T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK Outlook for June is for Above Normal temperature and Normal precipitation probability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Northwest Geographic Area Coordination Center Predictive Services Late Summer and Autumn 2013 Significant Fire Potential Outlook Thursday September 5 th.
Advertisements

KNF Pocket Card Klamath NF Pocket Cards Fire Season 2002.
Los Padres National Forest
Summer 2009 Western Fire Season Outlook Overview Significant fire potential is expected to be above normal across much of California, Florida, central.
BUSHFIRES IN AUSTRALIA
Eastern Great Basin May, June, July/August Monthly/Seasonal Outlook Shelby Law EGBCC Predictive Services Meteorologist.
NC Division of Forest Resources: Wildfire Activity and Outlook for Winter / Spring 2011 Paul Gellerstedt, NCFS 24 March 2011.
 2014 Annual Report. Bureau of Indian Affairs Colorado River Agency Fort Yuma Agency Western Regional Office Bureau of Land Management Colorado River.
2015 Fire Season Considerations and Outlook SWCC Predictive Services Updated April 17, 2015.
Great Basin May - August, 2015 Fire Potential Outlook Gina McGuire Shelby Law Nanette Hosenfeld GBCC Predictive Services Meteorologists.
Firefighter Refresher: Fuel Types and Suppression Tactics.
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
 Often times meteorologists and climatologists to make some calculations in order to better understand trends in the weather. Here are three calculations.
2015 SPRING FIRE POTENTIAL OUTLOOK EASTERN AREA PREDICTIVE SERVICES.
Climate recap and outlook Philip Mote, PhD University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System - Climate Impacts Group Boise, ID October 17,
1 Climate recap and outlook Nate Mantua, PhD University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System - Climate Impacts Group Kelso, WA October.
National Fire Danger Rating System. NFDRS Basics Indicator of worst case fire danger Five danger classes –Low, moderate, high, very high, extreme Describes.
Unit 4 Weather ©Mark Place,
Red Flag Criteria Project. A Red Flag Warning is a local, short term, temporary warning issued by the National Weather Service indicating the presence.
The Impacts of Weather Nolan J. Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University Presented at Ogallala Symposium, Wray, Colorado, February 23,
Understanding Drought
2008 Seasonal Prediction for Canada Kerry Anderson Richard Carr Peter Englefield.
Unit 10 Fuel Moisture.
Outlook Winter/Spring 2014 John Pendergrast National Weather Service Melbourne, FL
Using Short Range Ensemble Model Data in National Fire Weather Outlooks Sarah J. Taylor David Bright, Greg Carbin, Phillip Bothwell NWS/Storm Prediction.
CPC’s U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook & Future Plans April 20, 2010 Brad Pugh, CPC.
Eastern Great Basin July – October, 2014 Fire Potential Outlook Shelby Law EGBCC Predictive Services Meteorologist.
T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK Day Outlook: Near Normal temperature for Central Arizona. Below Normal precipitation probability for Central/Northen.
6 -10 D AY T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK Day Outlook: probability for Above Normal temperatures in Western Arizona and Above Normal precipitation.
Fire Danger Index Calculation of the index is based on a number of factors: Weather – drought (days since last rainfall), temperature, wind, relative humidity,
2013 Spring Weather Outlook MARAC Region V Meeting April 24, 2013 Cindy Bean Meteorologist National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office San Joaquin.
Municipal Water District of Orange County 2015 Water Supply Report February 10, 2015.
WEATHER – The condition or activity of the atmosphere at a given time and place, especially as described by variables such as temperature, humidity, wind.
1 Fire Weather Science Fire Weather System Project EcoConnect-Fire Implementation, June 2013 April 2011.
2014 Fire Season Considerations and Outlook SWCC Predictive Services Updated May 13, 2014.
Rich Naden/Chuck Maxwell Southwest Area Predictive Services.
National Weather Service Steve Gohde WFO Duluth Observing Program Leader Craig Schmidt WFO Twin Cities Service Hydrologist January 6, 2015.
Drought and Heat Wave of 2012 Midwest and Great Plains Worst drought since 1956 with ~60% of contiguous U.S. under drought, worst agricultural drought.
Fire climate interactions on the American Pacific Coast ACRE workshop Meteoswiss, June Valérie Trouet A.H. Taylor, A.M. Carleton, C.N. Skinner.
Fire Danger MODIS direct broadcast data for enhanced forecasting and real-time environmental decision making.
National Weather Service Diane Cooper MPX /DLH Service Hydrologist Steve Gohde DLH Observations Program Leader December 13, 2011.
Travis D. Miller Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Texas AgriLife Extension Service The 2011 drought situation: July, 2011 Travis D. Miller Professor,
Techniques for Evaluating Wildfire Smoke Impact on Ozone for Possible Exceptional Events Daniel Alrick 1, Clinton MacDonald 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, Charles.
T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK 6-10 Day Outlook: Below Normal temperature for Northern Arizona. Above Normal precipitation probability for Arizona.
NOAA’s National Weather Service 2010 Spring Flood Outlook #2 March 5, 2010 By: Darrin Hansing ILX Service Hydrologist.
EFCC Weather Outlook 5 June 2012 Fire Season Key Elements From NWCC Below normal snowpack Early snowmelt Early snowmelt Long term drought Long term drought.
Weather of the Prairies Sarah Marsden. Weather Patterns Over the course of a year, the temperature is typically around -3°F to 73°F and is near never.
2015 Fire Season Considerations and Outlook SWCC Predictive Services Updated May 18, 2015.
T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION - L AST 3 M ONTHS Temperature: Above to Much Above Average for all of Arizona Precipitation: Below Average to Near Average.
2015 PNF P RECIPITATION. PNF W EATHER S TATION P RECIPITATION Crown King January - June Historic Normal: 8.21” Crown King January - June Year to.
Jonathan Pangburn CAL FIRE Unit Forester San Benito-Monterey Unit March 15, 2012.
Outlook Winter/Spring 2013 John Pendergrast National Weather Service Melbourne, FL
T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK Day Outlook: Below Normal temperature for Arizona. Normal precipitation probability for Central Arizona.
This Afternoon Red Flag Warnings Thru Early Evening Being Added as We Speak.
2016 Fire Season Considerations and Outlook SWCC Predictive Services Updated February 17, 2016.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
S-244 Field Observer & Fire Effects Monitor ENVIRONMENTAL OBSERVATIONS.
2016 LATE SPRING/SUMMER FIRE POTENTIAL OUTLOOK EASTERN AREA PREDICTIVE SERVICES.
NOPS 2016 PS Weather Operations. ROMAN is GONE! Some workable replacements: MesoWest NWS Plots WIMS DRI.
Prescribed Fire in the Forest Ecosystem FORS 5610 / 7610 Location: Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center For more information: Dr. Pete Bettinger.
The Weather Station Model
Topic 5B: WEATHER RELATIONSHIPS KEY WEATHER VARIABLES Topic 5: METEOROLOGY.
BASIC FIRE WEATHER. Objectives  Describe relationship among dry bulb temperature, dew point, wet bulb temperature, and relative humidity.  Describe.
ECOSYSTEM MODEL EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Forecast Capability for Early Warning:
Prescriptions Gary Jarvis Fire Planner National Forests in Mississippi.
The Water Cycle Daily Starter Get Your Textbook (Open to Page 23-25)
The Pocosin “Tale of Two Burns”
Unit 4 Weather about Doppler Radar.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Presentation transcript:

T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK Outlook for June is for Above Normal temperature and Normal precipitation probability

D ROUGHT The current Drought Monitor indicates that drought conditions range from Moderate to Severe for Colorado River District BLM The Drought Outlook for Central Arizona shows that drought conditions will persist or intensify through June

L IVE F UEL M OISTURE

D EAD F UEL M OISTURE Dead Fuel Moisture is the moisture content of dead organic fuels that is controlled entirely by exposure to environmental conditions. There are four fuel classes modeled within NFDRS. 1-Hour Fuel Moisture - Dead fuels less than ¼” in diameter. Very responsive to current conditions (temperature, humidity, precipitation). Value range: % 10-Hour Fuel Moisture - Dead fuels ranging from ¼” to 1” in diameter. Responsive to daily changes in weather. Value range: % 100-Hour Fuel Moisture - Dead fuels ranging from 1” to 3” in diameter. As opposed to 1 & 10-Hour, these fuels are impacted by 24-hour trends (Max/Min Temp, Max/Min RH, precipitation duration). Value range: % 1000-Hour Fuel Moisture - Dead fuels ranging from 3” to 8” in diameter. Value is based on running 7-day average. Impacted by 24-hour Max/Min Temp, Max/Min RH and precipitation duration values for a 7-day period. Value range: %

CRD HR FM 1000-Hour Fuel Moisture is below average and has reached the 10 th Percentile

E NERGY R ELEASE C OMPONENT The Energy Release Component is a number related to the available energy within the flaming front at the head of a fire. Daily variations in ERC are due to changes in the moisture content of the fuels present, both live and dead. As live fuels cure and larger dead fuels dry, ERC values get higher. The 1000-hr Fuel Moisture is one of the primary inputs into the ERC calculation and as such, 24-hour Max/Min Temperature, Max/Min RH and Precipitation Duration all affect the calculation. Since wind and fine fuel moisture do not affect the ERC calculation, the daily variation is relatively small. The ERC scale is open-ended or unlimited and is heavily dependent on the fuel model that is being used. Historically on the Prescott NF, the highest ERC values in the G fuel model have been around 110, while the highest ERC values in the B fuel model have been around 150.

CRD ERC V ALUES /T REND ERC is above average and has exceeded the 97 th Percentile

K INGMAN P RECIPITATION Total of 0.85” recorded at Union Pass since January 1

Y UMA P RECIPITATION Total of 0.10” recorded at Fort Yuma since January 1

19 Fires 0 Lightning Caused Fire Size Class: D+ 0 Fire Size Class: ABC 0 19 Human Caused Fire Size Class: D+ 0 Fire Size Class: ABC 19 Fires - 18 Acres Fire Size Class A: B: C: D: E: F: G: CRD F IRE A CTIVITY

F IRE P OTENTIAL O UTLOOK