commission imposed fine equivalent to entire value of market Methylglucamine 2002 (€2.85m) –Commission imposed fines on a cartel which has no European presence Nucleotides 2002 (€20m) –Commission conducting simultaneous Dawn Raids with other competition authorities e.g. alleged PVC cartel 12/02/2003 involving EU, US, Japan & Canada

2 Some numbers… –1969 to date >70 cartel decisions imposing fines in excess of €4.3 billion –2001 to date 19 cartel decisions imposing fines in excess €3 billion –Commission making on average 1 cartel decision a month (previously 1 cartel decision every 2-3 years) –Recent success partly due to new Leniency Notice ( ) –Since new Leniency Notice, Commission has received >30 applications for full immunity and a further 10 applications for a reduction in fine. –Commission receiving increasing simultaneous applications for immunity (US, Canada, Japan)

3 Enforcement –Article 81(1) EC Treaty prohibits all agreements between undertakings which both affect trade between EU Member States and have as their object or effect the prevention restriction or distortion of competition –Regulation 17 grants Commission substantial powers to terminate infringements of Article 81(1), initiate proceedings and issue decisions –Article 11 Requests - demand information from companies –Dawn Raids - surprise investigation where the Commission: –searches business premises, company car, diary, computer etc –is assisted by officials from NCA –can take away copies including computer copies (2001 conducted first “paperless” Dawn Raid) –can demand on the spot explanations of documents (except self-incrimination)

4 Modernisation Regulation 1/2003 will enter into force 1 May 2004 replaces Regulation 17 and strengthens the Commission’s powers of enforcement and investigation –Role of NCAs be substantially increased - especially important with enlargement and additional 10 countries joining the EU –Commission will be able to search private homes –Commission will be able to conduct interviews with executives –Commission will be able to affix seals on areas to ensure that evidence is not tampered with –Some EU Member States have enacted legislation criminalizing infringements of antitrust rules

5 Leniency Notice Immunity from fines (100%) –1st to whistleblow –1st to provide the Commission with evidence of infringement –cooperate fully with the Commission’s investigation –cease participation in the infringement –not coerced others to participate in the cartel Reduction in fine (20%-50%) –cease participation in the infringement –provide evidence which represents “significant added value”

6 Oral Presentations The Commission will accept oral presentations “hypotheticals” –Greatly benefit companies not wishing to produce a paper-trail e.g. facing US discovery rules –Commission has already processed 5 Leniency applications on the basis of oral statements rather than corporate statements.

7 Legal Privilege General principle of confidentiality for correspondence between lawyers and their clients Legal Privilege not available for: –In-house counsel (whatever their status under national rules) –Non-EU lawyers (unless admitted to an EU-bar) Therefore the Commission can seize these documents in a Dawn Raid! Ensure that all documents pass through an EU qualified lawyer in private practice. NB: when dealing with a Dawn Raid undertaken by an NCA take care as different rules of privilege may apply e.g. in Germany and Italy any document located in “the client’s hands” may be removed.

8 Double Jeopardy (“Ne Bis in Idem”) In addition to the EU regime, each EU Member States is able to undertake parallel, or even sole, investigations into cartel behaviour –Immunity granted by the Commission under the Leniency Notice does not prevent NCAs from acting - no double jeopardy! –However Walt Wilhem principle requires NCAs to take account of fines imposed by EU –Article 4 of Protocol No.7 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) provides right not be to punished twice in criminal proceedings. Although civil fines they have a criminal character. –Article 50 Charter of Fundamental Rights of EU (CFR) applies Ne Bis in Idem between several Member States. Therefore, CFR provides for principle of double jeopardy.

9 UK development… –Enterprise Act 2002 provides for individual criminalisation (no UK or EU criminal offence for companies) –Criminal offence for individuals who dishonestly agree to engage in hard-core cartel agreements (Sect 188 EA) –Maximum 5 years imprisonment or unlimited fine –OFT will have power to disqualify company directors for up to 15 years –Criminal Leniency available (OFT “no action” letter) –admission of guilt –not the ringleader –cease participation in the cartel –full cooperation with the investigation –full disclosure

10 UK development… A Director/ employee whistleblowing and claiming criminal leniency does not provide immunity from civil liability for the company! –Results in a race to the finishing post –individual vs. individual (UK individual criminal leniency) –individual vs. company (UK individual criminal & UK corporate civil leniency) –company vs. company (UK/EU corporate civil leniency) –Conflict of interest - company lawyers will not be able to act for individuals subject to criminal proceedings –Criminal offence extraditable to countries which have equivalent offences (e.g. Sir Anthony Tennant Fine Art Auction Houses Cartel would now be extradited - fortunately for Sir Anthony, EA not retrospective) –EA expected to come into force June/July 2003

11 Conclusion –Commission more aggressive towards combating cartels –Growing recognition of international cooperation for international cartels –Increased level of fines –However, no criminal sanctions at EU level and therefore no “ultimate” deterrent.

12 Questions