Technology-Enabled Learning in Engineering Education Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd Department of Electrical Engineering Texas A&M University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & CAPACITY BUILDING
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2008 – 2009 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
Peer-Led Team Learning: A Model for Enhancing Student Learning Claire Berardini & Glenn Miller Third Annual Faculty Institute Pace University.
Class Size Increasing? Use Cooperative Learning Tools to Differentiate Curriculum and Motivate Students Susan Belgrad Professor of Elementary Education.
Computers in the Second Language Writing Classroom
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Computer Software in Today’s Classrooms Chapter 4.
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
Computer Software.
Jude Carroll, author of Tools for Teaching in an Educationally Mobile World (Routledge 2015) Supporting teaching across cultures: the role of good practice.
Ryann Kramer EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
SECTION ONE: PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES Let us start our discussion here by posing two related questions as follows. First, does the literature tell us that a.
Technology-Enabled Learning, Wright State University, December 6 th, 2001 Technology-Enabled Learning Jeff Froyd, Texas A&M University,
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
Authors: Daniela Kirovska-Simjanoska, SEEU, Macedonia Iva Matasic, Consulio, Croatia.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Mohammad A. Rob Management Information Systems University of Houston-Clear Lake Houston, Texas 77058
The Mechanics of Putting Your Courses Online Summer Institute 2003 Lesley Blicker, Office of Instructional Technology
Applications Software
Teaching and Learning with Technology  Allyn and Bacon 2002 Distance Education: Using Technology to Redefine the Classroom Chapter 11 Teaching and Learning.
PEDAGOGY FOR LEARNER ENGAGEMENT. STUDENT-STAFF INTERACTION How do you directly engage with each of your students, formally and informally to: foster a.
Before you are seated, please look inside the back of your nametag for a slip of colored paper. Please seat yourself at the table bearing a sheet of paper.
1 Differentiating Instruction. 2 K-W-L This is what I know about Differentiating Instruction (DI) This is what I want to know about DI This is what I.
Mid semester Feedback. This PowerPoint slide show is intended to give me the opportunity to apply what I have learned in this course. I will address what.
ENHANCING PARENT INVOLVEMENT IN NC-CCSS FOR K-2 MATHEMATICS AT P.W. MOORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
Introduction CSE 1310 – Introduction to Computers and Programming Vassilis Athitsos University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Transitioning Content, Students and Instructors. Illustrate advantages of blended learning Identify major business impacts Examine alternative media available.
Teaching culturally diverse groups Jude Carroll January 2014 Presentation at the University of Sheffield.
Network Communication- Supported Teacher Inservice Development Mark Hawkes Haomin Wang Dakota State University.
Advantages of Using Children’s Literature provides a motivating introduction to complex curriculum topics mathematical vocabulary can be reinforced and.
Teaching in a Web-Based Distance Learning Environment: An Evaluation Summary Based on Four Courses Charles Graham, Joni M. Craner, Byung-ro Lim, & Kursat.
The Balance Between Theoretical and Practical Work Within Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses Dr. Bahawodin Baha March Development Partnerships.
Gouri Banerjee, Ph. D. Dept. Math & IT, Emmanuel College Boston, Massachusetts. 1 Gouri Banerjee Blended Learning Environments, 2010.
8 th Grade Integers Natalie Menuau EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
Mercer University Department of Technical Communication by Dr. Helen Grady School of Engineering 9 October 2008 Presentation prepared for University of.
Writing Across the Curriculum Prepared by: Ricardo Ortolaza, Ed.D. Chief Learning Officer Presented and Adapted for the South Florida Campus by: Idali.
What is Matlab Course Goals Precedence Accounts & Login Variables Error Types Course Logistics Vince Bertsch Office:
TOOL5100: CSCL Issues in CSCW and groupware A. Mørch, Issues in CSCW and Groupware: Anders Mørch TOOL 5100,
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Using Blogs in the Classroom Presented By: Patrick Egan.
+ Tooling CDIO with Mathemaitca Drafted by Ben Koo
Digital Learning India 2008 July , 2008 Mrs. C. Vijayalakshmi Department of Computer science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology – IIT.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
1 CIS101 Introduction to Computing Week 01 Dr. Catherine Dwyer Information Systems.
Technology in the Classroom: A Working Discussion Group Nelson C. Baker, Ph.D. Georgia Tech SUCCEED College of Engineering CETL, OIT-Educational Technologies.
Reviving Continuum Mechanics: Computation across the undergraduate curriculum Michael Dennin UC Irvine Special Thanks to Peter Taborek, Bill Heidbrink.
Online Learning Florence Martin Associate Professor in Instructional Technology
Integration of Distance Education to Support Learning.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Technology Workshop 2 June 22, Extent of Technology Integration in Instruction by ABE Teachers.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Webinar NGSS Earth and Space Science: Needs and a Call to Action April 9, pm Eastern | 3pm Central | 2pm Mountain | 1pm Pacific Dr. Ed Robeck, American.
Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Presenter : Ching-ting Lin 2007/1/9CSL ICE.NTNU1 Considerations for Developing Evaluations of Online Courses Achtemeier,
COLLABORATIVE WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN EDUCATION USING WIKIS & BLOGS IN THE CLASSROOM.
Tia Juana Malone, English Professor Ruth Ronan, Course Developer Assessment Strategies That Promote Student Engagement.
Nevada STEM Program Recognition Rubric K-12 Program Definitions Exploratory The Exploratory STEM program describes a school program that has intermittent.
Learning Management System. Introduction Software application or Web-based technology used to plan, implement, and assess a specific learning process.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Prof. Burks Oakley II Assoc. Vice President for Academic Affairs
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
Project-Based Learning
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
WPAs Promoting Integrative Thinking Through Composition Across Campus
Building Academic Language
The Heart of Student Success
Building Academic Language
Presentation transcript:

Technology-Enabled Learning in Engineering Education Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd Department of Electrical Engineering Texas A&M University

Curriculum-wide, college-wide, and perhaps university-wide action is required to take advantage of the opportunities and meet the challenges offered by increasingly capable technology with respect to improving engineering education. 5 – Strongly Agree 4 – Agree 3 – Neutral 2 – Disagree 1 – Strongly Disagree Mark your answers on a piece of paper and submit.

Overall Workshop Objective Participants will give significantly stronger assent to the following statement: Curriculum-wide, college-wide, and perhaps university-wide action is required to take advantage of the opportunities and meet the challenges offered by increasingly capable technology with respect to improving engineering education.

Workshop Ground Rules Workshop is a PARTNERSHIP –Both facilitator and participants are mutually accountable for the outcomes of the workshop. Ask questions at ANY TIME –Facilitator may place the question in an issue bin, but the question will be addressed during the workshop. Participants must DISCOVER the directions in which action will be taken –I don’t know the answers to all the questions, and even if I did (which I don’t), participants would not be sufficiently engaged to act upon the answers.

Learning and Teaching Learning Theories How do people learn? Neurological Cognitive Content-Specific Classroom Pedagogical Theories How do you facilitate learning? Active learning Cooperative learning Contextual learning Technology-enabled learning Expectations What do you want people to learn? Syllabi/Objectives/Outcomes/Taxonomy

Categories of Technology Learner-Centered: Focus on what students are doing with technology Stop here and ask participants for suggestions on what students can do with technology. Are they receiving/consuming information? Are they communicating/collaborating with other students? With the teacher? Are they learning to use new tools for designing and/or analyzing engineering artifacts?

Forming Teams Reorganize yourselves into teams of 4 people Teams composition should emphasize diversity among disciplines Introduce yourself to your teammates –Name –Department –What do you want to take away from the workshop? –What do you want to contribute to the workshop? Be prepared to share the answers from your teammates

Categories of Technology Consumptive Technology –Facilitates access to and transfer of information –Faculty generate info; students read info –Examples: browsers, Adobe Acrobat Reader Collaborative Technology –Facilitates communication among class members –Examples: , web forums (WebBoard) Generative Technology –Facilitates increasingly powerful actions by users –Students can perform more difficult tasks with the same effort or the same tasks with less effort –Examples: MATLAB, Maple, Microsoft Office

Team Discussion Describe ways in which the preceding breakdown of technologies helps you create ways to apply technology to engineering education. Describe ways in which the preceding breakdown of technologies makes it more difficult for you to create ways to apply technology to engineering education

Team Discussion Results Helps First remark Hinders First remark

Consumptive Technology Examples Hypertext Browsers Adobe Acrobat Reader Multimedia Players –Real Player –Microsoft Media Player Java Applets Computer-Graded Assignments (?)

Consumptive Technology Characteristics Student perspective: Technology is easy to learn and use. Faculty perspective: Technology presents a substantial learning curve and choices among technologies are difficult to make. Faculty perspective: It takes a SUBSTANTIAL amount of time to create material for student consumption. For multi-media materials the ratio of creation time to viewing time may be higher than 10:1. Faculty perspective: Reuse of material is very important.

Consumptive Technology Woody Flowers presentation – Burks Oakley presentations – Kurt Gramoll projects (Engineering Media Lab) – NEEDS (National Engineering Education Delivery System) – SCALE (Sloan Center for Asynchronous Learning Environments) –

Team Discussion Describe at least four different applications of consumptive technology in the undergraduate engineering curriculum at UA. For each application describe at least three ways in which student learning could be improved. For each application describe at least three barriers to successful implementation.

Team Discussion Results

Collaborative Technology Examples Web Forums – threaded discussions –WebBoard –First Class Instant Messaging –AOL IM –ICQ Conferencing Software –Microsoft NetMeeting

Consumptive Technology Characteristics Student perspective: Technology is easy to learn and use. Faculty perspective: Technology presents a substantial learning curve and choices among technologies are difficult to make. Faculty perspective: It takes a SUBSTANTIAL amount of time to create material for student consumption. For multi-media materials the ratio of creation time to viewing time may be higher than 10:1. Faculty perspective: Reuse of material is very important.

Communicative Technology Math Forum –

Generative Technology Examples Programming Languages Office Productivity Suites Numeric Manipulation Systems Symbolic Manipulation Systems Computer-Aided Design Packages

Generative Technology Generative technologies have steeper and longer learning curves for both students and faculty than consumptive and collaborative technologies. If students and faculty go to the effort to learn a generative technology, it seems that it would be more helpful to build on that learning in one or more subsequent classes.

Team Discussion Describe at least four applications of each of the following types of technologies in the undergraduate curriculum at UA. –Consumptive Technology –Communicative Technology –Generative Technology

Generative Technology Programming Languages System Languages –FORTRAN –C –C++ Scripting Languages –Perl –Python –TCL –Rebol

Generative Technology Office Productivity Suites Microsoft Office –Word –Excel –PowerPoint –Outlook – –Access - database

Generative Technology Numeric Manipulation Systems MATLAB –Simulink –Toolboxes: Signal Processing, Control, etc. Octave –Open Source Project

Generative Technology Symbolic Manipulation Systems Maple Mathematica MathCAD

Generative Technology Computer-Aided Design Systems Electrical –Mentor Graphics, Cadence, Spice Mechanical / Thermal / Fluid –Working Model, Interactive Physics –SDRC IDEAS –AutoCAD, Mechanical Desktop

Generative Technology Laboratory Systems Examples –LabVIEW –VEE Computer-Based Instrumentation Laboratory Automation

Generative Technologies Familiarity Symbolic Manipulation Systems? Numerical Manipulation Systems? Computer-Aided Design Packages? Laboratory Systems

Generative Technologies Learn from our experiences in teaching programming to languages –Sometimes difficult to motivate, sometimes associated with the knowledge of students that they would not use programming in subsequent courses –Confusion on which language(s) to teach, primarily because different professors wanted to use different languages in following courses –Engineering professors, by the nature of their learning experiences, don’t arrive equipped to teach programming